|
On October 31 2011 14:27 SKTerran.117 wrote:got the game today, enjoying the single player so far, although I die a lot a lot 
The SP is awful and a huge waste of time IMO. Just go straight into MP, that's where the fun is.
|
On October 31 2011 13:01 TyrantPotato wrote: HAHAHAHAHA logged into a server. Rush on Caspian border.. Attackers have 45 lives and all sniping from spawn.
so i type :not sure if team retarded, or just play cod.
sheer laughs were had as almost ALL of them defended cod as the "pro" sport game.
i get banned from server.
oh you wait a month or 2. thats how it was when BC2 came out but after the influx of cod players came and went people knew what the hell was up. i was just in a conquest game, and put into a random squad of random people, and we stayed together the entire game! it was really fun, we would all hide out and shit behind buildings and then wam all of us at once taking shit over, it was really awesome.
|
On October 31 2011 14:40 Silidons wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 13:01 TyrantPotato wrote: HAHAHAHAHA logged into a server. Rush on Caspian border.. Attackers have 45 lives and all sniping from spawn.
so i type :not sure if team retarded, or just play cod.
sheer laughs were had as almost ALL of them defended cod as the "pro" sport game.
i get banned from server.
oh you wait a month or 2. thats how it was when BC2 came out but after the influx of cod players came and went people knew what the hell was up. i was just in a conquest game, and put into a random squad of random people, and we stayed together the entire game! it was really fun, we would all hide out and shit behind buildings and then wam all of us at once taking shit over, it was really awesome.
im not too worried or annoyed.
i just thought it was funny getting banned and all.
as soon as MW3 comes out i imagine almost 40% of all players will dissappear then shit will get real.
|
Got the game on Friday, was looking forward to a weekend of battlefield 3! The multiplayer is awesome... When you can play it. The game crashes back to the browser after 5 minutes! There are thousands of people on the foruns complaining about this. None of the "fixes" work and there hasn't been a single peep from EA or DICE about it. You can't help but get the feeling the game was rushed out to beat the MW3 release, and its not the good quality finished product it should be.
|
On October 31 2011 14:47 Nagvalk wrote: Got the game on Friday, was looking forward to a weekend of battlefield 3! The multiplayer is awesome... When you can play it. The game crashes back to the browser after 5 minutes! There are thousands of people on the foruns complaining about this. None of the "fixes" work and there hasn't been a single peep from EA or DICE about it. You can't help but get the feeling the game was rushed out to beat the MW3 release, and its not the good quality finished product it should be.
Make sure you have punkbuster updated and in the options its set to enabled or whatever. If your punkbuster is not updated this would be a cause.
|
I've been using mobile AA. rofl talk about a score booster, thing is fkin fun though and imo way funner than a jet.
overall 10/10 will whore it again, almost got all the unlocks too ^>~
|
Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly.
|
On October 31 2011 14:57 Onlinejaguar wrote: Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly.
Like what?
|
On October 31 2011 14:35 dranko wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 14:27 SKTerran.117 wrote:got the game today, enjoying the single player so far, although I die a lot a lot  The SP is awful and a huge waste of time IMO. Just go straight into MP, that's where the fun is. the jet and tank mission were really enjoyable... other than that, i agree
|
On October 31 2011 15:00 XCetron wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 14:57 Onlinejaguar wrote: Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly. Like what?
Mortar would be a good guess i'd say.
|
On October 31 2011 13:56 Dbars wrote: Holy crap am i bad at this game. Cant rank up worth a damn. Most of the maps i play are cluster fucks and i can barely move without getting killed. My guns are awful so i just been noob tubing people. What have you guys been playing? Large conquest battles seem like awful exp but are pretty damn chaotic and fun. Capturing points, with a LAV, seems to be the most efficient way.
Another cheap way to get points, is to issue commands to your squad, you get like 20 points every time they do something near that objective.
A good trick is to stick with one class until you reach level 15, when you can get the UMP and use it for the other classes, so just pick your favourite class and start leveling it until you. Personally I like the engineer since you can repair yourself when needed, and take down enemies with RPGs, but support and medic can get you some points fast, especially if you're capturing objectives. Recon can get you a lot of points once you hit the MAV and spend the entire time spotting people out, getting surveillance ribbons, and getting the medals, which are worth 10k a piece.
Here is my friend whom uses MAV and thus has a higher award score than combat. http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/xPhate4219x/stats/290769015/pc/
|
On October 31 2011 15:05 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 15:00 XCetron wrote:On October 31 2011 14:57 Onlinejaguar wrote: Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly. Like what? Mortar would be a good guess i'd say.
and AA tank, which also happens to be anti infantry. UMP45 is still retarded aswell.
|
I On October 31 2011 14:49 blade55555 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 14:47 Nagvalk wrote: Got the game on Friday, was looking forward to a weekend of battlefield 3! The multiplayer is awesome... When you can play it. The game crashes back to the browser after 5 minutes! There are thousands of people on the foruns complaining about this. None of the "fixes" work and there hasn't been a single peep from EA or DICE about it. You can't help but get the feeling the game was rushed out to beat the MW3 release, and its not the good quality finished product it should be. Make sure you have punkbuster updated and in the options its set to enabled or whatever. If your punkbuster is not updated this would be a cause. I did the manual update, didn't do an in game enabled though! Will give it a go thanks! Running an Asus GTX560 ti CU2 top, the 900 mhz overclocked one and I've seen a lot of the same complaints by 560 users, so maybe that's an issue.
|
On October 31 2011 15:08 Onlinejaguar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 15:05 Grettin wrote:On October 31 2011 15:00 XCetron wrote:On October 31 2011 14:57 Onlinejaguar wrote: Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly. Like what? Mortar would be a good guess i'd say. and AA tank, which also happens to be anti infantry. UMP45 is still retarded aswell.
rofl yes because infantry should stand a chance versus something that spits bullets and is armoured
/rolleyes
|
On October 31 2011 15:11 askTeivospy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 15:08 Onlinejaguar wrote:On October 31 2011 15:05 Grettin wrote:On October 31 2011 15:00 XCetron wrote:On October 31 2011 14:57 Onlinejaguar wrote: Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly. Like what? Mortar would be a good guess i'd say. and AA tank, which also happens to be anti infantry. UMP45 is still retarded aswell. rofl yes because infantry should stand a chance versus something that spits bullets and is armoured /rolleyes
I have had NO problems what so ever against vehicles and especially against AA tanks. Play engineer or support (with C4s) and there you go. :o)
|
On October 31 2011 15:17 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 15:11 askTeivospy wrote:On October 31 2011 15:08 Onlinejaguar wrote:On October 31 2011 15:05 Grettin wrote:On October 31 2011 15:00 XCetron wrote:On October 31 2011 14:57 Onlinejaguar wrote: Game is fun. Shame that people find the most OP thing and exploit the hell out of it instead of playing properly. Like what? Mortar would be a good guess i'd say. and AA tank, which also happens to be anti infantry. UMP45 is still retarded aswell. rofl yes because infantry should stand a chance versus something that spits bullets and is armoured /rolleyes I have had NO problems what so ever against vehicles and especially against AA tanks. Play engineer or support (with C4s) and there you go. :o)
I have no problems with infantry when im in an AA tank because I stick to my role and shoot down enemy chairforce and I dont go near infantry ridden zones. If someone sneaks up on me I drive awAY 100% best counter
|
Holy shit, just played a game of conquest on metro. This map is the most imba thing in a videogame i have seen in my 20 years as a gamer. If your US you can give up from the start, or am i missing something? I mean RU just has to rush to point B and then camp on highground and rpg the shit out of the choke points (stairs), i dont see any way you could win on this map as US.
|
On October 31 2011 15:23 altered wrote: Holy shit, just played a game of conquest on metro. This map is the most imba thing in a videogame i have seen in my 20 years as a gamer. If your US you can give up from the start, or am i missing something? I mean RU just has to rush to point B and then camp on highground and rpg the shit out of the choke points (stairs), i dont see any way you could win on this map as US.
on metro if you're US you have to hope that you can get some sort of foothold up top while theyre taking B and if you can keep them off that first wall by the escalators theres a 25% chance you can push forward and take B. i think twice today on the TL server US won but you almost have to rely on the other team screwing up
|
On October 31 2011 13:56 Dbars wrote: Holy crap am i bad at this game. Cant rank up worth a damn. Most of the maps i play are cluster fucks and i can barely move without getting killed. My guns are awful so i just been noob tubing people. What have you guys been playing? Large conquest battles seem like awful exp but are pretty damn chaotic and fun.
I've found a great way to rank up is to find a server that is Conquest on Metro only and play Assault if you're attacking or Support if you're defending. That way you can keep resupplying people endlessly shooting rockets down the escalators or reviving all the people trying to get up them. It's a win-win.
|
On October 31 2011 15:27 colingrad wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2011 15:23 altered wrote: Holy shit, just played a game of conquest on metro. This map is the most imba thing in a videogame i have seen in my 20 years as a gamer. If your US you can give up from the start, or am i missing something? I mean RU just has to rush to point B and then camp on highground and rpg the shit out of the choke points (stairs), i dont see any way you could win on this map as US. on metro if you're US you have to hope that you can get some sort of foothold up top while theyre taking B and if you can keep them off that first wall by the escalators theres a 25% chance you can push forward and take B. i think twice today on the TL server US won but you almost have to rely on the other team screwing up
I'm really struggling with a lot of the maps for similar reasons, honestly. It feels like with teams of equal skill, there's a huge number of impassable rush objectives or blatant imbalances.
Metro stage 3 comes to mind for attackers, and Damavand stage 4. One of the grand bazaar stages is ridiculous as well, I think stage 2, because you have the option of a tremendously tight corridor with four machine gunners at the end of it, or a huge wide open channel with no cover with thirty snipers at the end of it.
Canals conquest also seems rough for the team that spawns on the water. I've had enemy teams take nearly all the points before we even make landfall, because you have to choose between waiting for your boat to fill or leaving half your team stranded on the ship. It's also pretty annoying when your squad is eliminated, as people tend to become selfish with the boats later on, and so you often end up chilling in the hangar for a very long time. The team that spawns on land has no such issues.
I dunno. Maybe I'm wrong or too much of a noob to deal in those situations, but it seems like DICE took some inspiration from Brink that should have been left in that craphole of a game.
|
|
|
|
|
|