EPTBattlefield 3 - Page 304
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
TigerKarl
1757 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
Server is set to 32 Player. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ND5mH.png) Edit: I fixed the round count. Whoops! | ||
|
chambanog
35 Posts
On November 03 2011 16:35 irninja wrote: Since the vote is split half/half on the rush/conquest ordeal. I split it the same. You should remove the single Tehran conquest round until they fix the lag on it, because i notice some players dropping when that map comes up.. I hear rush tehran doesn't have the lag issues that conquest has so that should be fine. | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
On November 03 2011 16:37 chambanog wrote: You should remove the single Tehran conquest round until they fix the lag on it, I hear rush tehran doesn't have the lag issues that conquest has so that should be fine.. I believe the tehran lag is only in 64 player. Tell ya what, ill remove it anyway. Rather not chance it. | ||
|
chambanog
35 Posts
On November 03 2011 16:37 irninja wrote: I believe the tehran lag is only in 64 player. Tell ya what, ill remove it anyway. Rather not chance it. Oh i didnt notice you set it to 32 :p edit: HA you ninja edited it.. | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
| ||
|
chambanog
35 Posts
On November 03 2011 16:40 irninja wrote: I dunno, for some reason I too find that 32 player servers are more strategic, and offer more teamwork. I think it depends on map size, like 64 player caspian/firestorm is fine, those maps are so big that it takes a while for infantry to run from one point to another. When you have 64 people on grand bazaar or damavand though, that's when it gets chaotic and a rocket fest. | ||
|
Skullflower
United States3779 Posts
On November 03 2011 16:27 irninja wrote: I hear tehran is fine for rush, not so much conquest. Ok, I just despise that map on Conquest is all | ||
|
Belisarius
Australia6233 Posts
EDIT: Wait, you actually have metro in there anyway... Personally I really like rush, but I feel like you have to pick your maps very carefully at the moment. Canals rush I've always found to be a pretty good map. Kharg island is also not awful; a lot better than GB or Damavand anyway. Is there a particular reason they're off rotation? | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
On November 03 2011 16:54 Belisarius wrote: Just a note, rush on Damavand peak is horrifyingly broken. I probably wouldn't have that in there. The last stage is as bad as metro 3. Grand bazaar I'm also not such a big fan of, personally. Too many chokepoints and not enough angles of attack make it pretty rough for attackers in general. EDIT: Wait, you actually have metro in there anyway... Personally I really like rush, but I feel like you have to pick your maps very carefully at the moment. Canals rush I've always found to be a pretty good map. Kharg island is also not awful; a lot better than GB or Damavand anyway. Is there a particular reason they're off rotation? You caught my mistake. Canals is back on there. I completely overlooked it. Tehran is only available in rush, only once every ~8 maps. Same with Metro, rush only, once a blue moon. | ||
|
Keitzer
United States2509 Posts
However, if you like long, really epic battles, play Conquest on Caspian/Firestorm or 32 player on Bazaar/Damavand | ||
|
Rizell
Sweden237 Posts
"Your windows version is too old. Either update it or you dont meet the minimum requirments" ... wtf is this? My computer DO meet the minimum requirment.... | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On November 03 2011 17:29 Rizell wrote: I have a problem.. when i try to install bf3 i get the a error message that sounds something like "Your windows version is too old. Either update it or you dont meet the minimum requirments" ... wtf is this? My computer DO meet the minimum requirment.... You can't run it on XP dude :/ | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
On November 03 2011 17:29 Rizell wrote: I have a problem.. when i try to install bf3 i get the a error message that sounds something like "Your windows version is too old. Either update it or you dont meet the minimum requirments" ... wtf is this? My computer DO meet the minimum requirment.... I suddenly feel really bad for you. | ||
|
Rizell
Sweden237 Posts
wtf, what kind of bullshit is that?  Why do you make a game that cant run on a OS that still ALOT of people use? Isent there a workaround`? | ||
|
kleetzor
Germany360 Posts
impartial on HC impartial on Maps | ||
|
tokicheese
Canada739 Posts
| ||
|
Zilver
Finland282 Posts
HC 24/7 Metro | ||
|
Latham
9593 Posts
custom set rules/infantry only 24/7 Grand Bazaar and Seine Crossing | ||
|
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
On November 03 2011 17:44 Rizell wrote: wtf, what kind of bullshit is that? Why do you make a game that cant run on a OS that still ALOT of people use? Isent there a workaround`?It was clearly stated months before release, how did you not pick up on this?  Sorry man. | ||
| ||
