EPTYeah. Sucks to be in SEA.
[LR] The International II - 2012 - Page 766
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
Fwizzz
Philippines4420 Posts
Yeah. Sucks to be in SEA. | ||
|
Dead9
United States4725 Posts
if everything was rebroadcast 12 hours after the initial broadcast | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
Assuming: The winner bracket finalists are 50-50 to win and whoever team loses is going to win his Bo3 in the losers finals with 100% probablility. In this scenario losing the winner's finals gives you an advantage because of how variance works  | ||
|
dtz
5834 Posts
Otherwise, somewhere in SEA like Singapore probably is the ideal one. It's easy to get to and very easy to get Visa for as well. The other possibility is maybe Sweden ( they have Esport stadium there) or Kiev ( imagine Navi in front of their home crowd!) | ||
|
Ramong
Denmark1706 Posts
| ||
|
parazice
Thailand5517 Posts
Thailand XD | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:34 Dead9 wrote: you know what would be sick if everything was rebroadcast 12 hours after the initial broadcast Well they braodcast for more than 12 hours AND upload vods within 12 hours, so whats the point? | ||
|
quannguyen
Vietnam1390 Posts
Agree. Thailand or Singapore is best imo  | ||
|
Reap_
Brunei Darussalam760 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:44 quannguyen wrote: Agree. Thailand or Singapore is best imo I really hope it'll be in China. If it isn't, I'm fine with Singapore. Then I can maybe attend it myself :D | ||
|
windzor
Denmark1013 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:37 dtz wrote: I think they will Asia next. If they are ready to distribute in China ( distributor settled, adoption by G-league/Ace), then i think they will do TI3 China. Otherwise, somewhere in SEA like Singapore probably is the ideal one. It's easy to get to and very easy to get Visa for as well. The other possibility is maybe Sweden ( they have Esport stadium there) or Kiev ( imagine Navi in front of their home crowd!) Given the reason why they chose Seattle (They are producing most of the things themselves, cheaper to do it in Seattle then) I think Seattle is most likely the place for TI3 next year again. | ||
|
deichkind
Sweden347 Posts
If i had to bet money I would say China. | ||
|
Andrebreton
France4 Posts
| ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
| ||
|
dtz
5834 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:47 windzor wrote: Given the reason why they chose Seattle (They are producing most of the things themselves, cheaper to do it in Seattle then) I think Seattle is most likely the place for TI3 next year again. First year was in Gamescom though. Although last year was mostly to showcase the game for the first time, i think their intention is to do iTI all over the world. This year , i think it is in Seattle because this year it is about making the best tournament possible. It is easier to do that in Valve home offfice/town. They needed to make this the Gold Standard considering the amount of eyes on Valve and Dota 2. With TI2 momentum , they will probably open free registration soon. For future organizers, they can just say " just copy and do whatever we did for TI2 as the guideline" Maybe if a lot of countries are not ready, next year is in Seattle again. But sooner or later it will go to China and SEA and CIS and back to EU imo. The gaming/esports culture and fans are just much stronger around those regions. | ||
|
bearcatter
United States171 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:47 deichkind wrote: One have been in EU right and now its in NA so logically next is somewhere in Asia. If i had to bet money I would say China. They did it in EU last year because they were unveiling the game at Gamescom | ||
|
DreamerHyung
76 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:36 Shikyo wrote: I think I'll entertain you guys with some high level thinking Assuming: The winner bracket finalists are 50-50 to win and whoever team loses is going to win his Bo3 in the losers finals with 100% probablility. In this scenario losing the winner's finals gives you an advantage because of how variance works Even if we consider the assumption to be true (which imo is REALLY far-fetched), the WB loser would have to play 2-3 extra games compared to the WB winner. This would mean extra tiredness and bigger chance to reveal secret/special strats they could have kept for the grand finals. | ||
|
Benjef
United Kingdom6921 Posts
| ||
|
Oktyabr
Singapore2234 Posts
| ||
|
Fwizzz
Philippines4420 Posts
| ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On September 02 2012 23:36 Shikyo wrote: I think I'll entertain you guys with some high level thinking Assuming: The winner bracket finalists are 50-50 to win and whoever team loses is going to win his Bo3 in the losers finals with 100% probablility. In this scenario losing the winner's finals gives you an advantage because of how variance works You have no idea what you are talking about. First of all, your assumptions are not practical. And variance could only be applied BEFORE any games have happened. Once the first set of games have been decided (you have a winner and loser). Those games cannot be counted in the variance any longer. | ||
| ||
