On December 08 2016 14:58 plasmidghost wrote: EE is going to win 2-0
I haven't been able to watch any of the games so far. Has NP looked solid so far?
I see them as a stable team. If you beat them then you're good enough to top 8, if you can't then you need to change something in the team. A bit like the old FNG virtus pro.
This game is looking interesting. DC in a big lead from early game with strong cores in Invoker and Luna. They risk losing a fight and getting raxed even through tier 2 though, SD + Terrorblade + DK + Chen. Even ahead in networth they might lose a straight up fight with these linesups before bkbs.
I like black and don't want to flame too hard, but I guarantee you if EE was playing TB there that people would flame the shit out of the TB for not sundering
On December 09 2016 01:03 bagels21 wrote: I like black and don't want to flame too hard, but I guarantee you if EE was playing TB there that people would flame the shit out of the TB for not sundering
On December 09 2016 01:03 bagels21 wrote: I like black and don't want to flame too hard, but I guarantee you if EE was playing TB there that people would flame the shit out of the TB for not sundering
EE is a relevant player though.
so you're saying Black^ needs to blog about Puppey?
facelss is playing like they formed yesterday lol. no gameplan . chen lvl 5 min 13. and their mid player loses his mid matchups in 90% of games even with 2vs1 scenario. i think they need more than strategy change after this tournament.
On December 09 2016 01:03 bagels21 wrote: I like black and don't want to flame too hard, but I guarantee you if EE was playing TB there that people would flame the shit out of the TB for not sundering
EE is a relevant player though.
so you're saying Black^ needs to blog about Puppey?
He'd have to be good enough to join a Puppey team first.
On December 09 2016 01:06 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
On December 09 2016 01:05 stuchiu wrote:
On December 09 2016 01:03 bagels21 wrote: I like black and don't want to flame too hard, but I guarantee you if EE was playing TB there that people would flame the shit out of the TB for not sundering
EE is a relevant player though.
so you're saying Black^ needs to blog about Puppey?
He'd have to be good enough to join a Puppey team first.
On December 09 2016 01:06 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
On December 09 2016 01:05 stuchiu wrote:
On December 09 2016 01:03 bagels21 wrote: I like black and don't want to flame too hard, but I guarantee you if EE was playing TB there that people would flame the shit out of the TB for not sundering
EE is a relevant player though.
so you're saying Black^ needs to blog about Puppey?
He'd have to be good enough to join a Puppey team first.
Black is like bulba in a carry position. I feel bad for him. Also what might have happened is cis mentality in a sea team. They played like a team and wrecked everybody, now they seem like individuals matched up in the same game vs a real pro team
On December 09 2016 01:23 Pontual wrote: Black is like bulba in a carry position. I feel bad for him. Also what might have happened is cis mentality in a sea team. They played like a team and wrecked everybody, now they seem like individuals matched up in the same game vs a real pro team
the thing is facelss isn't really SEA team.. they have 2 players who have been exclusively playing in SEA. i don't see an ounce of SEA aggression or SEA heroes in their draft and game strategy.
Their laning was actually very SEA-like during their dominant phase. Then everything went to shit during Summit for whatever reason. I refuse to believe they can even play their current draft lmao.
I mean, black said in an interview (actually here at LD) that they hadn't someone to do calls. They all did and whoever said shit with more confidence they woul follow. Seems hard to do that in a lan huh. They just don't have a captain. They won't play on the same page. That's my reasoning
XY has been playing the 4 roaming role all along. Of course things are going to go bad when they suddenly switch it up and let Nutz roam instead. Why draft something you can't play >.>
On December 09 2016 01:59 Alpino wrote: You guys are all dissing them but they have a good shot at winning this game
Although sniper is great defender i don't agree with you. Faceless are much more propense to do mistakes than Dc right now. Plus sahdow demon illusions are the best thing to take high ground without commiting
On December 09 2016 02:03 Emnjay808 wrote: Man LD's casting has not improved AT ALL over the years.
It was inevitable since he started focusing more on every other aspect of his business (which is really successful as far as I can tell).
It also hasn't declined massively either, which is something of an achievement. He's no longer one of the best casters, but he is fairly solid. There's also not any more woaw the refraction moments.
I'm more and more a fan of godz' casting, he has to be the only caster focusing more on what players do right instead of mainly pointing mistakes, it's very refreshing.
On December 09 2016 03:49 Nevuk wrote: Lycan was almost a non factor. They could have drafted literally any carry that could split push and had the same thing happen.
On December 09 2016 03:58 Nevuk wrote: I love that they have english subtitles for 1437. Maybe they just do it for every member of NP? (I could totally understand if it was envy)
On December 09 2016 04:02 plasmidghost wrote: EE gonna get 2-0ed and get another last place at a Valve event fuck my life
This is why I normally just bandwagon from tournament to tournament in Dota 2. I was rooting for Wings to win it all again going into the tournament but that ship's sailed, so I dunno. Maybe i'll just start rooting for LGD or hop on the VP train.
Ehomes problem is that lesh does less aoe magic damage than potm and then they have a bunch of melee heroes running around doing nothing into NP's sandking and golem
lesh is one of the bigger examples Icefrog has smited. Lightning storm went from being broken to being one of the worst spells in the game even though the slow is nice
On December 09 2016 04:46 Kuroeeah wrote: I don't recall NP throwing on a cloud 9 level yet. NP usually loses by doing something atrociously bad in lane and rolls over if anything.
as a diehard NP fan I can tell you, they have the ability to throw c9 style no doubts
On December 09 2016 04:59 ZeaL. wrote: I dunno why but this major feels super weak so I haven't been watching much. The only team that gets me excited is VP.
shit brackets. no Secret & Liquid.felt like watching a small LAN
On December 09 2016 04:59 ZeaL. wrote: I dunno why but this major feels super weak so I haven't been watching much. The only team that gets me excited is VP.
I think Newbee is really strong too, fwiw. They'll likely emerge from the other side
On December 09 2016 04:59 ZeaL. wrote: I dunno why but this major feels super weak so I haven't been watching much. The only team that gets me excited is VP.
I think Newbee is really strong too, fwiw. They'll likely emerge from the other side
On December 09 2016 05:26 Papercappu wrote: i think even if it goes late game NP have a better chance to win because they have better highground
NP have better high ground than SD-Luna-Ench against Naga?
I'm pretty sure he means highground defense. I don't care what lineup you have, you aren't pushing highcground into NP's lineup without like 3 people down.
I haven't really had much time to watch Boston major yet, seen just parts and glimpses, but man, it seems to me the production value is great this time around. Secretshop promo and all :D GJ!
Edit: I don't recognise EE at all this game. But I guess it's too soon for EEchoke(tm) yet.
On December 09 2016 05:35 Comeh wrote: I mean NP can still throw this
This game was unthrowable because Luna, SD, and DS were going to take all the scraps from the map while DK would be stuck at 8k net worth in perpetuity.
On December 09 2016 05:36 ShiaoPi wrote: EHOME is on full tilt
Yeah, they kind of drafted themselves into a corner though. They definitely should have tried to take this game extremely late, but I seems like they incorrectly though that they could snowball with an aegis.
Now they can try to take it late but it won't matter because DK's going to be worthless for the rest of the game.
On December 09 2016 05:36 ShiaoPi wrote: EHOME is on full tilt
Yeah, they kind of drafted themselves into a corner though. They definitely should have tried to take this game extremely late, but I seems like they incorrectly though that they could snowball with an aegis.
Now they can try to take it late but it won't matter because DK's going to be worthless for the rest of the game.
They could snowball with an aegis. But it swung the wrong way.
Also, just in case: Warlock is going to outfarm Luna soon, it's not just DK.
On December 09 2016 05:36 ShiaoPi wrote: EHOME is on full tilt
Yeah, they kind of drafted themselves into a corner though. They definitely should have tried to take this game extremely late, but I seems like they incorrectly though that they could snowball with an aegis.
Now they can try to take it late but it won't matter because DK's going to be worthless for the rest of the game.
they were baited into Luna/SD
NP got literally all their favorite heroes in exchange for that combo
envy redeeming his name here. A lot of people, myself included, didn't think EE had it in him to be a tier 1 player. Envy is changing minds and making games
On December 09 2016 05:45 ShiaoPi wrote: chinese doto is fine. Newbee and LGD are looking really strong and ig.V put up one hell of a fight against vp while playing with standins
yeah, honestly I think NB might be the only team VP should be worried about anymore
On December 09 2016 05:44 Achaian wrote: envy redeeming his name here. A lot of people, myself included, didn't think EE had it in him to be a tier 1 player. Envy is changing minds and making games
On December 09 2016 05:48 FacelessScandinavian wrote: why didnt they gg out when they lost bot rax - surely they are not stupid enough to not understand the game was over at that point
On December 09 2016 05:48 FacelessScandinavian wrote: why didnt they gg out when they lost bot rax - surely they are not stupid enough to not understand the game was over at that point
also never underestimate NP's ability to throw or you will be baffled
On December 09 2016 05:48 FacelessScandinavian wrote: why didnt they gg out when they lost bot rax - surely they are not stupid enough to not understand the game was over at that point
also never underestimate NP's ability to throw or you will be baffled
From what I remembered, not even clown9 threw a single game with a Naga lead
On December 09 2016 05:36 ShiaoPi wrote: EHOME is on full tilt
Yeah, they kind of drafted themselves into a corner though. They definitely should have tried to take this game extremely late, but I seems like they incorrectly though that they could snowball with an aegis.
Now they can try to take it late but it won't matter because DK's going to be worthless for the rest of the game.
They could snowball with an aegis. But it swung the wrong way.
Also, just in case: Warlock is going to outfarm Luna soon, it's not just DK.
Well DK just wasn't going to get any farm after they lost map control. SD and DS can farm with shell/illusions, and Luna gets whatever scraps are left over.
But yeah that's actually a decent point that Luna's farm was going to suffer too. I suppose Ehome's strategy was actually going okay, not great, but they definitely had a chance, and if they get that aegis their pushing racks.
On December 09 2016 05:48 FacelessScandinavian wrote: why didnt they gg out when they lost bot rax - surely they are not stupid enough to not understand the game was over at that point
also never underestimate NP's ability to throw or you will be baffled
From what I remembered, not even clown9 threw a single game with a Naga lead
That might be the case, but they still seem exceedingly more prone to throws than other teams
Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
A sequence of chain feeding. Ehome's decision to half ass an early teamfight strategy really screwed them over. Not sure why they felt they had that super low% kill on the Naga so close to dire tier2 mid. Some sloppy play for a game 3 elimination match by Ehome. Let's see if we can actually see some crisp Chinese dotes in these next two matches.
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
The problem is they treated Team Tinker as an EU team.
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
Boy, stop stretching it. You have yourself said that the best NA team at TI6 was EG. That makes DC a EU team.
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
Boy, stop stretching it. You have yourself said that the best NA team at TI6 was EG. That makes DC a EU team.
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
Boy, stop stretching it. You have yourself said that the best NA team at TI6 was EG. That makes DC a EU team.
Wanna put a 1 week ban on who gets further?
(no contest if they get same position)
I'll repeat: TI6. I understand, it's difficult, but try to read.
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
The problem is they treated Team Tinker as an EU team.
Difference is basically timing and team formation.
DC picked up multiple EU players in the week they got kicked from top teams (a couple of days before the roster deadline), and several tournaments/one major before TI, and had an NA team house that everyone went to from the start, and continue to use ~1 year later.
TT was EU like a month or 2 before TI5 invites, traded several EU players for (arguably) worse NA counterparts and finally just moved everyone to NA for a month before qualifiers. Then promptly disbanded as a team and org immediately after failing.
So basically TT is one of many EU teams that tried to jump on easier qualifiers, then left/disbanded after failing. DC was an NA team that jumped on better players that's still based in NA for whatever reason even after success.
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
Boy, stop stretching it. You have yourself said that the best NA team at TI6 was EG. That makes DC a EU team.
Or he's arguing that EG was still the best NA team despite losing to DC? And calling people boy is so condescending, especially for such a petty argument.
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
nah SD is still cancer to me. i saw SD solo killed a jugg with his own illusions once
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
Was EG-Wings the game that triggered the bitching about SD-Luna? Not the OG one? Because the EG game looked already super lost before the combo took effect.
guys DC was a bunch of veteran european players who travelled into NA for easy qualis and because the org seems nice + Moo
if the idea is to accurately reflect what region produces better teams/players, then DC can't be NA
if the idea is to count numbers on who "has more titles" then sure do whatever you want, but if the same 5 players switched orgs to fnatic or whatever would they cease being NA? teams aren't fluid like that
On December 09 2016 05:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: Maybe we shouldn't focus on the technicalities. The organization is NA, the team house is in NA, they play in NA qualifiers, they speak English on the team as US or Canadian teams do... They scrim on NA, pub on NA.
Doesn't matter that much where they were all born.
Boy, stop stretching it. You have yourself said that the best NA team at TI6 was EG. That makes DC a EU team.
Or he's arguing that EG was still the best NA team despite losing to DC? And calling people boy is so condescending, especially for such a petty argument.
That would be a big stretch to argue that DC were the worse team clinching that series.
As for "boy", when people bring up people using English as an argument to consider them an NA team, that warrants nothing but condescension.
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
Was EG-Wings the game that triggered the bitching about SD-Luna? Not the OG one? Because the EG game looked already super lost before the combo took effect.
It was the EG one because wings/china fan boys refused to except that EG played better and wings drafted awfully to counter sd/luna, so they blamed the hero combo to take credit away from eg and blame away from wings.
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
Was EG-Wings the game that triggered the bitching about SD-Luna? Not the OG one? Because the EG game looked already super lost before the combo took effect.
It was the EG one because wings/china fan boys refused to except that EG played better and wings drafted awfully to counter sd/luna, so they blamed the hero combo to take credit away from eg and blame away from wings.
Except that i can argue all day that NP drafted awfully to counter sd luna as well, but since EHOME forget how to play dota when they play Warlock, it did not matter. As for credit... EG managed to lose a fight in that second game, they were basically 3k mmr scrubs + Show Spoiler +
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
Was EG-Wings the game that triggered the bitching about SD-Luna? Not the OG one? Because the EG game looked already super lost before the combo took effect.
It was the EG one because wings/china fan boys refused to except that EG played better and wings drafted awfully to counter sd/luna, so they blamed the hero combo to take credit away from eg and blame away from wings.
I dunno, I'm a pretty big EG fangay and I think SD/luna or illusion spam in general is too stronk. Not to say that wings played well, they certainly could have played better
NP picked mirana naga into sd/luna, where as wings picked pure single target. How is that not a much better set up to deal with illusion spam? And yes eg lost a whole team fight, they're totally awful and they literally only won because sd/luna is unbeatable, good thing they picked that in game one as well.
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
Was EG-Wings the game that triggered the bitching about SD-Luna? Not the OG one? Because the EG game looked already super lost before the combo took effect.
It was the EG one because wings/china fan boys refused to except that EG played better and wings drafted awfully to counter sd/luna, so they blamed the hero combo to take credit away from eg and blame away from wings.
I dunno, I'm a pretty big EG fangay and I think SD/luna or illusion spam in general is too stronk. Not to say that wings played well, they certainly could have played better
Ohh yeah its really strong, the problem is when you blame only the strong gimmick for the loss, not the poor drafting or good play from the team that picked it.
You have to draft a spellcaster based lineup to counter SD. Don't tell me SD is not OP when a mere support hero can force a team to draft a specific system.
On December 09 2016 06:11 Jaaaaasper wrote: wow a team drafted to counter SD luna and crushed it. Maybe its not cancer and wings just played liek shit against it huh?
Was EG-Wings the game that triggered the bitching about SD-Luna? Not the OG one? Because the EG game looked already super lost before the combo took effect.
It was the EG one because wings/china fan boys refused to except that EG played better and wings drafted awfully to counter sd/luna, so they blamed the hero combo to take credit away from eg and blame away from wings.
I dunno, I'm a pretty big EG fangay and I think SD/luna or illusion spam in general is too stronk. Not to say that wings played well, they certainly could have played better
I would agree and EG as a team has never shone away from picking obnoxious stuff in the past but that game looked over in the first 15 minutes because of SD+Lesh, not SD Luna.
On December 09 2016 06:25 Jaaaaasper wrote: NP picked mirana naga into sd/luna, where as wings picked pure single target. How is that not a much better set up to deal with illusion spam? And yes eg lost a whole team fight, they're totally awful and they literally only won because sd/luna is unbeatable, good thing they picked that in game one as well.
It is better than what Wings had. Hardly good enough when proper execution can and does lead to having no towers at 14 minutes.
On December 09 2016 06:27 babysimba wrote: You have to draft a spellcaster based lineup to counter SD. Don't tell me SD is not OP when a mere support hero can force a team to draft a specific system.
SD is strong, but if you don't ban against it, and don't pick to counter it, that still poor play. I'm not saying the hero isn't strong, I'm saying blaming it for Wings loss after wings gave it away and then picked 0 aoe against it was their fault, but blaming the op hero for the loss takes credit from the team who won ad blame from the team who did nothing to prepare against it.
On December 09 2016 06:16 Kirsed wrote: The NP AF grudge match in ro4.
I want this to happen now
For someone who only tuned in today: What's the grudge?
there is no grudge lol. NP and AF are big friends. Go look at their twitter accounts. They were cheering for each other during major quals and have scrimmed together. EE has been scrimming with the Greeks since he was on C9.
On December 09 2016 06:25 Jaaaaasper wrote: NP picked mirana naga into sd/luna, where as wings picked pure single target. How is that not a much better set up to deal with illusion spam? And yes eg lost a whole team fight, they're totally awful and they literally only won because sd/luna is unbeatable, good thing they picked that in game one as well.
It is better than what Wings had. Hardly good enough when proper execution can and does lead to having no towers at 14 minutes.
So you're saying EG exucuted it well, but ehome didn't? Cool I'm not saying it isn't strong, I'm saying blaming just the strong heroes with out giving credit for execution or blame for poor exuction is dumb. SD is strong, SD Luna is stronger, but dota has always had cancerous stuff, its not fair to give it all credit for wins or losses.
On December 09 2016 06:27 babysimba wrote: You have to draft a spellcaster based lineup to counter SD. Don't tell me SD is not OP when a mere support hero can force a team to draft a specific system.
SD is strong, but if you don't ban against it, and don't pick to counter it, that still poor play. I'm not saying the hero isn't strong, I'm saying blaming it for Wings loss after wings gave it away and then picked 0 aoe against it was their fault, but blaming the op hero for the loss takes credit from the team who won ad blame from the team who did nothing to prepare against it.
You are just assuming Wings didn't try to counter it. Wings clearly had a gameplan with their mobile fighting heroes that can dive squishy supports. But SD is such a ridiculous hero that can rape both early and late game. Usually a balanced hero has strengths and weakness during different timings of the game. But when a hero is strong enough to force you to draft a certain way or there's zero way to defeat it by exploiting certain timings, it is clearly OP. Basically disco pony at TI5 comes to mind.
There's nothing to stop the deathball. I can already foresee TA getting astraled every single time fights occur. I will probably feel like shit as the TA player
On December 09 2016 06:25 Jaaaaasper wrote: NP picked mirana naga into sd/luna, where as wings picked pure single target. How is that not a much better set up to deal with illusion spam? And yes eg lost a whole team fight, they're totally awful and they literally only won because sd/luna is unbeatable, good thing they picked that in game one as well.
It is better than what Wings had. Hardly good enough when proper execution can and does lead to having no towers at 14 minutes.
why are you still responding to jasper, all he does is shitpost and flamebait
he's not even funny like our lord and savior azarkon
On December 09 2016 06:25 Jaaaaasper wrote: NP picked mirana naga into sd/luna, where as wings picked pure single target. How is that not a much better set up to deal with illusion spam? And yes eg lost a whole team fight, they're totally awful and they literally only won because sd/luna is unbeatable, good thing they picked that in game one as well.
It is better than what Wings had. Hardly good enough when proper execution can and does lead to having no towers at 14 minutes.
why are you still responding to jasper, all he does is shitpost and flamebait
he's not even funny like our lord and savior azarkon
lol. It's funny how the history of LD has a couple of dudes who basically just flamebait (i.e. Mensol, the random fnatic guy, there was an LGD/china fan - forgot his name)
On December 09 2016 07:17 babysimba wrote: There's nothing to stop the deathball. I can already foresee TA getting astraled every single time fights occur. I will probably feel like shit as the TA player
I actually like the AF line up going into the lategame. Astral only does so much, because you have two really high DPS'ers, and with vacuum and wall, you have a really good tactic to help TA while she's in Astral.
Newbee just going for extra safe play by team hugging whole game. Game might seem close with that networth difference but it's not. AF lineup really lack CCs spells to take teamfight. Splitting up to farm only increase risk of giving track kills imo.
I actually liked those drafts. Each team had a way to operate to win and it came down to execution. Both teams had a really fine edge to actually ride. If Newbee lost a rolling team fight, they could have gotten rolled by the snowball.
If MVP can't even make BH work these days, I think no other teams can make it work. Every team is just going 5 man lineup, having a BH is like a burden in teamfight besides the role of giving extra movespeed
On December 09 2016 07:40 babysimba wrote: If MVP can't even make BH work these days, I think no other teams can make it work. Every team is just going 5 man lineup, having a BH is like a burden in teamfight besides the role of giving extra movespeed
Yeah, support bh right now is really sad. Unless you can get multiple kills in the laning stage and early level 6 there's pretty much nothing you can offer.
haven't watched/played dota in like 2 years, watching this makes me want to buy a desktop to play again, dota is fucking dope. likin the production of the event too, i really dislike ~ESPORTS~ but this is pretty nice
On December 09 2016 08:04 kidswift wrote: haven't watched/played dota in like 2 years, watching this makes me want to buy a desktop to play again, dota is fucking dope. likin the production of the event too, i really dislike ~ESPORTS~ but this is pretty nice
On December 09 2016 08:25 FiWiFaKi wrote: At this rate, a 6 slotted morphing will be enough. Morphing outcarries Slark no problem, and DK drops off much like Puck does.
In my experience DK drops off more than puck since puck is hard to kite. (I like to hate on DK.)
Puck is really really bad, DK will be more useful IMO. Besides, AF has a Batrider which overlaps quite a bit with Puck. AF's draft just doesn't make that much sense IMO. We'll see. Perhaps I will be proven wrong and Morphling just wrecks the game in the next 10-15 minutes
On December 09 2016 08:25 FiWiFaKi wrote: At this rate, a 6 slotted morphing will be enough. Morphing outcarries Slark no problem, and DK drops off much like Puck does.
In my experience DK drops off more than puck since puck is hard to kite. (I like to hate on DK.)
I find DK scales decently as long as you focus on AS and HP over initiation.
On December 09 2016 08:28 wims80 wrote: Puck is really really bad, DK will be more useful IMO. Besides, AF has a Batrider which overlaps quite a bit with Puck. AF's draft just doesn't make that much sense IMO. We'll see. Perhaps I will be proven wrong and Morphling just wrecks the game in the next 10-15 minutes
eh the issue is that if Puck lives like that, he can still come back and contribute a lot of damage/silence
On December 09 2016 08:25 FiWiFaKi wrote: At this rate, a 6 slotted morphing will be enough. Morphing outcarries Slark no problem, and DK drops off much like Puck does.
In my experience DK drops off more than puck since puck is hard to kite. (I like to hate on DK.)
I find DK scales decently as long as you focus on AS and HP over initiation.
Think DK should start going midas like invoker goes? Rush early midas, scale, youa re good with items. I saw a Dk earlier vs an Invoker, both had even networth early, invoker went midas, invoker gets over double networth. DK still pretty tanky with just his dragon's blood and can fight without too much early as long as you have team backup.
On December 09 2016 08:25 FiWiFaKi wrote: At this rate, a 6 slotted morphing will be enough. Morphing outcarries Slark no problem, and DK drops off much like Puck does.
In my experience DK drops off more than puck since puck is hard to kite. (I like to hate on DK.)
I find DK scales decently as long as you focus on AS and HP over initiation.
Think DK should start going midas like invoker goes? Rush early midas, scale, youa re good with items. I saw a Dk earlier vs an Invoker, both had even networth early, invoker went midas, invoker gets over double networth. DK still pretty tanky with just his dragon's blood and can fight without too much early as long as you have team backup.
He just needs to keep up with items.
Pretty much. DK is "okay", but he really needs items in the Late Game. Then he's practically unkillable.
This game was completely about the Oracle living. That's the one downside with 4 Protect 1 lineups, as it means most of the game is how gets the jump properly.
On December 09 2016 08:25 FiWiFaKi wrote: At this rate, a 6 slotted morphing will be enough. Morphing outcarries Slark no problem, and DK drops off much like Puck does.
In my experience DK drops off more than puck since puck is hard to kite. (I like to hate on DK.)
I find DK scales decently as long as you focus on AS and HP over initiation.
Think DK should start going midas like invoker goes? Rush early midas, scale, youa re good with items. I saw a Dk earlier vs an Invoker, both had even networth early, invoker went midas, invoker gets over double networth. DK still pretty tanky with just his dragon's blood and can fight without too much early as long as you have team backup.
He just needs to keep up with items.
Except DK actually wants to do stuff entering midgame, midas does not help at all in that regard, also XP is not so great on him.
dk can do big ancient stacks pretty quickly once he hits 11, so preparing an ancient stack for him can help give a networth/exp boost once he hits 11 and has level 2 dragon
On December 09 2016 08:25 FiWiFaKi wrote: At this rate, a 6 slotted morphing will be enough. Morphing outcarries Slark no problem, and DK drops off much like Puck does.
In my experience DK drops off more than puck since puck is hard to kite. (I like to hate on DK.)
I find DK scales decently as long as you focus on AS and HP over initiation.
Think DK should start going midas like invoker goes? Rush early midas, scale, youa re good with items. I saw a Dk earlier vs an Invoker, both had even networth early, invoker went midas, invoker gets over double networth. DK still pretty tanky with just his dragon's blood and can fight without too much early as long as you have team backup.
He just needs to keep up with items.
DK doesn't want Midas. His issue isn't getting levels quickly, it's maintaining farm rate so he can get the appropriate items. In most games you prioritize timings over farm, so Armlet -> Blink/SB/BKB becomes standard. With that setup you can end the game with a coordinated team but if you don't, you will never be able to replace those items quickly enough to be relevant.
If my lineup doesn't need to end the game by say 35 minutes and we have other heroes for initiation, I prefer Armlet -> Maelstrom -> AC -> BKB/Mjolnir -> Satanic/Heart. Even then I'm not being the primary damage dealer, just an unkillable pain in the ass that frontlines for the safelaner.
On December 09 2016 08:45 FiWiFaKi wrote: DK Midas is an awful item.
DK just needs a lot of mid tier items, a Midas slows you way too much, since he needs to be pushing throughout all of the early-mid game.
And that is what the DK tried to do, failed and was unable to keep up and scale. Dk scales well with items, why not get an item to ensure you scale and keep up? Not necessarily midas, something to focus on farming him up.
I know you are saying, he just needs a bunch of mid tier items to fight! Well he never got them, He ended with 3 mid tier items, armlet, bkb, blink, not a lot of damage, pure initiation and then....nothing.
Sure if your push idea is working that's fine, but maybe we should start rethinking DK and his role. Focus on scaling DK, cause he scales well, really damn well with items. Instead of just making him early push tower bot, focus on scaling him more..
On December 09 2016 08:54 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: i remember when liquid`fata dk was a thing theyd prepare ancient stacks for him...
medusa's post50minute game is vastly overrated
putting qop lina and brood above meepo is also super questionable
meepo can actually still just end the game if you manage to teamwipe, that makes ihm better than all 3 of those already
Well, the old evaluation for scaling cores assumed 4 protect 1. The ability to win 1v5 isn't really that important anymore.
failing to see direct relevance of your statement
im just assuming the gamestate is the hero in question is around 25-30k networth at 50 minutes, the enemy carry hero is around there, and then the teams are about equal otehrwise too
obv exceptions for heroes that naturally rice faster like alch tb naga am sven etc, they'll hit those networth values at 40 minutes or faster in a good game and win...?
idk its weird to talk about the lategames of those heroes alone cuz whether or not theyve farmed well and had a decent game relates to whether or not its still even a game at 50 minutes
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
I'd probably give him a B, he's always more underwhelming than I think he'd be come lategame. In games where you're able to split push effectively, I guess an A. Idk, on paper he seems a lot better than how games turn out with him.
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
I'd probably give him a B, he's always more underwhelming than I think he'd be come lategame. In games where you're able to split push effectively, I guess an A. Idk, on paper he seems a lot better than how games turn out with him.
he's terrible at 50 minutes, like 80% of team comps just start killing the bear too fast at that stage
Any chance this is just an aghs farming alch? SD, Nyx, PotM and weaver aghs are all incredible. It would be super risky and gimmicky in an elim game, but possible it could work.
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
Lone druid is an awful late game carry. It's a terrible argument that just because you have a 12 slotted hero means it'll ever be good.
Even in a dream scenario where you actually get 12 items, you're still not doing impressive damage on either sylla or his bear. Bear doesn't have stat growth or survivability and Sylla even slotted with the most expensive items doesn't do enough damage.
On December 09 2016 08:45 FiWiFaKi wrote: DK Midas is an awful item.
DK just needs a lot of mid tier items, a Midas slows you way too much, since he needs to be pushing throughout all of the early-mid game.
And that is what the DK tried to do, failed and was unable to keep up and scale. Dk scales well with items, why not get an item to ensure you scale and keep up? Not necessarily midas, something to focus on farming him up.
I know you are saying, he just needs a bunch of mid tier items to fight! Well he never got them, He ended with 3 mid tier items, armlet, bkb, blink, not a lot of damage, pure initiation and then....nothing.
Sure if your push idea is working that's fine, but maybe we should start rethinking DK and his role. Focus on scaling DK, cause he scales well, really damn well with items. Instead of just making him early push tower bot, focus on scaling him more..
DK can't farm well, he scales well with gold but he just can't farm and is a strong fighter with midgame items. He's on par with other 6 slotted carries but he will be 6 slotted way later.
You said Medusa's post-50 minute game is overrated. I agree but it's overrated now. If we were still in the era of single core lineups, then she would still be one of the best.
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
I'd probably give him a B, he's always more underwhelming than I think he'd be come lategame. In games where you're able to split push effectively, I guess an A. Idk, on paper he seems a lot better than how games turn out with him.
he's terrible at 50 minutes, like 80% of team comps just start killing the bear too fast at that stage
The only way to play him at that point is to get aghs and split push with the bear and dodge all fights. There was an OG game where this happened not too long ago, but I've never seen LD win a true lategame scenario aside from that
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
Lone druid is an awful late game carry. It's a terrible argument that just because you have a 12 slotted hero means it'll ever be good.
Even in a dream scenario where you actually get 12 items, you're still not doing impressive damage on either sylla or his bear. Bear doesn't have stat growth or survivability and Sylla even slotted with the most expensive items doesn't do enough damage.
Yeah, in theory a LD with tons of utility items like: BoT, Guardian Greaves, Scythe, Heart, Crimson Guard/Vlads, AC... With a super farmed bear like: radiance, abyssal, mkb, bkb, phase, daedalus or something like that.
But it never really works out in practice. And that's more like a 90 minute game. When you're playing offensive and pushing, bear is good, when you're playing defensive, it's very underwhelming.
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
I'd probably give him a B, he's always more underwhelming than I think he'd be come lategame. In games where you're able to split push effectively, I guess an A. Idk, on paper he seems a lot better than how games turn out with him.
he's terrible at 50 minutes, like 80% of team comps just start killing the bear too fast at that stage
The only way to play him at that point is to get aghs and split push with the bear and dodge all fights. There was an OG game where this happened not too long ago, but I've never seen LD win a true lategame scenario aside from that
yea that game was the 5th game of elimination mode, arguably a game where the opponents had one of the 20% of comps that just cant deal with ld fully at any stage
On December 09 2016 08:54 FiWiFaKi wrote: If I had to assign tiers to lategame (post 50 minutes) carries:
SS Tier: Medusa, Spectre, Terrorblade S Tier: Naga, Chaos Knight, Storm Spirit, Tinker, Faceless Void A Tier: AM, Sven, Sniper, Clinks, Slark, OD, Tiny, Ember B Tier: WK, Luna, Weaver, Alchemist (since aghs), Juggernaut, TA, Gyro, Invoker, LS, PA, Naix C Tier: QoP, Lina, Brood, Razor, SF, Huskar, Ursa, Slardar, Lycan, DK, Viper D Tier: Meepo, BS
Obviously depends on draft, but just to assign rough lategame potential to the common heroes.
I can has Lone Druid?
Lone druid is an awful late game carry. It's a terrible argument that just because you have a 12 slotted hero means it'll ever be good.
Even in a dream scenario where you actually get 12 items, you're still not doing impressive damage on either sylla or his bear. Bear doesn't have stat growth or survivability and Sylla even slotted with the most expensive items doesn't do enough damage.
Well that's why the bear pulverizes towers so fast. I agree he's more D tier alongside things like Nature's Prophet or core Pugna.
Can't wait for Arc Warden in captain's mode. That hero is terrifying late game.
I have no idea how you stop this Alch now, generally speaking, I think the game is roughly even when the Alch is 40-50% in front of your top core in NW.
On December 09 2016 09:20 nojok wrote: Do you even get manta on luna when you're facing SD? It makes it so much easier for SD to get his favorite illusions.
Necessary evil. Without Manta illusions you lose too much damage.
On December 09 2016 08:45 FiWiFaKi wrote: DK Midas is an awful item.
DK just needs a lot of mid tier items, a Midas slows you way too much, since he needs to be pushing throughout all of the early-mid game.
And that is what the DK tried to do, failed and was unable to keep up and scale. Dk scales well with items, why not get an item to ensure you scale and keep up? Not necessarily midas, something to focus on farming him up.
I know you are saying, he just needs a bunch of mid tier items to fight! Well he never got them, He ended with 3 mid tier items, armlet, bkb, blink, not a lot of damage, pure initiation and then....nothing.
Sure if your push idea is working that's fine, but maybe we should start rethinking DK and his role. Focus on scaling DK, cause he scales well, really damn well with items. Instead of just making him early push tower bot, focus on scaling him more..
DK can't farm well, he scales well with gold but he just can't farm and is a strong fighter with midgame items. He's on par with other 6 slotted carries but he will be 6 slotted way later.
DK can farm, the problem is that's not what people are focusing on with him, maybe we should reconsider how he is played. Like how we are now seeing support weaver, support slardar, or old support PA before it got nerfed. They were all played the same way one way, then people started to realize they could be played with a new different focus.
there's no way you can actually be happy if your newbee right now.
Weaver is outfarming your cores 20 minutes in. Alchemist is having a free game. Your cores are being pressured. Your only win condition is a team fight.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
smoothing out their power curve reduces the chance that nb randomly wins midgame fights and comes back during midgame
i dont think theyre gonna be outgunned in the lategame, unless, as i said, alch inexplicably chain feeds
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
Well an Alch can have an Agh's for you at like 35 minutes this game, a Mirana will have her Agh's completed at probably the 30 minute mark.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
Well an Alch can have an Agh's for you at like 35 minutes this game, a Mirana will have her Agh's completed at probably the 30 minute mark.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Nah, mirana has to go agha, alches takes a lot of farm, weaver a bit less and nyx is perma roaming so there is a bit of room to use this agha outside of teamfights. Besides it's still the best agha in the game, no reason to delay it this game.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
Well an Alch can have an Agh's for you at like 35 minutes this game, a Mirana will have her Agh's completed at probably the 30 minute mark.
If I were Alchemist, I wouldn't give her the first Aghs. I would prioritize Weaver and Nyx.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
Well an Alch can have an Agh's for you at like 35 minutes this game, a Mirana will have her Agh's completed at probably the 30 minute mark.
If I were Alchemist, I wouldn't give her the first Aghs. I would prioritize Weaver and Nyx.
When I said 35 minutes, I assumed 2nd Agh's. I would go Nyx > Mirana > 6th item > SD > Weaver.
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
Well an Alch can have an Agh's for you at like 35 minutes this game, a Mirana will have her Agh's completed at probably the 30 minute mark.
If I were Alchemist, I wouldn't give her the first Aghs. I would prioritize Weaver and Nyx.
When I said 35 minutes, I assumed 2nd Agh's. I would go Nyx > Mirana > 6th item > SD > Weaver.
weaver's actually a much better aghs to have at that timing
you can literally fullheal an alch and pull him out of lasso from like 2000 range away
On December 09 2016 09:23 FiWiFaKi wrote: Mmm, Mirana buying an Agh's... I don't know if I like that. Really going to hurt their late game, which imo they should be going for.
Aghs accelerates your farm so quickly that you should always get it.
Well an Alch can have an Agh's for you at like 35 minutes this game, a Mirana will have her Agh's completed at probably the 30 minute mark.
If I were Alchemist, I wouldn't give her the first Aghs. I would prioritize Weaver and Nyx.
When I said 35 minutes, I assumed 2nd Agh's. I would go Nyx > Mirana > 6th item > SD > Weaver.
weaver's actually a much better aghs to have at that timing
you can literally fullheal an alch and pull him out of lasso from like 2000 range away
Given they were about to push high ground, I fully agree.
On December 09 2016 09:35 Kuroeeah wrote: you guys remember the old PL + KOTL days when PL threw a lance at someone and it would spawn a million illusions?
That was great, my favorite meta for sure. Cancer Lancer best Lancer
On December 09 2016 09:38 Kuroeeah wrote: yeah i do agree with the overall consensus that this major thus far has been disappointing in game quality. VP games are fun to watch though
We will see a lot more Alch Naga and SD in the next days.
You wouldn't prioritise a mirana Agha gift over any of those heroes because her spending the 4.2k gold on something else isn't going to benefit the team that much before the gift. Nyx could get like eul or force, weaver with the usual DPS items, SD because he can't farm on fast anyway.
On December 09 2016 09:36 FiWiFaKi wrote: That's what you get for sharing your replays of games against western teams with each other >_<
Now we get to watch you devour one of your own.
Whoa, what exactly happened? :O Is there a forum thread for this?
Lil interview on TL, Bluemoon asked about it... That's where I heard about it.
Ah yeah, just read it again and saw it, thought it sounded familiar but wasn't sure. Wow that's pretty significant I guess.
Also lol there seems to be pretty polarized reactions to this major so far XD (really great vs boring)
I've been enjoying it. Maybe because I have some western bias, so I like when all the boys are doing well.
TI was depressing for me, because cheering for Secret and all. Really not much I can complain about. I haven't been watching as much Dota as some people here recently, so maybe that's why the patch isn't stale for me, while it seems to be a little bit for others.
Now we get to see which LGD squad gets to be the last hope. But hey, even if they weren't using subs, didn't everyone here say LFY were going to lose anyway because Yao only loses games?
On December 09 2016 09:42 Achaian wrote: Spirit from Ad Finem, sad days for the middle kingdom
Invited teams failed the following shuffle or are affected by the TI curse, the two teams which actually qualified have visa issues and the one team which almost qualified has yet to lose a map. It could have looked a lot different without the visa issues.
We all have different preferences. I really like when games go later, and games that or single or dual core... And we've been getting more of that than in the last year (before that there was a lot of 4 protect 1 though).
I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
On December 09 2016 09:43 Papercappu wrote: the games quality are pretty shit but im loving the upsets
Same here. Happy to see NP not choke and AF make it through. Otherwise it feels like any other tournament so far. I enjoyed The Summit more but we still have a ton of great matches so I'm holding out hope (for NP).
On December 09 2016 09:46 Papercappu wrote: single elimination ended up being pretty cool tbh. i still dont want it for TI though
I agree. My advice from improvement would be making two groups of 8, doing a bo1 or bo2 round robin, and 1st in group plays 8th in other group, etc. Then do the single elim bracket.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
...so basically you want more illusions for tower sieging.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
...so basically you want more illusions for tower sieging.
I just think on team fight at 20-25 minutes often decides the game, and I would prefer it to require a little bit more to break high ground. Nowadays when you look at something like that Alch pushing those rax, it just breaks base too quickly. Like you can almost just BKB and kill everything before the enemy can ward you off.
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: We all have different preferences. I really like when games go later, and games that or single or dual core... And we've been getting more of that than in the last year (before that there was a lot of 4 protect 1 though).
I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
Yeah people are quick to forget truely terrible heroes, ok SD allows to siege safely and it denies what is supposed to be THE fight of the game : the highground defense. But he's far from being as annoying as many heroes were when they were top pick imo. I'm dreaming of a dota without radiance on illusions though.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
...so basically you want more illusions for tower sieging.
I just think on team fight at 20-25 minutes often decides the game, and I would prefer it to require a little bit more to break high ground. Nowadays when you look at something like that Alch pushing those rax, it just breaks base too quickly. Like you can almost just BKB and kill everything before the enemy can ward you off.
Things that are strong at pushing, push too fast, while things that are slow at pushing have no chance.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
...so basically you want more illusions for tower sieging.
I just think on team fight at 20-25 minutes often decides the game, and I would prefer it to require a little bit more to break high ground. Nowadays when you look at something like that Alch pushing those rax, it just breaks base too quickly. Like you can almost just BKB and kill everything before the enemy can ward you off.
Things that are strong at pushing, push too fast, while things that are slow at pushing have no chance.
I still prefer this than the 20 minutes farming phase while containing the opponents in their base which was the rule before pushing highground. At least a team can now end when they have a lead. I'm not saying it's perfect but highground was just too tough to take for too long.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
...so basically you want more illusions for tower sieging.
I just think on team fight at 20-25 minutes often decides the game, and I would prefer it to require a little bit more to break high ground. Nowadays when you look at something like that Alch pushing those rax, it just breaks base too quickly. Like you can almost just BKB and kill everything before the enemy can ward you off.
The harder high ground becomes to break, the more often teams will resort to safe ways of doing it. There's simply too much risk in slow-sieging with heroes when comeback gold is in play.
if im forced to pick between illusions poking at buildings for 25 minutes a game and slacks content i think id pick the illusions. everything about this major sucks.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: We all have different preferences. I really like when games go later, and games that or single or dual core... And we've been getting more of that than in the last year (before that there was a lot of 4 protect 1 though).
I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
Yeah people are quick to forget truely terrible heroes, ok SD allows to siege safely and it denies what is supposed to be THE fight of the game : the highground defense. But he's far from being as annoying as many heroes were when they were top pick imo. I'm dreaming of a dota without radiance on illusions though.
I think of Radiance Illusions as a fun dynamic, I enjoy the imbalanced vs imbalanced hero kind of stuff rather than making heroes more mild. I think it's maybe more of radiance being too strong, I think removing the miss chance, or lowering burn damage to 50 or whatever would be more than overkill and we wouldn't even see illusion heroes anymore. So maybe a slight nerf to radiance would be good.
And yeah, I agree, SD is definitely one of the more enjoyable heroes. The less played heroes are always more fun to watch than the played ones, only so much you can do.
On December 09 2016 09:46 FiWiFaKi wrote: I think we're in a pretty good place all things considered. Honestly, the change that I would be most eager to make is giving rax twice as much effective health, and buffing towers by like 10% in damage and hp.
...so basically you want more illusions for tower sieging.
I just think on team fight at 20-25 minutes often decides the game, and I would prefer it to require a little bit more to break high ground. Nowadays when you look at something like that Alch pushing those rax, it just breaks base too quickly. Like you can almost just BKB and kill everything before the enemy can ward you off.
The harder high ground becomes to break, the more often teams will resort to safe ways of doing it. There's simply too much risk in slow-sieging with heroes when comeback gold is in play.
My opinion is that the later into the game you go, the more randomness you introduce. Like if you're behind, you'll get wrecked in mid game, but come late game, with good initiation you have a way larger chance.
That should be the big incentive to try and finish the game, so I don't really think stronger buildings would make people do it safely... The teams can resort to pushing high ground safely even now.
The panels have been pretty bad this major, they can't just get talent like Pyrion and Sheever and put them on an expert analysis panel. They don't have expert level insight
Honestly in a double elim system I think china would've wound up placing a lot better also. IG.V put up a really solid showing against VP who are the current favorites.
On December 09 2016 10:01 wims80 wrote: The panels have been pretty bad this major, they can't just get talent like Pyrion and Sheever and put them on an expert analysis panel. They don't have expert level insight
They're called "experts" but they are really audience surrogates.
Why do people put a band-aid on their forehead -__-... Especially when it's for a TV shot, it's not like a band-aid on your forehead even does anything.
On December 09 2016 10:01 wims80 wrote: The panels have been pretty bad this major, they can't just get talent like Pyrion and Sheever and put them on an expert analysis panel. They don't have expert level insight
dota has way too much shitty "talent" for a game of its size/age. idk how most of these people are still getting work.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
On December 09 2016 10:01 wims80 wrote: The panels have been pretty bad this major, they can't just get talent like Pyrion and Sheever and put them on an expert analysis panel. They don't have expert level insight
Fogged is decent but he's fairly quiet. Winter being there has been the best thing about the panels
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I think the idea was there will be 5 players in the Ro8.
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
On December 09 2016 10:01 wims80 wrote: The panels have been pretty bad this major, they can't just get talent like Pyrion and Sheever and put them on an expert analysis panel. They don't have expert level insight
Fogged is decent but he's fairly quiet. Winter being there has been the best thing about the panels
Winter always carries analyst desk and commentary. Just once I want him to have a good co-caster.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I think the idea was there will be 5 players in the Ro8.
why would he even say that out like that tho??? lol is mind blowing
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I don't understand what you're trying to say. And we have 10 Chinese players right now, but we'll be guaranteed only five in about two hours or less.
Draskyl, Merlini, Synd, Capitalist, Winter... Only 5 people in the scene I can think of that know a lot of stuff, and are charismatic enough to make very good analysts. Need to find some new talent somewhere.
On December 09 2016 10:01 wims80 wrote: The panels have been pretty bad this major, they can't just get talent like Pyrion and Sheever and put them on an expert analysis panel. They don't have expert level insight
You need to fill time with talking too and most experts are not good enough at that. Not everyone has the same role
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
Same, especially these last 2 series
Part of the reason the games are onesided is that they're based on group seedings : we're seeing the strongest team vs the weakest team in most of these matchups. (It would be even worse in this first set of matches if they used round robin for more accurate group seeding, I think).
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
Same, especially these last 2 series
Part of the reason the games are onesided is that they're based on group seedings : we're seeing the strongest team vs the weakest team in most of these matchups. (It would be even worse in this first set of matches if they used round robin for more accurate group seeding, I think).
The weaker team won 4 of the 7 series though (according to seedings)
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
Same, especially these last 2 series
Part of the reason the games are onesided is that they're based on group seedings : we're seeing the strongest team vs the weakest team in most of these matchups. (It would be even worse in this first set of matches if they used round robin for more accurate group seeding, I think).
The weaker team won 4 of the 7 series though (according to seedings)
On December 09 2016 10:10 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Man I'm not Slacks fan but he made like 3000 segments and interviews for this major that's pretty impressive
I feel like they should have split it up a bit, would be nice to see some variety. He is doing a fine job though.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I agree that it can come across as a touch racist, but if it was a starcraft tournament I don't think a similar statistic on korean participation would be out of place.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I don't understand what you're trying to say. And we have 10 Chinese players right now, but we'll be guaranteed only five in about two hours or less.
is just so weird the way they put it that way, because i was expecting the next game would be 2x LGD teams. And then he said we are down to 5 chinese players from 28, i was just like, wtf, did i miss the whole series
i mean, either way, you just dont say anything like that in any sport event, like '20 russians down to 2 russians'?
On December 09 2016 10:07 FiWiFaKi wrote: Draskyl, Merlini, Synd, Capitalist, Winter... Only 5 people in the scene I can think of that know a lot of stuff, and are charismatic enough to make very good analysts. Need to find some new talent somewhere.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I hear stats like that in olympic coverage all the time (especially if one nation had an overwhelming numbers advantage or something). It's not that rare in sports, really.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I don't understand what you're trying to say. And we have 10 Chinese players right now, but we'll be guaranteed only five in about two hours or less.
is just so weird the way they put it that way, because i was expecting the next game would be 2x LGD teams. And then he said we will be down to 5 chinese players, i was just like, wtf, did i miss the whole series
i mean, either way, you just dont say anything like that in any sport event, like '20 russians down to 2 russians'?
I wonder how many people it bothers. I don't think it would bother me regardless of which nationality they used.
Poll: Does what BurningSera is saying bother you aswell?
No (20)
95%
Yes (1)
5%
21 total votes
Your vote: Does what BurningSera is saying bother you aswell?
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
Same, especially these last 2 series
Part of the reason the games are onesided is that they're based on group seedings : we're seeing the strongest team vs the weakest team in most of these matchups. (It would be even worse in this first set of matches if they used round robin for more accurate group seeding, I think).
The weaker team won 4 of the 7 series though (according to seedings)
TBF, the groups were not balanced at all in my opinion given the situation with visas and also the valve invite policy.
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
Same, especially these last 2 series
Part of the reason the games are onesided is that they're based on group seedings : we're seeing the strongest team vs the weakest team in most of these matchups. (It would be even worse in this first set of matches if they used round robin for more accurate group seeding, I think).
The weaker team won 4 of the 7 series though (according to seedings)
TBF, the groups were not balanced at all in my opinion given the situation with visas and also the valve invite policy.
That's why group seedings argument makes no sense since that presumes a good seeding and fair groups.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I hear stats like that in olympic coverage all the time (especially if one nation had an overwhelming numbers advantage or something). It's not that rare in sports, really.
edit : At least in the US
i can understand that, only if one side traditionally (absolutely) dominates that sport. but chinese to dota is not like korean to sc.
On December 09 2016 09:46 apes wrote: everyone getting caught up in their favorites winning or losing should take a step back. these games are fuckin terrible.
I humbly disagree, I think the games have been fine.
Same, especially these last 2 series
Part of the reason the games are onesided is that they're based on group seedings : we're seeing the strongest team vs the weakest team in most of these matchups. (It would be even worse in this first set of matches if they used round robin for more accurate group seeding, I think).
The weaker team won 4 of the 7 series though (according to seedings)
TBF, the groups were not balanced at all in my opinion given the situation with visas and also the valve invite policy.
That's why group seedings argument makes no sense since that presumes a good seeding and fair groups.
yeah I agree with you, I don't think the "seeds" meant that much besides the 1/4. Finishing fourth basically was indicative that you stunk lol.
On December 09 2016 10:00 BurningSera wrote: wtf, who wrote that script, 28 chinese players down to 5, what????
what, i dont even xD
they probably took the stat off liquipedia and misquoted it
i mean, who the hell says anything along that line in 2016, imagine 'we have 28 americans down to 5 americans' in any sport game event for example, wtf lol.
and not only that, the game is LGD vs LGD, so literally 10 chinese players are in front of us right now lolol
I don't understand what you're trying to say. And we have 10 Chinese players right now, but we'll be guaranteed only five in about two hours or less.
is just so weird the way they put it that way, because i was expecting the next game would be 2x LGD teams. And then he said we are down to 5 chinese players from 28, i was just like, wtf, did i miss the whole series
i mean, either way, you just dont say anything like that in any sport event, like '20 russians down to 2 russians'?
You do if you expect the Russians to do really well, I think that was their point. I don't find it mind-blowing at all
On December 09 2016 10:55 Kuroeeah wrote: this is the most unchina-chinese game i've ever seen
This is China as fuck though. VG vs Newbee TI4? All the DK brawls?
China has been all about massacring each other at every tower since TI2 at least. Sometimes Chinese teams almost border on naivety on how gung-ho they are about their 5man facerush stuff and going into every fight.
On December 09 2016 10:55 Kuroeeah wrote: this is the most unchina-chinese game i've ever seen
This is China as fuck though. VG vs Newbee TI4? All the DK brawls?
China has been all about massacring each other at every tower since TI2 at least. Sometimes Chinese teams almost border on naivety on how gung-ho they are about their 5man facerush stuff and going into every fight.
VG vs Newbee was horrendously boring (ti4 finals lul) and DK's playstyle as a team is deviated from the rest of the world (much like how Wing's is not a Chinese-like team in playstyle). IG was a great example of a team that also aggressive until the roster changes.
LGD is the most stable ass Chinese, Chinese team and this game is clowny as fuck.
On December 09 2016 10:55 Kuroeeah wrote: this is the most unchina-chinese game i've ever seen
This is China as fuck though. VG vs Newbee TI4? All the DK brawls?
China has been all about massacring each other at every tower since TI2 at least. Sometimes Chinese teams almost border on naivety on how gung-ho they are about their 5man facerush stuff and going into every fight.
VG vs Newbee was horrendously boring (ti4 finals lul) and DK's playstyle as a team is deviated from the rest of the world (much like how Wing's is not a Chinese-like team in playstyle). IG was a great example of a team that also aggressive until the roster changes.
LGD is the most stable ass Chinese, Chinese team and this game is clowny as fuck.
It was boring for you because you couldn't get hyped. But we are talking about Dota here, not your feelings. VG vs Newbee was all about taking 10 minute 5v5 fights non-stop, Newbee just happened to win ALL of them plus the lanes in games 3 and 4. Ever since the introduction of smokes and the changes in 6.70~6.72 China has generally favoured early-mid game teamfight comps
And yeah DK was a more versatile team, as is Wings, but they never shied away from a good ol' bloodbath like this one.
On December 09 2016 10:55 Kuroeeah wrote: this is the most unchina-chinese game i've ever seen
This is China as fuck though. VG vs Newbee TI4? All the DK brawls?
China has been all about massacring each other at every tower since TI2 at least. Sometimes Chinese teams almost border on naivety on how gung-ho they are about their 5man facerush stuff and going into every fight.
VG vs Newbee was horrendously boring (ti4 finals lul) and DK's playstyle as a team is deviated from the rest of the world (much like how Wing's is not a Chinese-like team in playstyle). IG was a great example of a team that also aggressive until the roster changes.
LGD is the most stable ass Chinese, Chinese team and this game is clowny as fuck.
It was boring for you because you couldn't get hyped. But we are talking about Dota here, not your feelings. VG vs Newbee was all about taking 10 minute 5v5 fights non-stop, Newbee just happened to win ALL of them plus the lanes in games 3 and 4. Ever since the introduction of smokes and the changes in 6.70~6.72 China has generally favoured early-mid game teamfight comps
And yeah DK was a more versatile team, as is Wings, but they never shied away from a good ol' bloodbath like this one.
it's more like VG failed to memepush. all of their drafts was super all-in that game
On December 09 2016 11:20 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: oh this SK kill might save LGD
BUT THEY GO BACK TO BASE???
literally did nothing with 80sec dead SK
If they were 0-1 down, I'd kind of understand. But what is this, are they trying to throw or something. I've never seen a pro team play this scared for no logical reason.
LGD making strange choices in fights. Get easy pickoff. Then stay with three people having the slardar debuff on them when trying to back out after disruptor cd is over.
LGD just get jumped on and jumped on just like last game. No initiative or clear play goals. They push to the tower but then weaver goes farm ancients instead of hitting it
TBH China has performed below expectation for a long time now, with a few exceptions here and there (CDEC, Wings). Maybe the game has shifted away too much from what they used to be good at.
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
On December 09 2016 13:20 Nevuk wrote: I really wonder what sgamer is saying about the chinese performances.
Back to flaming ehome(especially sylar and lanm) like they have done since season start, guessing new teams to come out of next shuffle, some thread asking CTY to return, someone asking xiao8 to beat greeks and many more
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
JW do you hate the NA scene for doing the exact same things?
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
JW do you hate the NA scene for doing the exact same things?
This is a fair question. The NA scene has always been an amazing race to the bottom that somehow produces a few good dota players.
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
Buuut didn't AUI came out with a bloggo about how important replays are in improving the scene? Why is there such drama here, west can share reps of china if they want to study.
Why are replays so sacred? should we return to BW days when reps are banned from release.
On December 09 2016 12:31 calh wrote: TBH China has performed below expectation for a long time now, with a few exceptions here and there (CDEC, Wings). Maybe the game has shifted away too much from what they used to be good at.
grass root dota still there.
it's being known that the new comers in Chinese scene are not as strong as the west and they've being going through a transition phase for 2 TIs now.
On December 09 2016 12:31 calh wrote: TBH China has performed below expectation for a long time now, with a few exceptions here and there (CDEC, Wings). Maybe the game has shifted away too much from what they used to be good at.
grass root dota still there.
it's being known that the new comers in Chinese scene are not as strong as the west and they've being going through a transition phase for 2 TIs now.
On December 09 2016 12:31 calh wrote: TBH China has performed below expectation for a long time now, with a few exceptions here and there (CDEC, Wings). Maybe the game has shifted away too much from what they used to be good at.
grass root dota still there.
it's being known that the new comers in Chinese scene are not as strong as the west and they've being going through a transition phase for 2 TIs now.
On December 09 2016 12:37 kidswift wrote: robodoto is no longer efficient? good.
The problem is that they no longer play that. I think it would be very efficient if they actually did it.
LGD losing today was due to too many individual plays with no plan. So they often got a good start then fell apart when they should be following a team strategy and focusing pre-arranged targets in fights.
On December 09 2016 14:49 sweatbomb wrote: China failed hard this major.
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
JW do you hate the NA scene for doing the exact same things?
This is a fair question. The NA scene has always been an amazing race to the bottom that somehow produces a few good dota players.
To me, NA looks more like kids who don't know any better. Chinese teams give off the vibe of a vandetta against other regions that is more intentional.
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
JW do you hate the NA scene for doing the exact same things?
This is a fair question. The NA scene has always been an amazing race to the bottom that somehow produces a few good dota players.
To me, NA looks more like kids who don't know any better. Chinese teams give off the vibe of a vandetta against other regions that is more intentional.
NA had a vendetta against DC because they got paid a salary lmao
On December 09 2016 16:43 Shergal wrote: China dominated TI5 though, only EG and Secret were better but Secret choked to hell (to Chinese team EHOME)
by that Logic with exception of TI 1, every TI China is either Wins it or Dominate it
TI1 : 4 team, 2 out of top 6 is China, Winner : CIS TI2 : 5 team, 4 out of top 6 is China, Winner : China TI3 : 5 team, 3 out of top 6 is China, Winner : EU TI4 : 5 team, 4 out of top 6 is China, Winner : China TI5 : 6 team, 4 out of top 6 is China, Winner : NA TI6 : 6 team, 2 out of top 6 is China, Winner : China
so we can say TI6 is actually the worst China as a whole have perform since TI1
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
There's nothing even remotely unethical about sharing your experiences with friends
On December 09 2016 12:31 FiWiFaKi wrote: When looking at all the chinese teams still left in the tournament, there isn't a single one who's won a single game against a non-chinese team.
They shouldn't get more than one direct invite after this performance.
a single game or a single series ? because EHOME won 1 game against NP you a super west-fanboy or east-hatetrain?
Because of the entire performance of the chinese teams this tournament.
And I don't like how the chinese teams are fairly unethical/unsportsmanlike, so maybe that has a bit to do with it, but mainly based on merit.
i'm not sure what you argument is about whether it's about chinese being terrible or unethical.. i'm not even sure what you mean by unenthical i don't see them like that
you can't not uninvite chinese so they don't do that well in a single tournament .. they've done well on the others and they've always done well at TI
I think the whole unethical thing comes from the Chinese teams sharing replays of scrims with Western teams among each other
i don't really see anything wrong with that
there's no disclosure agreement that they can't share those .. and i bet even western teams talk about stuff they discover from other teams to teams/players they are close with
It's just stuff that rubbed me the wrong ways, like when the chinese scene were lynching was it DK? Just whenever drama comes out from the Chinese scene, I'm like this is so stupid, nothing big comes to mind right now though.
And that's what I'm saying, there's no NDA agreement... Hence why what they're doing is not illegal, but rather unethical or unsportsmanlike, at least from my view of competition.
There's nothing even remotely unethical about sharing your experiences with friends
I mean, whatever, they think helping each other will help chinese scene grow. So they're doing that, it is like NA grouped and did this agaisnt eu or vice-versa, it would be fine imo.
I personally have no idea what the implied agreement about sharing information is when two teams agree to scrim, nor if different teams have different opinions on the issue. If I were to guess, though, I'd say it's probably "don't share info on the scrim" because if both teams agree to mutually share info with their own compatriots, it's possible both teams would be worse off and people would then avoid scrimming.