EPTAnyone wanna help me get settled and shiet should add me ;d
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/en/user/wessie50/
Battlefield 3 - Page 321
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
mtn
729 Posts
Anyone wanna help me get settled and shiet should add me ;d http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/en/user/wessie50/ | ||
|
Grettin
42417 Posts
| ||
|
IMSmooth
United States679 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:12 Probe1 wrote: Gonna requote this so people don't miss the explanation of the numbers >.> Inaccurate data by IMSmooth. Yea i just read that this morning, I was tired and saw that and was a little surprised so i posted. So i am sorry for that. Thank you all for jumping to me being a troll though, appreciate it. | ||
|
Butcherski
Poland446 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16129 Posts
On November 07 2011 03:58 Butcherski wrote: The game is frustrating until you realize that playing 64 players public conquest is the most retarded shit yo have ever witnessed. My personal favorite is 32 players Rush in Hardcore mode. I have not tried team dm and squad DM tho but again i would advise against paying 64 players when you are new to the game. Once you figure things out and find a server with a decent crows it becomes playable. I disagree completely. 64 Player conquest is the game mode I got the game for. Most of the maps are way too big for anything less and feel empty otherwise. I've been learning the game on this difficulty and I'm getting better at it all the time. If I could just learn to fly correctly I'd be golden. | ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42417 Posts
On November 07 2011 04:01 Vindicare605 wrote: I disagree completely. 64 Player conquest is the game mode I got the game for. Most of the maps are way too big for anything less and feel empty otherwise. I've been learning the game on this difficulty and I'm getting better at it all the time. If I could just learn to fly correctly I'd be golden. This completely depends how good the server is. Some of the 64 servers are playing 32 version of the map, which is absolutely retarded and some are playing 64 version map on 32 player servers. | ||
|
Tarias
Netherlands480 Posts
I also always play with 2-3 friends, and the 32 player games are small enough to be carried by a 4 man squad:D I play mainly conquest btw, maps are horrible for rush, defening is way too easy. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
|
Tarias
Netherlands480 Posts
On November 07 2011 04:28 blade55555 wrote: Damn you guys are weird I bought this game for 32 vs 32 conquest and thats all I play. I find it the most fun. That is all I did in BF2 and thats all I am doing in BF3 because ITS CHAOS OF FUN! :D Thats how it started for me, but BF2 maps were soooo much better, and alot bigger as well. BF3 maps with 32 players give me the same feeling the BF2 maps did with 64 players. Can't wait for the karkand DLC:D | ||
|
Laids
United Kingdom596 Posts
| ||
|
KaoReal
Canada340 Posts
| ||
|
!Frost!
United States14 Posts
| ||
|
Slakkoo
Sweden1119 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42417 Posts
On November 07 2011 05:07 Slakkoo wrote: Is there a way to change name? http://www.origin.com/us/change-id | ||
|
Slakkoo
Sweden1119 Posts
| ||
|
TunaBarrett
Sweden1045 Posts
Why does everyone think its great? | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On November 07 2011 05:25 TunaBarrett wrote: So i cant understand all the hype behind the scar-h, cant get over the insane recoil. Why does everyone think its great? its insanely powerful is why everyone likes it. | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
| ||
|
Vaelone
Finland4400 Posts
On November 07 2011 05:25 TunaBarrett wrote: So i cant understand all the hype behind the scar-h, cant get over the insane recoil. Why does everyone think its great? It uses harder hitting bullets than the other Engineer guns and does most damage out of all Engineer guns. Though it also has smaller clip as a downside. Might drop it for either SG553 or G36C depending of how they turn out to be. | ||
| ||
