EPT
Sign in to the DotA 2 LP using your TL information, go to the page you want to fix, click edit in the section, insert redirects where you can, preview to see that everything is correct on page, then submit and wait. I recently just started doing things on there myself after seeing some of the lack of information in a few sections.
[LP] The Liquipedia Dota 2 Wiki - Page 8
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
|
PardonYou
United States1360 Posts
Sign in to the DotA 2 LP using your TL information, go to the page you want to fix, click edit in the section, insert redirects where you can, preview to see that everything is correct on page, then submit and wait. I recently just started doing things on there myself after seeing some of the lack of information in a few sections. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
SilverStar
Sweden18511 Posts
10'000 USD prizepool and lan tournament Also look at the discussion page for what is missing. | ||
|
SilverStar
Sweden18511 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/WePlay_Dota2_League/Season_1 | ||
Burpies
Canada409 Posts
| ||
|
Julmust
Sweden4867 Posts
| ||
|
Severedevil
United States4839 Posts
On July 13 2013 04:00 Julmust wrote: yeah I was actually thinking the same thing yesterday. I think that, in most games, the end score is more important then game time. Both are kinda misleading. What'd I really rather know is the point at which the outcome of a game is decided. That's a judgment call of course, but game stats stop mattering once one side has clearly won. | ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
On July 12 2013 07:50 Burpies wrote: I'm not sure if anybody still reads this, but for the longest time I thought the time/length in the bracket match summary was the score of the game (as I'm sure a lot of other people probably do as well). So I guess what I'm trying to say is why do we have the length of the game in the first place? Seems so irrelevant especially compared to the game score. Don't some tournaments still use game time as a tiebreaker? In that sense it might be relevant. | ||
|
hansomreiste
Turkey4 Posts
I've been involved in an amateur tournament and more are likely to come especially in EU region. So, I'd like to add new tournaments with more formats and enrich Liquipedia's non-pro section. Now, I just have to copy what has been used so far just because I don't know how to create new ones. Bringing more and more faces into Liquipedia would also provide us with many more people contributing and knowing about the community. | ||
|
epok
United States117 Posts
| ||
|
Oukka
Finland1683 Posts
On December 09 2013 01:47 epok wrote: Out of curiosity, has liquidpedia ever considered being one of the more comprehensive amateur tournament listings in the scene? I feel like it's a necessary feature that other sites like dotapedia have forgetten about completely (see this link and I'd be grateful for it.) The focus is on the pro-scene because of few reasons. A: Pro-scene is what is most visible part of competitive gaming. This means more interest for pro tournaments -> demand for info about pro-scene. B: Pro-scene is global, many amateur tournaments are very local and including them in globally distributed and aimed wiki does very little good. C: Regulating what to include and how would be very hard if we were to include every LAN tournament someone holds in their basement. (or even small regional or city-wide tournaments) D: Sourcing info for amateur tournaments would be a nightmare, it is hard enough for what is currently included E: In general quality would suffer with lots of event pages that might or might not be kept up to date and would end up being rather irrelevant and useless for most wiki-users. Do note that I'm not an official authority of this matter though, Salle is the head of LP and you could ask this questing for example in the Ask TL Staff Anything thread. | ||
|
epok
United States117 Posts
| ||
|
Coledash
Finland23 Posts
| ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
On February 06 2014 17:12 Coledash wrote: Hey is it just me or is the wiki mostly dead? I was thinking of contributing, but dont want to waste my time if this is lost cause. This wiki is very much alive. Join us. | ||
|
Coledash
Finland23 Posts
On February 06 2014 17:16 packrat386 wrote: This wiki is very much alive. Join us. Thanks for the info, will do  | ||
|
Dubzex
United States6994 Posts
| ||
|
Julmust
Sweden4867 Posts
| ||
|
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
Gathering all of the aforementioned information about the items is easy enough, but adding them and sorting them on pages is the long and hard part. Adding to all that, the importance of cosmetic items compared to detailed info about pro tournaments/teams is benign. Don't get me wrong, I love ogling and beautiful item sets and to see which items I need to complete a certain set but it is a superficial issue when there is so much more important stuff going on. | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
|
Alexc26
United Kingdom222 Posts
On February 09 2014 04:21 Julmust wrote: If people start creating pages for cosmetics I'm sure someone will gather them all in a portal sooner or later. Problem is that you need someone to do all the grunt work and actually add a shitload of cosmetics. Although I've not really edited the wiki before, I wouldn't mind giving it a go and trying to put the information there for cosmetics, as I noticed a lot of heroes are missing the information. | ||
| ||
