• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:42
CEST 12:42
KST 19:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview3[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)5Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview5
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League4Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double0Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double
Tourneys
Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 527 Hell Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies 25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ VPN experiences vespene.gg — BW replays in browser
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Organizations: Raisi…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1353 users

KeSPA and Blizzard near an agreement. - Page 7

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
206 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
sandyph
Profile Joined September 2010
Indonesia1640 Posts
May 10 2011 04:09 GMT
#121
On May 10 2011 05:16 heyoka wrote:
Interesting to see unfold, GSL on real TV would be pretty huge.


according to Tasteless GSL is coming to Arirang TV and he will be commentating with Jason Lee.

Arirang TV is aired internationally through most cable provider
Put quote here for readability
Laneir
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1160 Posts
May 10 2011 04:11 GMT
#122
Im waiting for the day i can turn my TV on and see SC2 anytime of the day or just Esport in General T.T
Follow me on Instagram @Chef_Betto
purecarnagge
Profile Joined August 2010
719 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:18:53
May 10 2011 04:18 GMT
#123
Always wondered why Blizzard didn't do a graphics facelift to SC1. It would make it better for TV broadcasting...as SC1 is still the top dog in Korea... Although SC2 seems to be growing very steady.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:35:59
May 10 2011 04:19 GMT
#124
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard HAVE NOT YET reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:37 GMT
#125
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.
dudecrush
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada418 Posts
May 10 2011 04:38 GMT
#126
I am so happy this is getting resolved.

Long Live BW!!!
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#127
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


Rumor : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts

I just hope these "news" wouldn't affect negotiations negatively if they are not finalized yet.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:00:55
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#128
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

The truth will prevail in the future. And of course, the truthfulness of this artcle also.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.
Easy come, Easy go
Drium
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States888 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#129
I don't really follow BW anymore, but it's good to see this resolved in a way that will allow BW to continue to be broadcasted.
KwanROLLLLLLLED
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#130
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66363 Posts
May 10 2011 05:05 GMT
#131
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.
POGGERS
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10366 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:12:27
May 10 2011 05:11 GMT
#132
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


lmao, they never said they wanted to kill kespa.

If you think that is "lmao", the same can be said with kespa.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES51041 Posts
May 10 2011 05:13 GMT
#133
On May 10 2011 14:05 konadora wrote:
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


you mean the harmony between them and dogspa(referring to that comic that came out last month)
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:37:11
May 10 2011 05:28 GMT
#134
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.


I think that you're heavily judging that fact based on Kespa chairman or Kespa side. The fact is none of these sources you mentioned contains any certain word or information from Blizzard. If one of the guys from Blizzard gives a comment on this IP agreement, I would be highly convinced.

And the previous incidents, as you might know, since last year when the negotiation broke up, Kespa always kept saying that we are still trying to negotiate Blizzard. So the negotiation process might be undergoing but still, the agreement is not yet finalized.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't know why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"

Riot Games part is also a full of guessing by DES. The sentence is written like "It seems that Riot Games might hire a crucial employee from Blizzard Korea"
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:30 GMT
#135
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
May 10 2011 05:31 GMT
#136
Best news I've seen on TL in a long time, and that's really saying something.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:45:14
May 10 2011 05:43 GMT
#137
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.

Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:55 GMT
#138
On May 10 2011 14:43 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.



If you read what I posted I imply that is the case.
Atticus.axl
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States456 Posts
May 10 2011 06:27 GMT
#139
I'm so happy to see this finally start to settle. Long live Broodwar, long live SC2, long live e-sports.
DoctorHelvetica <3
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
May 10 2011 06:38 GMT
#140
I don't know what future KeSPA has in the future of Starcraft outside of Brood War. Putting legal issues aside, it seems to me that in general, pro gaming teams in SC2 enjoy the latitude the have with regards to how they operate without the long shadow of KeSPA influencing them. Moving forward, I feel that KeSPA would have to make some serious changes internally and practically reform itself it wants to define a position in Starcraft2.

Although I think they will currently just focus on pushing Brood War as hard and as long as it is profitable, but from a business perspective, KeSPA has to be considering the global implications SC2 currently has to offer over Brood War.

I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard lets up on Brood War licensing with regards to KeSPA since they now have situated themselves quite firmly in the development of SC2, so if KeSPA were to continue the SC2 legacy, they would have to come to Blizzard and Gretech now without any real alternative.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 94
CranKy Ducklings80
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 388
Lowko188
RotterdaM 86
Rex 29
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 706
firebathero 461
Rush 328
ZerO 312
Hyuk 250
actioN 231
Pusan 217
Larva 192
EffOrt 150
Hyun 130
[ Show more ]
Zeus 129
ggaemo 102
Leta 80
scan(afreeca) 58
Sharp 55
ToSsGirL 51
Aegong 43
Soulkey 39
910 33
Shinee 31
Backho 25
sorry 18
Sacsri 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
GoRush 13
IntoTheRainbow 13
zelot 13
Noble 11
Light 0
Dota 2
Gorgc5285
XaKoH 637
XcaliburYe67
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2044
shoxiejesuss1092
allub202
x6flipin195
markeloff142
Other Games
singsing1003
Sick250
Trikslyr17
ZerO(Twitch)14
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL561
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 49
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 10
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2446
• Jankos297
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
18m
GSL
22h 48m
herO vs Classic
Cure vs Clem
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
GSL
1d 22h
Maru vs SHIN
Zoun vs Rogue
WardiTV Spring Champion…
2 days
SKillous vs Strange
Lambo vs Strange
Ryung vs Strange
Lambo vs Ryung
Ryung vs SKillous
Lambo vs SKillous
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
4 days
IPSL
4 days
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
BSL
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

2026 KK StarCraft Pro League
BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
YSL S3
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: King of Kings
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.