On January 17 2016 02:26 bluzi wrote: I wonder why its not a BO5 did SL commented on it ???? i guess its the venue or something like that....
liquipedia says bo5 grand finals
is there a reliable source that says bo3?
Well Loda thinks its a bo5, he said so in the post match interview.
EG's diverse hero pool will prove to be too much. EG can play all of Alliance's signature heroes, while Alliance cannot do the same. EG doesn't need to automatically ban LD/NP/Batrider and so on because they can just pick them for themselves. This is why EG has been the most dominant team over the last couple years. Huge hero pool and flexibility in the roles. Alliance is playing some fantastic Dota, I think it will be a good series. But it goes 3-1 for EG.
On January 17 2016 02:26 bluzi wrote: I wonder why its not a BO5 did SL commented on it ???? i guess its the venue or something like that....
liquipedia says bo5 grand finals
is there a reliable source that says bo3?
Well Loda thinks its a bo5, he said so in the post match interview.
EG's diverse hero pool will prove to be too much. EG can play all of Alliance's signature heroes, while Alliance cannot do the same. EG doesn't need to automatically ban LD/NP/Batrider and so on because they can just pick them for themselves. This is why EG has been the most dominant team over the last couple years. Huge hero pool and flexibility in the roles. Alliance is playing some fantastic Dota, I think it will be a good series. But it goes 3-1 for EG.
I'm not sure who to cheer for tomorrow, but I guess probably Alliance. Nothing creates more salt on here than Alliance winning, and I'm fueled by salt. Mark my words, even if they theoretically stomped EG tomorrow, this thread would still fill up with people saying it was just a fluke and Alliance is still a tier 3 team etc.
They have the most dedicated haters of any team out there, I love it.
Sheever said it was Bo3 on stream, even if everyone is thinking it's a Bo5. Probably should get some clarity on that.
Since I won't be around for the event itself, more than likely, I'll take a second run at figuring out what PPD will attempt to ban away from Alliance. I managed to figure out the bans again LGD simply because LGD didn't play too much beyond a certain set of heroes.
Alliance is a little trickier, as EG has used much of the same hero pool this tournament. Especially as other people are picking Nature's Prophet a lot. There's also a benefit to forcing s4 to pick up the Bulldog hero early, as it saves him a ban on Broodmother. But ppd banned Chen & Nature's Prophet in their group stage game, while Puppey banned Wisp + Batrider/Nature's Prophet (x2).
I think ppd is going to ban Chen + 1 other. So I'm going to go with Chen + Batrider in the first phase. Both are signature heroes that are currently well in the Meta, plus early roamers, which Alliance has done well lately. Second phase bans are going to be dependent who they lock in during the first phase. Though if EG has first pick, don't be surprised to see Chen + Nature's Prophet Bans with First Pick Lone Druid.
they have two grand finals tomorrow and even cs is bo3. it's always disappointing when a final isn't a bo5 (or has a WB advantage). they had 4 series today. I don't understand both bo3 finals -_-'
in cs teams made clear that they don't want a bo5 final if it is the same day as the semi final. but that's not the case with this tournament
On January 17 2016 08:09 Nyan wrote: they have two grand finals tomorrow and even cs is bo3. it's always disappointing when a final isn't a bo5 (or has a WB advantage). they had 4 series today. I don't understand both bo3 finals -_-'
in cs teams made clear that they don't want a bo5 final if it is the same day as the semi final. but that's not the case with this tournament
It's gotta be scheduling. A Dota2 Bo5 could be anywhere from 2.5 hours to 6 hours to complete. Depending on how quickly some games go and if you get a barn-burner of a super-long game.
EG's going to be the biggest challenge yet for Alliance, although that's hardly a surprise to mention. Sumail is one of the few players in the entire scene who can equal or eclipse s4 in laning and playmaking, and honestly Alliance could just straight-up lose based on that. RTZ rices as hard as Bulldog, and has a wider and more flexible hero pool, even if his breadth doesn't match Loda. Fear is the equal or possibly superior to EGM, though a full potential EGM can pull off sickeningly good plays that even Fear struggles to match. PPD isn't as good ingame as Akke, but his drafting is legendary for dismantling seemingly unstoppable strategies and is certainly being turned on Alliance as we speak. Universe defies comparison to any other player, although it's worth noting that he does have off games.
At the same time, however, Alliance does offer some significant threats to EG. PPD has never faced their strategy in the flesh before, and it's totally possible that the Swedes will work the game from an angle that he's just not prepared to handle. One of EG's flaws is also their uncoordinated teamfights, which are generally carried by superb individual performances by Universe, Sumail, and occasionally Fear, rather than having all the players operate in perfect unity. Alliance, on the other hand, rarely has knockout performances in teamfights by anyone but s4 and EGM, and instead win them through a level of coordination only matched by some rare few Chinese teams. Teamfights could just backfire on EG insanely hard. Similarly, Alliance's lanes tend to perform shockingly well, sometimes in defiance of draft, and their aggression could be a painful blow to EG.
All in all, it's very hard to judge between the two. EG have the decisive advantage, and if someone held a gun to my head and forced me to put money on the match, I'd put it on them. But Alliance is their equal in mental fortitude with the attitude of champions and access to some strange dimension of play that doesn't seem to square properly with what anyone else does. In a certain sense, it's reminiscent of the TI3 finals, of a match between two enduring teams with the potential and desire to win it all. This could be just an utter stomp, if the unity of Alliance isn't enough to match the talent and strategy of EG, but it also has the potential to be a real clash of the titans and a match to remember.
I'm pretty excited for it. It helps that I love both teams and will be happy with either one winning. The way that they play this game is beautiful to me, and I'm real happy to see them at the top of this stacked tournament.
On January 17 2016 13:33 Acritter wrote: All in all, it's very hard to judge between the two. EG have the decisive advantage, and if someone held a gun to my head and forced me to put money on the match, I'd put it on them. But Alliance is their equal in mental fortitude with the attitude of champions and access to some strange dimension of play that doesn't seem to square properly with what anyone else does. In a certain sense, it's reminiscent of the TI3 finals, of a match between two enduring teams with the potential and desire to win it all. This could be just an utter stomp, if the unity of Alliance isn't enough to match the talent and strategy of EG, but it also has the potential to be a real clash of the titans and a match to remember.
I'm pretty excited for it. It helps that I love both teams and will be happy with either one winning. The way that they play this game is beautiful to me, and I'm real happy to see them at the top of this stacked tournament.
I just hope it'll be good overall. Both teams actually accomplished the majority of what they needed by making the final. EG showed they're still on form in the new meta (or setting it with First Pick Vengeful Spirit/Witch Doctor) and Alliance showed they should be at Shanghai. (They also showed that poise under pressure that got them the invite by winning WCA. Liquid, Empire and LGD all could have gotten that Invite by winning there, it turned out.) So at this point, while I'd like to see EG win, I really just want some good Dota. That's the important thing.
And I really wish it was a Bo5, so we could see the adjustments come online. ppd could roll out either that super-sustain strategy he ran early in the Bo1 or their push-heavier style. Alliance actually had some pretty good bans against EG the first time, but I think Faceless Void probably gets First Phase Banned. I'd love to see Sumail's Invoker, but I'm fairly sure that's going to get banned right away.
On January 17 2016 13:33 Acritter wrote: All in all, it's very hard to judge between the two. EG have the decisive advantage, and if someone held a gun to my head and forced me to put money on the match, I'd put it on them. But Alliance is their equal in mental fortitude with the attitude of champions and access to some strange dimension of play that doesn't seem to square properly with what anyone else does. In a certain sense, it's reminiscent of the TI3 finals, of a match between two enduring teams with the potential and desire to win it all. This could be just an utter stomp, if the unity of Alliance isn't enough to match the talent and strategy of EG, but it also has the potential to be a real clash of the titans and a match to remember.
I'm pretty excited for it. It helps that I love both teams and will be happy with either one winning. The way that they play this game is beautiful to me, and I'm real happy to see them at the top of this stacked tournament.
I just hope it'll be good overall. Both teams actually accomplished the majority of what they needed by making the final. EG showed they're still on form in the new meta (or setting it with First Pick Vengeful Spirit/Witch Doctor) and Alliance showed they should be at Shanghai. (They also showed that pose under pressure that got them the invite by winning WCA. Liquid, Empire and LGD all could have gotten that Invite by winning there, it turned out.) So at this point, while I'd like to see EG win, I really just want some good Dota. That's the important thing.
And I really wish it was a Bo5, so we could see the adjustments come online. ppd could roll out either that super-sustain strategy he ran early in the Bo1 or their push-heavier style. Alliance actually had some pretty good bans against EG the first time, but I think Faceless Void probably gets First Phase Banned. I'd love to see Sumail's Invoker, but I'm fairly sure that's going to get banned right away.
I'm a little bit in the opposite boat: EG are always going to be a monstrous team and very well-respected no matter what happens, and they're used to taking second-place finishes in events like this. For Alliance, though, winning this would be massive. It would be a huge confidence boost, and would really shake the scene up. It would be exciting as hell to see. But more than that, I want both teams to bring their best Dota and show us what it really means to be world champion.
Bo5 would be by far the best, I agree. It would nudge the advantage in EG's favor for sure, but it would also bump up the quality of games. Void is gonna get banned unless Alliance run some kind of targeted punish (which is totally possible), and it's pretty likely that EG are going to ban s4 playmaking heroes. He's so central to Alliance's gameplan that interrupting him will give EG a huge advantage. I hope we get one game of full Alliance rat, to see how EG react to it, and some nice mid matchups. I'm pretty damn eager right now.
On January 17 2016 13:33 Acritter wrote: All in all, it's very hard to judge between the two. EG have the decisive advantage, and if someone held a gun to my head and forced me to put money on the match, I'd put it on them. But Alliance is their equal in mental fortitude with the attitude of champions and access to some strange dimension of play that doesn't seem to square properly with what anyone else does. In a certain sense, it's reminiscent of the TI3 finals, of a match between two enduring teams with the potential and desire to win it all. This could be just an utter stomp, if the unity of Alliance isn't enough to match the talent and strategy of EG, but it also has the potential to be a real clash of the titans and a match to remember.
I'm pretty excited for it. It helps that I love both teams and will be happy with either one winning. The way that they play this game is beautiful to me, and I'm real happy to see them at the top of this stacked tournament.
I just hope it'll be good overall. Both teams actually accomplished the majority of what they needed by making the final. EG showed they're still on form in the new meta (or setting it with First Pick Vengeful Spirit/Witch Doctor) and Alliance showed they should be at Shanghai. (They also showed that pose under pressure that got them the invite by winning WCA. Liquid, Empire and LGD all could have gotten that Invite by winning there, it turned out.) So at this point, while I'd like to see EG win, I really just want some good Dota. That's the important thing.
And I really wish it was a Bo5, so we could see the adjustments come online. ppd could roll out either that super-sustain strategy he ran early in the Bo1 or their push-heavier style. Alliance actually had some pretty good bans against EG the first time, but I think Faceless Void probably gets First Phase Banned. I'd love to see Sumail's Invoker, but I'm fairly sure that's going to get banned right away.
I'm a little bit in the opposite boat: EG are always going to be a monstrous team and very well-respected no matter what happens, and they're used to taking second-place finishes in events like this. For Alliance, though, winning this would be massive. It would be a huge confidence boost, and would really shake the scene up. It would be exciting as hell to see. But more than that, I want both teams to bring their best Dota and show us what it really means to be world champion.
Bo5 would be by far the best, I agree. It would nudge the advantage in EG's favor for sure, but it would also bump up the quality of games. Void is gonna get banned unless Alliance run some kind of targeted punish (which is totally possible), and it's pretty likely that EG are going to ban s4 playmaking heroes. He's so central to Alliance's gameplan that interrupting him will give EG a huge advantage. I hope we get one game of full Alliance rat, to see how EG react to it, and some nice mid matchups. I'm pretty damn eager right now.
By the way, did you mean "poise under pressure?"
Whatever could you mean by that last question.
I do think the Batrider is going to be the pick that's contended for the most. ppd did draft it early in 1 game for Sumail, he normally doesn't like to give away Sumail's pick until later. (It seems like there is more value in dominating Mid Lane via a good pick/bad counter available for Sumail, since it let's him snowball a lot easier and it opens up the entire middle of the map for ganking.) But I'm going to be really surprised if Lone Druid makes it through to the second phase during the series. Especially since Arteezy can play it both safe & mid.
I'm also curious if ppd breaks out the Earth Spirit in game 1. Jerax did destroy Alliance with it, but Liquid didn't have the followup to capitalize. You need burst or further catch to use all of the stun + silences well. I'm actually curious if Invoker + Earth Spirit isn't the most stupidly powerful combo in the game at the moment. Which is probably why Invoker is getting banned all 3 games.
EG will use very strong supports to fuck up the lanes. Bat, NP, LD, brood both teams will contest a lot. EG will be scared to death of brood, but might allow Alliance to have LD with a plan in mind. Not bold predictions, but yeah.
Lingering in my mind is also EG using Morphling after losing to it yesterday. RTZ does like the hero, and it can fit into already comfortable EG lineups without much changing.
or they will pick LD for themselves in first phase and just ban NP...giving bat to universe seems like plausible choice ...sumail invoker can also be their choice with those...alacrity on bear is awesome.
On January 17 2016 16:19 uthgard wrote: I'll be both happy and unhappy when either of these two teams win due to my dislike of them
at this point my only hope is for the games to be as clowny as possible
yea,same here..i don't support any of these teams,neither do care for any of their players...but i would like to watch clowny series going into game 3 as much as possible.
On January 17 2016 16:19 uthgard wrote: I'll be both happy and unhappy when either of these two teams win due to my dislike of them
at this point my only hope is for the games to be as clowny as possible
yea,same here..i don't support any of these teams,neither do care for any of their players...but i would like to watch clowny series going into game 3 as much as possible.
On January 17 2016 16:19 uthgard wrote: I'll be both happy and unhappy when either of these two teams win due to my dislike of them
at this point my only hope is for the games to be as clowny as possible
yea,same here..i don't support any of these teams,neither do care for any of their players...but i would like to watch clowny series going into game 3 as much as possible.
why don't you like their players?
i said i don't care if any of those player win...that doesnt mean i dont like them ...i just dont support them..IDK how it sounded and how u took it..not sure how to rephrase it..just as an example,i like PPD for his captainship,but i don't care if he wins or loses his games.same with both old men loda and fear because i support other teams. :D
This is quite awesome..minsk has some hardcore fans
On January 17 2016 13:33 Acritter wrote: All in all, it's very hard to judge between the two. EG have the decisive advantage, and if someone held a gun to my head and forced me to put money on the match, I'd put it on them. But Alliance is their equal in mental fortitude with the attitude of champions and access to some strange dimension of play that doesn't seem to square properly with what anyone else does. In a certain sense, it's reminiscent of the TI3 finals, of a match between two enduring teams with the potential and desire to win it all. This could be just an utter stomp, if the unity of Alliance isn't enough to match the talent and strategy of EG, but it also has the potential to be a real clash of the titans and a match to remember.
I'm pretty excited for it. It helps that I love both teams and will be happy with either one winning. The way that they play this game is beautiful to me, and I'm real happy to see them at the top of this stacked tournament.
I just hope it'll be good overall. Both teams actually accomplished the majority of what they needed by making the final. EG showed they're still on form in the new meta (or setting it with First Pick Vengeful Spirit/Witch Doctor) and Alliance showed they should be at Shanghai. (They also showed that pose under pressure that got them the invite by winning WCA. Liquid, Empire and LGD all could have gotten that Invite by winning there, it turned out.) So at this point, while I'd like to see EG win, I really just want some good Dota. That's the important thing.
And I really wish it was a Bo5, so we could see the adjustments come online. ppd could roll out either that super-sustain strategy he ran early in the Bo1 or their push-heavier style. Alliance actually had some pretty good bans against EG the first time, but I think Faceless Void probably gets First Phase Banned. I'd love to see Sumail's Invoker, but I'm fairly sure that's going to get banned right away.
I'm a little bit in the opposite boat: EG are always going to be a monstrous team and very well-respected no matter what happens, and they're used to taking second-place finishes in events like this. For Alliance, though, winning this would be massive. It would be a huge confidence boost, and would really shake the scene up. It would be exciting as hell to see. But more than that, I want both teams to bring their best Dota and show us what it really means to be world champion.
Bo5 would be by far the best, I agree. It would nudge the advantage in EG's favor for sure, but it would also bump up the quality of games. Void is gonna get banned unless Alliance run some kind of targeted punish (which is totally possible), and it's pretty likely that EG are going to ban s4 playmaking heroes. He's so central to Alliance's gameplan that interrupting him will give EG a huge advantage. I hope we get one game of full Alliance rat, to see how EG react to it, and some nice mid matchups. I'm pretty damn eager right now.
By the way, did you mean "poise under pressure?"
Whatever could you mean by that last question.
I do think the Batrider is going to be the pick that's contended for the most. ppd did draft it early in 1 game for Sumail, he normally doesn't like to give away Sumail's pick until later. (It seems like there is more value in dominating Mid Lane via a good pick/bad counter available for Sumail, since it let's him snowball a lot easier and it opens up the entire middle of the map for ganking.) But I'm going to be really surprised if Lone Druid makes it through to the second phase during the series. Especially since Arteezy can play it both safe & mid.
I'm also curious if ppd breaks out the Earth Spirit in game 1. Jerax did destroy Alliance with it, but Liquid didn't have the followup to capitalize. You need burst or further catch to use all of the stun + silences well. I'm actually curious if Invoker + Earth Spirit isn't the most stupidly powerful combo in the game at the moment. Which is probably why Invoker is getting banned all 3 games.
Oh, that must have been my mistake. Seeing things that aren't there, or something. I'll have to clean my monitor.
It's very interesting how differently Alliance and PPD treat the issue of playmaking. PPD tends to be conservative, exactly as you say, using Sumail as the X-factor in much the same way as LGD use Sylar, while Alliance are perfectly happy to broadcast an insane portion of their draft with a first phase Puck. However, the only way EG ever get LD is if they devote their first pick to the hero. Alliance have left absolutely no question about how much they value that hero. I think EG are going to make their peace with that and try to get their drafting advantage elsewhere. Or, rather, I think that if they fall into the trap of trying to contest the bear, they're going to let the rest of Alliance punish their arrogance heavily. The strong heroes that EG likes to keep in hiding until the second phase aren't going to be permitted that kind of luxury against Alliance.
If EG use Earth Spirit, Alliance are probably going to play around it strategically in the same way as they did against Liquid, with high aggression making rotations just look weak, and mechanically a lot better. I can't help but feel that picking Earth Spirit against Alliance is a hidden trap in the same way as banning Bullldog heroes is.
Hi everybody, I dont read everything but someone can explain me why nobody buy necro on LD considering battle cry buff all units under the control of LD ? 150 damage added seem pretty broken with a good root timing
On January 17 2016 18:18 Tegenaria wrote: Hi everybody, I dont read everything but someone can explain me why nobody buy necro on LD considering battle cry buff all units under the control of LD ? 150 damage added seem pretty broken with a good root timing
He can use other items better usually , Radiance is a must as AC , after that usually its items that he needs to keep things locked down or hit ppl with - Basher/MKB (evasion heroes) . If you go Necro (which isn't bad at all) you need to do it first item to have big impact , so skipping Radiance which means you are all in on the Necro , really risky , today`s bear is a farming machine so a Midas + Radiance is the meta , makes you scale really well. Necro as a 3rd big item is usually a waste as the impact those little dudes have diminish with time.
I hate them both. either way I felt lost already but I hate [A] more, so gonna bitterly cheer for EG but since day 2 of this tournament whoever I cheer for is losing that's why it ends up 2 of my hated team in the grand final
Started watching dota after TI2 when beta keys were easy to get, this team has a special flavor to me. I'm also a big loda defender, he's a great player. . The patch team argument was just to start a random LR argument which are usually fun.
I don't see alliance depushing the deathball from EG or trading towers very well against luna's aura + jakiro. On the other hand, alliance has more comfort heroes than EG.
On January 17 2016 19:26 Kamisamanachi wrote: U know what, This is the exact same lineup alliance had against cloud9 at ESL frankfurt semifinals game 2..i am sure it is same
This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team. Why do you even bring up Chinese teams when they've never done well against this very team?
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
yea..they beat them at ESL new york with an insane early game outplay...go check your knowledge
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Yeah okay, maybe you will shut up when you're spouting BS?
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
pretty sure he started playing dota wayy before that and placed 4th at TI4..
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Shouldn't say never if you don't actually mean never.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Yeah okay, maybe you will shut up when you're spouting BS?
Why don't you get a bit of common sense? Of course I was talking about 2014. Do I actually need to explain what a figure of speech is?
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Yeah okay, maybe you will shut up when you're spouting BS?
Why don't you get a bit of common sense? Of course I was talking about 2014... Of course I was, uh uh.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
pretty sure he started playing dota wayy before that and placed 4th at TI4..
He joined his first fully professional Dota team in 2014 and started playing amateur in 2013.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Yeah okay, maybe you will shut up when you're spouting BS?
Why don't you get a bit of common sense? Of course I was talking about 2014. Do I actually need to explain what a figure of speech is?
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Yeah okay, maybe you will shut up when you're spouting BS?
Why don't you get a bit of common sense? Of course I was talking about 2014... Of course I was, uh uh.
You said "never".
If you don't mean "never", you don't say "never".
Holy shit you guys are pedantic. I'm just not going to respond to this shit in the future.
On January 17 2016 19:40 Kipsate wrote: im suprised Loda doesnt go for Blink first before Radiance but I suppose they don't need any initition right now
He's in no rush to provide more for his team, he can wait a bit more to hit a stronger timing a bit later.
On January 17 2016 19:35 Acritter wrote: This is exactly what I saw as a serious risk for EG. Alliance's aggression and cohesion are just miles ahead of anyone but some of the Chinese teams, like how VG was at their peak. EG relies so much on individual skill that their team cohesion is lacking, making them hugely vulnerable to this kind of play.
Except VG never beat PPD's team.
Yeah, ESL One New York 2014 never happened /s
Yeah okay let's go back two years to when PPD first started playing Dota.
Yeah okay, maybe you will shut up when you're spouting BS?
Why don't you get a bit of common sense? Of course I was talking about 2014... Of course I was, uh uh.
You said "never".
If you don't mean "never", you don't say "never".
Holy shit you guys are pedantic. I'm just not going to respond to this shit in the future.
Nah, you just putting your head in the sand here, nothing else.
On January 17 2016 19:52 Danzo wrote: Man is Qop heavy nerf or did Sumail just choke hard? He rarely loses mid that hard.
Alliance supports were free to do whatever they wanted while s4 was safe 'cause EG's supports were focusing on shutting down Bulldog. Made a big difference.
On January 17 2016 19:52 Dysisa wrote: Picking Luna for RTZ was definitely a mistake, but I wonder what carry they should have picked for him instead?
The DS was a much bigger problem for them in my eyes. They had nobody to initiate with before the game was over. 0 pressure on Alliance. Something like a SB there and charge might split the map up for them instead of doing nothing when being forced out of lane.
The competitive scene is so weird right now... Seriously even after their WCA win I would say (and many people propably agree) that Alliance was a dark horse, Underdog or whatever. And they are slamming through this bracket just like OG did slam through the Frankfurt major and like Alliance did before at WCA... it feels so weird that you cant bet on anything right now for sure. Regarding that its not even that surprising that Secret casually bombed out in the first round (meaning you can rule out the slump argument)
s4 outplayed sumail soo hard ..and that luna pick,rofl...good stuff from alliance..
this patch feels like supports keeping their safe lane alive or rotating to kill enemy safe lane or offlane and not mid...this is reverse of last patch
Iirc harassed hard early then got a solo kill. Sumail nearly died again but got a kill on the dazzle dive (3 hp). After that return to base puck was too far ahead for him to lane easily
On January 17 2016 19:56 Kamisamanachi wrote: s4 outplayed sumail soo hard ..and that luna pick,rofl...good stuff from alliance..
this patch feels like supports keeping their safe lane alive or rotating to kill enemy safe lane or offlane and not mid...this is reverse of last patch
I don't think many NP players outside of bulldog would have got so much from this lane. This T1 was up during so long and served as a bait for so many fights.
On January 17 2016 19:58 Elurie wrote: If they have to pick one or another, I'd say wisp was more ban-worthy than furion.
definitely but if bulldog needs to he will surely get his farm and pressure the whole map. one very important aspect is also like he always scouts with his treants and arguably always the right spot to the right time.
On January 17 2016 19:54 Terrorbladder wrote: I tuned in the last 20 mins of this game so how did sumail lose mid to s4 puck?
Besides it being a nice match up, he had help.
Doesn't matter if he had help
giving up a solo kill is inexcuseable and and something that shouldn't happen
Sumail fucked up this game.
I didn't actually see the solo kill, but depending on what happened it's somewhat excusable. When you're extremely pressured mid you sometimes have to playrisky and really push it in order to not get crushed. Sometimes that ends up killing you and crushing you more.
On January 17 2016 20:01 sunrazgriz wrote: guys, the draft is even or there is an outdraft ?
Idk if it was outdraft and more of just outplay in the lane stages of the game and Alliance support rotations. Sure they shut down bulldog Nature Prophet, but at the cost of first blood on Dark Seer and Sumail losing mid and dying to rotations.
On January 17 2016 19:54 Terrorbladder wrote: I tuned in the last 20 mins of this game so how did sumail lose mid to s4 puck?
Besides it being a nice match up, he had help.
Doesn't matter if he had help
giving up a solo kill is inexcuseable and and something that shouldn't happen
Sumail fucked up this game.
I didn't actually see the solo kill, but depending on what happened it's somewhat excusable. When you're extremely pressured mid you sometimes have to playrisky and really push it in order to not get crushed. Sometimes that ends up killing you and crushing you more.
Playing safely isn't always the best thing to do.
And we're talking about Sumail here who is known to never play safe in his mid lane.
On January 17 2016 19:54 Terrorbladder wrote: I tuned in the last 20 mins of this game so how did sumail lose mid to s4 puck?
Besides it being a nice match up, he had help.
Doesn't matter if he had help
giving up a solo kill is inexcuseable and and something that shouldn't happen
Sumail fucked up this game.
I didn't actually see the solo kill, but depending on what happened it's somewhat excusable. When you're extremely pressured mid you sometimes have to playrisky and really push it in order to not get crushed. Sometimes that ends up killing you and crushing you more.
Playing safely isn't always the best thing to do.
depends on the heroes that are being played, the pressure that was put on sumail also wasn't a BH camping him mid for the first 6 min. Qop has an escape mechanism and should never die in a 1v1 like that.
anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
On January 17 2016 20:01 sunrazgriz wrote: guys, the draft is even or there is an outdraft ?
Idk if it was outdraft and more of just outplay in the lane stages of the game and Alliance support rotations. Sure they shut down bulldog Nature Prophet, but at the cost of first blood on Dark Seer and Sumail losing mid and dying to rotations.
If anything it was alliance outdrafted. All eg had to do was not lose laning really hard and then they were likely have a better teamfight and alliance would be on a clock.
Eg just lost hard, even harder than they needed to for alliance to carry the advantage to a win later.
On January 17 2016 19:54 Terrorbladder wrote: I tuned in the last 20 mins of this game so how did sumail lose mid to s4 puck?
Besides it being a nice match up, he had help.
Doesn't matter if he had help
giving up a solo kill is inexcuseable and and something that shouldn't happen
Sumail fucked up this game.
I didn't actually see the solo kill, but depending on what happened it's somewhat excusable. When you're extremely pressured mid you sometimes have to playrisky and really push it in order to not get crushed. Sometimes that ends up killing you and crushing you more.
Playing safely isn't always the best thing to do.
depends on the heroes that are being played, the pressure that was put on sumail also wasn't a BH camping him mid for the first 6 min. Qop has an escape mechanism and should never die in a 1v1 like that.
The pressure wasn't so much against QoP but for Puck, if that makes sense. Puck is 1,000% safe the entire laning phase and can do whatever he wants. That's a great deal of pressure in a normally even 1v1.
An escape mechanism is all well and good, but it depends on what actually happened. As I said, I didn't see it, but maybe Sumail tried to make a play with Blink or whatever, IDK.
WD seems like a pretty obvious good pick but if chen always has max creeps the stun will probably be more "wasted" on creeps than actually stun heroes.
On January 17 2016 20:05 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
I mean, she would be fine pick for the plan if EG would not lose other 2 lanes so fucking hard.
On January 17 2016 20:05 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
I mean, she would be fine pick for the plan if EG would not lose other 2 lanes so fucking hard.
"fine" is not fine when you require "near-optimal" in an "important grand finals series" with your last pick 1 position
On January 17 2016 20:05 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
I mean, she would be fine pick for the plan if EG would not lose other 2 lanes so fucking hard.
But they lost the other lanes so hard in part because of the Luna pick!
IDK, could have just let Arteezy 1v1 anyway. Dunno if you can shut out a Prophet enough to ever warrant three heroes focusing on him all laning phase.
On January 17 2016 20:05 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
I mean, she would be fine pick for the plan if EG would not lose other 2 lanes so fucking hard.
"fine" is not fine when you require "near-optimal" in an "important grand finals series"
Name me a carry that would do fine in circumstances like that.
Even morph would not fly at all (hello, no cast point no-target silence).
On January 17 2016 20:05 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
I mean, she would be fine pick for the plan if EG would not lose other 2 lanes so fucking hard.
"fine" is not fine when you require "near-optimal" in an "important grand finals series"
Name me a carry that would do fine in circumstances like that.
Even morph would not fly at all (hello, no cast point no-target silence).
morph can survive 3 seconds of being silenced fine if he's competent.
morph was fine, ta was fine (JUST BUY A QB), clinkz was fine...
What is the idea behind Zeus Bat? Isolated they are both good additions to the team but imo both heroes dont really work that well together (there should be better combos)
On January 17 2016 20:05 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: anyone who says luna was a fine pick is totally blind
the only way luna was fine was such that they picked it as like a pseudo alch with 044, because eclipse was gonna do nothing as long as bulldog had something to say about it
and luna isnt even particularly strong in the first place. she's a niche pick and this game was not her niche in any way.
I mean, she would be fine pick for the plan if EG would not lose other 2 lanes so fucking hard.
"fine" is not fine when you require "near-optimal" in an "important grand finals series"
Name me a carry that would do fine in circumstances like that.
Even morph would not fly at all (hello, no cast point no-target silence).
morph can survive 3 seconds of being silenced fine if he's competent.
morph was fine, ta was fine (JUST BUY A QB), clinkz was fine...
3 seconds of being silenced with 2 second stun follow-up and fuckton of burst.
Unless you have the reaction to smash morph strength before silence, he would pop.
TA with QB could work, clinkz... not sure, but could work.
On January 17 2016 20:13 Gear 3rd wrote: What is the idea behind Zeus Bat? Isolated they are both good additions to the team but imo both heroes dont really work that well together (there should be better combos)
Spec + Zeus buffing the Bat gank from across the map.
On January 17 2016 20:13 Gear 3rd wrote: What is the idea behind Zeus Bat? Isolated they are both good additions to the team but imo both heroes dont really work that well together (there should be better combos)
Zeus ult gives vision for good intitations with bat
Veno vs Jugg is an interesting matchup. Healing ward completely counters everything veno does, but veno can very easily snipe it by spamming wards. An easy A-click on the healing ward can ruin Jugg.
On January 17 2016 20:28 Gear 3rd wrote: I have not played 6.86 yet.. do both savage roars (bear and ld) share their cooldown? or do they work independently?
On January 17 2016 20:28 Gear 3rd wrote: I have not played 6.86 yet.. do both savage roars (bear and ld) share their cooldown? or do they work independently?
All right, Alliance really are back. This is a lackluster performance from EG to be sure, but part of that is because Alliance is playing just so wildly out of control that it makes EG look awful. They've remembered how to put on unstoppable pressure, and that's all they need to be back in 2013 form.
There's a significant chance that they might be the best team on Earth again.
Isnt it funny? while other teams try to figure out to play every patch and evolve the meta, alliance just try to play their style every patch and now the patch is working kinda in their favor again and they dominate since they are used to playing this kind of dota. I really dont feel like any opponent of alliance was at their best this tournament. I am excited what happens when they are
spec is absolutely useless in the fight ... he just pops instantly but he also went in solo into the whole A lineup. If only they tried to get some early game pickoffs ...
S4 simply came up with a strategy that, as of now, has no holes. The only way they lose is by losing early game, and that only happens when they play badly. As long as they execute, this strategy has no answer from any of the standard line ups people use.
On January 17 2016 20:41 Azarkon wrote: S4 simply came up with a strategy that, as of now, has no holes. The only way they lose is by losing early game, and that only happens when they play badly. As long as they execute, this strategy has no answer from any of the standard line ups people use.
these aren't standard lineups, they're all still water-testing counter attempts
3 other top teams failing in bo3s doesn't mean counters don't exist
what an anticlimatic final :/ the only one who put up a fight against the old Alliance playstyle is who? yeah puppeys secret as it seems who wouldve thought. hey hey still props to alliance, but i cant help but feel it sure helps if youre the only one who doesnt have to adjust to a patch since you are just playing your old style once more but this time it works
EG really needed to ban LD instead of Wisp imo. LD is just too easy to execute and hard to kill when you build your lineup around him. There's nothing Spectre can do to outcarry him in this game.
again rtz goes deep after A just to get omnislashed to the face and instadie ... if he just plays a bit more cautious they can pick off so many while A retreats.
On January 17 2016 20:50 DucK- wrote: Ban NP and LD and half the battle is won. Why even bother.
That'd work but for the fact that Alliance has other picks that you cannot give them, such as bat.
On other news: Valve just announced their International Compendium! the first crowd funded tournament prize pool! you can predict the winners and such! looks pretty cool.
On January 17 2016 20:44 Gear 3rd wrote: what an anticlimatic final :/ the only one who put up a fight against the old Alliance playstyle is who? yeah puppeys secret as it seems who wouldve thought. hey hey still props to alliance, but i cant help but feel it sure helps if youre the only one who doesnt have to adjust to a patch since you are just playing your old style once more but this time it works
Puppey is the only person ever who brought the draft to an even footing against championship-tier Alliance. Ironically, this time he doesn't have a team that can properly match them. I'm not really a fan of Puppey's style, but his competence as a captain is beyond question.
Out of the other people here, only Kuroky has really faced the horror before. It seems he never really learned from Puppey during their time together, although he put up a decent fight and really suffered from M_C's nerves. It's not all that surprising that everyone is being caught off-guard.
What I'll say about Alliance is that their style is and has always been extremely strong. It withstood some pretty harsh hero nerfs before, and really it was team stress that brought them to their lowest. The patch hero thing is something that every team deals with, with the sole possible exception of EG, no matter how much people try to deny it.
everyone is flaming rtz,but i think universe just straight up awful in that last game..he missed almost every lasso early game.the amount of the time he hesitated early game..and of course,rtz's performance was poor
nothing personal, but this actionslacks dude has the power to make me cringe so hard that i have to turn away from my screen, I'm sure he's not there by accident though and there must be lots of people who are into his style
On January 17 2016 20:58 CursedRich wrote: nothing personal, but this actionslacks dude has the power to make me cringe so hard that i have to turn away from my screen, I'm sure he's not there by accident though and there must be lots of people who are into his style
Alliance dodged a few bullets before winning the tournament. First they dodged being unable to participate in the tournament at all. Then they were under the gun on Day 2 of group stage after a horrible Day 1. Then they nearly got 2-0'd by Secret in the quarters.
On January 17 2016 20:58 CursedRich wrote: nothing personal, but this actionslacks dude has the power to make me cringe so hard that i have to turn away from my screen, I'm sure he's not there by accident though and there must be lots of people who are into his style
you are not alone.
I don't think he's great on stage like that, but I think he's fantastic with fringe content.
On January 17 2016 20:58 CursedRich wrote: nothing personal, but this actionslacks dude has the power to make me cringe so hard that i have to turn away from my screen, I'm sure he's not there by accident though and there must be lots of people who are into his style
you are not alone.
i literally mute or turn off the stream anytime i hear him.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
5:th ban from Alliance. They could have picked AA instead of spectre though.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
Last ban from alliance because EG somehow perefered to 4th pick spectre and 3rd pick veno.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
5:th ban from Alliance. They could have picked AA instead of spectre though.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
5:th ban from Alliance. They could have picked AA instead of spectre though.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
5:th ban from Alliance. They could have picked AA instead of spectre though.
On January 17 2016 20:57 Kamisamanachi wrote: everyone is flaming rtz,but i think universe just straight up awful in that last game..he missed almost every lasso early game.the amount of the time he hesitated early game..and of course,rtz's performance was poor
rtz did the best he could do with spec in that game given his useless (sry) mates. His teammates failed to get any kills with wd zeus bat, not much that spec can do there. Spec is a hero that profits a lot from his team doing good, when his team is just not doing anything really it's hard. they didn't have good lockdown or anything, perhaps they should have gotten enigma or smth.
I don't think RTZ played bad. the game was set up in such way it was always gonna be uphill battle for them.
they were relying on the globals and the magic wave clear to hold off long enough for rtz to come online.
alliance just executed to perfection, every fight they achieve some objective, rtz had to bb and join fights before he was ready, of course he will die as he was like their tank and damage.
universe had to initiate but alliance was always ready... tough games... it was draft issue which ppd needs to sort out.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
5:th ban from Alliance. They could have picked AA instead of spectre though.
What was Alliance's fifth pick?
NS
Thanks, though actually, it doesn't even matter now that I think about it. Chen + Lone Druid first two picks = you already know what Alliance is going to do. PPD must have saw it coming but didn't think Ancient Apparition was the pick. I'm sure he has causes for thinking so. But I don't think Venomancer was the pick; his damage is too low to get through the heals during the first 20-30 minutes.
On January 17 2016 21:10 haduken wrote: I don't think RTZ played bad. the game was set up in such way it was always gonna be uphill battle for them.
they were relying on the globals and the magic wave clear to hold off long enough for rtz to come online.
alliance just executed to perfection, every fight they achieve some objective, rtz had to bb and join fights before he was ready, of course he will die as he was like their tank and damage.
universe had to initiate but alliance was always ready... tough games... it was draft issue which ppd needs to sort out.
Alliance disengaged from fights really well when Fear dropped down his Death ward as well, made a lot of difference
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
Last ban from alliance because EG somehow perefered to 4th pick spectre and 3rd pick veno.
rtz played fine, was a hard game to do anything as spectre.
EG doesn't really play Chen/IO(no since Aui left) which I feel like they should concentrate on improving for now I believe. Chen is far too strong right now to pass up on and it woul increas their strategic divertsity too.
So I guess this actually puts Secret on a better position in the patch, considering they basically should've won against the champions and only barely lost. Also they can play some of these Alliance heroes.
On January 17 2016 21:10 haduken wrote: I don't think RTZ played bad. the game was set up in such way it was always gonna be uphill battle for them.
they were relying on the globals and the magic wave clear to hold off long enough for rtz to come online.
alliance just executed to perfection, every fight they achieve some objective, rtz had to bb and join fights before he was ready, of course he will die as he was like their tank and damage.
universe had to initiate but alliance was always ready... tough games... it was draft issue which ppd needs to sort out.
Alliance disengaged from fights really well when Fear dropped down his Death ward as well, made a lot of difference
this is like TI3 alliance all over again, they forcing teams to out play them while making it look effortless.
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
yeah sumail does look very ordinary vs s4 but then again we forget that s4 was considered THE best mid (excluding his horrendous TI performance on secret 2.0)
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
s4: NS, Puck, Bat, QoP, DP - 5 Sumail: Zeus, QoP, Ember, Bat, Brew, SK, Razor, DP, Invoker - 9
Yeah man, Sumail only almost played twice as many heroes as S4 this tournament. If only his hero pool wasn't so limited and he could do more than play a different hero almost every game.
This patch could develop into a nightmare for EG. I will stop my rant about A now. I still dont like them but when they won I thought "well at least theyre celebrating: humans confirmed!" Imo if some particular players sort out their issues (which they propably will) i think Secret TL could come out really strong this patch in the long run. And i am really curious how OG and VG will approach the patch at shanghai. Off to TI3 VODs to study.
On January 17 2016 21:04 Azarkon wrote: Was Ancient Apparition banned this game? I'd have thought that would be the pick they wanted instead of Venomancer.
Last ban from alliance because EG somehow perefered to 4th pick spectre and 3rd pick veno.
AA was 5th ban. They couldnt AA unless they thought it was more important than spectre (4th pick). Either way, the other one of spec/AA they dont pick 4th is the obvious 5th ban for alliance.
On January 17 2016 21:14 Shergal wrote: So I guess this actually puts Secret on a better position in the patch, considering they basically should've won against the champions and only barely lost. Also they can play some of these Alliance heroes.
Secret had a very solid pick against Alliance the first game, that looked to have actually put Alliance off their game. They took away the Prophet, took Bat, forced Alliance to ban Chen, banned the Juggernaut the second phase, and Alliance only got to play their Lone Druid, which was not enough for their strategy to work.
The second game, however, even though Secret threw, they were not as successful at shutting down the picks. Alliance got both Chen and Lone Druid that game, and that made it a lot easier for them.
The third game, Puppey got his Chen but Alliance got both Bat and Lone Druid. From that series as well as this one, it looks as though you don't want to give Alliance two of Bat/Lone Druid/Prophet/Wisp, but that's of course not practical unless you're going to first pick those heroes yourself.
artour should redirect some of that passive aggression into encouraging fear/ppd to master chen and/or wisp
yeah, it seems PPD only plays heroes where there is only one thing he has to do proper for his team (most of the time save them in a way) and pretty much nothing more besides buying almost all support items. He never really plays some early aggression supports or does he?
On January 17 2016 21:14 Shergal wrote: So I guess this actually puts Secret on a better position in the patch, considering they basically should've won against the champions and only barely lost. Also they can play some of these Alliance heroes.
Secret had a very solid pick against Alliance the first game, that looked to have actually put Alliance off their game. They took away the Prophet, took Bat, forced Alliance to ban Chen, banned the Juggernaut the second phase, and Alliance only got to play their Lone Druid, which was not enough for their strategy to work.
The second game, however, even though Secret threw, they were not as successful at shutting down the picks. Alliance got both Chen and Lone Druid that game, and that made it a lot easier for them.
The third game, Puppey got his Chen but Alliance got both Bat and Lone Druid. From that series as well as this one, it looks as though you don't want to give Alliance two of Bat/Lone Druid/Prophet/Wisp, but that's of course not practical unless you're going to first pick those heroes yourself.
Fuck all the cry babies about the patch , alliance got nerfed to the ground as a team after TI3 , so now we see holes in EG drafting ? good , it shouldn't be their patch all the time shouldn't it ? no chen or wisp player is hurting them like alliance having no Ember player is hurting them for ages now , just let us celebrate the win peacefully , jeez , OG/Vg/newbee didn't get half the flake Alliance get for running the same thing over and over until a major/TI was won/almost won .... whatever haters gonna hate , they outplayed EG and won fair and square , RTZ should be mad at his team losing mid lanes and picking him a god damn Luna.....
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
s4: NS, Puck, Bat, QoP, DP - 5 Sumail: Zeus, QoP, Ember, Bat, Brew, SK, Razor, DP, Invoker - 9
Yeah man, Sumail only almost played twice as many heroes as S4 this tournament. If only his hero pool wasn't so limited and he could do more than play a different hero almost every game.
You forgot to add Razor, Leshrac, Brewmaster, and, Dragon Knight to S4's hero pool. Also, Lina for Sumail. (S4 continued to pick Leshrac even after he was nerfed) 9 to 10
I'm confused what this patch talk has to do with "hating". Dota is a game where what is good changes every once in a while. Some teams/players are better at other stuff than others. It's clear that patches can favor some teams over another, sometimes slightly and sometimes more. There is nothing right or wrong about being good in some sort of a patch. But as a dota player to be as successful as you can over a longer period you want to adapt to every patch better than your competitors,
People are certainly allowed to talk about it. It doesn't mean that it discredits Alliance's win. At least for now what they are doing seems to be simply better than anyone else.
And yea, the biggest difference between Alliance 1 year ago and Alliance now is simply s4 being on the team. Them going from a good team to a team that could perhaps be the best in the world may be where the patch comes in.
I have to say, Slacks did a pretty hype interview. Loda was flabbergasted for a second after his first question. Though due to his apparent character I never know if he's posing a serious question to, joking with or playing the interviewee.
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
s4: NS, Puck, Bat, QoP, DP - 5 Sumail: Zeus, QoP, Ember, Bat, Brew, SK, Razor, DP, Invoker - 9
Yeah man, Sumail only almost played twice as many heroes as S4 this tournament. If only his hero pool wasn't so limited and he could do more than play a different hero almost every game.
limited because almost all sumail hero can be stomp by single s4 bat ppd moves is pick bat , and banned puck , dp , and qop. let me say once more , s4lt beat sumail all day long
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
s4: NS, Puck, Bat, QoP, DP - 5 Sumail: Zeus, QoP, Ember, Bat, Brew, SK, Razor, DP, Invoker - 9
Yeah man, Sumail only almost played twice as many heroes as S4 this tournament. If only his hero pool wasn't so limited and he could do more than play a different hero almost every game.
You forgot to add Razor, Leshrac, Brewmaster, and, Dragon Knight to S4's hero pool. Also, Lina for Sumail. (S4 continued to pick Leshrac even after he was nerfed) 9 to 10
?
How did I forget anything? I was going by this tournament, as I clearly stated, seeing as that was what was being discussed. S4 won the tournament despite playing half as many heroes as Sumail, so clearly Sumail's hero pool isn't too limited to win the tournament - that's total nonsense.
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
s4: NS, Puck, Bat, QoP, DP - 5 Sumail: Zeus, QoP, Ember, Bat, Brew, SK, Razor, DP, Invoker - 9
Yeah man, Sumail only almost played twice as many heroes as S4 this tournament. If only his hero pool wasn't so limited and he could do more than play a different hero almost every game.
limited because almost all sumail hero can be stomp by single s4 bat
This is not what limited hero pool means, nor is it true. Bat, even S4 Bat, should not stomp all of the heroes Sumail plays.
S4 playing better than Sumail isn't the same as S4 having a broader hero pool.
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
Not only are they different mids, but that's not even true. S4 has 10 heroes over 23 games this patch, and sumail has 9 over 21. Statistically even in diversity.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
On January 17 2016 21:14 Shergal wrote: So I guess this actually puts Secret on a better position in the patch, considering they basically should've won against the champions and only barely lost. Also they can play some of these Alliance heroes.
Secret had a very solid pick against Alliance the first game, that looked to have actually put Alliance off their game. They took away the Prophet, took Bat, forced Alliance to ban Chen, banned the Juggernaut the second phase, and Alliance only got to play their Lone Druid, which was not enough for their strategy to work.
The second game, however, even though Secret threw, they were not as successful at shutting down the picks. Alliance got both Chen and Lone Druid that game, and that made it a lot easier for them.
The third game, Puppey got his Chen but Alliance got both Bat and Lone Druid. From that series as well as this one, it looks as though you don't want to give Alliance two of Bat/Lone Druid/Prophet/Wisp, but that's of course not practical unless you're going to first pick those heroes yourself.
Nah I think the only real issue is Chen. All the other heroes can be countered and outplayed, it's just the performance level of the teams in this LAN was really low (IMO, including Alliance, but they're on an upwards spiral with all their heroes being viable again).
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
Nah, Alliance stopped being the best team in the world, but TI3-TI4 season they were still a top team with plenty good finishes and some wins. It was just TI4 where they did terribly.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
Crumbled from best of the world status yes, crumbled to the level they were at after s4 left no. Alliance was still a team that won several EU events during the TI3-TI4 gap and wasn't even looking all that bad going into TI. Their placing was definitely below expectations.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
Crumbled from best of the world status yes, crumbled to the level they were at after s4 left no. Alliance was still a team that won several EU events during the TI3-TI4 gap and wasn't even looking all that bad going into TI. Their placing was definitely below expectations.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
They had a post-ti hangover and instead of having faith in the guy who captained them to an aegis, loda started to question his leadership. See Secret @ TI5 for an example of how s4 performs when there's infighting on his roster
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
They had a post-ti hangover and instead of having faith in the guy who captained them to an aegis, loda started to question his leadership. See Secret @ TI5 for an example of how s4 performs when there's infighting on his roster
Loda did not question s4's leadership. S4 wanted to leave cause he thought EGM wasn't supporting him mid enough for the kind of play the meta was requiring.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
They had a post-ti hangover and instead of having faith in the guy who captained them to an aegis, loda started to question his leadership. See Secret @ TI5 for an example of how s4 performs when there's infighting on his roster
Loda did not question s4's leadership. S4 wanted to leave cause he thought EGM wasn't supporting him mid enough for the kind of play the meta was requiring.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
Crumbled from best of the world status yes, crumbled to the level they were at after s4 left no. Alliance was still a team that won several EU events during the TI3-TI4 gap and wasn't even looking all that bad going into TI. Their placing was definitely below expectations.
Mind you: Alliance were winning against Eu teams.
When East was much stronger.
Idk what your point is. Of course Alliance wasn't a favorite or anything going into TI4, but for example they were doing better than c9 in the months leading up to the event. c9 was 5th-6th, a result like that wouldn't even look that bad for Alliance. But now in the close group stage they got knocked out and their placing looks bad.
On January 17 2016 21:50 a-game wrote: I don't think alliance crumbled because of meta. loda just had to learn the hard way that the team isn't shit without s4
Alliance crumbled before s4 went away.
Crumbled from best of the world status yes, crumbled to the level they were at after s4 left no. Alliance was still a team that won several EU events during the TI3-TI4 gap and wasn't even looking all that bad going into TI. Their placing was definitely below expectations.
Mind you: Alliance were winning against Eu teams.
When East was much stronger.
Idk what your point is. Of course Alliance wasn't a favorite or anything going into TI4, but for example they were doing better than c9 in the months leading up to the event. c9 was 5th-6th, a result like that wouldn't even look that bad for Alliance. But now in the close group stage they got knocked out and their placing looks bad.
All teams prepared a shit ton against alliance too.
On January 17 2016 22:13 lolnoty wrote: Alliance's reason for being good is S4's time in Secret. Alliance's entire style this tournament reminds me a lot of Secret when he was their captain.
In what way? A lot of their style reminds me of what Alliance was when s4 was still with them in the old days. Bulldog plays a secondary carry, s4 is the primary initiator, a lot of their strats are timing pushes utilizing LD/NP, etc.
For me the interesting thing in the run up to Shanghai is whether or not Alliance have a better grasp on the patch than everyone else, or whether everyone else has just forgotten how to play against Alliance. I was a bit disappointed with the time before the major because I thought we'd see the different regional styles of the qualifier start to merge into one, but Alliance are often so distinct that it will be interesting to see how this actually shapes what comes after.
On January 17 2016 21:04 sunrazgriz wrote: but... but... in bo5 , EG would .....
VP looked just a good against them in the Summit up 2-0. Alliance 100% won, but don't pretend that you know how it would have gone if it were 5 games.
okay it's starladder fault then.
no? Alliance won. It doesn't matter how many games the finals were, the length of series makes it completely different and not worth arguing.
even bo7 , sumail's hero pool is limited , s4 win all day long vs sumail.
limited compared to which other mids?
i believe the starladder final is EG vs A
s4: NS, Puck, Bat, QoP, DP - 5 Sumail: Zeus, QoP, Ember, Bat, Brew, SK, Razor, DP, Invoker - 9
Yeah man, Sumail only almost played twice as many heroes as S4 this tournament. If only his hero pool wasn't so limited and he could do more than play a different hero almost every game.
You forgot to add Razor, Leshrac, Brewmaster, and, Dragon Knight to S4's hero pool. Also, Lina for Sumail. (S4 continued to pick Leshrac even after he was nerfed) 9 to 10
?
How did I forget anything? I was going by this tournament, as I clearly stated, seeing as that was what was being discussed. S4 won the tournament despite playing half as many heroes as Sumail, so clearly Sumail's hero pool isn't too limited to win the tournament - that's total nonsense.
Ah okay. I wasn't inferring that Sumail's hero pool was small. Sumail has a wider hero pool than S4, no question. I just wanted to show that S4 has more heroes that work in this meta than many people think.
On January 17 2016 21:42 bluzi wrote: Fuck all the cry babies about the patch , alliance got nerfed to the ground as a team after TI3 , so now we see holes in EG drafting ? good , it shouldn't be their patch all the time shouldn't it ? no chen or wisp player is hurting them like alliance having no Ember player is hurting them for ages now , just let us celebrate the win peacefully , jeez , OG/Vg/newbee didn't get half the flake Alliance get for running the same thing over and over until a major/TI was won/almost won .... whatever haters gonna hate , they outplayed EG and won fair and square , RTZ should be mad at his team losing mid lanes and picking him a god damn Luna.....
Who's crying? I see EG hates more than anything. I can't go anywhere without NA Dota meme's and non stop praises for S4.
On January 17 2016 21:51 Artisreal wrote: I have to say, Slacks did a pretty hype interview. Loda was flabbergasted for a second after his first question. Though due to his apparent character I never know if he's posing a serious question to, joking with or playing the interviewee.
Yeah, he brought more energy than someone like kotlguy, though he overdid it a few times.
Never win tournaments just before a major. WCA was fine because everyone called it fluke, but this isn't good. Now the bullseye will be on Alliance for the Shanghai Major. They better go and loose to some tier 2 EU teams now to take that eye away and place it back on EG where it should be!
On January 18 2016 00:34 Ohforfsake wrote: Alliance won? Crap, they didn't get the memo...
Never win tournaments just before a major. WCA was fine because everyone called it fluke, but this isn't good. Now the bullseye will be on Alliance for the Shanghai Major. They better go and loose to some tier 2 EU teams now to take that eye away and place it back on EG where it should be!
:D :D :D
Or why not do a ti3 repeat, where they win everyone including the big daddy?
On January 18 2016 00:34 Ohforfsake wrote: Alliance won? Crap, they didn't get the memo...
Never win tournaments just before a major. WCA was fine because everyone called it fluke, but this isn't good. Now the bullseye will be on Alliance for the Shanghai Major. They better go and loose to some tier 2 EU teams now to take that eye away and place it back on EG where it should be!
:D :D :D
Or why not do a ti3 repeat, where they win everyone including the big daddy?
Noone has been able to do it since then. And going into TI3 people were questioning how good Alliance really was since they lost in the last tournament before the big one. But I guess there's only to hope for you're view to come true now.
On January 18 2016 02:27 Evander Berry Wall wrote: Validated the invite.
The invite was valid all along. IDK how people thought 2 minor LAN wins on a previous patch outweighed a major LAN win on the current patch. Honestly most of the people who disagreed with the invite were either super salty Liquid fans or just flat out don't know to evaluate strong play. I wasn't one hundred percent convinced after WCA because it was only a single outing, but they certainly looked much more solid than Liquid at the time.
On January 17 2016 21:14 Shergal wrote: So I guess this actually puts Secret on a better position in the patch, considering they basically should've won against the champions and only barely lost. Also they can play some of these Alliance heroes.
Secret had a very solid pick against Alliance the first game, that looked to have actually put Alliance off their game. They took away the Prophet, took Bat, forced Alliance to ban Chen, banned the Juggernaut the second phase, and Alliance only got to play their Lone Druid, which was not enough for their strategy to work.
The second game, however, even though Secret threw, they were not as successful at shutting down the picks. Alliance got both Chen and Lone Druid that game, and that made it a lot easier for them.
The third game, Puppey got his Chen but Alliance got both Bat and Lone Druid. From that series as well as this one, it looks as though you don't want to give Alliance two of Bat/Lone Druid/Prophet/Wisp, but that's of course not practical unless you're going to first pick those heroes yourself.
Nah I think the only real issue is Chen. All the other heroes can be countered and outplayed, it's just the performance level of the teams in this LAN was really low (IMO, including Alliance, but they're on an upwards spiral with all their heroes being viable again).
WTF are you even saying.... man im going to be braindead by the end of this LR .....those were the top teams in the world , they dont just become all bad in a day nor god like in the other , the level was high as always in the tip top of the dota world , you cannot understand the game and level of play is not anyone fault by yourself mate....
On January 18 2016 02:27 Evander Berry Wall wrote: Validated the invite.
The invite was valid all along. IDK how people thought 2 minor LAN wins on a previous patch outweighed a major LAN win on the current patch. Honestly most of the people who disagreed with the invite were either super salty Liquid fans or just flat out don't know to evaluate strong play. I wasn't one hundred percent convinced after WCA because it was only a single outing, but they certainly looked much more solid than Liquid at the time.
I enjoyed this tournament a lot (and what an insane crowd !), but they'll have to work for a better tourney format next time. Not enough dota for such a big amount of teams imo.
Got a chance to watch the VOD without being spoiled. (yah!)
Thoughts:
You need 3 things to Win a big tournament:
1) 3 strategies or 3 variations on the same strategy, allowing you to always get a good draft. 2) A draft advantage via Hero Pool compared to the Tournament Meta. 3) At least one player playing at a "next level" compared to everyone else.
Alliance brought a 4th key that's going to need to be figured out. They've figured out how to farm more efficiently with the new map. In a low-kill EG game, they're almost always up 2-3k at 10 minutes, but they were consistently outfarmed in both games, regardless of how the lanes were going. That Dire off-lane needs to be really explored well.
(Credit to Puppey for both calling how the series would play out and the score.)
I do think the Veno was probably not the best choice in game 2 from ppd, but that's not why they lost. They lost because Alliance had figured out their farming pattern better and come up with some brutally hard to deal with rotations. Add on top of that their best heroes dominated the Meta at Starladder. But Alliance both knows how to play them and how to play against them. That game 2 was instructive. With Bat + Zeus, Alliance played the Vision + Nighttime game so well that it was a 2:1 kill score at 20 minutes. Alliance's warding was also really on point. (And it showed some of the problem EG had in game 2 against LGD: really good vision game prevents a lot of what EG wants to do.)
s4 was definitely playing the best of Alliance, though everyone was on-point from Day 2 on. And since s4 is their playmaker, that really opened up the map for them. Add in the great vision game and they were able to both farm better and shut down the farm on EG.
The last point I have is that I think EG hit on the actual Meta direction in Day 1 and didn't quite realize it. Alliance had both strong push and supports that can heal + do something else. (Juggernaut's Healing Ward was pretty critical in game 2 as well.) Call it the "hard sustain" method of support play we've been seeing for a while now, but it's only getting more important. Game 1 really turned on the sustain + position of Alliance at that Top Radiant Tier 1 fight. If Wisp gets picked off, they probably get wiped and the game looks very different. (Most EG games tend to be about those early rotations. If they snag the right one, they can carry the lead to a victory. That's why banning Spirit Breaker is what allowed them to move from 0-2 to win 3-2 against VP at The Summit 4.)
I don't recall exactly how the early games went but I feel the reason for Alliance being ahead early through just farming is quite logical. When Bulldog plays LD or NP, he can at times disrupt the enemy safelane from using their pulls as efficiently they could. If they do succeed in zoning him, he can always go to the new camp to farm that. Meanwhile EG completely abandoned their offlane both games as far as I recall. They couldn't disrupt Alliance's pulls at all, so Loda had complete free farm and the supports also had complete freedom to do what they wanted, for example use the pulls to get maximum levels, or farm the jungle when Akke had Chen. Or alternatively help s4 in killing the opposing mid.
On January 17 2016 21:27 Gear 3rd wrote: This patch could develop into a nightmare for EG. I will stop my rant about A now. I still dont like them but when they won I thought "well at least theyre celebrating: humans confirmed!" Imo if some particular players sort out their issues (which they propably will) i think Secret TL could come out really strong this patch in the long run. And i am really curious how OG and VG will approach the patch at shanghai. Off to TI3 VODs to study.
To be frank I've always considering to be one of the most robotic teams out there, but hey we're all biased I guess.