• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 02:08
CET 08:08
KST 16:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book15Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14
Community News
ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0218LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)23Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker10PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar)13
StarCraft 2
General
How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker Terran Scanner Sweep Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16) PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Revival: Season 4 Korea Qualifier (Feb 14) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth Mutation # 510 Safety Violation
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Gypsy to Korea Which units you wish saw more use in the game? ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/02 Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Diablo 2 thread Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ADHD And Gaming Addiction…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2045 users

KeSPA and Blizzard near an agreement. - Page 7

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
206 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
sandyph
Profile Joined September 2010
Indonesia1640 Posts
May 10 2011 04:09 GMT
#121
On May 10 2011 05:16 heyoka wrote:
Interesting to see unfold, GSL on real TV would be pretty huge.


according to Tasteless GSL is coming to Arirang TV and he will be commentating with Jason Lee.

Arirang TV is aired internationally through most cable provider
Put quote here for readability
Laneir
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1160 Posts
May 10 2011 04:11 GMT
#122
Im waiting for the day i can turn my TV on and see SC2 anytime of the day or just Esport in General T.T
Follow me on Instagram @Chef_Betto
purecarnagge
Profile Joined August 2010
719 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:18:53
May 10 2011 04:18 GMT
#123
Always wondered why Blizzard didn't do a graphics facelift to SC1. It would make it better for TV broadcasting...as SC1 is still the top dog in Korea... Although SC2 seems to be growing very steady.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:35:59
May 10 2011 04:19 GMT
#124
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard HAVE NOT YET reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:37 GMT
#125
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.
dudecrush
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada418 Posts
May 10 2011 04:38 GMT
#126
I am so happy this is getting resolved.

Long Live BW!!!
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#127
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


Rumor : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts

I just hope these "news" wouldn't affect negotiations negatively if they are not finalized yet.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:00:55
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#128
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

The truth will prevail in the future. And of course, the truthfulness of this artcle also.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.
Easy come, Easy go
Drium
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States888 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#129
I don't really follow BW anymore, but it's good to see this resolved in a way that will allow BW to continue to be broadcasted.
KwanROLLLLLLLED
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#130
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66358 Posts
May 10 2011 05:05 GMT
#131
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.
POGGERS
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10366 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:12:27
May 10 2011 05:11 GMT
#132
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


lmao, they never said they wanted to kill kespa.

If you think that is "lmao", the same can be said with kespa.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES50627 Posts
May 10 2011 05:13 GMT
#133
On May 10 2011 14:05 konadora wrote:
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


you mean the harmony between them and dogspa(referring to that comic that came out last month)
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:37:11
May 10 2011 05:28 GMT
#134
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.


I think that you're heavily judging that fact based on Kespa chairman or Kespa side. The fact is none of these sources you mentioned contains any certain word or information from Blizzard. If one of the guys from Blizzard gives a comment on this IP agreement, I would be highly convinced.

And the previous incidents, as you might know, since last year when the negotiation broke up, Kespa always kept saying that we are still trying to negotiate Blizzard. So the negotiation process might be undergoing but still, the agreement is not yet finalized.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't know why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"

Riot Games part is also a full of guessing by DES. The sentence is written like "It seems that Riot Games might hire a crucial employee from Blizzard Korea"
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:30 GMT
#135
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
May 10 2011 05:31 GMT
#136
Best news I've seen on TL in a long time, and that's really saying something.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:45:14
May 10 2011 05:43 GMT
#137
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.

Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:55 GMT
#138
On May 10 2011 14:43 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.



If you read what I posted I imply that is the case.
Atticus.axl
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States456 Posts
May 10 2011 06:27 GMT
#139
I'm so happy to see this finally start to settle. Long live Broodwar, long live SC2, long live e-sports.
DoctorHelvetica <3
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
May 10 2011 06:38 GMT
#140
I don't know what future KeSPA has in the future of Starcraft outside of Brood War. Putting legal issues aside, it seems to me that in general, pro gaming teams in SC2 enjoy the latitude the have with regards to how they operate without the long shadow of KeSPA influencing them. Moving forward, I feel that KeSPA would have to make some serious changes internally and practically reform itself it wants to define a position in Starcraft2.

Although I think they will currently just focus on pushing Brood War as hard and as long as it is profitable, but from a business perspective, KeSPA has to be considering the global implications SC2 currently has to offer over Brood War.

I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard lets up on Brood War licensing with regards to KeSPA since they now have situated themselves quite firmly in the development of SC2, so if KeSPA were to continue the SC2 legacy, they would have to come to Blizzard and Gretech now without any real alternative.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft554
SortOf 133
ProTech0
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1470
Leta 109
Aegong 40
Yoon 34
Free 28
910 18
IntoTheRainbow 11
ivOry 5
Dota 2
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 750
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King109
Other Games
tarik_tv11330
summit1g9700
gofns2500
C9.Mang0506
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick716
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH90
• Hupsaiya 79
• practicex 36
• Sammyuel 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra4087
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
52m
LiuLi Cup
3h 52m
Cure vs Reynor
Clem vs Maru
Rogue vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Serral
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4h 52m
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
9h 47m
RSL Revival
10h 52m
AI Arena Tournament
12h 52m
Replay Cast
16h 52m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 2h
LiuLi Cup
1d 3h
Ladder Legends
1d 10h
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: King of Kings
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round Qualifier
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.