EPTGSL official map change SOON™ - Page 11
| Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
|
bubblegumbo
Taiwan1296 Posts
| ||
|
Xeph
Korea (South)191 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On January 09 2011 01:51 bubblegumbo wrote: It's pretty disgraceful that Blizzard only offered one decent map to replace all the shit ones they made, and GOM had to get unofficial map-makers to design better maps. Blizzard didn't offer anything and I don't see why they should as there's a huge community and the tools to design exactly the kinds of maps you want | ||
|
Superouman
France2195 Posts
you just pass , you don't battle there. expo layout is okay amoroso looks 2x bigger than enigma. huge open middle, even tight paths are large? expo layout too safe for zergs compared to the map size. really, REALLY hard time for terran in zvt biohasard (wtf so ugly for a kor map)it LOOKS like there is a tiny passage from the nat to the central third, i can't see a zerg break this expo without broodlords. and against zerg, you can annoy him with tanks and colo and probably drops on that pod. i hope you can't land units on nat cliff, it would be so retarded if you can because you would stop any aggression directly from opponent's base protoss and terran will never try to go through the middle since he has so many tight tight paths. I don't like this map at all crossfire: i never liked it, double sized ramp (srsly stop this shit), i don't see any danger from the "backdoor" which is on the front. awful nat placement. the paths tooooo choked and tight, expo layout is okay the best map imo is aiur garden and i don't like it very much, it is just okay. as a zerg player i obviously play on amoroso all day since it's nearly freewin on any matchup | ||
|
Tennet
United States1458 Posts
| ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On January 09 2011 01:57 Superouman wrote: i don't like the way the middle is involved in aiur garden you just pass , you don't battle there. expo layout is okay amoroso looks 2x bigger than enigma. huge open middle, even tight paths are large? expo layout too safe for zergs compared to the map size. really, REALLY hard time for terran in zvt biohasard (wtf so ugly for a kor map)it LOOKS like there is a tiny passage from the nat to the central third, i can't see a zerg break this expo without broodlords. and against zerg, you can annoy him with tanks and colo and probably drops on that pod. i hope you can't land units on nat cliff, it would be so retarded if you can because you would stop any aggression directly from opponent's base protoss will never try to go through the middle since he has so many tight tight paths. I don't like this map at all crossfire: i never liked it, double sized ramp (srsly stop this shit), i don't see any danger from the "backdoor" which is on the front. awful nat placement. the paths tooooo choked and tight, expo layout is okay the best map imo is aiur garden and i don't like it very much, it is just okay. as a zerg player i obviously play on amoroso all day since it's nearly freewin on any matchup Get on gisado and promote your (and iCCup) maps man! Talk to people! You gotta have someone who can speak/translate korean no? ^^ EDIT: To poster below: Testbug imba  | ||
|
Gingerninja
United Kingdom1339 Posts
| ||
|
Sewi
Germany1697 Posts
Hope Blizz learns something fromt that and they will put some of these maps in their ladder pool | ||
|
Toxiferous
United States388 Posts
On January 09 2011 01:57 Superouman wrote: i don't like the way the middle is involved in aiur garden you just pass , you don't battle there. expo layout is okay amoroso looks 2x bigger than enigma. huge open middle, even tight paths are large? expo layout too safe for zergs compared to the map size. really, REALLY hard time for terran in zvt biohasard (wtf so ugly for a kor map)it LOOKS like there is a tiny passage from the nat to the central third, i can't see a zerg break this expo without broodlords. and against zerg, you can annoy him with tanks and colo and probably drops on that pod. i hope you can't land units on nat cliff, it would be so retarded if you can because you would stop any aggression directly from opponent's base protoss and terran will never try to go through the middle since he has so many tight tight paths. I don't like this map at all crossfire: i never liked it, double sized ramp (srsly stop this shit), i don't see any danger from the "backdoor" which is on the front. awful nat placement. the paths tooooo choked and tight, expo layout is okay the best map imo is aiur garden and i don't like it very much, it is just okay. as a zerg player i obviously play on amoroso all day since it's nearly freewin on any matchup What do you base all this off? Absolutely nothing? Lol. Wait to play the maps before criticizing | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
While I am all for the new maps since they rock; basically the entire success of these new maps will depend on Blizzard's reaction. If they sync their map pool in some way, like say diamond and master league players play on GSL maps everyone else plays on crappy maps, then it will be smooth sailing. If not, then shit could get ugly. | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
testbug for GSL 5 finals | ||
|
Armsved
Denmark642 Posts
On January 09 2011 01:57 Superouman wrote: biohasard (wtf so ugly for a kor map)it LOOKS like there is a tiny passage from the nat to the central third, i can't see a zerg break this expo without broodlords. and against zerg, you can annoy him with tanks and colo and probably drops on that pod. i hope you can't land units on nat cliff, it would be so retarded if you can because you would stop any aggression directly from opponent's base protoss will never try to go through the middle since he has so many tight tight paths. I don't like this map at all Just played it and it seemes pretty awsome. There are tiny passages but they dont do a whole lot. Only for reinforcement. You attack from other direction (from the middle). You can drop the cliff at the nat, but it doesnt hit the mineral line and its so small that queen can walk into close range of siege tanks. Just played TvZ on it (we both are around 3k) and even thou I tried exploiding the chokes as hard as possible with with siege tanks he still won. Yes he could only break me once he had broodlords, but thats pretty much always the case vs a terran who builds tanks. The map feels awsome, only problem could be collusus. FFs are not better than on any blizzard map as long as you attack from the middle. Im not saying the map is perfect, but damn it seems really good. | ||
|
FindingPride
United States1001 Posts
| ||
|
Nightmarjoo
United States3359 Posts
On January 09 2011 02:03 Toxiferous wrote: What do you base all this off? Absolutely nothing? Lol. Wait to play the maps before criticizing He bases it off his knowledge and experience he gained becoming one of the best foreign bw mappers and the best foreign sc2 mapper. | ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On January 09 2011 02:03 Toxiferous wrote: What do you base all this off? Absolutely nothing? Lol. Wait to play the maps before criticizing ![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/4Qcj5.jpg) | ||
|
Art.FeeL
1163 Posts
| ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
| ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On January 09 2011 02:12 iCCup.Diamond wrote: It looks like it's time for me to start kicking down some Korean doors! No time to loose! Gogogoogogogogo | ||
|
DrGreen
Poland708 Posts
anyways, awesome change! | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38149 Posts
On January 09 2011 02:12 iCCup.Diamond wrote: It looks like it's time for me to start kicking down some Korean doors! I'd recommend you knock politely first, but yeah got onto them man you guys have some great maps and it'd be awesome if you could get them played on! | ||
| ||
