EPTSee for yourself.
http://www.dota2.com/international/announcement
WePlay Dota 2 League - Page 30
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
CrazyBirdman
Germany3509 Posts
See for yourself. http://www.dota2.com/international/announcement | ||
|
Kznn
Brazil9072 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:15 Asha` wrote: holy shit that centaur lol also lgd.cn got booted from ti3, tongfu invited instead daymn WAT | ||
|
cilinder007
Slovenia7251 Posts
im down with that | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
| ||
|
ForTheDream
Germany1780 Posts
| ||
|
ForTehDarkseid
8139 Posts
but i wonder would if work if fnatic pick more survivable carry and batrider & lina got their shit together. | ||
|
weiliem
2071 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:15 Asha` wrote: holy shit that centaur lol also lgd.cn got booted from ti3, tongfu invited instead daymn This is not a good news.... Guess it gives Western teams better chances... lol | ||
|
pyro19
6575 Posts
| ||
|
CrazyBirdman
Germany3509 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:22 weiliem wrote: This is not a good news.... Guess it gives Western teams better chances... lol They can still qualify which they probably will. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:22 pyro19 wrote: Hmm They still show LongDD as a part of the LGD.cn squad ? Just a mistake. | ||
|
weiliem
2071 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:20 cecek wrote: I need to see more Slark. Don't give a shit what team picks him, who wins... just pick Slark again. Fnatic's gonna pick drow ranger next.... xP | ||
|
Zozo
Brazil2579 Posts
If you ask me, I like the trade lock thing. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38255 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:22 weiliem wrote: This is not a good news.... Guess it gives Western teams better chances... lol lgd will still probably qualify, and tongfu were one of the favourites to win theirs anyway. Mostly it's brutal for the other asian qualifier teams who went from having a possible shot at beating guys like tongfu to being very unlikely to beat lgd.cn | ||
|
pyro19
6575 Posts
They are definitely not out of this TI3 just yet..It just became a lot harder tho | ||
|
teapoted
United Kingdom24425 Posts
Just completely idiotic. | ||
|
Sbrubbles
Brazil5776 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:20 LeLoup wrote: All things considered I don't think he is that bad. The issue is as with a number of heroes that aren't seen often is where do you lane him? Do you risk him as a solo offlaner or do you have him take the 1 position and farm like a carry? Either way it feels like you're giving something up. Well, Liquid seemed to be trying to force the trilane on trilane, so maybe allowing slark a 1v1 against bat was the idea. | ||
|
AwfuL_
Netherlands6976 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=411350 | ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13032 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:27 SkelA wrote: Why dark pact removes napalm stacks? Because it removes debuffs. | ||
|
HOMEMdoGAS
Portugal1418 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:27 SkelA wrote: Why dark pact removes napalm stacks? if napalm is a debuff( which i think it is) why shouldnt it remove napalm? | ||
| ||
