EPT[Movie] The Hobbit Trilogy - Page 25
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
havox_
Germany442 Posts
| ||
|
Feartheguru
Canada1334 Posts
On December 15 2012 21:49 corumjhaelen wrote: It's not an opinion. There are plenty of factual reasons why one is superior to another. Subjectivity is only a little bit of the answer. Let's hear some examples of factual reasons why one movie is superior to another. | ||
|
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
On December 15 2012 22:02 Feartheguru wrote: Let's hear some examples of factual reasons why one movie is superior to another. The wider array of technique used, their adequation with the motivation of the directors, the subject of the movie and how it was treated, the influence and impact of the work in subsequent movies etc etc. It's not because people on tl keep it to "I liked it because I thought the story was cool" that that's all their is to movie making. Finally, I'm pretty sure it's not the place to argue in favor or aginst"post-modernist" bullshit. So I'll call off the arguments here, unless I go watch The Hobbit I guess. | ||
|
kukarachaa
United States284 Posts
1) it was too long. 2) in a lot of the fight scenes camera was moving around way too fast and I couldn't tell what was going on 3) the first time goblin king opened his mouth and spoke in perfect English was really weird 4) troll scene felt retarded, so was the stone giants one 5) the whole movie felt really disconnected, there was no flow to it, | ||
|
Bam Lee
2336 Posts
| ||
|
zimms
Austria561 Posts
| ||
|
FeUerFlieGe
United States1193 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17870 Posts
On December 15 2012 21:59 havox_ wrote: to be honest: i thought the movie was really boring... ok, yes, it was part 1 of 3. but if that means that there has to be a 3 hour movie in which nothing happens at all... then i have to disagree with splitting it up this much. 1st part of LotR was really boring too. | ||
|
schimmetje
Netherlands1104 Posts
Not if you were a fan of the source material, it was set up very much true to the original. The Hobbit on the other hand could probably be done by now. Of course, Jackson could expand on the story in a great way (which'd be really hard however, ask Lucas how well those kind of things work out), but right now that's really neither here nor there. Here's to hoping though. | ||
|
Markwerf
Netherlands3728 Posts
1st part of LotR is the best I think, 2nd is decent but just one big battle and 3rd one is a bunch of crap that should have lasted one hour shorter. Kind of what I expected though considering the book is boring towards the end too. | ||
|
KapsyL
Sweden704 Posts
gollum is funny | ||
|
OKMarius
Norway469 Posts
On December 15 2012 23:23 Markwerf wrote: 1st part of LotR is the best I think, 2nd is decent but just one big battle and 3rd one is a bunch of crap that should have lasted one hour shorter. Kind of what I expected though considering the book is boring towards the end too. Agreed. Fellowship of the Ring is by far the best Tolkien movie. The Hobbit movie struggles because it tries to mimic it, but fails short because there is much less at stake here. The Hobbit would be much better if they actually stayed true to the book, and wasn't too obsessed with making sense in the LOTR universe PJ created. The movie should have been from Bilbo's perspective at all times, because The Hobbit is about The Hobbit. It would also have been better if they removed all those "cheap thrills" scenes. | ||
|
Slakkoo
Sweden1119 Posts
| ||
|
SpikeStarcraft
Germany2095 Posts
... i thought we could all be happy here and discuss how awesome the movie was... | ||
|
TerransHill
Germany572 Posts
1) It was to long. The book has 300-400 pages and gets splitted into 3 movies with 170 min length. Feels way to streched sometimes. 2) Its to silly and childish. I know that The Hobbit is somewhat for children but the movie goes to far sometimes. I dont remember the orcs being that silly in the book and I also dont remember that their leader is a fat jabba the hutt troll with double chin. The orcs are not menacing and evil like in LotR. They are cutified and u almost feel sorry for them lol. | ||
|
Tennet
United States1458 Posts
| ||
|
TheUnderking
Canada202 Posts
| ||
|
Zera474
Austria2 Posts
Peter Jackson made a really good job creating the story, it was different from the book because he could not created the evil Orc boss without telling the storys of the dwarves how they found their new home the blue mountains etc etc... The only thing what felt really weird were the stone giants and the very long beginning in the shire think 45minutes but it was nearly the same in lotr. It was also a whole lot action for only the first part of the movie much more then u would think. I really dont understand why many people didnt liked the movie because it was more funny and had more action then the FIRST part of lotr. The story was also really nice and ian mckellen und martin freeman played so good! | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
On December 16 2012 00:14 Tennet wrote: To those complaining about Gandalf, he's a wizard he arrives precisely when he means to. hahahah, xDD. I'll go watch it tomorrow, will post my thoughts after. | ||
|
dense12
United States40 Posts
| ||
| ||
