EPT[Minor] Dota Pit S7 - Championship Sunday - Page 6
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On April 29 2019 05:07 Moobutt wrote: If Doom gets off on Rubick, NiP win fights. If not, they lose. edit: No buy back Rubick is bad. Doom Rubick and Win game. Wow, what a late game. Also, Xinq tournament MVP. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51485 Posts
 | ||
|
plasmidghost
Belgium16168 Posts
| ||
|
Danzo
2820 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
|
Yurie
11836 Posts
| ||
|
Moobutt
United States1996 Posts
On April 29 2019 05:09 Taf the Ghost wrote: Doom Rubick and Win game. Wow, what a late game. Also, Xinq tournament MVP. Yeah Xinq's Rubick is definitely the story of that last game | ||
|
Rufus Dupres
Germany1071 Posts
| ||
|
Yurie
11836 Posts
On April 29 2019 05:14 Rufus Dupres wrote: What a series... intense and packed with a lot of action. Well deserved for NiP considering their performance during the playoffs. Looks like ppd found the right words after that wonky group stage. Saw some people suggest that NiP used the group stage as a scrimming session. Testing out different strats since all teams enter upper bracket after group stage. | ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On April 29 2019 05:26 Yurie wrote: Saw some people suggest that NiP used the group stage as a scrimming session. Testing out different strats since all teams enter upper bracket after group stage. There was a bit of that, but NiP also lost two both series that they did off some pretty bad misplays. They looked a lot better in the Bracket than the Groups, but there was matches like vs Gambit G2 where they went offlane Lion. Which worked right until the moment it didn't. (Lion is too squishy for pos 3 going into the Midgame. See what 33 did with Doom all of the time.) | ||
|
VGhost
United States3613 Posts
On April 28 2019 21:05 Taf the Ghost wrote: Format was different, but for a tournament where really only first truly matters, this was a decent way to do it. Upper bracket winner will win over 60% of the time, so the lower bracket Bo1s gives everyone a chance without dragging things out. ... How badly did Alliance's laning phase go in game 1? I don't quite get how that draft died so horribly. If you told anybody the tournament finished 1. NiP 2. EHOME 3.Alliance nobody would be surprised, but EHOME especially really should have had to start with some kind of disadvantage after that disaster of a group stage to be fair. Basically groups didn't matter. Re. the game Tide got dumpstered, other two lanes were even-ish. Advantage EHOME and the Alch wasn't enough. | ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On April 29 2019 07:05 VGhost wrote: If you told anybody the tournament finished 1. NiP 2. EHOME 3.Alliance nobody would be surprised, but EHOME especially really should have had to start with some kind of disadvantage after that disaster of a group stage to be fair. Basically groups didn't matter. Re. the game Tide got dumpstered, other two lanes were even-ish. Advantage EHOME and the Alch wasn't enough. Thanks for the report on the match. Result actually isn't too surprising, Majestic over-performed, Ehome took the place RNG probably should have had. How things got there was a little different. Groups were actually pretty interesting. I like the Bo3 Round Robin phase and would love to see it used more. I also actually liked the Bo1s in the lower bracket, though I could have gone for either Lower Bracket Round 3 or Round 2 going to Bo3. | ||
| ||
