| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Ideas
United States8132 Posts
On June 15 2010 07:45 AmbitiousNub wrote: I'm surprised no one is talking about the Goldeneye Remake!!! http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=14mb8k9&s=6 goldeneye: the best shooter to everyone who never played or heard of half-life rare isn't even making it any way lol it's 100% just a name-brand game. | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
| ||
|
Cpadolf
Sweden1199 Posts
On June 15 2010 07:48 Ideas wrote: goldeneye: the best shooter to everyone who never played or heard of PC shooters Fixed  True, it and Halo where very revolutionizing for the genre, but console shooters are still so inferior to good PC shooters it's not even funny. On June 15 2010 07:54 motbob wrote: Rare isn't even that good of a developer anymore. Yeah, they haven't been for like 10 years. | ||
|
Ideas
United States8132 Posts
On June 15 2010 07:54 motbob wrote: Rare isn't even that good of a developer anymore. yea i never thought they were good at all but maybe he did On June 15 2010 07:55 Cpadolf wrote: Fixed True, it and Halo where very revolutionizing for the genre, but console shooters are still so inferior to good PC shooters it's not even funny. how did goldeneye revolutionize anything at all? ill give halo credit for coming up with a lot of standard stuff today (not that all of it is even necassarily good though ) like melee/grenade buttons and rechargable shields, but seriously wtf did goldeneye do? | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
Only non console shooters I can think of are Crysis 1 and Half Life 2 | ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
Then I saw wii exclusive and shed a tear. | ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
On June 15 2010 07:58 7mk wrote: well what do you mean by PC shooters though? Only non console shooters I can think of are Crysis 1 and Half Life 2 Quake, counterstrike, team fortress, Unreal Tournament, Battlefield, Tribes, RTCW | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
Cpadolf
Sweden1199 Posts
On June 15 2010 07:58 7mk wrote: well what do you mean by PC shooters though? Only non console shooters I can think of are Crysis 1 and Half Life 2 I mean FPSs for PC in general are just a lot better than FPSs for consoles, due to controls. This is true for non exclusive games as well, except when they fuck the PC version up due to laziness (hello MW2). Just an opinion of course but I really don't understand people who like FPSs for consoles better than for PC. | ||
|
Ryhn
United States509 Posts
They've announced multiple races, personal star ships, and branching class paths for all 8 choices. On top of being fully voice acted with Bioware's story telling backing everything up. The complaints I can muster against the game are just not great enough to pull my expectations down. Bioware hwaiting! | ||
|
Ideas
United States8132 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:02 Jibba wrote: Technically they made about half of those into console games. They were terrible, but still... well there are ports and then like totally new console-only spinoffs. I consider a shooter to be a PC shooter if it was made for the PC 1st and then ported over to the consoles (as is the case with games like FEAR and The Orange Box). if it was the other way around then it's probably bad any way so I dont care about it but it's not a PC shooter (such as Modern Warfare 2). franchises like unreal and battlefield actually had complete console spinoffs too, but that doesnt mean that UT3 or BF2 aren't PC shooters. cuz they are | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:00 Bosu wrote: Quake, counterstrike, team fortress, Unreal Tournament, Battlefield, Tribes, RTCW I was thinking about the present though and about single player games. None of these are single player games and all of them are really really old (not that I dont like playing some of them, even now, but still) Also TF's and UT's and BF's sequels are all console games too. | ||
|
whiteLotus
1833 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:04 Ryhn wrote: I'm rather excited for the Star Wars MMO, so far they've lined up 15 playable planets, and the game's still a year from release. They've announced multiple races, personal star ships, and branching class paths for all 8 choices. On top of being fully voice acted with Bioware's story telling backing everything up. The complaints I can muster against the game are just not great enough to pull my expectations down. Bioware hwaiting! star wars will have monthly fee y? and i wonder what requirements will be ;( dunno if my old 86gt can run it  | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:04 Ryhn wrote: I'm rather excited for the Star Wars MMO, so far they've lined up 15 playable planets, and the game's still a year from release. They've announced multiple races, personal star ships, and branching class paths for all 8 choices. On top of being fully voice acted with Bioware's story telling backing everything up. The complaints I can muster against the game are just not great enough to pull my expectations down. Bioware hwaiting! I'd like to know where you heard this. Bioware hasn't said anywhere that this would be in game. | ||
|
Ryhn
United States509 Posts
Personally I'd prefer a monthly fee. | ||
|
Ryhn
United States509 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:06 On_Slaught wrote: I'd like to know where you heard this. Bioware hasn't said anywhere that this would be in game. Did you not watch the EA Press Conference? They announced it minutes ago. It serves as a customizable way to express yourself, as well as a home base. | ||
|
Deleted User 55994
949 Posts
| ||
|
Ideas
United States8132 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:03 Cpadolf wrote: I mean FPSs for PC in general are just a lot better than FPSs for consoles, due to controls. This is true for non exclusive games as well, except when they fuck the PC version up due to laziness (hello MW2). Just an opinion of course but I really don't understand people who like FPSs for consoles better than for PC. it's not just controls (or graphics for that matter) though. when a shooter is designed for the PC, it's very clear in how fast-paced the game is and complex the controls are. Counter-Strike was fucking garbage on the xbox because of how fast-paced it is and how imprecise and slow a controller is. crysis 1 would of never worked on consoles just because of how complex the controls were, and it's clearly evident in Crysis 2 that htey had to make a lot of changes to the controls (for better or for worse, but probably worse) simplifying things to make it playable on the 360/PS3. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:07 Ryhn wrote: Did you not watch the EA Press Conference? They announced it minutes ago. Wtf? i fucking missed it? Ugh now I have to go rewatch all that shit. | ||
|
Ideas
United States8132 Posts
On June 15 2010 08:07 faction123 wrote: Is that really it for bioware at e3 or do they have more scheduled this week? i've looked around and can't find anything. No ME3 or DA2? mass effect 2 JUST came out lol. I wouldnt expect to hear much for a at least a little bit | ||
| ||
OSC
Mid Season Playoffs
Ryung vs MojaLIVE!
Nice vs NightPhoenix
Cham vs TBD
MaNa vs TriGGeR
SteadfastSC233
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
The PondCast
OSC
Wardi Open
CranKy Ducklings
Safe House 2
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Safe House 2
|
|
|
EPT
