EPTp.s. who cares if he's cocky, he's actually contributing to the community unlike most of us...
1.16.0 Antihack Maps (NEW) - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Bond(i2)
Canada926 Posts
p.s. who cares if he's cocky, he's actually contributing to the community unlike most of us... | ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
On January 11 2009 08:25 >>>>>> Ashur <<<<<<wrote: O yea, hackers won't instant drop. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN MAN!? Awesome to see you! | ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5532 Posts
| ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
| ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5532 Posts
spartan is the owner of vgt the fastest ladder moto makes antihack maps | ||
|
Ava.Kah
United States4 Posts
On January 11 2009 08:48 jimminy_kriket wrote: k well stormplugin isnt dropping me anymore i dont know what caused it then, my bw crashed when it happened, does this map do that? thank god i thought new ah map were dropping random people. The crash ur describing is not related to the maps and happen whether u use Stormplugin or not, and it also gives other players a dropscreen... so don't worry people won't think you hack | ||
|
tec27
United States3702 Posts
On January 11 2009 07:37 Ava.Kah wrote: This map doesn't 100% rely on tricks like Intra v1.2, instead, these maps DIRECTLY detects map hack. Hacks won't be easily patchable against this, if they are even possible to patch vs new method. The triggers you're using are by definition tricks, nowhere near as powerful as regular antihacks. I'm all fine with you advertising that they currently beat hacks, as they do, but to say they're going to be hard to patch against is fairly false (and wtf do you mean by "directly"? As far as I know, the triggers you're using can only access the data portion of SC, which is going to make it pretty much impossible to detect maphacks 'directly' (which I would take to mean detecting code changes in certain parts of the game)). | ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On January 11 2009 10:12 LuckyFool wrote: The Mineral/Gas Counter for players is really awesome. :-) Should add population to it also | ||
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
| ||
|
bp1696
United States288 Posts
| ||
|
Phrujbaz
Netherlands512 Posts
On January 11 2009 09:48 tec27 wrote: The triggers you're using are by definition tricks, nowhere near as powerful as regular antihacks. I'm all fine with you advertising that they currently beat hacks, as they do, but to say they're going to be hard to patch against is fairly false (and wtf do you mean by "directly"? As far as I know, the triggers you're using can only access the data portion of SC, which is going to make it pretty much impossible to detect maphacks 'directly' (which I would take to mean detecting code changes in certain parts of the game)). I can't for the life of me figure out why people have so much confidence in "regular antihacks." They are as trivial to defeat as these maps are - with the difference that the antihack maps might not be properly understood by someone that specializes in reverse code engineering rather than starcraft map making. | ||
|
rekluce
United States51 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
On January 11 2009 15:21 Phrujbaz wrote: I can't for the life of me figure out why people have so much confidence in "regular antihacks." They are as trivial to defeat as these maps are - with the difference that the antihack maps might not be properly understood by someone that specializes in reverse code engineering rather than starcraft map making. The difference being, a properly written regular antihack can self-update and detect new hacks, these maps become obsolete once the hack author works around them and provide no protection against many other types of hack. | ||
|
darnoconrad
Canada110 Posts
On January 11 2009 11:42 bp1696 wrote: I like his attitude, I find it refreshing. Thanks for the map. I second that! Good Job. Not everyone can figure out the programming/coding. | ||
|
YianKutKu
United States142 Posts
| ||
|
TenSu
United States7 Posts
| ||
|
Phrujbaz
Netherlands512 Posts
On January 11 2009 16:38 R1CH wrote: The difference being, a properly written regular antihack can self-update and detect new hacks, these maps become obsolete once the hack author works around them and provide no protection against many other types of hack. Both are obsolete once the hack author works around them. Sure, you can make a new antihack, and the hacker can make a new workaround, and you can keep on going forever. In the end people just need to stop being no-life asshats and learn to play a fair game ffs. | ||
|
Python_Max
Ukraine51 Posts
Ashur probably means that there are passive/external hacks which wouldn't cause a drop because they are undetectable by the map. I suggest you to be more careful when choosing words. | ||
|
Nightmarjoo
United States3360 Posts
As for patching the maps, I can't be specific, but it's going to be much more complicated than simply "patching" the hack this time. Since most of you don't understand EUDs at all or how this works at all, please don't say false things you don't really know about like "WELL THEY'LL JUST PATCH THE HACK SO WHO CARES" because it is both misleading and demoralizing. Also, this should work on even all private maphacks, and definitely works vs all current public hacks. | ||
| ||
