EPTHere's a video of Marin, I'd suggest you to turn off the sound tho - the music is annoying.
2008-2009 football(soccer) thread - Page 14
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Mandalor
Germany2362 Posts
Here's a video of Marin, I'd suggest you to turn off the sound tho - the music is annoying. | ||
|
kroko
Finland2136 Posts
On September 05 2008 17:53 Liquid`Drone wrote: it is a fact that some nationalities perform better at penalty shootouts than others germans always win, brazilians are awesome at shooting penalties but dont have as good anti-penalty GKs, england and holland traditionally suck, portugal has done well but thats cause ricardo is a great penalty GK.. I think penalty shootouts are awesome and the by far best way to decide who advances, but it's not like one team is better than another because they play 1-1 and one team wins at a penalty shootout.. and I mean, normally a team gets to play what, one penalty shootout every 4 year or something on average if they are one of the best teams who always advance past the groupstage.. it doesnt really give you a big enough sample size to decide on anything. 12 games on euro qualifation big enough sample size to decide anything ? Also when does good luck evolve into skill and bad luck into non-skill ? I mean 42 years of bad luck is kinda big sample size.... | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
On September 05 2008 18:32 Mandalor wrote: There's a few up and coming players in germany that are actually technically gifted. Marko Marin is absolutely amazing and so is Toni Kroos. Here's a video of Marin, I'd suggest you to turn off the sound tho - the music is annoying. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvPZUziD3Go&feature=related bought him in fm | ||
|
Aerox
Malaysia1213 Posts
On September 05 2008 18:30 SoMuchBetter wrote: penaltys are great for their excitement factor but they really are a poor method of deciding who advances. i hear that blatter wants to remove penalty shootouts from the next world cup, and one of the ideas is to have the shootout performed before extra time, so that if by the end of extra time the scores are level, the penaltys decide the winner. however if a team wins extra time, they win the match regardless of the shootout results. That is a great idea! I hope they implement this. | ||
|
TonyL2
England1953 Posts
For the England team I want the young player to be given more of a chance, Ashley Young, Walcott, Bentley, Agbonlahor and so on. They're promising but haven't had enough opportunities because not all of them play for the big 4. | ||
|
white_box921
United Kingdom967 Posts
| ||
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28591 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28591 Posts
english players do probably have more pressure than players from any other european country though so it might just be harder because of that. | ||
|
Ra.Xor.2
United States1784 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28591 Posts
leagues show who the best team is, tournaments/championships do not. | ||
|
ilj.psa
Peru3081 Posts
It would be a bad idea for them to change the order of extra time-penalties imo. Imagine a world cup final , where team A wins penalty shootout and B loses. It would be obvious that the team A would play defensively the entire extra time, this would lower the quality of the " most hyped game in the world cup" by a lot | ||
|
Telemako
Spain1636 Posts
On September 06 2008 00:03 Carnac wrote: every international tournament should be decided solely by penalty shootouts r u serious? O_o Penalty shootouts are the anti-football T_T | ||
|
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
i think its fine the way it is | ||
|
TonyL2
England1953 Posts
Also just a little bit of fun, BBC have a "Pick your England 11", http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/internationals/3914143.stm They have this at every international England game, but I'm bored So, the squad that I'd play is: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3206/englandxict8.jpg) Shame, that Ferdinand is injured  | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On September 06 2008 19:20 MaGic~PhiL wrote: If you dont have a penalty shootout it will all be about stamina and who makes the first mistake or is too aggressive and so on.. i think its fine the way it is as opposed to it being 3 parts luck 1 part nerves? | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28591 Posts
| ||
|
white_box921
United Kingdom967 Posts
On September 06 2008 20:25 SoMuchBetter wrote: as opposed to it being 3 parts luck 1 part nerves? I don't aggree that penalty is base on luck. It is no coincidence that some country (team) always does well and some screw up badly. | ||
|
ryung70
Germany227 Posts
American experiments The North American Soccer League in the 1970s and then Major League Soccer in the 1990s experimented with a variation of the shootout procedure. Instead of a straight penalty kick, the shootout started 35 yards from the goal and having five seconds to attempt a shot. The player could make as many moves as he could in a breakaway situation in the five seconds, then attempt a shot. This procedure is similar to that used in an ice hockey penalty shot. As with a standard shootout, this variation used a best-of-five-kicks model, and if the score was still level, the tiebreaker would head to an extra round of one attempt per team. This format rewarded player skills, as players were able to attempt to fake out goalkeepers in an attempt to make the shot, as in a one-on-one skills contest. The MLS abandoned this experiment in 2000. | ||
| ||
