• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:50
CEST 23:50
KST 06:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 295Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion7BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion7Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles0MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon445.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes40
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 2 Serral wins HomeStory Cup 29 Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) What is your PC setup in 2026 for SCBW/SC2 ?
Tourneys
GSL CK #5 Race War WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event HomeStory Cup 29 Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family
Brood War
General
Pros Debate: Zerg Unfairly Nerfed? (ASL S22 map) BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Wildcard Qualifier IPSL Spring 2026 Top 4! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming!
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport] Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2981 users

KeSPA and Blizzard near an agreement. - Page 7

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
206 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
sandyph
Profile Joined September 2010
Indonesia1640 Posts
May 10 2011 04:09 GMT
#121
On May 10 2011 05:16 heyoka wrote:
Interesting to see unfold, GSL on real TV would be pretty huge.


according to Tasteless GSL is coming to Arirang TV and he will be commentating with Jason Lee.

Arirang TV is aired internationally through most cable provider
Put quote here for readability
Laneir
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1160 Posts
May 10 2011 04:11 GMT
#122
Im waiting for the day i can turn my TV on and see SC2 anytime of the day or just Esport in General T.T
Follow me on Instagram @Chef_Betto
purecarnagge
Profile Joined August 2010
719 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:18:53
May 10 2011 04:18 GMT
#123
Always wondered why Blizzard didn't do a graphics facelift to SC1. It would make it better for TV broadcasting...as SC1 is still the top dog in Korea... Although SC2 seems to be growing very steady.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 04:35:59
May 10 2011 04:19 GMT
#124
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard HAVE NOT YET reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:37 GMT
#125
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.
dudecrush
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada418 Posts
May 10 2011 04:38 GMT
#126
I am so happy this is getting resolved.

Long Live BW!!!
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#127
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


Rumor : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts

I just hope these "news" wouldn't affect negotiations negatively if they are not finalized yet.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:00:55
May 10 2011 04:50 GMT
#128
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

The truth will prevail in the future. And of course, the truthfulness of this artcle also.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.
Easy come, Easy go
Drium
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States888 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#129
I don't really follow BW anymore, but it's good to see this resolved in a way that will allow BW to continue to be broadcasted.
KwanROLLLLLLLED
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 04:59 GMT
#130
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66364 Posts
May 10 2011 05:05 GMT
#131
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.
POGGERS
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10377 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:12:27
May 10 2011 05:11 GMT
#132
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


lmao, they never said they wanted to kill kespa.

If you think that is "lmao", the same can be said with kespa.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES51100 Posts
May 10 2011 05:13 GMT
#133
On May 10 2011 14:05 konadora wrote:
lmao blizzard dogs, finally realising they can't survive in korea without harmony between them and kespa.


you mean the harmony between them and dogspa(referring to that comic that came out last month)
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:37:11
May 10 2011 05:28 GMT
#134
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.


I think that you're heavily judging that fact based on Kespa chairman or Kespa side. The fact is none of these sources you mentioned contains any certain word or information from Blizzard. If one of the guys from Blizzard gives a comment on this IP agreement, I would be highly convinced.

And the previous incidents, as you might know, since last year when the negotiation broke up, Kespa always kept saying that we are still trying to negotiate Blizzard. So the negotiation process might be undergoing but still, the agreement is not yet finalized.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't know why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"

Riot Games part is also a full of guessing by DES. The sentence is written like "It seems that Riot Games might hire a crucial employee from Blizzard Korea"
Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:30 GMT
#135
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
May 10 2011 05:31 GMT
#136
Best news I've seen on TL in a long time, and that's really saying something.
jayGroove
Profile Joined October 2010
United States15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 05:45:14
May 10 2011 05:43 GMT
#137
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.

Easy come, Easy go
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
May 10 2011 05:55 GMT
#138
On May 10 2011 14:43 jayGroove wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 14:30 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 14:28 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:59 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:50 jayGroove wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:37 Milkis wrote:
On May 10 2011 13:19 jayGroove wrote:
After I read this thread, I checked Korean article from TIG and it seems that some korean presses wrote the article based on unofficial source, so called "rumor". And everybody is saying about what is not actually happening.

The actual fact is forth court "Defense date" is delayed. After that, none of these things is just "rumor". Please, let's discuss about this after when Blizzard hold a press conference and finally made an IP agreement with Kespa.

Once again, KeSPA and Blizzard DIDN'T reach an agreement. It's just guessing based on unofficial source.


Are you sure? Just because Thisisgame hasn't reported on it, it's only a rumor?

It's true that it's not the best source, but the point is that the story adds up with previous stories and bits and pieces that were written about.

We will see though, but it looks very likely at this point.


How can you judge the fact based on "알려진 바에 따르면", in english "according to as it is known "? I don't see any reasonable fact behind the article from Daily sports (일간스포츠 in English). Because the whole article was written by unknown source.

Maybe this article will prove what is true or not in the future.
But I would say it's a little bit early to write the title like "KeSPA and Blizzard reach an agreement"
for now.


There are several sources that refer to some of the previous incidents (ie: Blizzard contacting KeSPA), and that's not just DES. Secondly, the quotation from the chairman of KeSPA also makes it likely

I think it's pretty safe to conclude simply due to the fact that it would definitely have been contradicted by now, also. It's just that the stories add up that leads me to believe that it's a high probability of certainty.

Even the "Blizzard contacts KeSPA to mediate between OGN/MBC" part from DES, the article is about critical situation of Blizzard based on "according to as it is known source" and Blizzard didn't give any comments about DES guessing or rumor. I don't why you give much credits for this.
Also, the Korean title of that article is very emotional. It's like "The Crisis of Blizzard, and K.O. by Korean E-sports"


There are other sources that report the same thing, or else I would have just completely ignored it.

Anyway, KeSPA to be honest has been a lot more frank about the situation than Blizzard throughout the entire thing, which is why I don't need Blizzard's confirmation. But yeah, we will see.


That's regretful. Blizzard and Kespa situation is now working like politics.

If you judge the fact based on Kespa-biased information and write the title like "Blizzard and Kespa reach agreement", you would lead many people to believe Blizzard and Kespa successfully reach IP Agreement. But the truth is it's still not yet finalized.

I strongly suggest that you should add "Rumor" or "?" on the title.



If you read what I posted I imply that is the case.
Atticus.axl
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States456 Posts
May 10 2011 06:27 GMT
#139
I'm so happy to see this finally start to settle. Long live Broodwar, long live SC2, long live e-sports.
DoctorHelvetica <3
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
May 10 2011 06:38 GMT
#140
I don't know what future KeSPA has in the future of Starcraft outside of Brood War. Putting legal issues aside, it seems to me that in general, pro gaming teams in SC2 enjoy the latitude the have with regards to how they operate without the long shadow of KeSPA influencing them. Moving forward, I feel that KeSPA would have to make some serious changes internally and practically reform itself it wants to define a position in Starcraft2.

Although I think they will currently just focus on pushing Brood War as hard and as long as it is profitable, but from a business perspective, KeSPA has to be considering the global implications SC2 currently has to offer over Brood War.

I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard lets up on Brood War licensing with regards to KeSPA since they now have situated themselves quite firmly in the development of SC2, so if KeSPA were to continue the SC2 legacy, they would have to come to Blizzard and Gretech now without any real alternative.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#58
RotterdaM1290
TaKeTV687
TKL 456
SteadfastSC233
IndyStarCraft 185
ZombieGrub132
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1290
TKL 462
SteadfastSC 274
IndyStarCraft 208
ZombieGrub139
JuggernautJason41
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 66
Purpose 9
Bale 7
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm109
canceldota106
Counter-Strike
summit1g2744
kRYSTAL_37
Other Games
Grubby4224
tarik_tv3916
shahzam671
C9.Mang0203
Liquid`Hasu188
UpATreeSC56
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV287
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 218
• Hupsaiya 48
• davetesta1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21235
Other Games
• imaqtpie1667
• Shiphtur366
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 10m
WardiTV Weekly
13h 10m
The PondCast
1d 12h
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
4 days
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
5 days
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S3
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W3
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 1
Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.