• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:10
CEST 14:10
KST 21:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event5Serral wins EWC 202543Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9
Community News
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 193Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4
StarCraft 2
General
YouTube Income Criteria Explained: How to Qualify Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays RSL Season 2 Qualifier Links and Dates
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups BW General Discussion Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM 2025 Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 616 users

KeSPA and Blizzard near an agreement. - Page 7

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
206 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
sandyph
Profile Joined September 2010
Indonesia1640 Posts
May 10 2011 04:09 GMT
#121
On May 10 2011 05:16 heyoka wrote:
Interesting to see unfold, GSL on real TV would be pretty huge.


according to Tasteless GSL is coming to Arirang TV and he will be commentating with Jason Lee.

Arirang TV is aired internationally through most cable provider
Put quote here for readability
Laneir
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1160 Posts
May 10 2011 04:11 GMT
#122
Im waiting for the day i can turn my TV on and see SC2 anytime of the day or just Esport in General T.T
Follow me on Instagram @Chef_Betto
purecarnagge
Profile Joined August 2010
719 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:18:53
May 10 2011 04:18 GMT
#123
Always wondered why Blizzard didn't do a graphics facelift to SC1. It would make it better for TV broadcasting...as SC1 is still the top dog in Korea... Although SC2 seems to be growing very steady.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:35:59
May 10 2011 04:19 GMT
#124
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard HAVE NOT YET reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:37 GMT
#125
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.
dudecrush
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada418 Posts
May 10 2011 04:38 GMT
#126
I am so happy this is getting resolved.

Long Live BW!!!
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#127
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


Rumor : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts

I just hope these "news" wouldn't affect negotiations negatively if they are not finalized yet.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:00:55
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#128
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

The truth will prevail in the future. And of course, the truthfulness of this artcle also.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.
Easy come, Easy go
Drium
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States888 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#129
I don't really follow BW anymore, but it's good to see this resolved in a way that will allow BW to continue to be broadcasted.
KwanROLLLLLLLED
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#130
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66163 Posts
May 10 2011 05:05 GMT
#131
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.
POGGERS
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10343 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:12:27
May 10 2011 05:11 GMT
#132
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


lmao, they never said they wanted to kill kespa.

If you think that is "lmao", the same can be said with kespa.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES50123 Posts
May 10 2011 05:13 GMT
#133
On May 10 2011 14:05 konadora wrote:
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


you mean the harmony between them and dogspa(referring to that comic that came out last month)
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
TL+ Member
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:37:11
May 10 2011 05:28 GMT
#134
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.


I think that you're heavily judging that fact based on Kespa chairman or Kespa side. The fact is none of these sources you mentioned contains any certain word or information from Blizzard. If one of the guys from Blizzard gives a comment on this IP agreement, I would be highly convinced.

And the previous incidents, as you might know, since last year when the negotiation broke up, Kespa always kept saying that we are still trying to negotiate Blizzard. So the negotiation process might be undergoing but still, the agreement is not yet finalized.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't know why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"

Riot Games part is also a full of guessing by DES. The sentence is written like "It seems that Riot Games might hire a crucial employee from Blizzard Korea"
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:30 GMT
#135
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
May 10 2011 05:31 GMT
#136
Best news I've seen on TL in a long time, and that's really saying something.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:45:14
May 10 2011 05:43 GMT
#137
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.

Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:55 GMT
#138
On May 10 2011 14:43 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.



If you read what I posted I imply that is the case.
Atticus.axl
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States456 Posts
May 10 2011 06:27 GMT
#139
I'm so happy to see this finally start to settle. Long live Broodwar, long live SC2, long live e-sports.
DoctorHelvetica <3
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
May 10 2011 06:38 GMT
#140
I don't know what future KeSPA has in the future of Starcraft outside of Brood War. Putting legal issues aside, it seems to me that in general, pro gaming teams in SC2 enjoy the latitude the have with regards to how they operate without the long shadow of KeSPA influencing them. Moving forward, I feel that KeSPA would have to make some serious changes internally and practically reform itself it wants to define a position in Starcraft2.

Although I think they will currently just focus on pushing Brood War as hard and as long as it is profitable, but from a business perspective, KeSPA has to be considering the global implications SC2 currently has to offer over Brood War.

I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard lets up on Brood War licensing with regards to KeSPA since they now have situated themselves quite firmly in the development of SC2, so if KeSPA were to continue the SC2 legacy, they would have to come to Blizzard and Gretech now without any real alternative.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
12:00
#15
LiquipediaDiscussion
RSL Revival
10:00
S2: Korea Server Qualifier
CranKy Ducklings278
Rex132
Gemini_19103
IntoTheiNu 48
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1569
Rex 132
MindelVK 47
BRAT_OK 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36684
Calm 9242
Rain 4542
Sea 3953
Flash 1165
Horang2 1032
Jaedong 947
EffOrt 846
firebathero 742
BeSt 539
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 467
Stork 406
ToSsGirL 334
Zeus 311
ggaemo 297
Last 225
Barracks 202
hero 175
Soma 139
Dewaltoss 105
JulyZerg 97
Aegong 85
Killer 73
Pusan 61
Sharp 37
Movie 32
NaDa 30
Sea.KH 29
[sc1f]eonzerg 22
yabsab 21
Noble 12
IntoTheRainbow 8
SilentControl 7
Shine 6
Icarus 6
Stormgate
Lowko398
NightEnD34
Dota 2
XcaliburYe1011
qojqva730
boxi98408
Counter-Strike
zeus209
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor237
Other Games
singsing2066
B2W.Neo1310
DeMusliM456
Happy305
RotterdaM243
KnowMe135
SortOf114
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV760
League of Legends
• Jankos1288
Counter-Strike
• C_a_k_e 910
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2h 50m
CSO Cup
3h 50m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 50m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 2h
Wardi Open
1d 22h
RotterdaM Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Summer Champion…
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
Online Event
6 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.