| Forum Index > General Games |
|
annedeman
Netherlands350 Posts
On January 02 2015 20:08 SilverSkyLark wrote: I mean when the stack has a lot spells in it. still no, unless you have spells like redirect, divert. you choose targets when you put a spell on the stack, and you wil not be able to change it, when a spell has no legal targets left when it resolves it fizzles and the spell is "countered" for most intends an purposes(except that it does not care about can't be countered clauses) | ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
On January 02 2015 20:12 annedeman wrote: still no, unless you have spells like redirect, divert. you choose targets when you put a spell on the stack, and you wil not be able to change it, when a spell has no legal targets left when it resolves it fizzles and the spell is "countered" ooohh. I get it, I might have misread an article I read about priority and the stack. | ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On January 02 2015 20:20 SilverSkyLark wrote: ooohh. I get it, I might have misread an article I read about priority and the stack. To add to what the others have written, targetting occurs when you cast a spell (i.e. before it is placed on the stack). Once you've finished casting the spell the targets are "locked in", so to speak. From the Comprehensive Rules: 114. Targets 114.1.Some spells and abilities require their controller to choose one or more targets for them. The targets are object(s),player(s), and/or zone(s) the spell or ability will affect. These targets are declared as part of the process of putting the spell or ability on the stack. The targets can't be changed except by another spell or ability that explicitly says it can do so. | ||
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
On January 02 2015 20:08 SilverSkyLark wrote: I mean when the stack has a lot spells in it. Still no, targets are chosen on cast. Spells like Cabal Therapy are different in that they target the opponent, and you choose the card for discard. So choose does not equal target. Then cards like Memorcide doesn't choose a card until resolution so your opponent does not know what card you plan on hitting with it (only really relevant in fringe situations). Edit: Priority has nothing to do with the stack directly, it's a player thing that basically boils down to which player gets to play/do things first in a given situation. So say when you get into your main phase on your turn, you, the player, has priority and the opposing non-turn player does not get to play something before you unless you pass priority which can be done in a number of ways. Just to clarify for new players...This is a common problem for players who play fast/on autopilot. The most common priority interaction you see in standard right now is with Courser of Kruphix (and planeswalkers). Once your Courser of Kruphix is on the field on your turn, the opponent doesn't get to kill it before everyone sees the top card of your library (this one is fairly obvious), nor does the opponent gets to kill it before you play a land either off the top of the library or from your hand. | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
![[image loading]](http://mythicspoiler.com/frf/cards/mardushadowspear.jpg) He's not the flashiest card in the set, but he looks like a good man. A 1 drop that beats for 2 is already passable in a standard aggressive deck and on top of that he's a warrior and if you draw him later in the game, he essentially has haste and dodges sorcery speed removal. That guy's going right into BW warriors. | ||
|
Draconicfire
Canada2562 Posts
![[image loading]](http://media.wizards.com/2014/ujehvsbfrf153/EN_vmx735b0ia.png) | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
| ||
|
LennX
4570 Posts
| ||
|
mr_tolkien
France8631 Posts
The spoilers have been pretty crazy. White getting half the cake is hilarious since it was already the most played color by a pretty wide margin. But what's more interesting is that the format finally gets 2-drops worth playing other than Seeker, and that could shake things up (most decks curve started at 3 those days...). | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
| ||
|
GoSuNamhciR
126 Posts
| ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
| ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On January 05 2015 15:41 SilverSkyLark wrote: Man, GP's are really something. Lots of people from all over the country fly in to compete. The atmosphere is just great. I can imagine that. I don't have the time to travel to events but it would be nice to try that.. | ||
|
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
http://sketchydoodles.tumblr.com/post/107320372375/from-the-genius-of-dougbeyermtg-springs-this | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
Mmmm, I'll enjoy this pack, especially as someone playing Sidisi EDH | ||
|
Lampshade_
United States9 Posts
On January 07 2015 03:35 WindWolf wrote: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/arcana/fate-reforged-clash-pack-2015-01-06 Mmmm, I'll enjoy this pack, especially as someone playing Sidisi EDH I thought I was the only person crazy enough to play Sidisi EDH.... can I grab a decklist from you? I'll be uploading mine soon haha | ||
|
botchedit
74 Posts
We Mardu Warrior aggro now. | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On January 07 2015 17:32 Lampshade_ wrote: I thought I was the only person crazy enough to play Sidisi EDH.... can I grab a decklist from you? I'll be uploading mine soon haha Will post it later, but a warning. It is a casual deck. Not really meant for serious play. At all. Mostly build it because I like the B/U/G color combo, and late game things can get pretty bananas | ||
|
Lampshade_
United States9 Posts
On January 07 2015 17:37 WindWolf wrote: Will post it later, but a warning. It is a casual deck. Not really meant for serious play. At all. Mostly build it because I like the B/U/G color combo, and late game things can get pretty bananas I picked it because imo it seemed like the best commander for reanimation by far. It has black and green, with blue for support. It's a turn 4 auto enabler with free tokens as a little bonus. My deck is basically fatties / counters / control / reanimation. What's yours like? | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On January 07 2015 17:39 Lampshade_ wrote: I picked it because imo it seemed like the best commander for reanimation by far. It has black and green, with blue for support. It's a turn 4 auto enabler with free tokens as a little bonus. My deck is basically fatties / counters / control / reanimation. What's yours like? Ehh... I don't really have a strategy like that (It's only my first Commander deck, and I mostly play Limited events anyway these day). But if I had to explain it in some way, survive early-mid game, go nuts late game | ||
| ||
|
|
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
