|
Chuan why are you so pissed.
This is not the time for argument.
|
On August 11 2013 07:42 Comeh wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 07:41 TheYango wrote:On August 11 2013 07:40 maru~ wrote:On August 11 2013 07:38 r.Evo wrote:On August 11 2013 07:36 TheYango wrote: The thing that people are not respecting is how much of a gold disadvantage having double/triple buybacks on your position 1-3 heroes actually allows you to fight ridiculous high ground defense fights. If they splitpush a big creep wave into your tier 3, and then give up 3+ buybacks to hold their lane while you lose yours, that's actually a net gain for a split-push based team.
Even with an Alch double your net worth, you still don't win 7v5/8v5 fights on enemy high ground. Chinese teams are deathly aware of this because pushing high ground in 2009/2010 was a nightmare when there was no buyback CD and buybacks were cheaper, so even with 1 core, you'd still be trying to push through double/triple buybacks from the same hero.
People who have been watching the game that long should remember a certain LGD vs. EHOME game where LGD played a 5 intel hero comp against a Sniper + Shadowfiend dual core--the game was long over for them after Sniper and Shadowfiend got their items up, but they defended and Aegis+Cheese push with Storm's triple buyback. We just saw DK holding highground against a 20k+ gold advantage against probably the most aggressive team left in the tournament besides Na'Vi. It's just easy to forget. To be fair though, that was mostly Orange throwing. And people would have called it Tongfu throwing as well if Tongfu tried to force a push through, lost to a double/triple buyback and lost a T3 tower or rax to Furion TPing to that lane and pushing after the won fight. To be honest, I think they HAD to do that. But I also think IG massively misplayed that teamfight on several fronts, and should have won.
They clearly didn't have to since they won(I know rather silly hyperbole). Anyway there was a chance they lost if they went for it and a chance they won if they went for it. Favoring not losing isn't always bad and in this case they were able to eventually get a moment where they could win it.
I imagine there're 3 parallel realities now. One where TF went for it and lost which was met with chants of TF throwing. One where TF went for it and won which would be met with iG so bad/TF so good. Then one where TF didn't then lost later, more chants of throwing.
|
|
|
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
On August 11 2013 07:44 maru~ wrote: Russian casters said Chuan and Zhou don't talk to each other and there are rumors that Zhou will get kicked. yeah listen to V1lat, same as him claiming that 1 team won't attend TI3.
|
loving sf being in the spotlight again, if only potm was brought back..I still reminisce slahser's glory days with her.
|
On August 11 2013 07:43 l3loodraven wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 07:40 dtz wrote:On August 11 2013 07:36 TheYango wrote: The thing that people are not respecting is how much having double/triple buybacks on your position 1-3 heroes actually allows you to fight ridiculous high ground defense fights. If they splitpush a big creep wave into your tier 3, and then give up 3+ buybacks to hold their lane while you lose yours, that's actually a net gain for a split-push based team.
Even with an Alch double your net worth, you still don't win 5v7/5v8 fights on enemy high ground. Chinese teams are deathly aware of this because pushing high ground in 2009/2010 was a nightmare when there was no buyback CD and buybacks were cheaper, so even with 1 core, you'd still be trying to push through double/triple buybacks from the same hero.
People who have been watching the game that long should remember a certain LGD vs. EHOME game where LGD played a 5 intel hero comp against a Sniper + Shadowfiend dual core--the game was long over for them after Sniper and Shadowfiend got their items up, but they defended and Aegis+Cheese push with Storm's triple buyback. Yeah actually i have thought that maybe it should be possible to buyback in the spot where you die because currently buyback is too big of a defender's advantage. Maybe if you buyback within 10 second then you can revive in the spot where you die or something. Will favor teams ending the games early and hitting a timing when they got a good advantage. Also promotes aggressive play in general. We might see 10v10 fights from early game. Haven't really thought about repercussions though so this might be a dumb idea. imo they should just get rid of buybacks altogether and give us more ways to spend our gold. I don't think buyback is a good mechanic. Maybe we should also remove the gold loss on death?
|
After TI3 Chuan bromance reunite with ZSMJ, Chuan + YYF to VG.
ZSMJ, Chuan, YYF, CTY and FY !
Shouldn't leave Fenrir out since he's pretty good, he can be back up player or coach...
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
|
Hopefully we can get a BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLE
But with Tobi sounding sick...
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
|
On August 11 2013 07:45 739 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 07:44 maru~ wrote: Russian casters said Chuan and Zhou don't talk to each other and there are rumors that Zhou will get kicked. yeah listen to V1lat, same as him claiming that 1 team won't attend TI3. It wasn't v1lat.
|
United Kingdom24425 Posts
On August 11 2013 07:45 dtz wrote: Chuan why are you so pissed.
This is not the time for argument.
Did you see the end of last game? Stood up shouting at ferrari from across the room.
|
On August 11 2013 07:45 Mataza wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 07:43 l3loodraven wrote:On August 11 2013 07:40 dtz wrote:On August 11 2013 07:36 TheYango wrote: The thing that people are not respecting is how much having double/triple buybacks on your position 1-3 heroes actually allows you to fight ridiculous high ground defense fights. If they splitpush a big creep wave into your tier 3, and then give up 3+ buybacks to hold their lane while you lose yours, that's actually a net gain for a split-push based team.
Even with an Alch double your net worth, you still don't win 5v7/5v8 fights on enemy high ground. Chinese teams are deathly aware of this because pushing high ground in 2009/2010 was a nightmare when there was no buyback CD and buybacks were cheaper, so even with 1 core, you'd still be trying to push through double/triple buybacks from the same hero.
People who have been watching the game that long should remember a certain LGD vs. EHOME game where LGD played a 5 intel hero comp against a Sniper + Shadowfiend dual core--the game was long over for them after Sniper and Shadowfiend got their items up, but they defended and Aegis+Cheese push with Storm's triple buyback. Yeah actually i have thought that maybe it should be possible to buyback in the spot where you die because currently buyback is too big of a defender's advantage. Maybe if you buyback within 10 second then you can revive in the spot where you die or something. Will favor teams ending the games early and hitting a timing when they got a good advantage. Also promotes aggressive play in general. We might see 10v10 fights from early game. Haven't really thought about repercussions though so this might be a dumb idea. imo they should just get rid of buybacks altogether and give us more ways to spend our gold. I don't think buyback is a good mechanic. Maybe we should also remove the gold loss on death?
Denies are anti-fun, get rid off them too
|
|
|
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
LION. SHADOW FIEND.
LETS GO INVICTUS GODS
FUCK THIS, LETS SHOW TONGFU WHERE THEY BELONG.
|
|
|
IG going to give Tongfu the finger!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|