On April 04 2018 07:19 Uranium wrote: Top 8 is now 2 CN, 2 SEA, 2 NA, 1 EU, 1 CIS which is pretty hype
Pretty nice spread this tournament. That's going to change rapidly after tomorrow, but it's great to see for now.
The interesting secondary story to this tournament is DPC points. The lower half of the current Bracket is really, really interesting. Getting to Winner's Final is a locked 675 DPC points, and all 4 teams in the lower half could really use those points.
VG would jump to 2835, comfortably in 4th, and likely locked into for TI. Mineski jumps to 1575, which vaults them to 7th (pending EG's outcome). Getting to at least 2nd would put them at 2250, 4th place (pending other results) and extremely unlikely to be dropped from the top 8. Optic just needs points, but they'd be best served by getting at least 2nd. TNC is in the same situation as Optic, though they have 270 points already. TNC isn't locked in for any other LANs right now, so they really need to see if they can ride this one for big points.
LGD also needs points, but I see it very unlikely they get through the winner of TL/VP or even passed EG. (However, they have a few more LANs coming up that they're going to, so they have space to score more points.)
Related to that, with all but the last two Major LAN participants locked in, I want to say it's mathematically impossible for TL & Secret to be knocked out of the Top 8. Unless there are more LANs we don't know about. We'll discuss that more after DAC is over.
On April 04 2018 11:17 babysimba wrote: EG draft too scary this game. Capable of winning 3 lanes, can push fast, can scale into late game as well with stuns and bh.
Enigma can shutdown TB in the late-game, which means LGD has to end this before it gets too late.
This would be a good game for TB meta 300 range talent to take out enigma outside of BH's range. LGD has good chance this game. They have a clock who can forcefully initiate on enigma.
I haven't watched much dota since TI. Jack seems to have become a better analyst than any of the others since, damn. It's rare that listening to someone on a panel is actually a pleasure.
On April 04 2018 12:24 Orome wrote: I haven't watched much dota since TI. Jack seems to have become a better analyst than any of the others since, damn. It's rare that listening to someone on a panel is actually a pleasure.
i like kyle, he is like the only one with any passion besides hype casters
On April 04 2018 12:24 Orome wrote: I haven't watched much dota since TI. Jack seems to have become a better analyst than any of the others since, damn. It's rare that listening to someone on a panel is actually a pleasure.
i like kyle, he is like the only one with any passion besides hype casters
I concur, I was a big kyle hater when he was a player but he is a lovely analyst
On April 04 2018 12:24 Orome wrote: I haven't watched much dota since TI. Jack seems to have become a better analyst than any of the others since, damn. It's rare that listening to someone on a panel is actually a pleasure.
i like kyle, he is like the only one with any passion besides hype casters
Haven't gotten to listen to him longer than 10 minutes, but I can easily imagine that. Active pros are usually fun to listen to.
On April 04 2018 12:27 babysimba wrote: LGD seems to draft against EG's playstyle more than their heroes.
Basically EG's tendency to split up across the map more.
as long as eg focus the od i think they have this
when there is a bh in the game the team with the better teamfight wins, eg should get a lead until the hg push, hg could be a pain, but think they chose bat so they can pull someone out
On April 04 2018 12:24 Orome wrote: I haven't watched much dota since TI. Jack seems to have become a better analyst than any of the others since, damn. It's rare that listening to someone on a panel is actually a pleasure.
i like kyle, he is like the only one with any passion besides hype casters
I concur, I was a big kyle hater when he was a player but he is a lovely analyst
he should be a real good analyst considering he's previously a captain of a proteam and he has relatively good communication skills
No heroes should have so much damage on top of that many CC spells. The last time a hero (earth spirit) has that, he got nerfed in a billion number of patches consecutively
I was wondering how the fuck LGD got ageis when nobody is killing roshan lol. Rhasta's snakes took him down all alone with some help of luna ult damage.
On April 04 2018 13:06 Orome wrote: did sumail lasso anything in the rosh fight?
Yeah, Underlord that got Astraled.
On April 04 2018 13:06 babysimba wrote: I was wondering how the fuck LGD got ageis when nobody is killing roshan lol. Rhasta's snakes took him down all alone with some help of luna ult damage.
Actually Gyro Flak Cannon and Luna's bounces did the most damage to the Roshan in the end from what I could tell, wards couldn't take him from 1/3 to 0 in like 5 seconds.
On April 04 2018 13:08 Terrorbladder wrote: From 19-12 to lose 23-23, nice throw TrashTZ
hardly rtz's fault this time .. he did as well as he possibly could but he's still a luna
the rest didn't look so well fear dk jumping in an awkward position, suma1l catching somebody but in a awful position, misery not really stopping SS from doing shit
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
What does Optic have to do with EG's failures? It's a bit wrong to compare Optic to a team that's been playing musical chairs with their lineup all season.
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
hold up, optic has yet to play, and neither NA team is out of the tournament just yet. don't be trashing my bois in green just yet
Tbh i don't have much hope with optic. You can only do so much with subpar core players. Maybe they can fluke this tournament but they'll have a hard time maintaining their form for sure.
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
hold up, optic has yet to play, and neither NA team is out of the tournament just yet. don't be trashing my bois in green just yet
Tbh i don't have much hope with optic. You can only do so much with subpar core players. Maybe they can fluke this tournament but they'll have a hard time maintaining their form for sure.
well, there is this crazy thing called improving. I think 33 has tons of potential. Pajkatt is fine. Ccnc though...
So, Liquid vs EG bo1...
I look forward to the wailing and gnashing of teeth either way.
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
hold up, optic has yet to play, and neither NA team is out of the tournament just yet. don't be trashing my bois in green just yet
Tbh i don't have much hope with optic. You can only do so much with subpar core players. Maybe they can fluke this tournament but they'll have a hard time maintaining their form for sure.
What's your opinion on 'personalities' praising Pajkatt non stop?
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
hold up, optic has yet to play, and neither NA team is out of the tournament just yet. don't be trashing my bois in green just yet
Tbh i don't have much hope with optic. You can only do so much with subpar core players. Maybe they can fluke this tournament but they'll have a hard time maintaining their form for sure.
What's your opinion on 'personalities' praising Pajkatt non stop?
Not gonna lie he makes little overextensions from what i've seen(he also makes less plays so there's that he's not a very risky player but the tradeoff is that he looks stable and safe). So i guess it's partly true ? But it could also be that he's a peer to them
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
hold up, optic has yet to play, and neither NA team is out of the tournament just yet. don't be trashing my bois in green just yet
Tbh i don't have much hope with optic. You can only do so much with subpar core players. Maybe they can fluke this tournament but they'll have a hard time maintaining their form for sure.
What's your opinion on 'personalities' praising Pajkatt non stop?
Not gonna lie he makes little overextensions from what i've seen(he also makes less plays so there's that he's not a very risky player but the tradeoff is that he looks stable and safe). So i guess it's partly true ? But it could also be that he's a peer to them
It's hard to criticize people heaping praise on pajkatt because 1. he is that careful player and 2. optic's style revolves around feeding him everything. The praise is definitely overblown as far as I'm concerned
On April 04 2018 13:10 apes wrote: na should just book tickets home after the group stages/bo1s end lol
hold up, optic has yet to play, and neither NA team is out of the tournament just yet. don't be trashing my bois in green just yet
Tbh i don't have much hope with optic. You can only do so much with subpar core players. Maybe they can fluke this tournament but they'll have a hard time maintaining their form for sure.
well, there is this crazy thing called improving. I think 33 has tons of potential. Pajkatt is fine. Ccnc though...
Yeah pajkatt is fine but still not sold with 33. Ccnc is just weird and inconsistent though.
On April 04 2018 13:30 Steelavocado wrote: edit: overreaction. Unfortunate chinese crowd (VERY GENERALLY SPEAKING) is biased vs chinese teams and dips out if they get knocked out.
Liquid's lineup is indeed a bit weird. They can't really kill people with Furion coming in, they constantly need multiple people to get any core kills. Though it's not easy at this point for VP to engage into TL either so it's possible TL somehow wins some fights and gets to a point where they have Orchid+Shadowbalde on Furion and then they can do something
Curious to see how strong the TL ball is when they march down a lane. Not sure if VP will be able to stop them
VP cores are pretty useless against Liquid's heroes in engagements at this point. Liquid doesn't have much catch but they don't need it if VP walks into them
Pretty weird how VP isn't respecting Liquid's strategy. It feels like they're playing way too passive and expecting to win the same way they did against VGJ.T.
Liquid's lineup can win VP's in late game as long as they choke their farm out and be ahead in items. They would also try to take fights that they outnumber VP, with the help of furion's map control.
Liquid's furion playstyle didn't change much from TI7 no matter who is playing him.
VP has an incredibly hard time killing anyone from TL. The Chen is completely useless and Liquid has great tools to scout the SK initiation so VP doesn't get any sort of combo off
Honestly it feels like VP threw away this game. They made no offensive moves and Rodjer dicked around on bottom lane farming his Aghs. He should've bought Pipe instead.
I think this is simply Liquid has played against VP so much that when they play their cookie-cutter line up they know how to play against it. Other teams just do not have this experience yet.
On April 04 2018 14:18 bLzPostman wrote: I think this is simply Liquid has played against VP so much that when they play their cookie-cutter line up they know how to play against it. Other teams just do not have this experience yet.
As a rebuttal, Liquid's draft is very linear and easy to see coming. Why VP didn't ban Underlord in the second phase is a mystery.
On April 04 2018 14:18 bLzPostman wrote: I think this is simply Liquid has played against VP so much that when they play their cookie-cutter line up they know how to play against it. Other teams just do not have this experience yet.
Nah VP played against a draft like that no problem. They really just played complacent as shit. Confident they'd outfarm and outscale liquid and just not contest against the pushing lineup
On April 04 2018 14:18 bLzPostman wrote: I think this is simply Liquid has played against VP so much that when they play their cookie-cutter line up they know how to play against it. Other teams just do not have this experience yet.
Nah VP played against a draft like that. They really just played complacent as shit. Confident they'd outfarm and outscale liquid and just not contest against the pushing lineup
I think they knew what liquid wants to do and just farmed as they should , that mid meed train cost them too much.
On April 04 2018 14:18 bLzPostman wrote: I think this is simply Liquid has played against VP so much that when they play their cookie-cutter line up they know how to play against it. Other teams just do not have this experience yet.
As a rebuttal, Liquid's draft is very linear and easy to see coming. Why VP didn't ban Underlord in the second phase is a mystery.
Yeah that was strange for me as well.
Very nice hold by VP.
EDIT: Hood on Naix, not something you see every day. :D
On April 04 2018 14:18 bLzPostman wrote: I think this is simply Liquid has played against VP so much that when they play their cookie-cutter line up they know how to play against it. Other teams just do not have this experience yet.
As a rebuttal, Liquid's draft is very linear and easy to see coming. Why VP didn't ban Underlord in the second phase is a mystery.
VP was expecting a carry pick as last pick, and going Underlord is somewhat allinnish for TL.
I think in general this shows a difference between these two teams. VP would never play a lineup like this I think. Their lineups are somewhat "standard" drafts quite often with good lanes, good amounts of catch, multiple sources of initiation, etc. Their lineups generally allow them to do things throughout the game and outplay the enemy. But there are lineups such as this one or some KotL timing pushes which have an incredibly strong 5 man timing even if they lack in other areas.
You can't expect a team to go on aggression just because you want them to. VP didn't win the lanes enough with a chen lineup to start the deathball momentum going. Instead, Liquid got control of the tempo and kept lanes shoved in. Liquid was obviously only going to take fights that they outnumbered VP and were confident in.
This tournament is the first time Liquid keeps giving GH Tusk in a long time, even when he's been really strong for a long time now, they didn't give GH Tusk. Now they're giving him more Tusks and holy shit, he's good.
On April 04 2018 14:44 bluzi wrote: Well , the VP draft was not bad but liquid just hit their now standard 5 man 18 min mid rax push , lets see if VP just bans furion next or not.
I don't think it matters if liquid gets NP but rather whether VP will play a slow game like last game and not respond to liquid giving all the advantages again
On April 04 2018 14:44 uthgard wrote: nvm it's over, few mistakes vp made ended up costing them the game. and lol rodjer chen
People that think Rodjer's Chen was bad don't really understand how impactful he was in this game. All the fights that VP took were possible because 2 lanes that they have lost were actually pushed with 2 Dragons most of the time.
Yeah, he got caught bunch of times, but Liquid had the map control and Rodjer had to be out of the base to farm Aghs or take Creeps, if you are sitting idle in base just to not get caught, then you lost the game already. He also gave important info because it is much better for him to get caught than any of their 3 cores.
On April 04 2018 14:44 bluzi wrote: Well , the VP draft was not bad but liquid just hit their now standard 5 man 18 min mid rax push , lets see if VP just bans furion next or not.
I don't think it matters if liquid gets NP but rather whether VP will play a slow game like last game and not respond to liquid giving all the advantages again
I think its impossible to fight liquid 5 man lineup early with what VP had , they had a disruptor which is not what you want in a passive lineup , so once Liquid committed to the Furion #1 and not #5 (which they run as well) they went with the lets outfarm and outfight them which was a good idea if they didnt feed mid with nonoe after losing the LS which cost them mid rax and bot. you could see the idea of prolonging the game that even with 2 rax down they were still winning the team fights , liquid are amazing at capitalizing on mistakes and putting a TON of pressure when they run those push strats and to be honest this looks like their only winning formula lately (of course not the only one , but by far their most successful)so i don`t think they want to deviate from it unless they have too.
Lets see if VP let them try the 5 man again with UL and the likes or they want to play a more normal game of Dota.
I'm also excited to see PPD kick some ass again. The TI7 panelists may have been garbage at entertaining folks but they seem to be pretty okay at this DOTA game.
On April 04 2018 15:12 goody153 wrote: VP playing a single core slow scaling lineup vs a snowbally sieging lineup by liquid
liquid takes this series .. probably good news cause mineski vs optic seems more exciting
the naga idea is intersting as early push means no BKB so they can reset the fight and focus whoever they want , lets see if it works out or not.
they have a solo damage which is the TB if they can position him properly per fight(or he doesn't get focused) maybe the sleep will help but VP never seem to be a naga team
i still feel like liquid will win this .. it's not the standard dual-core that VP normally does
14-4 vs a pushing lineup and they still lose , damn liquid meta is CRAZY strong right now , win laning stage roll game , lose laning stage (kill wise as LD still farmed) still win .
On April 04 2018 15:32 bluzi wrote: 14-4 vs a pushing lineup and they still lose , damn liquid meta is CRAZY strong right now , win laning stage roll game , lose laning stage (kill wise as LD still farmed) still win .
this is dealable
VP just didn't draft to deal with it (also timber later pick rocks)
In both games Liquid has managed to draft in a way where it's hard for VP to move out and kill people in small groups. In both games VP basically needs their entire team to get a single kill unless it's a lone AA or something
On April 04 2018 15:52 juuto wrote: Knew Liquid was going to do it and now I'm hoping for great results from Optic.
I'm hoping not. I want either mineski/LGD/TNC to get good results this major so that navi gets kicked out from the free invite cause they are the only one who is really weak from the top 8
On April 04 2018 15:44 maze. wrote: Radiant is now 10-2 during the main event.
I'm gonna make a guess. It's how the camera works right ? It's much harder to initiate from above than below
Read a reddit thread about Radiant vs Dire few weeks ago, like all of the heroes have ~4-5% higher win rate when played on Radiant side, it is worrying.
On April 04 2018 15:44 maze. wrote: Radiant is now 10-2 during the main event.
I'm gonna make a guess. It's how the camera works right ? It's much harder to initiate from above than below
Read a reddit thread about Radiant vs Dire few weeks ago, like all of the heroes have ~4-5% higher win rate when played on Radiant side, it is worrying.
I'm curious why did most heroes have higher winrate ? I thought dire's jungle area especially the offlane jungle is much better than the radiant. Does radiant initiation angle on rosh make it easier for radiant ?
Or is it much easier to push as radiant than dire ?
On April 04 2018 15:52 juuto wrote: Knew Liquid was going to do it and now I'm hoping for great results from Optic.
I'm hoping not. I want either mineski/LGD/TNC to get good results this major so that navi gets kicked out from the free invite cause they are the only one who is really weak from the top 8
I want TI invites to be of those deserving
even if they're kicked, there's still high chance they'll be in TI due to CIS qualifier but its better just Navi rather than Navi + random CIS team
On April 04 2018 15:52 juuto wrote: Knew Liquid was going to do it and now I'm hoping for great results from Optic.
I'm hoping not. I want either mineski/LGD/TNC to get good results this major so that navi gets kicked out from the free invite cause they are the only one who is really weak from the top 8
I want TI invites to be of those deserving
Na'Vi has no chance of holding onto that spot without more points.
On April 04 2018 15:52 juuto wrote: Knew Liquid was going to do it and now I'm hoping for great results from Optic.
I'm hoping not. I want either mineski/LGD/TNC to get good results this major so that navi gets kicked out from the free invite cause they are the only one who is really weak from the top 8
I want TI invites to be of those deserving
Na'vi being kicked out is an inevitability and I would love for NA to have more teams in the running for TI invite. I just feel like even if EG gets enough points for an invite, it'll be TI7 all over again. They can accomplish things every now and then but I have no faith in them at TI.
Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
On April 04 2018 16:07 nothingmuch wrote: Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
I mean, it...shouldn't be EG vs VP. Lower brackets are usually A vs D and B vs C (or A vs C and B vs D, whichever).
Did someone mess up with Liquipedia, or is that how they're actually seeding the lower bracket?
I still think rodjer on chen was a waste. yea he did what literally any chen players are expected to do but it's clear liquid know well how to deal with it
On April 04 2018 16:07 nothingmuch wrote: Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
I mean, it...shouldn't be EG vs VP. Lower brackets are usually A vs D and B vs C (or A vs C and B vs D, whichever).
Did someone mess up with Liquipedia, or is that how they're actually seeding the lower bracket?
EG should face VP. It's only in R2 LB they face an opponent from the other half of the bracket, so they don't meet LGD or Liquid again.
On April 04 2018 16:07 nothingmuch wrote: Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
I mean, it...shouldn't be EG vs VP. Lower brackets are usually A vs D and B vs C (or A vs C and B vs D, whichever).
Did someone mess up with Liquipedia, or is that how they're actually seeding the lower bracket?
idk if it's how dac actually does it, but it's pretty usual, ti does it too. the switch happens after the semis (so loser of lgd vp drops to the lower part of the lb)
On April 04 2018 16:07 nothingmuch wrote: Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
Personally I just like the group stage format because each team plays multiple different teams instead of just a few. For me it doesn't have much to do with the format somehow being better of guaranteeing some result. In almost every group stage there is some sort of an "upset" anyway and the bracket ends up having a really good matchup early on that people wouldn't have predicted before the event started.
On April 04 2018 16:07 nothingmuch wrote: Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
I mean, it...shouldn't be EG vs VP. Lower brackets are usually A vs D and B vs C (or A vs C and B vs D, whichever).
Did someone mess up with Liquipedia, or is that how they're actually seeding the lower bracket?
I don't think there's anything wrong. The side you drop into switches in the WB semis so you don't face the same team twice. Doing the first round like this is fine.
Fair enough, if the next upper bracket switches. I remember there was one Major that got shit for not switching the brackets at all (but changed it after they were called out).
Also what the fuck is up with those floating Liquipedia ads. I still remember the first super apologetic announcement about having tiny non-obtrusive ads on the main site. Jesus TL.
On April 04 2018 16:07 nothingmuch wrote: Kind of amusing how the oh so beloved format instantly produced an elimination bo1 between EG and VP. This outcome is hardly different from Swiss despite twice as many games. People will have to get used to the fact that the top ~5-10 teams pretty much all can take games/series off each other and your favorite team can always make an early exit (see secret and newbee).
there's a difference between top team eliminated early in group stage and later in the knockout stage. not to mention prize money included.
On April 04 2018 16:27 Orome wrote: Also what the fuck is up with those floating Liquipedia ads. I still remember the first super apologetic announcement about having tiny non-obtrusive ads on the main site. Jesus TL.
Make sure to report those on the main tlnet site so it can be fixed
On April 04 2018 16:27 Orome wrote: Also what the fuck is up with those floating Liquipedia ads. I still remember the first super apologetic announcement about having tiny non-obtrusive ads on the main site. Jesus TL.
Make sure to report those on the main tlnet site so it can be fixed
Ah they're not intended? Thanks, that's nice to know.
On April 04 2018 16:45 babysimba wrote: Nice to see iceiceice go back to his hotd playstyle. One reason why EG does decently these days is because they abuse hotd.
On April 04 2018 16:45 babysimba wrote: Nice to see iceiceice go back to his hotd playstyle. One reason why EG does decently these days is because they abuse hotd.
That item is broken.
Especially controlling enemy catapult which is even better than controlling a centaur for extra stun.
On April 04 2018 16:45 babysimba wrote: Nice to see iceiceice go back to his hotd playstyle. One reason why EG does decently these days is because they abuse hotd.
That item is broken.
Especially controlling enemy catapult which is even better than controlling a centaur for extra stun.
An HOD'd catapult shouldn't be able to hold an entire lane against 3 heroes like that.
Anyway, Optic needs to not open with Sand King, as I think teams have figured out how to pigeonhole them later in the draft with it. 33 needs to be on a hero that does more damage. Though this game got away because of that Abaddon + Prophet lane. Never knew that was a thing, but it worked way too well.
Meta is shifting to bringing in a lot of the old MVP.Phoenix tactics. We're seeing a lot of early, heavy rotations & defenses. NP makes this version entirely possible, so that seems like everyone will be banning it again.
How does it work exactly with the rocker locks? If one player just randomly decides to leave a team while rosters are locked, does his team automatically go to open qualifiers? What if a player has health issues and needs to be replaced?
Mushi is really good at laning with gyro lol. 2nd game I seen him do so well in a contested lane. Other gyro players often crumble in the first few waves due to low base damage.
On April 04 2018 17:45 babysimba wrote: Furion did everything this game, from winning the lane, to ganking, to pushing, to stacking, to getting utility items
In the next round, NP will be banned and Mineski probably drops 0-2. Though keeping Jabz off the Nyx is important too.
On April 04 2018 17:45 babysimba wrote: Furion did everything this game, from winning the lane, to ganking, to pushing, to stacking, to getting utility items
In the next round, NP will be banned and Mineski probably drops 0-2. Though keeping Jabz off the Nyx is important too.
Mineski picked Furion and Abaddon only once in groups and went 6-1 still. Also if they face TNC, pretty sure Mineski has had a pretty big matchup advantage against them online at least.
e: Actually looking at Mineski vs TNC results it hasn't been quite as bad as I remembered
Bracket on liqqy piddy is wrong no? EG vs VP i guess happens but it should be on the bottom as the bracket should flip itself in a double elimination? Should be VP vs EG vs loser of Mineski/TNC/VG Way it has it would be LGD/Liquid vs VP/EG in a bo1?
On April 04 2018 19:26 MrCon wrote: Liquid played heroes that can slow the gank train of VP, it was pretty smart drafting in retrospect.
I think VP just played completely complacent and gave most of their objectives without trying to contest(they literally gave two raxes before contesting)
Game two on the other hand was just liquid drafting better with tanky cores and VP having only single clear damage dealer which was TB. Puck can only do so much
On April 04 2018 19:57 Kipsate wrote: Slark, what year is this
it's a good slark game i think .. enemy lineup being batrider/wd/sk as the only slark control which is kinda decent for slark and linkens can make it already impossible not to mention the omni pick
the cores are TB and TA which slark are both good against
Slark was a pretty popular counterpick against TB when TB first came to CM after TI4. I remember some EG vs c9 games where EG ran some Zeus+Slark against c9's TB spam
how does Slark counter TB? by disappearing when about to be sundered, and TB ends up sunder another teammate but Slark has accumulate stat-steal anyway?
On April 04 2018 20:15 spudde123 wrote: Slark was a pretty popular counterpick against TB when TB first came to CM after TI4. I remember some EG vs c9 games where EG ran some Zeus+Slark against c9's TB spam
Yeah i remember that along with c9's own counter to TB being a safelane riki (that was the old riki) but that was before this broken reflection talent TB currently has.
didn't know you can be stuck on the side of the wardspot
On April 04 2018 20:20 Vertical wrote: how does Slark counter TB? by disappearing when about to be sundered, and TB ends up sunder another teammate but Slark has accumulate stat-steal anyway?
Yep that's about it. Combined with bkb linkens he just becomes an impossible target for sunder.
He can't be targetted he draws focus from other heroes as well. Pretty much complete nuisance.
Slark when gets enough items can kill tanky heroes within the duration of the shadow thing.
On April 04 2018 20:20 Vertical wrote: how does Slark counter TB? by disappearing when about to be sundered, and TB ends up sunder another teammate but Slark has accumulate stat-steal anyway?
Yep that's about it. Combined with bkb linkens he just becomes an impossible target for sunder.
He can't be targetted he draws focus from other heroes as well. Pretty much complete nuisance.
Slark when gets enough items can kill tanky heroes within the duration of the shadow thing.
On April 04 2018 20:23 goody153 wrote: didn't know you can be stuck on the side of the wardspot
On April 04 2018 20:20 Vertical wrote: how does Slark counter TB? by disappearing when about to be sundered, and TB ends up sunder another teammate but Slark has accumulate stat-steal anyway?
Yep that's about it. Combined with bkb linkens he just becomes an impossible target for sunder.
He can't be targetted he draws focus from other heroes as well. Pretty much complete nuisance.
Slark when gets enough items can kill tanky heroes within the duration of the shadow thing.
well Slark is currently 12-0-10 now, so yeah...
It's a pretty good slark game so idk how the hero fairs against a normal lineup.
On April 04 2018 20:23 goody153 wrote: didn't know you can be stuck on the side of the wardspot
On April 04 2018 20:20 Vertical wrote: how does Slark counter TB? by disappearing when about to be sundered, and TB ends up sunder another teammate but Slark has accumulate stat-steal anyway?
Yep that's about it. Combined with bkb linkens he just becomes an impossible target for sunder.
He can't be targetted he draws focus from other heroes as well. Pretty much complete nuisance.
Slark when gets enough items can kill tanky heroes within the duration of the shadow thing.
well Slark is currently 12-0-10 now, so yeah...
It's a pretty good slark game so idk how the hero fairs against a normal lineup.
Slark is not easy hero to play though. I think practice is really needed to play and time his abilities. Unlike Sven for example than you can be good at just by imagining what to do.
I don't think Slark completely "counters" TB but he does have the ability to hunt the TB when he is farming up and when you help him with some damage he can finish TB off in those situations or in fights. Back then the game wasn't obviously exactly the same so hard to precisely compare the pick, but Slark as a hero has some benefits against TB that other carries don't have
Slark aside, picking TB into OD and Lion is pretty brave from TNC
Noooo, we will no see more Slarks in pubs. Back to banning it again I guess. Or doing strong dual lanes against him. They had pretty strong supports this game to protect him and a bat is not going to be able to kill a Slark if both are even in levels.
Paparazi slark did not die a single time the entire game damn
On April 04 2018 20:31 spudde123 wrote: I don't think Slark completely "counters" TB but he does have the ability to hunt the TB when he is farming up and when you help him with some damage he can finish TB off in those situations or in fights. Back then the game wasn't obviously exactly the same so hard to precisely compare the pick, but Slark as a hero has some benefits against TB that other carries don't have
Slark aside, picking TB into OD and Lion is pretty brave from TNC
Yeah i mean not really hard counter but his ability set makes him a pretty good hero against TB compared to other carries(like gyro or whatever). It can still go either way but slark certainly has the edge in a straight up brawl
On April 04 2018 20:33 Yurie wrote: Noooo, we will no see more Slarks in pubs. Back to banning it again I guess. Or doing strong dual lanes against him. They had pretty strong supports this game to protect him and a bat is not going to be able to kill a Slark if both are even in levels.
It's still a pretty shit laner and hero in general. I'd still pick gyro over that hero 10/10
The main benefit slark brings is more macro based rather than teamfight.
I rate VG the most promising chinese team because they are probably the best chinese team in macro. Well they have a TI winning + finalist coach after all.
On April 04 2018 20:33 Yurie wrote: Noooo, we will no see more Slarks in pubs. Back to banning it again I guess. Or doing strong dual lanes against him. They had pretty strong supports this game to protect him and a bat is not going to be able to kill a Slark if both are even in levels.
It's still a pretty shit laner and hero in general. I'd still pick gyro over that hero 10/10
Different types, Slark is actually really good against Gyro for example.
Slark isn't a standard pick like before anymore, he is last pick material like Brood, Tinker etc, when you don't have enough counters as Lion and SS just shits on him, heroes that make Halberd too. Also his laning is buffed a lot in this patch since his base regen is buffed up to 2.75 hp/sec which is a lot for hero like Slark.
I know last month or so matumba has been on viper veno etc. but I'd say Liquid is overall far from that Miracle is often the sacked one when Matu plays LD etc.
damn it TNC you just need to finsh the game so that we got an assured top 3 SEA team so that navi gets bumped out of the top 8 which they don't deserve
On April 04 2018 21:46 Ramiz1989 wrote: From 28k advantage to 8k advantage. Now this is a true comeback.
On April 04 2018 21:50 goody153 wrote: damn it TNC you just need to finsh the game so that we got an assured top 3 SEA team so that navi gets bumped out of the top 8 which they don't deserve
On April 04 2018 21:50 goody153 wrote: damn it TNC you just need to finsh the game so that we got an assured top 3 SEA team so that navi gets bumped out of the top 8 which they don't deserve
On April 04 2018 21:46 Ramiz1989 wrote: From 28k advantage to 8k advantage. Now this is a true comeback.
we don't even suma1l for this lmao
Na`Vi will be out of top 8 soon anyway.
Not if the top 4 on this tournament are from the top 8 already.
On April 04 2018 21:50 goody153 wrote: damn it TNC you just need to finsh the game so that we got an assured top 3 SEA team so that navi gets bumped out of the top 8 which they don't deserve
On April 04 2018 21:46 Ramiz1989 wrote: From 28k advantage to 8k advantage. Now this is a true comeback.
we don't even suma1l for this lmao
Na`Vi will be out of top 8 soon anyway.
Not if the top 4 on this tournament are from the top 8 already.
But there are more tournaments after this one, Na`Vi with the current roster is losing to unknown random Russian stacks with Russian streamers and pub stars, they are not getting any more points.
slutty divine rapier have been with several man already it has been a while I've seen such a slutty rapier usually game ends quite soon after it's purchased
On April 04 2018 21:55 LemOn wrote: WTF is this 25 timber hahaha is the range unlimited?
Doubled, from 1400 to 2800.
that's pretty much unlimited, you'd have to target straight down the lane not to hit something haha
Well the problem is in team fights that when you miss a tree that you wanted to hit by little, you hit another tree that is like 2000 range from the one you wanted to hit, and while you walk back to team fight the fight is already over. You timberchain straight up to Africa.
On April 04 2018 22:00 juuto wrote: Do people not go for objectives when they're 25k networth ahead anymore? What's the deal here?
they cannot see the net worth lead
Well they've played enough pro games and have enough sense to know they were far enough ahead to take the game.
Phoenix and Underlord are some of the best base defense heroes in the game. It's not like TNC didn't go for any pushes, they went and didn't manage to get enough done. Maybe it was the wrong time or they did them poorly, but it's far from simple in the moment. You can't sit and hit the building against those heroes if they are alive, they will kill you from far away really easily with little committed.
Even when 25k or whatever ahead at 45mins, you can easily lose a fight against certain types of lineups with one error. Or in this case they didn't use the gold they had to have an answer against the Aeon Disk
On April 04 2018 22:00 juuto wrote: Do people not go for objectives when they're 25k networth ahead anymore? What's the deal here?
they cannot see the net worth lead
Well they've played enough pro games and have enough sense to know they were far enough ahead to take the game.
Phoenix and Underlord are some of the best base defense heroes in the game. It's not like TNC didn't go for any pushes, they went and didn't manage to get enough done. Maybe it was the wrong time or they did them poorly, but it's far from simple in the moment
If Phoenix and Underlord were that good at defending the base where massive networth advantages didn't matter, they'd be nerfed into the ground tomorrow. Like Kyle said, TNC didn't play to win, and that's why the game was drawn out long enough for VG to win. Whether it was through throws or whatever, TNC allowed all those opportunities for VG to happen.
When good teams play this patch, games end soon when networth leads are that large. There's really no excuse for TNC.
On April 04 2018 22:00 juuto wrote: Do people not go for objectives when they're 25k networth ahead anymore? What's the deal here?
they cannot see the net worth lead
Well they've played enough pro games and have enough sense to know they were far enough ahead to take the game.
Phoenix and Underlord are some of the best base defense heroes in the game. It's not like TNC didn't go for any pushes, they went and didn't manage to get enough done. Maybe it was the wrong time or they did them poorly, but it's far from simple in the moment
If Phoenix and Underlord were that good at defending the base where massive networth advantages didn't matter, they'd be nerfed into the ground tomorrow. Like Kyle said, TNC didn't play to win, and that's why the game was drawn out long enough for VG to win. Whether it was through throws or whatever, TNC allowed all those opportunities for VG to happen.
When good teams play this patch, games end soon when networth leads are that large. There's really no excuse for TNC.
Of course they allowed it to happen, but it doesn't mean it's as simple as randomly "going for objectives". Underlord and Phoenix have other weaknesses, and of course certain heroes can go highground against them better. TNC had a Gyro as their only hero who could do any building damage. It's a weakness of the lineup to an extent. Compare this to the times your "good teams" play, e.g. Liquid drafted a heavy timing push lineup in both games against VP and VP had no heroes that could spam from far away as well as Underlord or Phoenix can. Of course TL can go high ground easily in those cases
What VG did well was sneaking the rosh when TNC had taken their first rax. That likely would have been the game ending aegis. Then TNC tried to go when DP ult was down, but they couldn't deal with the Aeon Disk and the Cheese on DP. I need to see the game again to remember exactly what the teams did after that, but I believe TNC wanted to wait for the next aegis but VG started to win teamfights outside the base at that point