Relic vs Blizzard, lets show'em [Escapist Vote] - Page 15
Forum Index > Closed |
eatmyshorts5
United States1530 Posts
| ||
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
| ||
blabber
United States4448 Posts
| ||
fAnTaCy
United States893 Posts
| ||
Manbear
Canada306 Posts
| ||
iloahz
United States964 Posts
| ||
![]()
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
sl
Canada239 Posts
| ||
![]()
IntoTheWow
is awesome32274 Posts
| ||
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
Tinithor
United States1552 Posts
| ||
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
On March 28 2009 10:50 Jyvblamo wrote: Actually, the style of the races in SC are shockingly unoriginal if you do some research. =P I was not saying that they're original ideas but to claim that they are copied infers that they were directly 'copied' from warhammer. | ||
Fontong
United States6454 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Your right. I am too young to have played Starcraft and Warcraft 3. Heck I am downloading a Starcraft Demo right now. But I honestly don't think my age should determine whether or not my post is valid. I can't tell whether that educated post comment is sarcasm or not. When you say that the number of people playing it after +5 years Definitely correlates with the quality of the game, I agree with you for the most part. But, since relics games haven't stood the test of time, we can't exactly judge them by that. But because of the whole time thing, we can't judge which is better by sales. We also can't judge by reviews, because as standards change, so do reviews scores, and a game that met the standard in 1989, won't meet the standard today. So the only real choice we have for comparing the two is to assume the both have been released at the same time, and judge everything by a perfectly technical standpoint. But this of course, would probably destroy starcraft. While Starcraft may have invented the genre, that does not mean it is the best in the genre. Case in point being Resident evil. It invented the survival horror genre, but Silent hill 2 made it shine. Wolfenstien invented the FPS, but Doom made it popular. Infact, being the first in genre, Starcraft is at a disadvantage, cause it's unable to work out its flaws. Other games have been able to see what work, see what didn't work, put their own spin on it, and improve on starcraft's formula. Maybe Starcraft still continues to deliver to this day. Let me play a quick round in the demo I just downloaded. *plays game* Well, that was interesting. It wasn't strategically dead, which was good. I couldn't just walk over there and spam them, which was a plus. Granted that's all I had the energy to do. But I could only select twelve units at any given time, which PREVENTED me from spamming. that said, it's not really all that impressive. The artwork is bad, the animation is bad, and it just doesn't look appealing. There is also no motivation. In DoW your required to go forward to gain resources where as here I had no reason to cause there was a boatload of minerals sitting there behind me. And talk about SPEED. I swear in that game one year equals one second. I would've died if I had waited for that armor upgrade any longer. So with that quick summary, I conclude: It's overrated. Yes, it may be the most strategically balanced RTS on the market, but I didn't find it fun. Maybe that's cause its ten o clock, or maybe that's cause its only slightly more advanced then graph paper. I don't know. But from my little experience just then, I didn't find it all that fun to play or visually appealing. ARGH ARGH ARGH These people do not understand starcraft argh T_T omg Edit: Goodman wrote: The only people of that opinion are the ones who play sc competitively and are close minded enough to not accept any other innovations in RTS after sc. Serious play is not considered an art in relic games, it is considered sad. Because Relic games are played for fun, and even when played competitively in ladders, the emphasis is fun before competition, just as it should be. FOCK I can't believe someone actually agreed that their games are limited to pretty explosions and then used it to support their argument. O.O My life... | ||
EGMachine
United States1643 Posts
| ||
fAnTaCy
United States893 Posts
On March 28 2009 12:40 Machine[USA] wrote: their is so god damn many retards in that fourm. Agree here...they irritate me so much i was actually getting pissed at how idiotic they were x.x" | ||
sl
Canada239 Posts
| ||
stiga
United States377 Posts
| ||
Spyfire242
United States715 Posts
| ||
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
I find most people are just too hung up on losing that they can't derive pleasure from winning a hard won game. That sort of view point is pretty much what made SSB crash and burn. | ||
stiga
United States377 Posts
also what is this "For the emperor!" crap. lets see some FOR THE SWARM!! FOR AUIR!!! hey im terran player | ||
| ||