• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:21
CET 14:21
KST 22:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !8Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1: Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle screp: Command line app to parse SC rep files How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1643 users

The PiG Daily - Thinking critically about SC - Page 2

Forum Index > Community Content
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
May 24 2016 12:45 GMT
#21
The show is great to watch, and I love that you try to mention how the builds can be defended, or how stuff applies to other races. Last episode (Daily #8) was great to see that Guru's choice of not making more assimilators was not as dumb as the casters made it seem.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-24 13:19:28
May 24 2016 13:17 GMT
#22
On May 24 2016 19:42 PiGStarcraft wrote:
And here's my latest episode: PiG Daily #8 - Guru's Full Swarm ZvP - Guru vs Showtime!

Don't know how much BW you know, but this style existed in brood war as well. It was called "Sauron Zerg", and I think especially JulyZerg was famous for it. Likkypiddy. Idea is basically to mass silly amounts of (upgraded) low tech units on a huge economy. Happy to see it work in sc2 as well, if only as a surprise strategy, and definitely something I'd like to try.
todespolka
Profile Joined November 2012
221 Posts
May 24 2016 14:03 GMT
#23
I like this kind of content.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-24 14:13:44
May 24 2016 14:06 GMT
#24
--- Nuked ---
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-25 08:08:00
May 25 2016 08:03 GMT
#25
PiG Daily #9 - Nerchio’s agile and adaptive anti-muta ZvZ - Nerchio vs Scarlett DH Tours



Note: I think the maths part of my brain may be broken. I somehow totalled 600 + 400 + 600 = 1800. I really need to start using a calculator lol. So when I say the Anti-Air should cost 1800 mins/72 lings/36 drones it actually should be 1600 minerals, 64 lings, 32 drones. The point still stands but damn I'm stupid lol

Apologies for this episode being quite rambling. I realise after watching the VoD I didn't have a keen enough understanding to explain everything in simple terms. More prep for the next one!

Show notes:
+ Show Spoiler +
Nerchio’s agile anti-muta ZvZ

Complete understanding of the matchup
Showed a way of dealing with mutas using an alternative to hydras/mutas where you get ling upgrades, queens and tech straight to Hive. We’ve seen it used before but usually in more static games where it feels the players skip the midgame. In this one Nerchio was always in an incredibly fast-paced and action packed situation and yet still balanced his play very intelligently


But also an understanding of how his opponent plays
Played in ways we don’t normally see because he was taking risks and cutting corners. He was abusing the incomplete information of his opponent, and doing a splendid job of piecing together what he could get away with despite his own limited information


Upgraded lings
These featured heavily in Nerchio’s play. They’re fantastic vs straight muta play, but very weak vs roach-baneling timing attacks where they can’t do crap
He identified Scarlett wanted to go muta-ling-bane and countered it by rushing for upgrades and using his lings mobility rather than anti-air to nullify the mutas
The mutas never could come harass because Nerchio always had more production (fast 3rd base) or better upgrades, sometimes even both. He used this to threaten and counterattack with lings constantly, forcing the mutas to stay at home, and doing critical damage when she moved out.
This allowed Nerchio to skip early anti-air and get a later response off a larger economy as he skipped the huge deny in his economy that is extra queens and spores

Maths
Standard AA setup on 3-base:
4 extra queens and 8 spores
600 minerals (queens) + 400 minerals/8larva (drones that turn into spores) + 600 minerals (spores)
1800 minerals and 8 larva. Most of which needs to be invested all at once at the same time as the opponent starts even just 5 mutalisks.
1800 minerals is the equivalent to 72 zerglings, or 36 drones.



Nerchio invests that money into ling aggression and purposefully limits and denies extra bases and any stability from Scarlett
So why can’t scarlett just defend on the ground and then get her mutas across the map?
She is teching very fast - if she got to mutas un-interrupted she could afford many banes, spines, lings to secure 3-base and send her mutas across the map.
However Nerchio’s pressure is relentless and he forces many lings and banes out of her
Since he is ONLY investing in economy (drones + 3rd hatch) and units whereas Scarlett is trying to invest in TECH + economy (lair, gas, 3rd base) she is forced to add more army to defend from nerchio, but she is spread thinner and can’t afford the trades as easily off her high-gas tech-focused economy.
This makes it hard for Scarlett to ever get the 3rd and gives Nerchio a big production and economy lead

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Nerchio’s spending money on: ARMY + ECONOMY

Scarlett wants to spend money on ECONOMY + TECH

However Nerchio attacks constantly and forces Scarlett to spend money on army also

Scarlett’s money is now spread too thin, she can’t afford a lot of army and can’t secure a 3rd base.

Nerchio’s tech is slower but he has a 3rd base over Scarlett. Scarlett’s advantage is the mutas

The mutas are nullified by the mobile ling counters and aggression that force them to stay home - they never get a chance to force the BIG RESPONSE they normally do. She can’t do much about it because they aren’t as mobile as lings, and her lings can’t match nerchio’s, she’s just too far behind in production, upgrades or both.

Questions! ASK NOW with @x5_PiG

G2

Run-through

Analysis

Going straight for ling upgrades
Queen-ling… aggression!?


Summary:

Mutas are indeed powerful, but Nerchio showed that it also matters HOW you get to mutalisks.
Scarlett was teching super fast, but skipping out on army, Nerchio abused this weakness and denied her using a 3rd base in many games
If Scarlett was going for slower, 3-base mutas, off a more solid economy + army. Nerchio might have been forced to tech to hive faster and do less runbys.



On May 24 2016 23:06 Barrin wrote:
I really appreciate your highly analytical style; I find a high concentration of useful information / perspectives.

You're doing great, but you mentioned you could do better. Personally, I prefer quality over quantity. Don't burn out or run out of topics too fast!


Cutting back streaming hours to make sure I keep up with episode prep. Great topic for #9 - not the best execution by myself. Will definitely make sure I give myself plenty of time to prep for all the future eps

Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
breaker1328
Profile Joined March 2016
Canada298 Posts
May 26 2016 05:52 GMT
#26
PiG, I love your dailies. When you get the opportunity to cast you're one of my favorites, props to being the only english language caster that had played BW at Shanghai btw :p, and keep on keeping on. Like I said during your stream, copying Day9 is not the worst idea anyone has ever had and you are very good at it. Keep it up! I'll watch every episode.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 26 2016 08:26 GMT
#27
Time for the daily peeeg after work! I can get used to this.
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
May 26 2016 12:37 GMT
#28
PiG Daily #10 - Fundamentals of Starcraft - most important mechanics, macro and micro tips


Show Notes:
+ Show Spoiler +
Hotkeys - Hotkey Trainer Arcade map
Control Groups
1 hatch/cc/nexi
2-4 Army
5 barracks/gateways (creep queen hotkey for zerg)
6 - factories/starports or Robo/SG (tab between them)
7 - upgrade buildings
8 - special building/secondary upgrades

Adding eggs to your hotkey
Remove select all army key to get used to it
We should always be trying to rely on our own hotkeys rather than select all army because select all army inhibits our ability to split up and counterattack, flank etc.


Ctrl Click and double click
Ctrl click is a bit more reliable especially on moving units


Shift click de-selecting
cloning/scouts/back on gas
Shift Queing up actions
Insane multi-tasking often involves a lot of this - it looks to the observer like they’re everywhere - and sometimes they are but most of the time its nicely timed que’d up actions to hit at the same time as where they’re actively microing.
Camera Hotkeys
5-8 bases + rally pt
For Protoss rally pt = warpin pt

Advanced:

Rapid-fire
Great for corrosive bile, infested terran spam, warping in 5+ gateway units at a time
Control-group Stealing
Should be on by default

Macro

Macro is the art of constantly expanding your economy and building it stronger whilst also Teching, upgrading and spending your money on army. The key rules are:

Constantly build workers
Keep your money low
Spend the money as soon as it comes in so it can be used.
For instance if you invest in more workers, the earlier you get them the more time they get to mine!
Never get supply blocked
SOOO much better to have a big supply gap then to get blocked! Grinds your whole production to a halt Better to lose opportunity cost then freeze everything up

Macro Cycle
You can do small tasks in between, pros constantly bounce between things. However the important part is having one strong, rhythmical cycle:

Zerg
Every 30s
Inject
Produce
Overlords - last few larva on overlords every time - this steadily ramps up so you build 1 overlord/cycle for each base you have

The reason behind always macroing in a set order is that in Starcraft you always have a large number of actions to sustain macro. If you are doing everything in a random order you are guaranteed to have to constantly waste brain power thinking “what do I need to do now?”. So by memorising this order and carrying out your macro like this EVERY game you begin to do it by instinct without needing to think and therefore always covering all your bases. Not only that but the speed you macro at will increase noticeably.

So the goal here is that with every 30s macro cycle (the time it takes for injects to pop) you can go through this order automatically and speedily finish it in 10-15s. This leaves 25-30s for scouting, micro, building tech, and thinking about strategy.

Terran -22s
2xScvs/CC + drop mules
Que units on production
Que depots
From 40 supply (therabouts) you should always have 1 depot builder. That is, an scv constantly building depots. You should always que up another depot each time you return to base
Once you hit full 2-base production (roughly 5-rax + fact/starport) you need to add a second depot builder.
This way even if you are busy microing for a minute depots continue to be built. It also means you don’t need to keep pulling a worker off mining each time to go build depots, it becomes an easier and more habitual action

Protoss -22s
2xProbes/Nexus
Que units on production
Build pylons (1+/mining base)

My base is red on workers, should I stop building them?

Just rally that building to the next base, never stop building workers
Even if it’s red it’s ok. 18 workers per base is just as efficient as 16 workers. Anything up to 20 on each bases minerals is completely fine.
Anything under 16 is very bad!

When to transfer workers?
8:00 - transfer from main leaving 8 workers behind
11:00 - transfer from natural leaving 8 workers behind
We rarely get past the next marker, and always with different 3rd timings based on build so it’s not as set in stone.
Do this at the same time every game so it becomes habit! Especially in the middle and lower leagues I see players being very inconsistent with this. Even GMs often forget in high pressure games because it’s not a consistent habit.

What about when to add tech, production and upgrades?
As a beginner it’s not too important exactly when, as long as you’re building your economy up and spending your money
As you progress you can start to emulate patterns you see in pro play and learn efficient ways to head towards certain goals.

Micro

Attack-move!

Boxing micro
Try to do it with just 2 box + click actions to get used to doing an apm efficient version you can realistically have time to execute in a game
Spreading vs splash damage
Setting up a concave
More surface area
banana/moon
Doesn’t have to be perfect, just have them spread in the general shape and they’ll do the rest

Using Spellcasters

Get used to using 2 army control groups
To get started you can try always just move commanding (right click) your spellcasters on someone in your main army so they automatically follow
But they ALWAYS need their own hotkey
Often you only need to a-move, or spread and a-move your main army
Newer players more often make their army less effective by trying to micro too much
Spellcasters on the other hand need a lot more attention!

So a fight done well will often look like this:

Box click, box click to spread army
A-move
Control spellcasters

Example showing how to use infestors/vipers SLOW AT FIRST

Questions @x5_PiG also last Abathur code giveaway today!

Mineral walking workers
Useful for rush defence

Surrounding enemy workers
Pocket trick
Running away from harm (no pathing blocks so you can escape easier)
Attacking?

I used to copy this build in WoL off a 14/14 opening and had an insane winrate with it lol. I even used it in late 2012 several times off pool-hatch with a fake 3rd hatch cancel - worked a lot before the mothership core

Trick and small things

Shift + hold position queens on ramps
Queuing up attack commands with shift on an scv so your units pursue and resume attacking it after it shifts around the building
Hold position drones to block melee attackers

Summary: We just talked about a LOT of different things.

If you’re using this video to improve, choose 1-2 things. Practice them a bit and try to make them feel very natural before you try more things. Don’t try to learn everything at once! All of the notes will be posted in the TL thread.

Don’t be afraid to hop into a custom map to practice and learn new mechanics. If something’s brand new it’s best to practice it vs an easy AI, or even no opponent so you can focus on it in isolation.

Answer questions

End show!
Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
Kitai
Profile Joined June 2012
United States878 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-27 00:27:50
May 26 2016 23:12 GMT
#29
Hey PiG, just wanted express my gratitude for filling the void that was left when Day[9] stopped doing dailies. Watching these has helped fuel my desire to try laddering again. As an idea for a later daily, I'd like to learn some tips about how to build a better base. Building placement for the various races isn't talked about in depth very often, but when done effectively, players can use techniques to efficiently defend against harassment, hide tech, and minimize vulnerabilities without compromising their builds.

Once again, thanks so much for all the hard work.
"You know, I don't care if soO got 100 second places in a row. Anyone who doesn't think that he's going to win blizzcon watching this series is a fool" - Artosis, Blizzcon 2014 soO vs TaeJa
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-27 04:07:34
May 27 2016 04:06 GMT
#30
PiG Daily #11 - The hidden advantages of aggression - Has vs Happy WCS Spring Championship -- Part 1

"Right now we have Happy playing Trump-style, he's very scared of these mexistalkers..." - couldn't find a really poignant quote for this one, so I guess that'll do

I had some mic issues so this episode is cut into 2 parts:

Part 1


Part 2



Show Notes
+ Show Spoiler +
PvT of Has vs Happy

Has vs Happy frozen temple
Aggression sees Happy’s crazily safe tech-rush build
Keeps up the pressure despite the start going horribly (losing mocore)
Goes FULL economy behind it
In this case it’s an exaggerated example of what we’ve been talking about. Obviously Happy’s paranoid because it’s Has, but we see this same sort of over-defensiveness from the defender, and greed behind the aggression all the time!

Intro

Before looking at the less obvious features of aggression, let’s talk about the basics. At its core Starcraft is an economy game, and that’s the main thing we always look at. If someone is aggressive, it means they invest less in economy, and more in army in order to try and damage or kill their opponent. Therefore if they don’t do a certain amount of damage, they’re behind, and the attack has failed.

This is definitely the MAIN part of understanding aggression.
However we rarely go deeper. Lots of situations where players first attack or 2 doesn’t achieve anything, and they go on to win with their transitions.

I remember last years wcs when I 9-pooled Targa 3 times in a ZvZ each time vs 15pool. He always had textbook defence, and yet I won the series 2-1 with macro transitions that ended in very even games. On a regular basis we see Has’s aggression defended only to break through on the 2nd or 3rd tech-switch.

So how when an attack doesn’t work, does the player who is so clearly behind in economy leverage himself back into the game? To understand this we need to look at the hidden advantages of aggression. The best way to do this is to look at games where the initial attack doesn’t achieve its goal - but the player still finds that way to win!






The first step to benefiting from these hidden advantages is not overcommitting
Learning to recognise when the attack isn’t going well and changing up the style of attack/pressure, not just funneling units up a ramp to their death
Sure you’ve attacked and didn’t do damage, so you’re behind in economy.
But if you preserve a lot of your units then you can still scout and
The threat is still there! They’re afraid to move out incase you’re still reinforcing




Scouting info - force them to show their unit composition
Infer from that what their build is
Usually can figure out everything that’s happening if the pressure is great enough
Pressure them so much they don’t have time to scout and are afraid of walking out into a huge allin
Leads to several consequences:

Don’t have time to think about scouting/transition
Are unsure if you’re still going all-in or committing to economy
This means you can often cut corners behind the aggression and beeline directly to a tech and economy that you can’t defend - but they don’t realise they can push.
Usually by the time they do push the corner cutting/greedy transition has paid off


Force them into a certain reaction whilst you’re already going into the best counter to that reaction

Space
We touched on the idea of opening up space and having vision
It’s also you’re completely safe due to gearing up for your own attack - you can be surprised by attacks and you will defend cos you already have so many units

Questions to @x5_PiG

Strength and Weakness:

Usually the defender fails to weigh up and fully understand what the aggressor is capable of
However if they do they can almost always find a sharp counter-timing to stop you from cutting corners and getting ahead
Example: STOP AT JUST 2 TANKS and get faster stim
Especially if it’s a brand new type of aggression it’s incredibly hard to do the mental calculations on what could be coming behind it - that’s why only the very best of the best pro players feel impervious to aggressive and cheesy play


We talked about how players tend to mis-read aggression unless they are the very best or have experience dealing with it. But even if they have a good grasp of the situation and what’s possible, The aggressor is usually still more familiar with the situation. He chose to do this build and force the game down this path, he’s practiced it many many times and has learnt devious and clever things to do from here. (spreading creep back, recognise when to rush mutas, Has going phenix after oracle to keep the pressure up and force the T to stay at home
Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 27 2016 04:28 GMT
#31
I really liked the one with the mechanics! I have to start using steal hotkey more. Think I do all the other things though... bad at splitting of course, but I try.

Still stuck in gold, but I probably just have to play more.
Hasuu
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada178 Posts
May 28 2016 00:38 GMT
#32
Pig, you are a rock star. Keep up the great work. These videos are going to go so far for a lot of prospects.
MoosyDoosy
Profile Joined November 2014
United States4519 Posts
May 28 2016 01:26 GMT
#33
These actually really help PiG. And your stream is hella entertaining when I do manage to catch you streaming.

: ]
"Just a second too late rsoultin :D" - My 4k Guardian post
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-28 02:27:51
May 28 2016 02:05 GMT
#34
--- Nuked ---
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 28 2016 05:08 GMT
#35
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?
TokO
Profile Joined July 2011
Norway577 Posts
May 28 2016 11:44 GMT
#36
On May 28 2016 14:08 Cascade wrote:
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?


I think one can answer this answer this question in many different layers. One way to look at it is that every situation, every set-up to a game seems to suggest a course of action that will lead to victory for either player. We, the spectator saw the situation, and could identify a course of action, which no doubt would have been a good one for the Terran. Happy. on the other hand, has to consider a multitude of scenarios. Given that a scan is also a decision that forgoes economic benefit, imagine the situation that Happy does make a scan, or several scans. There are many questions that can be raised as to where to scan, how many scans to use to come to the conclusion of Has' greed, etc.. But my point is, that there is a large range of situations that Happy could discover where his chance of winning is a lot slimmer as a result of investing those scans. Facing that decision making problem, he decided to do what he did.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 28 2016 12:54 GMT
#37
On May 28 2016 20:44 TokO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2016 14:08 Cascade wrote:
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?


I think one can answer this answer this question in many different layers. One way to look at it is that every situation, every set-up to a game seems to suggest a course of action that will lead to victory for either player. We, the spectator saw the situation, and could identify a course of action, which no doubt would have been a good one for the Terran. Happy. on the other hand, has to consider a multitude of scenarios. Given that a scan is also a decision that forgoes economic benefit, imagine the situation that Happy does make a scan, or several scans. There are many questions that can be raised as to where to scan, how many scans to use to come to the conclusion of Has' greed, etc.. But my point is, that there is a large range of situations that Happy could discover where his chance of winning is a lot slimmer as a result of investing those scans. Facing that decision making problem, he decided to do what he did.

Yeah, that's true. There are a lot of possibilities. But still, Has mainly had the two options of doing all-in round 2, or macro up. I think Happy was aware of that. There must be a good timing to for example scan the natural and check saturation to tell the two apart, and act accordingly. Surely that must be worth a scan? But yeah, maybe I am oversimplifying things here.
craz3d
Profile Joined August 2005
Bulgaria856 Posts
May 28 2016 14:51 GMT
#38
I think Happy assumed Has would throw the kitchen sink at him. God knows how many times I've lost games after taking my foot off the pedal after defending an all-in, only to lose to the next attack. He probably glanced up at his mins after Has's attack and saw something low, so he dropped a bunch of mules.
Hello World!
TokO
Profile Joined July 2011
Norway577 Posts
May 28 2016 20:42 GMT
#39
On May 28 2016 21:54 Cascade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2016 20:44 TokO wrote:
On May 28 2016 14:08 Cascade wrote:
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?


I think one can answer this answer this question in many different layers. One way to look at it is that every situation, every set-up to a game seems to suggest a course of action that will lead to victory for either player. We, the spectator saw the situation, and could identify a course of action, which no doubt would have been a good one for the Terran. Happy. on the other hand, has to consider a multitude of scenarios. Given that a scan is also a decision that forgoes economic benefit, imagine the situation that Happy does make a scan, or several scans. There are many questions that can be raised as to where to scan, how many scans to use to come to the conclusion of Has' greed, etc.. But my point is, that there is a large range of situations that Happy could discover where his chance of winning is a lot slimmer as a result of investing those scans. Facing that decision making problem, he decided to do what he did.

Yeah, that's true. There are a lot of possibilities. But still, Has mainly had the two options of doing all-in round 2, or macro up. I think Happy was aware of that. There must be a good timing to for example scan the natural and check saturation to tell the two apart, and act accordingly. Surely that must be worth a scan? But yeah, maybe I am oversimplifying things here.


It was not my intention to defend Happy's decisions, I'm just saying that it's a bit more complicated than being able to draw a conclusion from a single scan. For one, a no gas natural has traditionally been a sure sign of all-in. But Has did a mineral heavy greedy build. Scouting the fourth or the third would have been more indicative of greed. But either way, you have very little information on the degree of tech associated with Has' transition. Is it a 4 gas safe 3-base? Is it 2 gas 3-base? Happy sure as hell didn't expect 2 gas 4-base.

There is some knowledge asymmetries in this situation as Has is likely to have a greater understanding of the circumstances around this specific scenario, compared to Happy. In that sense, it is expected that Happy will make less ideal decisions, compared to those of Has.
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
May 29 2016 01:51 GMT
#40
Happy actually did drop 2 scans on the natural - and considering the first saw it down and the second saw some decent number of probes on it (but no gas) Happy definitely could have stopped at just 3 tanks rather than a whole 5. That adjustment would have really helped him out imo. But it is still relatively limited information - he never knew about the 3rd and 4th nexus, he didn't get any info on the tech or production - so I can see why Happy overcommited so much to defence so early on.
Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV 2025
11:00
Playoffs
Clem vs RogueLIVE!
Creator vs TBD
Scarlett vs Spirit
ShoWTimE vs Cure
WardiTV1320
ComeBackTV 1135
TaKeTV 359
IndyStarCraft 158
Rex149
IntoTheiNu 20
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko297
IndyStarCraft 165
Rex 145
Harstem 128
BRAT_OK 65
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 30017
Calm 4974
GuemChi 2654
Bisu 2308
Rain 2247
Horang2 844
Stork 723
actioN 540
Shuttle 490
Mini 256
[ Show more ]
firebathero 245
Larva 206
ggaemo 192
Mind 133
Aegong 113
hero 98
Killer 93
JYJ 75
Zeus 73
Barracks 69
Snow 69
Hyun 65
ToSsGirL 57
Sea.KH 57
Bale 55
Mong 43
Shinee 37
Sacsri 30
sorry 26
Terrorterran 23
soO 23
910 18
zelot 16
GoRush 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Shine 11
JulyZerg 9
SilentControl 7
Dota 2
Gorgc3763
singsing3161
XcaliburYe153
qojqva115
League of Legends
C9.Mang0370
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1842
allub273
oskar123
Other Games
B2W.Neo1533
crisheroes396
Fuzer 271
XaKoH 122
hiko120
Trikslyr20
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
OSC
39m
Big Brain Bouts
3h 39m
YoungYakov vs Jumy
TriGGeR vs Spirit
The PiG Daily
7h 39m
SHIN vs ByuN
Reynor vs Classic
TBD vs herO
Maru vs SHIN
TBD vs Classic
CranKy Ducklings
20h 39m
WardiTV 2025
21h 39m
Reynor vs MaxPax
SHIN vs TBD
Solar vs herO
Classic vs TBD
SC Evo League
23h 9m
Ladder Legends
1d 5h
BSL 21
1d 6h
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 20h
Ladder Legends
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
2 days
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.