EPTchecked hotkeys? reps? the way he talks?
SaddleS Failed? - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
CapO
United States1615 Posts
checked hotkeys? reps? the way he talks? | ||
Liquid`Ret
Netherlands4535 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
The Proof: I watched all his games in his first day back, in few of his tvps if he sees terran go one fact expo he bulldogs. I thought that was all he got until this one game where the guy whos a C terran managed to defend his bulldog with a good building placement block + scvs, and i thought to myself that would be it for him, but then i saw him spent half his shit taking down the Ebay blocking the choke and turrets covering the high ground and the choke. It turned out he had a backup plan, his DTs were on their way. The guy have a good sense of timing and plays adaptive strategy in which he was able to beat C ranked mechanic. as he's trying to regain his own mechanic from the long break, he will only get better than C. he exploited all the mistakes he see, he played aggressive and and try to force mistakes. Shits he does make sense, he just doesn't have enough APM right now to execute his game plan due to his rust. I guess he's just walking his talk right now, i bet he will start talking when he's B, whenever that will be, i give him a month at least. | ||
|
Ideas
United States8179 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:06 ret wrote: obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall. example please? lol | ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:06 ret wrote: obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall. I don't think logic can be outdated, information he has is outdated, but if the premise of his argument is valid and sound, his logic is good. I think he will come to realize how wrong he is as he plays the new strategies and adapt to them, he has already shown his ability to adapt vs the bisu build. He claimed that Bisu build was not viable if the zerg knows every time that the toss is ganna canon fast expo. so the guy he was playing is tryign to prove him wrong. and they played a pvz in which saddles was the zerg, in the first game saddles made about 2.5 control gruops of lings with 12 drones and protoss made about 7 cannons behind buildings and probes. Saddles attacks and completely destroyed the protoss cannon wall in his second wave of lings. Second game they played same match up again, this time with better building placement from the protoss which only leaves 1 tiny opening for his lings to run in, saddles adapted, he build like 8 lings, and proceeded to sunken up 3 gas and then making nothing but ultra/lings. and ya he won that game too | ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know. | ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
| ||
|
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
| ||
|
CapO
United States1615 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:46 rei wrote: He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform. Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know. yes, you are. | ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
| ||
|
gm.tOSS
Germany898 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:46 rei wrote: He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform. Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know. Are you in love or something? o_O Sounds like you found finally purpose in life... I admit the trainbash is a little onesided and not really funny anymore - but at least take off the pink glasses. The way you try to shift everything until it somehow fits into your deranged little world makes me wanna puke. No matter what you're gonna say you can't possibly fix what he already said. Sooner or later he'll hit the wall where old strats won't work anymore because he's gonna face people who know how to counter them - and are well capable doing so. He even might get to b- sometime or who knows... but it aint gonna prove nothing anymore. | ||
|
KrAzYfoOL
Australia3037 Posts
| ||
|
NrG.Bamboo
United States2756 Posts
On January 17 2009 07:47 Empyrean wrote: Is this the same as nex-scy? If so, he was active in 2006. I don't think they are the same person. Also, ScY is still active =/ He uses JF-Thunder on East IIRC | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:06 ret wrote: obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall. lol. | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
and ya the example i provided shown "he'll hit the wall where old strates won't work anymore because he's ganna face people who know how to counter them - and are well capable doing so" and it also shown that he is deviating from his original claim. if he's ganna make it to B it will not be because of his old school, it will be because he adapted the new strategies and mechanics. and if you can get over yourself and read my words without pointing your e-p on my ass just because i am saying something you don't like to hear, you will actually see that I am saying is that saddles is admitting he's wrong with his plays, | ||
|
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:46 rei wrote: He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform. Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know. How about him coming and saying "I was ignorant. Sorry." That would speak louder than... well nothing? | ||
| ||
