• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:16
CEST 12:16
KST 19:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL62Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event21Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Practice Partners (Official) ASL20 Preliminary Maps SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 755 users

The PiG Daily - Thinking critically about SC - Page 2

Forum Index > Community Content
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
May 24 2016 12:45 GMT
#21
The show is great to watch, and I love that you try to mention how the builds can be defended, or how stuff applies to other races. Last episode (Daily #8) was great to see that Guru's choice of not making more assimilators was not as dumb as the casters made it seem.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-24 13:19:28
May 24 2016 13:17 GMT
#22
On May 24 2016 19:42 PiGStarcraft wrote:
And here's my latest episode: PiG Daily #8 - Guru's Full Swarm ZvP - Guru vs Showtime!

Don't know how much BW you know, but this style existed in brood war as well. It was called "Sauron Zerg", and I think especially JulyZerg was famous for it. Likkypiddy. Idea is basically to mass silly amounts of (upgraded) low tech units on a huge economy. Happy to see it work in sc2 as well, if only as a surprise strategy, and definitely something I'd like to try.
todespolka
Profile Joined November 2012
221 Posts
May 24 2016 14:03 GMT
#23
I like this kind of content.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-24 14:13:44
May 24 2016 14:06 GMT
#24
--- Nuked ---
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-25 08:08:00
May 25 2016 08:03 GMT
#25
PiG Daily #9 - Nerchio’s agile and adaptive anti-muta ZvZ - Nerchio vs Scarlett DH Tours



Note: I think the maths part of my brain may be broken. I somehow totalled 600 + 400 + 600 = 1800. I really need to start using a calculator lol. So when I say the Anti-Air should cost 1800 mins/72 lings/36 drones it actually should be 1600 minerals, 64 lings, 32 drones. The point still stands but damn I'm stupid lol

Apologies for this episode being quite rambling. I realise after watching the VoD I didn't have a keen enough understanding to explain everything in simple terms. More prep for the next one!

Show notes:
+ Show Spoiler +
Nerchio’s agile anti-muta ZvZ

Complete understanding of the matchup
Showed a way of dealing with mutas using an alternative to hydras/mutas where you get ling upgrades, queens and tech straight to Hive. We’ve seen it used before but usually in more static games where it feels the players skip the midgame. In this one Nerchio was always in an incredibly fast-paced and action packed situation and yet still balanced his play very intelligently


But also an understanding of how his opponent plays
Played in ways we don’t normally see because he was taking risks and cutting corners. He was abusing the incomplete information of his opponent, and doing a splendid job of piecing together what he could get away with despite his own limited information


Upgraded lings
These featured heavily in Nerchio’s play. They’re fantastic vs straight muta play, but very weak vs roach-baneling timing attacks where they can’t do crap
He identified Scarlett wanted to go muta-ling-bane and countered it by rushing for upgrades and using his lings mobility rather than anti-air to nullify the mutas
The mutas never could come harass because Nerchio always had more production (fast 3rd base) or better upgrades, sometimes even both. He used this to threaten and counterattack with lings constantly, forcing the mutas to stay at home, and doing critical damage when she moved out.
This allowed Nerchio to skip early anti-air and get a later response off a larger economy as he skipped the huge deny in his economy that is extra queens and spores

Maths
Standard AA setup on 3-base:
4 extra queens and 8 spores
600 minerals (queens) + 400 minerals/8larva (drones that turn into spores) + 600 minerals (spores)
1800 minerals and 8 larva. Most of which needs to be invested all at once at the same time as the opponent starts even just 5 mutalisks.
1800 minerals is the equivalent to 72 zerglings, or 36 drones.



Nerchio invests that money into ling aggression and purposefully limits and denies extra bases and any stability from Scarlett
So why can’t scarlett just defend on the ground and then get her mutas across the map?
She is teching very fast - if she got to mutas un-interrupted she could afford many banes, spines, lings to secure 3-base and send her mutas across the map.
However Nerchio’s pressure is relentless and he forces many lings and banes out of her
Since he is ONLY investing in economy (drones + 3rd hatch) and units whereas Scarlett is trying to invest in TECH + economy (lair, gas, 3rd base) she is forced to add more army to defend from nerchio, but she is spread thinner and can’t afford the trades as easily off her high-gas tech-focused economy.
This makes it hard for Scarlett to ever get the 3rd and gives Nerchio a big production and economy lead

TEXT ON SCREEN:

Nerchio’s spending money on: ARMY + ECONOMY

Scarlett wants to spend money on ECONOMY + TECH

However Nerchio attacks constantly and forces Scarlett to spend money on army also

Scarlett’s money is now spread too thin, she can’t afford a lot of army and can’t secure a 3rd base.

Nerchio’s tech is slower but he has a 3rd base over Scarlett. Scarlett’s advantage is the mutas

The mutas are nullified by the mobile ling counters and aggression that force them to stay home - they never get a chance to force the BIG RESPONSE they normally do. She can’t do much about it because they aren’t as mobile as lings, and her lings can’t match nerchio’s, she’s just too far behind in production, upgrades or both.

Questions! ASK NOW with @x5_PiG

G2

Run-through

Analysis

Going straight for ling upgrades
Queen-ling… aggression!?


Summary:

Mutas are indeed powerful, but Nerchio showed that it also matters HOW you get to mutalisks.
Scarlett was teching super fast, but skipping out on army, Nerchio abused this weakness and denied her using a 3rd base in many games
If Scarlett was going for slower, 3-base mutas, off a more solid economy + army. Nerchio might have been forced to tech to hive faster and do less runbys.



On May 24 2016 23:06 Barrin wrote:
I really appreciate your highly analytical style; I find a high concentration of useful information / perspectives.

You're doing great, but you mentioned you could do better. Personally, I prefer quality over quantity. Don't burn out or run out of topics too fast!


Cutting back streaming hours to make sure I keep up with episode prep. Great topic for #9 - not the best execution by myself. Will definitely make sure I give myself plenty of time to prep for all the future eps

Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
breaker1328
Profile Joined March 2016
Canada295 Posts
May 26 2016 05:52 GMT
#26
PiG, I love your dailies. When you get the opportunity to cast you're one of my favorites, props to being the only english language caster that had played BW at Shanghai btw :p, and keep on keeping on. Like I said during your stream, copying Day9 is not the worst idea anyone has ever had and you are very good at it. Keep it up! I'll watch every episode.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 26 2016 08:26 GMT
#27
Time for the daily peeeg after work! I can get used to this.
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
May 26 2016 12:37 GMT
#28
PiG Daily #10 - Fundamentals of Starcraft - most important mechanics, macro and micro tips


Show Notes:
+ Show Spoiler +
Hotkeys - Hotkey Trainer Arcade map
Control Groups
1 hatch/cc/nexi
2-4 Army
5 barracks/gateways (creep queen hotkey for zerg)
6 - factories/starports or Robo/SG (tab between them)
7 - upgrade buildings
8 - special building/secondary upgrades

Adding eggs to your hotkey
Remove select all army key to get used to it
We should always be trying to rely on our own hotkeys rather than select all army because select all army inhibits our ability to split up and counterattack, flank etc.


Ctrl Click and double click
Ctrl click is a bit more reliable especially on moving units


Shift click de-selecting
cloning/scouts/back on gas
Shift Queing up actions
Insane multi-tasking often involves a lot of this - it looks to the observer like they’re everywhere - and sometimes they are but most of the time its nicely timed que’d up actions to hit at the same time as where they’re actively microing.
Camera Hotkeys
5-8 bases + rally pt
For Protoss rally pt = warpin pt

Advanced:

Rapid-fire
Great for corrosive bile, infested terran spam, warping in 5+ gateway units at a time
Control-group Stealing
Should be on by default

Macro

Macro is the art of constantly expanding your economy and building it stronger whilst also Teching, upgrading and spending your money on army. The key rules are:

Constantly build workers
Keep your money low
Spend the money as soon as it comes in so it can be used.
For instance if you invest in more workers, the earlier you get them the more time they get to mine!
Never get supply blocked
SOOO much better to have a big supply gap then to get blocked! Grinds your whole production to a halt Better to lose opportunity cost then freeze everything up

Macro Cycle
You can do small tasks in between, pros constantly bounce between things. However the important part is having one strong, rhythmical cycle:

Zerg
Every 30s
Inject
Produce
Overlords - last few larva on overlords every time - this steadily ramps up so you build 1 overlord/cycle for each base you have

The reason behind always macroing in a set order is that in Starcraft you always have a large number of actions to sustain macro. If you are doing everything in a random order you are guaranteed to have to constantly waste brain power thinking “what do I need to do now?”. So by memorising this order and carrying out your macro like this EVERY game you begin to do it by instinct without needing to think and therefore always covering all your bases. Not only that but the speed you macro at will increase noticeably.

So the goal here is that with every 30s macro cycle (the time it takes for injects to pop) you can go through this order automatically and speedily finish it in 10-15s. This leaves 25-30s for scouting, micro, building tech, and thinking about strategy.

Terran -22s
2xScvs/CC + drop mules
Que units on production
Que depots
From 40 supply (therabouts) you should always have 1 depot builder. That is, an scv constantly building depots. You should always que up another depot each time you return to base
Once you hit full 2-base production (roughly 5-rax + fact/starport) you need to add a second depot builder.
This way even if you are busy microing for a minute depots continue to be built. It also means you don’t need to keep pulling a worker off mining each time to go build depots, it becomes an easier and more habitual action

Protoss -22s
2xProbes/Nexus
Que units on production
Build pylons (1+/mining base)

My base is red on workers, should I stop building them?

Just rally that building to the next base, never stop building workers
Even if it’s red it’s ok. 18 workers per base is just as efficient as 16 workers. Anything up to 20 on each bases minerals is completely fine.
Anything under 16 is very bad!

When to transfer workers?
8:00 - transfer from main leaving 8 workers behind
11:00 - transfer from natural leaving 8 workers behind
We rarely get past the next marker, and always with different 3rd timings based on build so it’s not as set in stone.
Do this at the same time every game so it becomes habit! Especially in the middle and lower leagues I see players being very inconsistent with this. Even GMs often forget in high pressure games because it’s not a consistent habit.

What about when to add tech, production and upgrades?
As a beginner it’s not too important exactly when, as long as you’re building your economy up and spending your money
As you progress you can start to emulate patterns you see in pro play and learn efficient ways to head towards certain goals.

Micro

Attack-move!

Boxing micro
Try to do it with just 2 box + click actions to get used to doing an apm efficient version you can realistically have time to execute in a game
Spreading vs splash damage
Setting up a concave
More surface area
banana/moon
Doesn’t have to be perfect, just have them spread in the general shape and they’ll do the rest

Using Spellcasters

Get used to using 2 army control groups
To get started you can try always just move commanding (right click) your spellcasters on someone in your main army so they automatically follow
But they ALWAYS need their own hotkey
Often you only need to a-move, or spread and a-move your main army
Newer players more often make their army less effective by trying to micro too much
Spellcasters on the other hand need a lot more attention!

So a fight done well will often look like this:

Box click, box click to spread army
A-move
Control spellcasters

Example showing how to use infestors/vipers SLOW AT FIRST

Questions @x5_PiG also last Abathur code giveaway today!

Mineral walking workers
Useful for rush defence

Surrounding enemy workers
Pocket trick
Running away from harm (no pathing blocks so you can escape easier)
Attacking?

I used to copy this build in WoL off a 14/14 opening and had an insane winrate with it lol. I even used it in late 2012 several times off pool-hatch with a fake 3rd hatch cancel - worked a lot before the mothership core

Trick and small things

Shift + hold position queens on ramps
Queuing up attack commands with shift on an scv so your units pursue and resume attacking it after it shifts around the building
Hold position drones to block melee attackers

Summary: We just talked about a LOT of different things.

If you’re using this video to improve, choose 1-2 things. Practice them a bit and try to make them feel very natural before you try more things. Don’t try to learn everything at once! All of the notes will be posted in the TL thread.

Don’t be afraid to hop into a custom map to practice and learn new mechanics. If something’s brand new it’s best to practice it vs an easy AI, or even no opponent so you can focus on it in isolation.

Answer questions

End show!
Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
Kitai
Profile Joined June 2012
United States873 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-27 00:27:50
May 26 2016 23:12 GMT
#29
Hey PiG, just wanted express my gratitude for filling the void that was left when Day[9] stopped doing dailies. Watching these has helped fuel my desire to try laddering again. As an idea for a later daily, I'd like to learn some tips about how to build a better base. Building placement for the various races isn't talked about in depth very often, but when done effectively, players can use techniques to efficiently defend against harassment, hide tech, and minimize vulnerabilities without compromising their builds.

Once again, thanks so much for all the hard work.
"You know, I don't care if soO got 100 second places in a row. Anyone who doesn't think that he's going to win blizzcon watching this series is a fool" - Artosis, Blizzcon 2014 soO vs TaeJa
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-27 04:07:34
May 27 2016 04:06 GMT
#30
PiG Daily #11 - The hidden advantages of aggression - Has vs Happy WCS Spring Championship -- Part 1

"Right now we have Happy playing Trump-style, he's very scared of these mexistalkers..." - couldn't find a really poignant quote for this one, so I guess that'll do

I had some mic issues so this episode is cut into 2 parts:

Part 1


Part 2



Show Notes
+ Show Spoiler +
PvT of Has vs Happy

Has vs Happy frozen temple
Aggression sees Happy’s crazily safe tech-rush build
Keeps up the pressure despite the start going horribly (losing mocore)
Goes FULL economy behind it
In this case it’s an exaggerated example of what we’ve been talking about. Obviously Happy’s paranoid because it’s Has, but we see this same sort of over-defensiveness from the defender, and greed behind the aggression all the time!

Intro

Before looking at the less obvious features of aggression, let’s talk about the basics. At its core Starcraft is an economy game, and that’s the main thing we always look at. If someone is aggressive, it means they invest less in economy, and more in army in order to try and damage or kill their opponent. Therefore if they don’t do a certain amount of damage, they’re behind, and the attack has failed.

This is definitely the MAIN part of understanding aggression.
However we rarely go deeper. Lots of situations where players first attack or 2 doesn’t achieve anything, and they go on to win with their transitions.

I remember last years wcs when I 9-pooled Targa 3 times in a ZvZ each time vs 15pool. He always had textbook defence, and yet I won the series 2-1 with macro transitions that ended in very even games. On a regular basis we see Has’s aggression defended only to break through on the 2nd or 3rd tech-switch.

So how when an attack doesn’t work, does the player who is so clearly behind in economy leverage himself back into the game? To understand this we need to look at the hidden advantages of aggression. The best way to do this is to look at games where the initial attack doesn’t achieve its goal - but the player still finds that way to win!






The first step to benefiting from these hidden advantages is not overcommitting
Learning to recognise when the attack isn’t going well and changing up the style of attack/pressure, not just funneling units up a ramp to their death
Sure you’ve attacked and didn’t do damage, so you’re behind in economy.
But if you preserve a lot of your units then you can still scout and
The threat is still there! They’re afraid to move out incase you’re still reinforcing




Scouting info - force them to show their unit composition
Infer from that what their build is
Usually can figure out everything that’s happening if the pressure is great enough
Pressure them so much they don’t have time to scout and are afraid of walking out into a huge allin
Leads to several consequences:

Don’t have time to think about scouting/transition
Are unsure if you’re still going all-in or committing to economy
This means you can often cut corners behind the aggression and beeline directly to a tech and economy that you can’t defend - but they don’t realise they can push.
Usually by the time they do push the corner cutting/greedy transition has paid off


Force them into a certain reaction whilst you’re already going into the best counter to that reaction

Space
We touched on the idea of opening up space and having vision
It’s also you’re completely safe due to gearing up for your own attack - you can be surprised by attacks and you will defend cos you already have so many units

Questions to @x5_PiG

Strength and Weakness:

Usually the defender fails to weigh up and fully understand what the aggressor is capable of
However if they do they can almost always find a sharp counter-timing to stop you from cutting corners and getting ahead
Example: STOP AT JUST 2 TANKS and get faster stim
Especially if it’s a brand new type of aggression it’s incredibly hard to do the mental calculations on what could be coming behind it - that’s why only the very best of the best pro players feel impervious to aggressive and cheesy play


We talked about how players tend to mis-read aggression unless they are the very best or have experience dealing with it. But even if they have a good grasp of the situation and what’s possible, The aggressor is usually still more familiar with the situation. He chose to do this build and force the game down this path, he’s practiced it many many times and has learnt devious and clever things to do from here. (spreading creep back, recognise when to rush mutas, Has going phenix after oracle to keep the pressure up and force the T to stay at home
Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 27 2016 04:28 GMT
#31
I really liked the one with the mechanics! I have to start using steal hotkey more. Think I do all the other things though... bad at splitting of course, but I try.

Still stuck in gold, but I probably just have to play more.
Hasuu
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada178 Posts
May 28 2016 00:38 GMT
#32
Pig, you are a rock star. Keep up the great work. These videos are going to go so far for a lot of prospects.
MoosyDoosy
Profile Joined November 2014
United States4519 Posts
May 28 2016 01:26 GMT
#33
These actually really help PiG. And your stream is hella entertaining when I do manage to catch you streaming.

: ]
"Just a second too late rsoultin :D" - My 4k Guardian post
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-28 02:27:51
May 28 2016 02:05 GMT
#34
--- Nuked ---
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 28 2016 05:08 GMT
#35
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?
TokO
Profile Joined July 2011
Norway577 Posts
May 28 2016 11:44 GMT
#36
On May 28 2016 14:08 Cascade wrote:
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?


I think one can answer this answer this question in many different layers. One way to look at it is that every situation, every set-up to a game seems to suggest a course of action that will lead to victory for either player. We, the spectator saw the situation, and could identify a course of action, which no doubt would have been a good one for the Terran. Happy. on the other hand, has to consider a multitude of scenarios. Given that a scan is also a decision that forgoes economic benefit, imagine the situation that Happy does make a scan, or several scans. There are many questions that can be raised as to where to scan, how many scans to use to come to the conclusion of Has' greed, etc.. But my point is, that there is a large range of situations that Happy could discover where his chance of winning is a lot slimmer as a result of investing those scans. Facing that decision making problem, he decided to do what he did.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
May 28 2016 12:54 GMT
#37
On May 28 2016 20:44 TokO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2016 14:08 Cascade wrote:
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?


I think one can answer this answer this question in many different layers. One way to look at it is that every situation, every set-up to a game seems to suggest a course of action that will lead to victory for either player. We, the spectator saw the situation, and could identify a course of action, which no doubt would have been a good one for the Terran. Happy. on the other hand, has to consider a multitude of scenarios. Given that a scan is also a decision that forgoes economic benefit, imagine the situation that Happy does make a scan, or several scans. There are many questions that can be raised as to where to scan, how many scans to use to come to the conclusion of Has' greed, etc.. But my point is, that there is a large range of situations that Happy could discover where his chance of winning is a lot slimmer as a result of investing those scans. Facing that decision making problem, he decided to do what he did.

Yeah, that's true. There are a lot of possibilities. But still, Has mainly had the two options of doing all-in round 2, or macro up. I think Happy was aware of that. There must be a good timing to for example scan the natural and check saturation to tell the two apart, and act accordingly. Surely that must be worth a scan? But yeah, maybe I am oversimplifying things here.
craz3d
Profile Joined August 2005
Bulgaria856 Posts
May 28 2016 14:51 GMT
#38
I think Happy assumed Has would throw the kitchen sink at him. God knows how many times I've lost games after taking my foot off the pedal after defending an all-in, only to lose to the next attack. He probably glanced up at his mins after Has's attack and saw something low, so he dropped a bunch of mules.
Hello World!
TokO
Profile Joined July 2011
Norway577 Posts
May 28 2016 20:42 GMT
#39
On May 28 2016 21:54 Cascade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2016 20:44 TokO wrote:
On May 28 2016 14:08 Cascade wrote:
As I see the failed all-in, is that if you manage to deny scout, you get a second chance through the "guess what I'm doing" mini-game. You can either gear up for round 2 of your all-in, or you can macro up super greedy. If your opponent prepares for the wrong one, you are in the game again, potentially even with an advantage.

In the episode, it seems like the terran prepared for round 2, while the toss was macroing up. Equally, had the toss prepared a second round, and the terran had started moving out to put on pressure, toss could have run it over.

With scans though, I don't see why terran would have to play that guessing game... Why didn't he just scan, identify that toss is being greedy, and go kill him?


I think one can answer this answer this question in many different layers. One way to look at it is that every situation, every set-up to a game seems to suggest a course of action that will lead to victory for either player. We, the spectator saw the situation, and could identify a course of action, which no doubt would have been a good one for the Terran. Happy. on the other hand, has to consider a multitude of scenarios. Given that a scan is also a decision that forgoes economic benefit, imagine the situation that Happy does make a scan, or several scans. There are many questions that can be raised as to where to scan, how many scans to use to come to the conclusion of Has' greed, etc.. But my point is, that there is a large range of situations that Happy could discover where his chance of winning is a lot slimmer as a result of investing those scans. Facing that decision making problem, he decided to do what he did.

Yeah, that's true. There are a lot of possibilities. But still, Has mainly had the two options of doing all-in round 2, or macro up. I think Happy was aware of that. There must be a good timing to for example scan the natural and check saturation to tell the two apart, and act accordingly. Surely that must be worth a scan? But yeah, maybe I am oversimplifying things here.


It was not my intention to defend Happy's decisions, I'm just saying that it's a bit more complicated than being able to draw a conclusion from a single scan. For one, a no gas natural has traditionally been a sure sign of all-in. But Has did a mineral heavy greedy build. Scouting the fourth or the third would have been more indicative of greed. But either way, you have very little information on the degree of tech associated with Has' transition. Is it a 4 gas safe 3-base? Is it 2 gas 3-base? Happy sure as hell didn't expect 2 gas 4-base.

There is some knowledge asymmetries in this situation as Has is likely to have a greater understanding of the circumstances around this specific scenario, compared to Happy. In that sense, it is expected that Happy will make less ideal decisions, compared to those of Has.
PiGStarcraft
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia987 Posts
May 29 2016 01:51 GMT
#40
Happy actually did drop 2 scans on the natural - and considering the first saw it down and the second saw some decent number of probes on it (but no gas) Happy definitely could have stopped at just 3 tanks rather than a whole 5. That adjustment would have really helped him out imo. But it is still relatively limited information - he never knew about the 3rd and 4th nexus, he didn't get any info on the tech or production - so I can see why Happy overcommited so much to defence so early on.
Progamerwww.twitch.tv/x5_pig | pigrandom88@gmail.com | @x5_PiG | www.facebook.com/pigSC2
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 4
Clem vs ClassicLIVE!
SHIN vs Cure
Tasteless793
Crank 758
ComeBackTV 436
Rex60
IntoTheiNu 52
3DClanTV 49
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 793
Crank 758
Rex 60
MindelVK 27
IndyStarCraft 26
EmSc Tv 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 8525
Calm 4586
Rain 2860
Horang2 2063
Bisu 952
Hyuk 843
Jaedong 541
Leta 258
Shuttle 209
Soma 179
[ Show more ]
PianO 163
ToSsGirL 142
TY 132
EffOrt 130
ZerO 103
Killer 64
Hyun 60
Rush 60
Last 51
JulyZerg 42
HiyA 27
zelot 25
JYJ21
Movie 20
Free 19
NaDa 9
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Sacsri 6
ivOry 4
Dota 2
XaKoH 704
XcaliburYe685
Fuzer 248
League of Legends
singsing510
JimRising 285
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1977
x6flipin212
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor268
Other Games
Happy508
crisheroes253
Pyrionflax224
ZerO(Twitch)25
Organizations
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 17
EmSc2Tv 17
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH319
• LUISG 27
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2302
Upcoming Events
FEL
1h 44m
WardiTV European League
1h 44m
BSL: ProLeague
7h 44m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 23h
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.