Winning the OSL Is Easy! - Page 4
Forum Index > Final Edits |
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
| ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
| ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32268 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
| ||
Mynock
4492 Posts
But in all objectivity it seems to me people lack DJ going any further with the data. If we strip down the dressing we see one thing being said: "To win an OSL you need an overall theoretical minimum of 65.31% winning percentage from qualifiers to the trophy." Now the thought of this is rather interesting, and I'm sure even tho lots of people figured this out back in 2001 or so, it has probably never been addressed so directly. But had DJ chosen to play around some with this quite intriguing number, like say - analyzing player's records and why some of them are champions altho their ratios don't fit, and others have brilliant ratios but choke - I'm sure most people would have been satisfied. Of course, it is most probable that DJ has formulated his article in this way precisely to leave all the thought-process to the readers, and generate discussion... But then you should understand that as well, HB, - and also understand that some people are just bound to "not get it". To summarize, the article's content is something one would see a thread in the Tournament section created about - sparking a discussion, but leaving it to the forum visitors to go beyond the raw data. It is this fundamental difference as compared to the other FE articles that leaves the sense of "lacking something" in most of the critics, I'm sure. Oh, and in-before anything else: I'm not defending ZergZoul, this is just an analysis of the situation. | ||
Snipinpanda
United States1227 Posts
No, its RIGGED. >.> | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
I thought this was assumed. It'll truly fly over some peoples' heads, but whatever. Think of it more as an article aimed at those who would laugh at the absurdity of the claims Etter makes here. In no way is he actually making any real points or wanting to spark discussion about using %s and winrates to determine a winner or strongest player. | ||
Mynock
4492 Posts
And just now I realised! You're a Legalist - I'm a Confucianist. By golly, WTF, superpope! | ||
paper
13196 Posts
my heart T_T... | ||
morfyy
Romania593 Posts
Indeed ^^ | ||
HonestTea
5007 Posts
On November 03 2007 17:53 paper wrote: omg stork in dinosaur outfit was fake?! my heart T_T... Don't worry, that image is 100% real. | ||
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
| ||
Razamataz
Canada135 Posts
| ||
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
ram
Lithuania602 Posts
On November 03 2007 13:25 LosingID8 wrote: anytime... winner of so1 osl... pride of south korea... sup carlo? you just cannot get bored with carlo =DDD nice to see him back! | ||
mdb
Bulgaria4058 Posts
| ||
ManaBlue
Canada10458 Posts
Furthermore, I would have been dumb enough to respond to you and mynock 6 months ago. Though I'm still dumb enough to have a debate with berated, completely ruining the thread (sorry DJ ), and escalating what was nothing but a punchline under the careful watch of HotBid, at least I'm improving. In closing, it is now official that it takes more cunning tactics to bait ManaBlue. The hunt for the right flavour is on! | ||
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
This is not a serious article, must be deleted | ||
JensOfSweden
Cameroon1767 Posts
| ||
| ||