|
Saddles: Iccup is easy?
keep in mind this is just my FIRST NIGHT back, my hands still feel like rocks compared to what they used to feel like, I'm sure I wont regain everything until at least a few weeks of playing... but when you easily get to C- on my first night playing in 3 years has the competition really improved all that much OUTSIDE of Korea as you guys say?
in a few days Ill be B ranked....
SaddleS on Iccup...
Now he cleared his stats and is now 9-2, perhaps getting to C rank was too hard (you can see his old games from game list).
But perhaps he will still get there:
It's because I have much better micro and macro than the person im playing, and I just impose that advantage on them as early as possible in the game... I KNOW that when I get to playing some sick B Koreans I will have to play a more conservative style.....
Perhaps those C- Korean gamers were too much.
|
Calgary25981 Posts
He's just ignorant really. Nothing more to say about it.
|
So your going to jock him about his performance. I feel as if I am jocking him posting in this thread. I read his posts but didn't dare to post b/c I don't wanna assume something I probably could be wrong about. A bit over confident more then ignorant is what I think about him.
|
If he can't make it out of C- this late in the season then there's no way in hell he can make B as quickly as he says. If he practices for a month or two, then fine whatever.
The difference between C- and B is fucking ginormous.
e: And his retarded brag about "easily" getting C- is a joke. Last season I've hit C- going 15-0 around this stage of the season. If I was retarded I'd immediately extrapolate and say that I'm B rank easily. But no, I max out in around C.
|
Who cares? He's always been cocky. Lol.
|
Braavos36375 Posts
On January 17 2009 00:41 Kennelie wrote:
So your going to jock him about his performance. I feel as if I am jocking him posting in this thread. I read his posts but didn't dare to post b/c I don't wanna assume something I probably could be wrong about. A bit over confident more then ignorant is what I think about him.
well, its already pretty much too late, he said he'd be "B ranked in a few days" a few days ago. he's nowhere close to that, especially after the reset. we still have no idea if he'll ever make C+, let alone B, especially with that mediocre win-loss ratio.
|
..in a week he will stall at the low C rank is my guess, though everyone has said that all ready.  He doesn't know how good B rank is but yeah, better to just wait and see if he is still playing in a week or so.
|
The thing is, from the few replays I saw of his iCCup games, his apm averaged around 150, which is nothing special, and I doubt he has either the micro or macro to crack into the B levels. Also, when I checked his games a day or two ago, a large portion of his recent PvZ games that he won ended within 5:00 minutes, which probably means that he's unable or too afraid to get into long games because he probably doesn't know how to pull off the modern FE Protoss builds, and he probably gets grossly outmacroed as the game progresses.
|
United States17042 Posts
On January 17 2009 01:21 koreasilver wrote:
The thing is, from the few replays I saw of his iCCup games, his apm averaged around 150, which is nothing special, and I doubt he has either the micro or macro to crack into the B levels. Also, when I checked his games a day or two ago, a large portion of his recent PvZ games that he won ended within 5:00 minutes, which probably means that he's unable or too afraid to get into long games because he probably doesn't know how to pull off the modern FE Protoss builds, and he probably gets grossly outmacroed as the game progresses.
I wonder if he 2 gates, and his opponents don't know how to deal with it. Most zergs face FE, which means that they don't get very much practice against 2 gates.
|
Canada3684 Posts
On January 17 2009 01:31 GHOSTCLAW wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 01:21 koreasilver wrote:
The thing is, from the few replays I saw of his iCCup games, his apm averaged around 150, which is nothing special, and I doubt he has either the micro or macro to crack into the B levels. Also, when I checked his games a day or two ago, a large portion of his recent PvZ games that he won ended within 5:00 minutes, which probably means that he's unable or too afraid to get into long games because he probably doesn't know how to pull off the modern FE Protoss builds, and he probably gets grossly outmacroed as the game progresses. I wonder if he 2 gates, and his opponents don't know how to deal with it. Most zergs face FE, which means that they don't get very much practice against 2 gates.
I don't think so. It's probably 25% 2 gate and 74% FE for me. I left the 1% for all the crazy one gate tech builds that I roll over.
Edit: I'm not saying he doesn't 2 gate, in fact he probably does if he wins in 5 minutes, I just meant that I don't find 2gating to be uncommon on iccup.
|
It's not just that they don't know how to deal with it. At some positions its really hard to defend a 2gate on LT, plus those who plays on LT in the first place are generally worse than the average iccup players of their rank. He seems to have changed to newer maps now though, props to him for that.
|
He is protoss after all...C- isn't really hard.
|
On January 17 2009 01:03 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 00:41 Kennelie wrote:
So your going to jock him about his performance. I feel as if I am jocking him posting in this thread. I read his posts but didn't dare to post b/c I don't wanna assume something I probably could be wrong about. A bit over confident more then ignorant is what I think about him. well, its already pretty much too late, he said he'd be "B ranked in a few days" a few days ago. he's nowhere close to that, especially after the reset. we still have no idea if he'll ever make C+, let alone B, especially with that mediocre win-loss ratio.
Who cares though honestly. People say a lot of things they can't back up that is nothing new. The same people keep giving this guy attention for no reason at all bringing his name up continually.
Hot_Bid do me a favor and file an OST, take a depo, and then settle this outside court (aka close this thread).
|
|
|
On January 17 2009 01:31 GHOSTCLAW wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 01:21 koreasilver wrote:
The thing is, from the few replays I saw of his iCCup games, his apm averaged around 150, which is nothing special, and I doubt he has either the micro or macro to crack into the B levels. Also, when I checked his games a day or two ago, a large portion of his recent PvZ games that he won ended within 5:00 minutes, which probably means that he's unable or too afraid to get into long games because he probably doesn't know how to pull off the modern FE Protoss builds, and he probably gets grossly outmacroed as the game progresses. I wonder if he 2 gates, and his opponents don't know how to deal with it. Most zergs face FE, which means that they don't get very much practice against 2 gates.
Yes he does. I even found a replay in the complaint forum of him doing a PvZ.
He 2gates, nothing really special about it, doesn't even micro that well, and his opponent is just so terrible (how he found an 85 apm zerg in C- is beyond me) that even after seeing the initial zealot implying a lack of FE, he continues going for a three hatch build, not getting a single sunken until it's way too late.
|
|
|
On January 17 2009 01:40 kidd wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 01:03 Hot_Bid wrote:On January 17 2009 00:41 Kennelie wrote:
So your going to jock him about his performance. I feel as if I am jocking him posting in this thread. I read his posts but didn't dare to post b/c I don't wanna assume something I probably could be wrong about. A bit over confident more then ignorant is what I think about him. well, its already pretty much too late, he said he'd be "B ranked in a few days" a few days ago. he's nowhere close to that, especially after the reset. we still have no idea if he'll ever make C+, let alone B, especially with that mediocre win-loss ratio. Who cares though honestly. People say a lot of things they can't back up that is nothing new. The same people keep giving this guy attention for no reason at all bringing his name up continually. Hot_Bid do me a favor and file an OST, take a depo, and then settle this outside court (aka close this thread).
Of course it's nothing new.
1. Someone says something stupid "it's so easy to kill a lurker with 1 marine".
2. They try to prove their point and fail.
3. They're laughed at.
4. The end.
If you don't find step 3 entertaining (I don't blame you, it's childish to find so much satisfaction in proving someone wrong, especially over the internet) then just ignore the whole thing and let the kids have their fun.
|
But then again, a quick check of random games revealed a bunch of losses to C+ and above, with one guy being 32-2 and another 38-13 or something like that, and some wins over C+/B- from last seasons =O
Maybe he has a chance! :D
|
Even I've beaten a former B- player... and I'm a middling D+ player (when I can arse myself, which is usually late in the season). There seems to be a lot of former C-'s in the D/D+ ranks at the moment (I swear, like every one of games is against one.. at least I'm coming close to beating them) for whatever reason. I doubt he'll come even close.
Edit: Also I find it hilarious he makes it a big deal about rushing D+ level players and winning. Low level players have somewhat crappy micro against 2 gate sometimes... it isn't like you're Bisu all of the sudden. Good luck winning games against C- players that aren't bottom feeders.
|
On January 17 2009 02:30 EtherealDeath wrote:
But then again, a quick check of random games revealed a bunch of losses to C+ and above, with one guy being 32-2 and another 38-13 or something like that, and some wins over C+/B- from last seasons =O
Maybe he has a chance! :D
He's definitely not getting to B.
|
On January 17 2009 02:30 EtherealDeath wrote:
But then again, a quick check of random games revealed a bunch of losses to C+ and above, with one guy being 32-2 and another 38-13 or something like that, and some wins over C+/B- from last seasons =O
Maybe he has a chance! :D
And almost all of his wins against terrible players!
|
I really dislike that guy's attitude.
Announcing to TL after not being active for 5 years that he will become a progamer, that's just plain ignorant and annoying.
|
16991 Posts
I'd like to hear from his side, honestly.
:/
|
God, despite what the guy said about getting B in a few days, give him a couple weeks before making accusations about his skill level. HE HASNT PLAYED FOR 5 YEARS, stop making such a big deal about this -_-.
|
On January 17 2009 03:56 Bond(i2) wrote:
God, despite what the guy said about getting B in a few days, give him a couple weeks before making accusations about his skill level. HE HASNT PLAYED FOR 5 YEARS, stop making such a big deal about this -_-.
Actually it's more like 2 years. As I recall, someone found his old WGtour id and the last games played were in 2006.
|
Hilarious replays. For a wannabe B+ players his macro is quite awful.
But i like his agressive oldschool style.
|
On January 17 2009 03:56 Bond(i2) wrote:
God, despite what the guy said about getting B in a few days, give him a couple weeks before making accusations about his skill level. HE HASNT PLAYED FOR 5 YEARS, stop making such a big deal about this -_-.
Well, it's cause he's been talking big without even knowing how much the game as evolved.
But yeah, I still wanna see how he does. It's an interesting experiment to say the least.
|
I think he was really overconfident and talked a lot of shit he should have without at least learning more about how the game has evolved over the years.
But, i find really annoying how some people keep saying "omg noob, you couldnt make it to B in a week after not playing for years, you are such a loser."
The guy acted really inmature and got owned by reality because of that, but just because someone acts like an idiot it doesnt mean you should do the same.
|
On January 17 2009 04:27 CrimsonLotus wrote:
But, i find really annoying how some people keep saying "omg noob, you couldnt make it to B in a week after not playing for years, you are such a loser."
who has said this?
i think if you had said "omg noob, you couldnt make it to B in a week after not playing for years, you are such a loser." then you'd have been more accurate. nobodys been flipping out on him that i've seen.
i think most of us, for me certainly, are just following his account out of curiosity. i'm not rabidly hoping he fails, i'm pretty neutral either way. it's just fun to see some caveman come out of hibernation and observe how he does in the modern game.
|
On January 17 2009 03:56 Bond(i2) wrote:
God, despite what the guy said about getting B in a few days, give him a couple weeks before making accusations about his skill level. HE HASNT PLAYED FOR 5 YEARS, stop making such a big deal about this -_-.
first ppl said 4 years, now ur exaggerating.
5 years my ass.
his last game during pgtour was in 2006. it's been like 2 years and like several months. almost 3 years.
|
On January 17 2009 01:31 GHOSTCLAW wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 01:21 koreasilver wrote:
The thing is, from the few replays I saw of his iCCup games, his apm averaged around 150, which is nothing special, and I doubt he has either the micro or macro to crack into the B levels. Also, when I checked his games a day or two ago, a large portion of his recent PvZ games that he won ended within 5:00 minutes, which probably means that he's unable or too afraid to get into long games because he probably doesn't know how to pull off the modern FE Protoss builds, and he probably gets grossly outmacroed as the game progresses. I wonder if he 2 gates, and his opponents don't know how to deal with it. Most zergs face FE, which means that they don't get very much practice against 2 gates.
Yeah, because of the standardization of the Protoss FE vs. Zerg, Zerg players have started to opt for poolfirst (mostly overpool) -> double expand builds, generally. The thing is, poolfirst builds have a really hard time against 2gate and so Saddles probably plays upon that advantage. D+ Zergs can probably beat Saddles without too much trouble if they open with 12hatch.
|
I give him some credit for trying at least
|
On January 17 2009 03:56 Bond(i2) wrote:
God, despite what the guy said about getting B in a few days, give him a couple weeks before making accusations about his skill level. HE HASNT PLAYED FOR 5 YEARS, stop making such a big deal about this -_-.
It's not about making accusations of his skill level. It's about him blatantly disregarding the evolution of Starcraft, and storming onto TL as if he's still hot shit, when he isn't, and actually never really was in the first place.
I'm assuming yeah, he used to be pretty good, but he decided to come back after so long, throw it everyone's face, and tell everyone on TL that the game we love and spend so much time worshipping is stale and hasn't changed. Now he's going to eat his words, and most of us will have a hell of a grand time watching him go down in flames.
The combination of him claiming to be better than he was back when he WAS good, and then telling everyone that he can be just as successful as he used to be within a "few days" is quite hilarious. ACTUALLY, he even went as far as saying the competition is LESS competitive today, I believe. Which is the adverse of the truth.
And if you still can't understand why we're making a mockery of him, then... Well you're probably a better person than I am, because I, like 99% of people, enjoy watching cocky dudes get what's coming.
|
On January 17 2009 05:46 Mikilatov wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 03:56 Bond(i2) wrote:
God, despite what the guy said about getting B in a few days, give him a couple weeks before making accusations about his skill level. HE HASNT PLAYED FOR 5 YEARS, stop making such a big deal about this -_-. + Show Spoiler +It's not about making accusations of his skill level. It's about him blatantly disregarding the evolution of Starcraft, and storming onto TL as if he's still hot shit, when he isn't, and actually never really was in the first place.
I'm assuming yeah, he used to be pretty good, but he decided to come back after so long, throw it everyone's face, and tell everyone on TL that the game we love and spend so much time worshipping is stale and hasn't changed. Now he's going to eat his words, and most of us will have a hell of a grand time watching him go down in flames.
The combination of him claiming to be better than he was back when he WAS good, and then telling everyone that he can be just as successful as he used to be within a "few days" is quite hilarious. ACTUALLY, he even went as far as saying the competition is LESS competitive today, I believe. Which is the adverse of the truth.
And if you still can't understand why we're making a mockery of him, then... Well you're probably a better person than I am, because I, like 99% of people, enjoy watching cocky dudes get what's coming
This pretty much sums it up
|
Really, who the fuck cares about how this guy does? I mean sure, he made an ass of himself, but it's not really necessary to give this guy any more attention. I'm pretty sure everyone who cares already has his ICCup profile bookmarked and constantly checks it.
Sorry to be the party pooper. Really, I am. But this dude doesn't need nor deserve any attention from this community, which was demonstrated when his previous threads were closed.
|
United States17042 Posts
same as lordweird, although it would be nice to hear his side of the story. Maybe this blog will get closed too.
|
On January 17 2009 06:25 LordWeird wrote:
Really, who the fuck cares about how this guy does? I mean sure, he made an ass of himself, but it's not really necessary to give this guy any more attention. I'm pretty sure everyone who cares already has his ICCup profile bookmarked and constantly checks it.
Sorry to be the party pooper. Really, I am. But this dude doesn't need nor deserve any attention from this community, which was demonstrated when his previous threads were closed.
But it's an awesome feeling to GIVE. This community is all about GIVING, it's such a nice and warm place after all.
Btw, I care.
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch
|
On January 17 2009 07:09 Rekrul wrote:
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch
Where's the hunch coming from?
|
16991 Posts
On January 17 2009 07:09 Rekrul wrote:
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch
Is this the same as nex-scy? If so, he was active in 2006.
|
On January 17 2009 07:19 d(O.o)a wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 07:09 Rekrul wrote:
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch Where's the hunch coming from?
checked hotkeys? reps? the way he talks?
|
Netherlands4511 Posts
obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall.
|
he is going to get B- sooner or later if he keeps playing non koreans. from his points of view people from D to C are just copy cats with good mechanic, and they can be taken out easily with his timing attacks.
The Proof:
I watched all his games in his first day back, in few of his tvps if he sees terran go one fact expo he bulldogs. I thought that was all he got until this one game where the guy whos a C terran managed to defend his bulldog with a good building placement block + scvs, and i thought to myself that would be it for him, but then i saw him spent half his shit taking down the Ebay blocking the choke and turrets covering the high ground and the choke. It turned out he had a backup plan, his DTs were on their way.
The guy have a good sense of timing and plays adaptive strategy in which he was able to beat C ranked mechanic. as he's trying to regain his own mechanic from the long break, he will only get better than C. he exploited all the mistakes he see, he played aggressive and and try to force mistakes. Shits he does make sense, he just doesn't have enough APM right now to execute his game plan due to his rust.
I guess he's just walking his talk right now, i bet he will start talking when he's B, whenever that will be, i give him a month at least.
|
On January 17 2009 08:06 ret wrote:
obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall.
example please? lol
|
On January 17 2009 08:06 ret wrote:
obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall.
I don't think logic can be outdated, information he has is outdated, but if the premise of his argument is valid and sound, his logic is good. I think he will come to realize how wrong he is as he plays the new strategies and adapt to them, he has already shown his ability to adapt vs the bisu build.
He claimed that Bisu build was not viable if the zerg knows every time that the toss is ganna canon fast expo. so the guy he was playing is tryign to prove him wrong. and they played a pvz in which saddles was the zerg, in the first game saddles made about 2.5 control gruops of lings with 12 drones and protoss made about 7 cannons behind buildings and probes. Saddles attacks and completely destroyed the protoss cannon wall in his second wave of lings.
Second game they played same match up again, this time with better building placement from the protoss which only leaves 1 tiny opening for his lings to run in, saddles adapted, he build like 8 lings, and proceeded to sunken up 3 gas and then making nothing but ultra/lings. and ya he won that game too
|
Calgary25981 Posts
Mechanics can absolutely outdate logic.
|
with the same information i belief that there is only 1 logical conclusion, provide him with the correct information he will see his wrong ideas if he is a person able to think logically.
|
Calgary25981 Posts
He said FE as P is 100% loss. Nothing in game mechanics mechanics has changed to make that wrong. That's an example of being ignorant to what people tell you.
|
He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform.
Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know.
|
|
|
But the thing is protoss would sometimes FE back in his glory days too.
|
On January 17 2009 08:46 rei wrote:
He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform.
Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know.
yes, you are.
|
|
|
On January 17 2009 08:46 rei wrote:
He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform.
Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know.
Are you in love or something? o_O Sounds like you found finally purpose in life...
I admit the trainbash is a little onesided and not really funny anymore - but at least take off the pink glasses. The way you try to shift everything until it somehow fits into your deranged little world makes me wanna puke.
No matter what you're gonna say you can't possibly fix what he already said.
Sooner or later he'll hit the wall where old strats won't work anymore because he's gonna face people who know how to counter them - and are well capable doing so.
He even might get to b- sometime or who knows... but it aint gonna prove nothing anymore.
|
jesus fucking christ rei pull saddle's cock out of your mouth already.
|
On January 17 2009 07:47 Empyrean wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 07:09 Rekrul wrote:
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch Is this the same as nex-scy? If so, he was active in 2006.
I don't think they are the same person. Also, ScY is still active =/ He uses JF-Thunder on East IIRC
|
On January 17 2009 08:06 ret wrote:
obbing games with this guy is so funny..he critiques players and strategies for doing stuff that is 100% correct and common nowadays using outdated logic and he will defend that outdated logic till the very end...very entertaining overall.
lol.
|
Guys just leave him alone, lol he WON'T get B and he knows it xDDDDDDDDd
|
How am I trying fixing what he said? i'm staying neutral in this matter, everything I said is backed with evidence and is sound in logic, how do you prove me wrong?
and ya the example i provided shown "he'll hit the wall where old strates won't work anymore because he's ganna face people who know how to counter them - and are well capable doing so" and it also shown that he is deviating from his original claim.
if he's ganna make it to B it will not be because of his old school, it will be because he adapted the new strategies and mechanics. and if you can get over yourself and read my words without pointing your e-p on my ass just because i am saying something you don't like to hear, you will actually see that I am saying is that saddles is admitting he's wrong with his plays,
|
Calgary25981 Posts
On January 17 2009 08:46 rei wrote:
He said FE as P is 100% loss without the information about how the protoss can defend and adapt to many different zerg timing allins he is capable to preform.
Yes that is extreme ignorant, and arrogant, but in his play he has shown that he acknowledge his mistakes. Even he doesn't spell it out for me in words, his play speaks louder, but who knows, maybe i'm thinking too highly of him for all I know.
How about him coming and saying "I was ignorant. Sorry." That would speak louder than... well nothing?
|
Braavos36375 Posts
rei its not so much how good he is or whether he'll eventually get good, its that he came in here ego blazing making ridiculous claims about how the scene is shit now and how he'll easily own up iccup to B in a few days. well its a few days, and what do we have, a reset and him not even at C. plsu the stupid, arrogant PvZ FE comments. sure the bandwagon went a little overboard, but honestly how do you expect people to react to someone like that? if you read the threads everyone was nice and positive until his ego busted out.
|
On January 17 2009 08:16 rei wrote:
If you have an mistake he will exploit it, if not he will try to make one for you.
OH MY GOD, I HAVE AN MISTAKE, PLEASE OH PLEASE DON'T EXPLOIT IT SADDLES!
Seriously, rei, do you even understand how belittling this is for you?
Why are you standing beside him when he gave no reason to do so?
You are investing your time and energy to defend another man, to cheer for him.. are you his girlfriend or something?
Also, your proof is not so great.
A couple of individual games vs likely bad players don't prove anything about the theory behind the strategies used.
|
I am totally neutral in this matter, I have never defended what saddles said, I have only pointed out the difference between logic and information ret confused on, which people takes it as me defending saddles because I am saying saddles lack information but still might be logical in his claims.
I made 2 neutral claims, 1st, from my observation he is good enough to likely to get to B- at least if he avoids koreans, 2nd, he can't do it without adapting to the new strategy, which he had shown in the games I observed.
|
On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD.
God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian.
what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above.
|
I wish I could make god by rubbing two rough surfaces together.
|
what i fail to understand is how he could even fathom achieving B rank when his previous wgt and pgt ranks floated around C+ to B- high with about 50%~ win.
|
On January 17 2009 10:08 rei wrote:
I am totally neutral in this matter, I have never defended what saddles said, I have only pointed out the difference between logic and information ret confused on, which people takes it as me defending saddles because I am saying saddles lack information but still might be logical in his claims.
I made 2 neutral claims, 1st, from my observation he is good enough to likely to get to B- at least if he avoids koreans, 2nd, he can't do it without adapting to the new strategy, which he had shown in the games I observed.
you must be neutral in the same way Fox News is fair and balanced
all you've done since this started is obs his games and report on all the ones where he wins while throwing in little idiotic generalizations like "he'll exploit mistakes" as if that is supposed to mean anything
|
Sucking someone's cock right off of their body is not a good example of being neutral.
|
On January 17 2009 10:36 radar14 wrote:
you must be neutral in the same way Fox News is fair and balanced
all you've done since this started is obs his games and report on all the ones where he wins while throwing in little idiotic generalizations like "he'll exploit mistakes" as if that is supposed to mean anything
Why so condescending? what have I done to you? the idiotic "generalizations" are facts, I have replays to prove them, and I might have word them wrong, I should have said that "he exploited mistakes" in fact let me fix it
why see things as black and white? i'm not on your side so i must be his side?
If I am not white I must be black?
|
On January 17 2009 09:02 rei wrote:
reason?
because he sucked period.
his claim to reach the high rank failed horribly. remember he said he should be a pro? wtf.
hes average at best.
please, don't say stuff like he can get to b- or w/e, cause ANYBODY can if he or she plays hard enough. this guy is nobody. he does not deserve any attention. all of this is just plain humor to us.
|
you guys are the ones that keep giving him attention because it humors you guys.
And by the same reasoning, you guys are humoring me because you guys keeps licking his balls when he has already gone silence. And ya he's reading everything you guys said and it is entertaining him.
|
haha, what are you, his confidante?
|
Why is there a SECOND thread about this...?
Has the general interest of Teamliquid degraded this much? Christ almighty, who gives a fuck about saddles.
|
ya, and Chill and Hot_bird might just ban all you people for being condescending to me. Because you guys are all violating TL.net Ten Commandments #6.
|
On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above.
frictional?
|
On January 17 2009 10:58 rei wrote:
you guys are the ones that keep giving him attention because it humors you guys.
And by the same reasoning, you guys are humoring me because you guys keeps licking his balls when he has already gone silence. And ya he's reading everything you guys said and it is entertaining him.
lol. you are out of your mind.
|
On January 17 2009 11:21 CapO wrote:
lol. you are out of your mind.
Sincerely agree, I need to stop before Chill and Hot_bird start banning.
|
Calgary25981 Posts
Judge me again. Seriously. Paint yourself a martyr and see where it gets you. Nowhere in this thread did it look like I would ban you. In fact I wasn't even talking in this thread anymore because I have nothing to add.
|
On January 17 2009 10:58 rei wrote:
you guys are the ones that keep giving him attention because it humors you guys.
And by the same reasoning, you guys are humoring me because you guys keeps licking his balls when he has already gone silence. And ya he's reading everything you guys said and it is entertaining him.
Master of puppets Im pulling your strings
Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams
Blinded by me, you cant see a thing
Just call my name, `cause Ill hear you scream
Master
Master
Just call my name, `cause Ill hear you scream
Master
Master
We're just puppets for his entertainment. 
|
I have nothing more to add to the saddles matter as well, I wasn't suggesting you would ban me, I was suggesting you would do something about those who broke the TL.net Ten Commandments #6 by being condescending to me. hence if i stop, you wouldn't have to trouble yourself with those people any more, sorry for the misunderstanding.
|
On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above.
I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language.
Not to mention as far as I can recall "friction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY.
|
On January 17 2009 11:11 rei wrote:
ya, and Chill and Hot_bird might just ban all you people for being condescending to me. Because you guys are all violating TL.net Ten Commandments #6.
No. Chill and Hot_Bid (Not sure what is with your obsession with adding random R's is about) will not ban us all because we were being condescending to you when you spent the whole time defending somebody who trashed on a respected ex-progamer who frequently posts on Teamliquid.net. You can say you were not defending him all you want, fact of the matter is you were defending him.
On January 17 2009 11:10 Romance_us wrote:
Why is there a SECOND thread about this...?
Has the general interest of Teamliquid degraded this much? Christ almighty, who gives a fuck about saddles.
Third .
|
The only friction here is the one between saddles' cock and rei's supple ass.
How's that for entertainment?
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!??!!
|
On January 17 2009 12:23 Frits wrote:
The only friction here is the one between saddles' cock and rei's supple ass.
How's that for entertainment?
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!??!!
Meh, like 1/2 of a star.
|
I tried so hard
but in the end it doesnt even matter
|
the fact that Chill and Hot_Bid not being condescending to me is because they do value the TL.net Ten Commandments and set an example with their own action. Your actions are a contrast to what those 2 have demonstrated.
Plexa once said being right doesn't give you the right to be condescending, so if you think you are right about saddles and hence, it is your right to be condescending because you are right then I can quote plexa for you: "You can get your point across without having to be condescending and rude."
and look what has happened? I have stolen Saddles' thunder ^^
|
On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY.
LOL ive never met a christian atheist before. awesome.
and this thread.
went to the shitters.
:/
|
On January 17 2009 12:29 Frits wrote:I tried so hard but in the end it doesnt even matter
:'-( No, no more sorrow.
|
On January 17 2009 12:32 rei wrote:
the fact that Chill and Hot_Bid not being condescending to me is because they do value the TL.net Ten Commandments and set an example with their own action. Your actions are a contrast to what those 2 have demonstrated.
Plexa once said being right doesn't give you the right to be condescending, so if you think you are right about saddles and hence, it is your right to be condescending because you are right then I can quote plexa for you: "You can get your point across without having to be condescending and rude."
and look what has happened? I have stolen Saddles' thunder ^^
god
I'm so tired of being what you want me to be, It doesn’t even matter how hard I try.
|
On January 17 2009 12:36 Raithed wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. LOL ive never met a christian atheist before. awesome. and this thread. went to the shitters. :/
Shitting in my thread
These wounds they will not heal
|
On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above.
Red herring.
I'm not sure how anyone can take you seriously.
|
On January 17 2009 12:36 Raithed wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. LOL ive never met a christian atheist before. awesome. and this thread. went to the shitters. :/
read the post instead of glancing over it haha.
|
On January 17 2009 12:44 koreasilver wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. Red herring. I'm not sure how anyone can take you seriously.
Guilty as charged, but Chill and I had an conversation just fine until other people started being condescending to me. And this thread of originally design to talk about saddles' progression ( which me and chill discussed peacefully) became all about me. 
|
On January 17 2009 12:47 d(O.o)a wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 12:36 Raithed wrote:On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. LOL ive never met a christian atheist before. awesome. and this thread. went to the shitters. :/ read the post instead of glancing over it haha.
fuck. ee han timing. i got rocked.
|
On January 17 2009 13:04 Raithed wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 12:47 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 12:36 Raithed wrote:On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. LOL ive never met a christian atheist before. awesome. and this thread. went to the shitters. :/ read the post instead of glancing over it haha. fuck. ee han timing. i got rocked.
Haha when I read your post I was like what? Did I phrase something wrong? So I glanced over it and I was like HAHA I know exactly what words he read.
|
tl;dr I posted at first in this post and once I am at work on monday(friday night atm) I will read this this thread. For the first page that I had read seems legit. This game is designed in a way that I have trouble playing vs good people but I can hold my own....micro wise. My macro isn't bad. But I am a team player so my game is different.
|
On January 17 2009 13:43 Kennelie wrote:
tl;dr I posted at first in this post and once I am at work on monday(friday night atm) I will read this this thread. For the first page that I had read seems legit. This game is designed in a way that I have trouble playing vs good people but I can hold my own....micro wise. My macro isn't bad. But I am a team player so my game is different.
team player? i think ur a noob player
|
That's b/c your noob ass sucks to game with
Edit: Hence that I can't carry your self choosing tactics ass. I have a easier time pulling a deaf hoes panties off.
|
On January 17 2009 07:09 Rekrul wrote:
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch
My profile for Nex Scy Biography
rei - whats your nex Aka?
|
My aka has been around since 2002 yours?
|
On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY.
I have not failed and on my third day of playing i did pretty well after resetting when first 2 days 65+ games of practice i went 40-28.
I was obviously not playing very well in those 68 games after only playing for the first time in 4 years. About 90% of my c rank losses were to 40-12 and 24-2 players who had B ranks in previous season, after seeing this in my match list I realized I should not have reset, I was playing very good players who did not belong at C-, they were just slow to rank up this season.
http://www.iccup.com/gamingprofile/saddles.html after resetting my only losses are to B ranked players. seems there are still a lot of them at lower ranks.. probably resets or ppl who havent played yet this season.
I do believe that in a few weeks of shaking the rust off I will be able to proceed to B or B+.
I've already beaten a few players who had B and B+ ranks in past seasons... and this is my 3'rd day of practice.... saying that "most D+ zergs will beat me" is not very accurate at all....
Give me like 12-14 days to get back into shape, I'm also gonna make a blog and upload some replays tonight, my replays are no longer garbage and as soon as my APM gets back to where it used to be (235-245) i'll be in good shape i think.
|
On January 17 2009 01:03 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 00:41 Kennelie wrote:
So your going to jock him about his performance. I feel as if I am jocking him posting in this thread. I read his posts but didn't dare to post b/c I don't wanna assume something I probably could be wrong about. A bit over confident more then ignorant is what I think about him. well, its already pretty much too late, he said he'd be "B ranked in a few days" a few days ago. he's nowhere close to that, especially after the reset. we still have no idea if he'll ever make C+, let alone B, especially with that mediocre win-loss ratio.
that mediocre win-loss ration was only because these were my first 3 days of serious practicing in the last 4 years.
It won't be nearly as mediocre this time around... and I really think in a few weeks of practice it will be something like 95-70 B
|
On January 17 2009 15:22 kdog3683 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 07:09 Rekrul wrote:
is there any chance saddles is scy-x17? just a hunch My profile for Nex Scy Biography rei - whats your nex Aka?
Omg that thread is too awesome. I wonder what gns gave you this information. I don't even know you and im gns......
|
On January 17 2009 16:02 JoeSaddles wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 01:03 Hot_Bid wrote:On January 17 2009 00:41 Kennelie wrote:
So your going to jock him about his performance. I feel as if I am jocking him posting in this thread. I read his posts but didn't dare to post b/c I don't wanna assume something I probably could be wrong about. A bit over confident more then ignorant is what I think about him. well, its already pretty much too late, he said he'd be "B ranked in a few days" a few days ago. he's nowhere close to that, especially after the reset. we still have no idea if he'll ever make C+, let alone B, especially with that mediocre win-loss ratio. that mediocre win-loss ration was only because these were my first 3 days of serious practicing in the last 4 years. It won't be nearly as mediocre this time around... and I really think in a few weeks of practice it will be something like 95-70 B
I haven't doubted you. Lets just see the results...
|
"in a few days Ill be B ranked...."
yes.
|
On January 17 2009 16:19 CapO wrote:
"in a few days Ill be B ranked...."
yes.
I should have said several instead of a few, didn't realize how much slower my APM is right now compared to what it used to be. as soon as my hand speed rises back to 245+ I will be good as I still understand the game and have a pretty good feel for it, my macro and micro is still there just not perfect yet. it's improving quickly and even on these brand new maps I am playing pretty well right now
|
|
|
Austin10831 Posts
On January 17 2009 15:54 JoeSaddles wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. I have not failed and on my third day of playing i did pretty well after resetting when first 2 days 65+ games of practice i went 40-28. I was obviously not playing very well in those 68 games after only playing for the first time in 4 years. About 90% of my c rank losses were to 40-12 and 24-2 players who had B ranks in previous season, after seeing this in my match list I realized I should not have reset, I was playing very good players who did not belong at C-, they were just slow to rank up this season. http://www.iccup.com/gamingprofile/saddles.html after resetting my only losses are to B ranked players. seems there are still a lot of them at lower ranks.. probably resets or ppl who havent played yet this season. I do believe that in a few weeks of shaking the rust off I will be able to proceed to B or B+. I've already beaten a few players who had B and B+ ranks in past seasons... and this is my 3'rd day of practice.... saying that "most D+ zergs will beat me" is not very accurate at all.... Give me like 12-14 days to get back into shape, I'm also gonna make a blog and upload some replays tonight, my replays are no longer garbage and as soon as my APM gets back to where it used to be (235-245) i'll be in good shape i think.
4 years? so who was sMi.SaddleS playing pgt just over 2 years ago?
You were at C+ with 97-105. The competition has gotten much more fierce since then, so unless being inactive made you a much better player, I don't know how you can just arbitrarily say you're going to be a B+ player.
|
On January 17 2009 16:23 JoeSaddles wrote:I should have said several instead of a few, didn't realize how much slower my APM is right now compared to what it used to be. as soon as my hand speed rises back to 245+ I will be good as I still understand the game and have a pretty good feel for it, my macro and micro is still there just not perfect yet. it's improving quickly and even on these brand new maps I am playing pretty well right now
Do you still think fe pvz is useless?
And are you still going to be playing bet games with IdrA in less than a week like you promised?
On January 17 2009 16:29 BroOd wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 15:54 JoeSaddles wrote:On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. I have not failed and on my third day of playing i did pretty well after resetting when first 2 days 65+ games of practice i went 40-28. I was obviously not playing very well in those 68 games after only playing for the first time in 4 years. About 90% of my c rank losses were to 40-12 and 24-2 players who had B ranks in previous season, after seeing this in my match list I realized I should not have reset, I was playing very good players who did not belong at C-, they were just slow to rank up this season. http://www.iccup.com/gamingprofile/saddles.html after resetting my only losses are to B ranked players. seems there are still a lot of them at lower ranks.. probably resets or ppl who havent played yet this season. I do believe that in a few weeks of shaking the rust off I will be able to proceed to B or B+. I've already beaten a few players who had B and B+ ranks in past seasons... and this is my 3'rd day of practice.... saying that "most D+ zergs will beat me" is not very accurate at all.... Give me like 12-14 days to get back into shape, I'm also gonna make a blog and upload some replays tonight, my replays are no longer garbage and as soon as my APM gets back to where it used to be (235-245) i'll be in good shape i think. 4 years? so who was sMi.SaddleS playing pgt just over 2 years ago? You were at C+ with 97-105. The competition has gotten much more fierce since then, so unless being inactive made you a much better player, I don't know how you can just arbitrarily say you're going to be a B+ player.
OH LOL
So he isn't even back from 4 years ago, ahahaha.
|
On January 17 2009 16:29 BroOd wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 15:54 JoeSaddles wrote:On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. I have not failed and on my third day of playing i did pretty well after resetting when first 2 days 65+ games of practice i went 40-28. I was obviously not playing very well in those 68 games after only playing for the first time in 4 years. About 90% of my c rank losses were to 40-12 and 24-2 players who had B ranks in previous season, after seeing this in my match list I realized I should not have reset, I was playing very good players who did not belong at C-, they were just slow to rank up this season. http://www.iccup.com/gamingprofile/saddles.html after resetting my only losses are to B ranked players. seems there are still a lot of them at lower ranks.. probably resets or ppl who havent played yet this season. I do believe that in a few weeks of shaking the rust off I will be able to proceed to B or B+. I've already beaten a few players who had B and B+ ranks in past seasons... and this is my 3'rd day of practice.... saying that "most D+ zergs will beat me" is not very accurate at all.... Give me like 12-14 days to get back into shape, I'm also gonna make a blog and upload some replays tonight, my replays are no longer garbage and as soon as my APM gets back to where it used to be (235-245) i'll be in good shape i think. 4 years? so who was sMi.SaddleS playing pgt just over 2 years ago? You were at C+ with 97-105. The competition has gotten much more fierce since then, so unless being inactive made you a much better player, I don't know how you can just arbitrarily say you're going to be a B+ player.
I was never 97-105....
and that time I played on pgt I played for about 2 days then stopped never played anywhere near 200 games ... I was addicted to world of warcraft for the last 3+ years. have not played BW seriously since 04-05
|
|
|
Austin10831 Posts
On January 17 2009 16:54 JoeSaddles wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 16:29 BroOd wrote:On January 17 2009 15:54 JoeSaddles wrote:On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. I have not failed and on my third day of playing i did pretty well after resetting when first 2 days 65+ games of practice i went 40-28. I was obviously not playing very well in those 68 games after only playing for the first time in 4 years. About 90% of my c rank losses were to 40-12 and 24-2 players who had B ranks in previous season, after seeing this in my match list I realized I should not have reset, I was playing very good players who did not belong at C-, they were just slow to rank up this season. http://www.iccup.com/gamingprofile/saddles.html after resetting my only losses are to B ranked players. seems there are still a lot of them at lower ranks.. probably resets or ppl who havent played yet this season. I do believe that in a few weeks of shaking the rust off I will be able to proceed to B or B+. I've already beaten a few players who had B and B+ ranks in past seasons... and this is my 3'rd day of practice.... saying that "most D+ zergs will beat me" is not very accurate at all.... Give me like 12-14 days to get back into shape, I'm also gonna make a blog and upload some replays tonight, my replays are no longer garbage and as soon as my APM gets back to where it used to be (235-245) i'll be in good shape i think. 4 years? so who was sMi.SaddleS playing pgt just over 2 years ago? You were at C+ with 97-105. The competition has gotten much more fierce since then, so unless being inactive made you a much better player, I don't know how you can just arbitrarily say you're going to be a B+ player. I was never 97-105.... and that time I played on pgt I played for about 2 days then stopped never played anywhere near 200 games ... I was addicted to world of warcraft for the last 3+ years. have not played BW seriously since 04-05
So smi.saddles was someone else?
|
|
|
Huh maybe some sMi members remember something about their SaddleS then?
Maybe he just noticed your name and thought it was cool, or its just some fucked up coincidence.
edit:
GosuGamers lists sMi.SaddleS as an inactive member of them, if you've never been a member of them its just probably a coincidence he is using the same name.
|
On January 17 2009 17:02 BroOd wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2009 16:54 JoeSaddles wrote:On January 17 2009 16:29 BroOd wrote:On January 17 2009 15:54 JoeSaddles wrote:On January 17 2009 12:16 d(O.o)a wrote:On January 17 2009 10:10 rei wrote:On January 17 2009 10:06 niteReloaded wrote:
OH MY GOD. God does not exist, it is a frictional character from a frictional book stop wasting my time mother fucking condescending Christian. what you have quote is as out of context as the quote i made above. I am not Christian I am an atheist but I still say OH MY GOD not because I'm christian and believe in him but because it is a commonly used term in the English language. Not to mention as far as I can recall "f riction" and "fiction" are two totally different thing TOTALLY. I have not failed and on my third day of playing i did pretty well after resetting when first 2 days 65+ games of practice i went 40-28. I was obviously not playing very well in those 68 games after only playing for the first time in 4 years. About 90% of my c rank losses were to 40-12 and 24-2 players who had B ranks in previous season, after seeing this in my match list I realized I should not have reset, I was playing very good players who did not belong at C-, they were just slow to rank up this season. http://www.iccup.com/gamingprofile/saddles.html after resetting my only losses are to B ranked players. seems there are still a lot of them at lower ranks.. probably resets or ppl who havent played yet this season. I do believe that in a few weeks of shaking the rust off I will be able to proceed to B or B+. I've already beaten a few players who had B and B+ ranks in past seasons... and this is my 3'rd day of practice.... saying that "most D+ zergs will beat me" is not very accurate at all.... Give me like 12-14 days to get back into shape, I'm also gonna make a blog and upload some replays tonight, my replays are no longer garbage and as soon as my APM gets back to where it used to be (235-245) i'll be in good shape i think. 4 years? so who was sMi.SaddleS playing pgt just over 2 years ago? You were at C+ with 97-105. The competition has gotten much more fierce since then, so unless being inactive made you a much better player, I don't know how you can just arbitrarily say you're going to be a B+ player. I was never 97-105.... and that time I played on pgt I played for about 2 days then stopped never played anywhere near 200 games ... I was addicted to world of warcraft for the last 3+ years. have not played BW seriously since 04-05 So smi.saddles was someone else?
yes for sure, especially now that I see he played another whole season and got to B+... where on pgtour I never played that many games, have not played competitively since 04'
|
|
|
Calgary25981 Posts
Ok, we're waiting for the results. You have 12-14 days!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
