• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:40
CET 01:40
KST 09:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win1BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced14[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Information Request Regarding Chinese Ladder SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest RSL Revival: Season 3 Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions Which season is the best in ASL? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh's Valkyrie Copium BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1175 users

KeSPA and Blizzard near an agreement. - Page 7

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
206 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
sandyph
Profile Joined September 2010
Indonesia1640 Posts
May 10 2011 04:09 GMT
#121
On May 10 2011 05:16 heyoka wrote:
Interesting to see unfold, GSL on real TV would be pretty huge.


according to Tasteless GSL is coming to Arirang TV and he will be commentating with Jason Lee.

Arirang TV is aired internationally through most cable provider
Put quote here for readability
Laneir
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1160 Posts
May 10 2011 04:11 GMT
#122
Im waiting for the day i can turn my TV on and see SC2 anytime of the day or just Esport in General T.T
Follow me on Instagram @Chef_Betto
purecarnagge
Profile Joined August 2010
719 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:18:53
May 10 2011 04:18 GMT
#123
Always wondered why Blizzard didn't do a graphics facelift to SC1. It would make it better for TV broadcasting...as SC1 is still the top dog in Korea... Although SC2 seems to be growing very steady.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:35:59
May 10 2011 04:19 GMT
#124
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard HAVE NOT YET reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:37 GMT
#125
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.
dudecrush
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada418 Posts
May 10 2011 04:38 GMT
#126
I am so happy this is getting resolved.

Long Live BW!!!
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#127
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


Rumor : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts

I just hope these "news" wouldn't affect negotiations negatively if they are not finalized yet.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:00:55
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#128
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

The truth will prevail in the future. And of course, the truthfulness of this artcle also.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.
Easy come, Easy go
Drium
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States888 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#129
I don't really follow BW anymore, but it's good to see this resolved in a way that will allow BW to continue to be broadcasted.
KwanROLLLLLLLED
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#130
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66357 Posts
May 10 2011 05:05 GMT
#131
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.
POGGERS
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10366 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:12:27
May 10 2011 05:11 GMT
#132
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


lmao, they never said they wanted to kill kespa.

If you think that is "lmao", the same can be said with kespa.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES50595 Posts
May 10 2011 05:13 GMT
#133
On May 10 2011 14:05 konadora wrote:
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


you mean the harmony between them and dogspa(referring to that comic that came out last month)
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:37:11
May 10 2011 05:28 GMT
#134
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.


I think that you're heavily judging that fact based on Kespa chairman or Kespa side. The fact is none of these sources you mentioned contains any certain word or information from Blizzard. If one of the guys from Blizzard gives a comment on this IP agreement, I would be highly convinced.

And the previous incidents, as you might know, since last year when the negotiation broke up, Kespa always kept saying that we are still trying to negotiate Blizzard. So the negotiation process might be undergoing but still, the agreement is not yet finalized.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't know why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"

Riot Games part is also a full of guessing by DES. The sentence is written like "It seems that Riot Games might hire a crucial employee from Blizzard Korea"
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:30 GMT
#135
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
May 10 2011 05:31 GMT
#136
Best news I've seen on TL in a long time, and that's really saying something.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:45:14
May 10 2011 05:43 GMT
#137
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.

Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:55 GMT
#138
On May 10 2011 14:43 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.



If you read what I posted I imply that is the case.
Atticus.axl
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States456 Posts
May 10 2011 06:27 GMT
#139
I'm so happy to see this finally start to settle. Long live Broodwar, long live SC2, long live e-sports.
DoctorHelvetica <3
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
May 10 2011 06:38 GMT
#140
I don't know what future KeSPA has in the future of Starcraft outside of Brood War. Putting legal issues aside, it seems to me that in general, pro gaming teams in SC2 enjoy the latitude the have with regards to how they operate without the long shadow of KeSPA influencing them. Moving forward, I feel that KeSPA would have to make some serious changes internally and practically reform itself it wants to define a position in Starcraft2.

Although I think they will currently just focus on pushing Brood War as hard and as long as it is profitable, but from a business perspective, KeSPA has to be considering the global implications SC2 currently has to offer over Brood War.

I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard lets up on Brood War licensing with regards to KeSPA since they now have situated themselves quite firmly in the development of SC2, so if KeSPA were to continue the SC2 legacy, they would have to come to Blizzard and Gretech now without any real alternative.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2025 KFC Monthly #3 - Day 5
CranKy Ducklings116
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
CosmosSc2 54
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 718
Dota 2
syndereN505
League of Legends
C9.Mang0216
Super Smash Bros
PPMD94
Other Games
summit1g11721
tarik_tv5136
Grubby3661
FrodaN1611
shahzam839
WinterStarcraft589
Maynarde114
Mew2King41
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick632
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 89
• davetesta68
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22373
Other Games
• Scarra1338
• imaqtpie1240
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
11h 20m
StarCraft2.fi
16h 20m
PiGosaur Monday
1d
Wardi Open
1d 11h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 16h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
4 days
BSL 21
4 days
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
BSL 21
5 days
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-28
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
META Madness #9
Light HT
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
Kuram Kup
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.