|
Hello i start to noticed alot viewbotters on twitch lately. Alot maybe 10 people if i just randomly go look. last 2days i saw people with 80k extra viewbots.
here is some extra resource: https://twitter.com/BotDetectorBot
What u guys think about this, i think its very unfair, and does twitch actualy care about this? They need secure this. Who knows how much bad subs are featured with this fake viewerbot.
Post below ur own opinium, and remember keep it gentle!
|
It screws with the "stats" on whats popular and even makes people like winter or painuser featured on TL, plus i often find myself looking at whatever has most views, because i figure its popular or something interesting is happening live right now.. then i tune in and all i see is some random diamond league player (winter) talking on a webcam as if he's day9..
i have no clue about the effects on their revenue with ads if the viewbots actually count, but i really hope not. I dont feel like these people who use that shit deserve extra income from that, sounds illegal, so on second thought it probably has no effect.. lol
i think this viewbot shit should be banned and i definitely frown upon anybody who uses it
|
So Winter used Viewbots?
Now it makes sense. I'm following the sc2 scene since 2011 and this guy appeared out of nowhere with 2k viewers.
|
Winter doesn't viewbot, he's been streaming for years now (I used to watch him late at night at least a year ago, when he had only a couple hundred viewers). There's been a lot of discussion about it on Reddit and other forums, and the general consensus is that he does not viewbot. If you look at charts of chat activity per number of viewers and # of people actively in chat compared to number of viewers the ratios are around the norm. He also has a decent number of subs. You've been following the pro scene, this guy has been streaming for ages late a night almost every night for 5+ hours.
@Magnu He's at least mid masters. Smurfs a lot because it's more entertaining. Also he's fairly knowledgable.
On the topic of viewbots, I don't know what else there is to say. Twitch has banned people over it, it's just somewhat hard to prove definite viewboting.
|
Viewbots are a risky investment.
|
inb4 this thread gets derailed to winter getting viewbotted or not, again...
On a serious note, do those viewbotted number also correlate with ad revenue? because then it for sure would be a problem.
|
On June 03 2014 05:23 MagnuMizer wrote: It screws with the "stats" on whats popular and even makes people like winter or painuser featured on TL, plus i often find myself looking at whatever has most views, because i figure its popular or something interesting is happening live right now.. then i tune in and all i see is some random diamond league player (winter) talking on a webcam as if he's day9..
i have no clue about the effects on their revenue with ads if the viewbots actually count, but i really hope not. I dont feel like these people who use that shit deserve extra income from that, sounds illegal, so on second thought it probably has no effect.. lol
i think this viewbot shit should be banned and i definitely frown upon anybody who uses it
On June 03 2014 05:27 Vandrad wrote: So Winter used Viewbots?
Now it makes sense. I'm following the sc2 scene since 2011 and this guy appeared out of nowhere with 2k viewers.
Okay, let’s get a few things straight.
First of all, view-botting is done by a number of external services and it is explicitly against Twitch.TV’s Terms of Service.
Second, just because a channel has viewbots on it does NOT mean that the broadcaster is intentionally botting. There are two other common things that may be the cause instead. Sometimes, other random watchers pay to have their favorite streamer botted or they do it to troll streamers they do not like. It is also common practice for botting companies to bot random streams in order to obscure who is and isn’t paying for their services. In either case, the streamer being botted is the victim rather than the perpetrator.
Third, Winter has neither been intentionally botting nor are a large percentage of his viewers bots. Like every stream, he does from time to time end up with a small number of bots in his audience. However, the percentage of his viewership that is the result of bots is HIGHLY likely to be low given chat speed and username percentage comparisons to other big streamers (eg. its relatively easy to prove that he doesn’t have any larger percentage of bots as viewers than Stephano, iNcontroL, or Demuslim, on average). Winter also did not get his viewers overnight. He built them relatively slowly and although his growth accelerated around 6 months ago, its taken him that long just to gain ~2,000 average viewers (which relative to the rest of Twitch isn’t even that big of a leap). This stuff isn’t hard to understand or observe.
TLDR; Get yo facts straight before posting next time!
|
Its fairly easy to tell when a stream is getting viewbotted. However, the problem is what to do about it.
It could be the streamer viewbotting themselves, a fan of the streamer viewbotting them, or someone that dislikes the streamer viewbotting them to try and get them banned. Or it could just be a troll doing it because they find it funny.
Also, in a chat I was in, Encryptio mentioned that there was some kind of exploit that he pointed out to people at Twitch months ago, which they didn't do anything about, and that he thinks that people finally found out about it. (Don't have a screenshot, sorry).
All in all its a tricky situation. Personally, I think the best way to deal with it is to have a detection system, and while a stream is being viewbotted disable ads/ remove the stream from the directory until it stops (people can still find it on favorites etc, just won't get new viewers from it).
That would be alot of work, and I'm not sure if its possible to efficiently implement, but it's just my thoughts on it.
|
That "detector" thingy claimed that only 160 of the 13k viewers were legit with when Snute and MC duked it out in the IEM qualifier produced by ESL and casted by Apollo and Kaelaris. I call bullshit
|
On June 03 2014 05:44 AlternativeEgo wrote: That "detector" thingy claimed that only 160 of the 13k viewers were legit with when Snute and MC duked it out in the IEM qualifier produced by ESL and casted by Apollo and Kaelaris. I call bullshit
It's not always right, but it works off trends and alot of other stuff. For most "normal" streamers, its pretty accurate. For events, it has a decent chance to be off, since those usually are anomalous compared to regular streams.
|
Viewbots do not add to ad revenue. So that is not the problem.
The main issue is just that viewbots can trick people into watching a stream and those real viewers DO contribute to ad revenue. Those real viewers might also sub/donate to a subpar stream.
It's also seen as an unfair advantage to be able to attract viewers easily because viewbots make a stream look popular. It bypasses the slow buildup of viewers new streamers experience (assuming they ever get any viewers at all!) For someone just switching between random streams, seeing a stream with lots of viewers naturally causes the viewer to have a higher chance of switching to it.
|
Yes viewbots do not affect ad revenue but they have other effects.
I was randomly watching around the other night, it happened to be the night Wildstar launched and one of the twitch admins had 300,000 viewers. It was obviously someone with a viewbot fucking with him but I was like how in the fuck does this dude I've never heard of have 300k viewers?!?!
|
I see alot noobs viewbot, even subs i think this is more wide spread and then people might actualy think. its a shame. If someone viewbots u should go offline. I try get featured. and a noob botted me so i went offline. i just be myself and get viewers auto when i do funny stuff. wintersc dunno about that guy, but would be suprezid here alot about this i do not name & shame so i'm not going to respond on this. Hope they add securiry in future.
|
On June 03 2014 05:47 Nighttiger wrote: Viewbots do not add to ad revenue. So that is not the problem.
The main issue is just that viewbots can trick people into watching a stream and those real viewers DO contribute to ad revenue. Those real viewers might also sub/donate to a subpar stream.
It's also seen as an unfair advantage to be able to attract viewers easily because viewbots make a stream look popular. It bypasses the slow buildup of viewers new streamers experience (assuming they ever get any viewers at all!) For someone just switching between random streams, seeing a stream with lots of viewers naturally causes the viewer to have a higher chance of switching to it.
I think if someone donates or subs to a stream they do it because they enjoy the stream instead of because that stream has high amount of viewers.....
|
On June 03 2014 06:02 bosshd wrote: I see alot noobs viewbot, even subs i think this is more wide spread and then people might actualy think. its a shame. If someone viewbots u should go offline. I try get featured. and a noob botted me so i went offline. i just be myself and get viewers auto when i do funny stuff. wintersc dunno about that guy, but would be suprezid here alot about this i do not name & shame so i'm not going to respond on this. Hope they add securiry in future. Yeah but you have to realise that some broadcaster get viewbotted instead of viewbotting themselves. It isn't as clear cut as simply banning every channel that has viewbotting going on. Don't like a streamer? Viewbot him and he'll be banned!
|
On June 03 2014 05:41 looknohands119 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2014 05:23 MagnuMizer wrote: It screws with the "stats" on whats popular and even makes people like winter or painuser featured on TL, plus i often find myself looking at whatever has most views, because i figure its popular or something interesting is happening live right now.. then i tune in and all i see is some random diamond league player (winter) talking on a webcam as if he's day9..
i have no clue about the effects on their revenue with ads if the viewbots actually count, but i really hope not. I dont feel like these people who use that shit deserve extra income from that, sounds illegal, so on second thought it probably has no effect.. lol
i think this viewbot shit should be banned and i definitely frown upon anybody who uses it Show nested quote +On June 03 2014 05:27 Vandrad wrote: So Winter used Viewbots?
Now it makes sense. I'm following the sc2 scene since 2011 and this guy appeared out of nowhere with 2k viewers. Okay, let’s get a few things straight. First of all, view-botting is done by a number of external services and it is explicitly against Twitch.TV’s Terms of Service. Second, just because a channel has viewbots on it does NOT mean that the broadcaster is intentionally botting. There are two other common things that may be the cause instead. Sometimes, other random watchers pay to have their favorite streamer botted or they do it to troll streamers they do not like. It is also common practice for botting companies to bot random streams in order to obscure who is and isn’t paying for their services. In either case, the streamer being botted is the victim rather than the perpetrator. Third, Winter has neither been intentionally botting nor are a large percentage of his viewers bots. Like every stream, he does from time to time end up with a small number of bots in his audience. However, the percentage of his viewership that is the result of bots is HIGHLY likely to be low given chat speed and username percentage comparisons to other big streamers (eg. its relatively easy to prove that he doesn’t have any larger percentage of bots as viewers than Stephano, iNcontroL, or Demuslim, on average). Winter also did not get his viewers overnight. He built them relatively slowly and although his growth accelerated around 6 months ago, its taken him that long just to gain ~2,000 average viewers (which relative to the rest of Twitch isn’t even that big of a leap). This stuff isn’t hard to understand or observe. TLDR; Get yo facts straight before posting next time! How u think twitch can secure broadcasters from getting viewbotted, does it require a complex new update?
|
On June 03 2014 06:06 Thorakh wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2014 06:02 bosshd wrote: I see alot noobs viewbot, even subs i think this is more wide spread and then people might actualy think. its a shame. If someone viewbots u should go offline. I try get featured. and a noob botted me so i went offline. i just be myself and get viewers auto when i do funny stuff. wintersc dunno about that guy, but would be suprezid here alot about this i do not name & shame so i'm not going to respond on this. Hope they add securiry in future. Yeah but you have to realise that some broadcaster get viewbotted instead of viewbotting themselves. It isn't as clear cut as simply banning every channel that has viewbotting going on. Don't like a streamer? Viewbot him and he'll be banned! Idd this is true, i dont want people that dont viewbot to get banned, but then again: how can twitch make it so this can be avoid CAHPCHA ? login required, hmmm or like someone else stated a DETECTOR that removes from main directory and u can still watch them on favorites.
|
My twitch inbox gets the occasional spam from the person who sells viewbots. The spam comes on different names. It's really just taking advantage of people who think that viewbots are going to help them.
The real thing is that viewbots really aren't worth the money because the people who need to pay for viewbots aren't really getting a return on their investment. Streaming alone doesn't get much profit unless you're consistently over 10k viewers. Most people who have to pay for viewbots aren't really skilled enough to continue getting viewers.
Then again I could be full of shit, I think viewbots has helped some of the more skilled players get an increased viewership... however.. they are still paying for it.
|
On June 03 2014 05:44 AlternativeEgo wrote: That "detector" thingy claimed that only 160 of the 13k viewers were legit with when Snute and MC duked it out in the IEM qualifier produced by ESL and casted by Apollo and Kaelaris. I call bullshit
Well, if someone from ESL takes this useless thing a bit serious. The founder of the Twitter account could be in some trouble.
This simply is character assassination, if they spread wrong informations. There is no proof, too.
So... What the fuck? Seriously...
|
On June 03 2014 06:24 Peqqz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2014 05:44 AlternativeEgo wrote: That "detector" thingy claimed that only 160 of the 13k viewers were legit with when Snute and MC duked it out in the IEM qualifier produced by ESL and casted by Apollo and Kaelaris. I call bullshit Well, if someone from ESL takes this useless thing a bit serious. The founder of the Twitter account could be in some trouble. This simply is character assassination, if they spread wrong informations. There is no proof, too. So... What the fuck? Seriously...
Dude, it says "I'm not necessarily accusing the streamers of botting their own channels." right in the Twitter profile description...
|
In the last 18 hours that I have streamed during primetime only 5 viewers have come in through twitch's avenues.
|
On June 03 2014 05:47 Nighttiger wrote: Those real viewers might also sub/donate to a subpar stream.
Wouldn't that still be their own fault lol
|
No, there is supposed to be some magic where even if people never see your stream because of shitty exploration functions in twitch that you be 'discovered' and be righteously judged by the truth of what is good or bad according to objective fact as defined by God himself.
|
hm, LoL wasnt that popular after all then
|
On June 03 2014 08:08 warthog wrote: hm, LoL wasnt that popular after all then I wasn't going to post, but this made me laugh. 
Anyways I was watching my buddy stream last night (with 1 other friend watching as well) when suddenly 480 viewers! Haha. Either it was viewer bots or twitch freaked out... it stayed like that for about 20 minutes and then went back to normal.
|
Ye imagine LoL has been boosted from the beginning lol Kappa
User was warned for this post
|
Ooh i forgot k is not allowed srr...
|
pretty silly rules thought!
|
I suspect that watching an embedded twitch stream will appear as a viewbot might to that viewbot detector (the detector just compares the advertised stream viewer count with the stream chat population). That'd explain things like the ESL viewer number discrepancy.
|
On June 03 2014 08:51 magicmUnky wrote: I suspect that watching an embedded twitch stream will appear as a viewbot might to that viewbot detector (the detector just compares the advertised stream viewer count with the stream chat population). That'd explain things like the ESL viewer number discrepancy. 98.8% of the viewers on the ESL stream were identified as being viewbots. I don't think it's reasonable to assume that 98.8% of the total viewers came from TeamLiquid. While we wait for another ESL stream to start, does anyone know if that particular stream was embedded on any high traffic sites that might have had an impact?
I did observe one potential out, which was that I was having a lot of trouble loading the user list in the chatroom. It was hanging pretty badly. If the tool was also unable to retrieve the list, that could have had something to do with it. But the numbers did seem to be changing over time, and the percentage was never 100%. As I said in the LR thread, we should keep an eye on it.
|
They hit people randomly not everybody pays for it.
For example I was streaming a few weeks ago and I went from 5-10 viewers into 1k/2k. Then after I stopped streaming I got a pm from the bot service saying if I want it to pay then xx.
|
well, if viewbots dont mess with the money side, then the obvious solution is to sort the streams differently if they become a permanent problem.
You can make the default sort "by subscriptions" for example, or twitch sorts with whatever algorithm they come up with.
then the bots become useless.
And at some point someone needs to start claning up the internet from all those infected hardware that is used for spam bots, social media bots and those ddos attacks.
|
A few days ago Minecraft had 160,000 viewers so I was like wat. Some girl had 130,000 viewers and then after a few mintues all the bots left, leaving her down to 1,000.
I knew there were bots but I didn't know there were that many, nor that all of those were seemingly controlled by one person.
|
On June 03 2014 10:26 LaNague wrote: well, if viewbots dont mess with the money side, then the obvious solution is to sort the streams differently if they become a permanent problem.
You can make the default sort "by subscriptions" for example, or twitch sorts with whatever algorithm they come up with.
then the bots become useless.
And at some point someone needs to start claning up the internet from all those infected hardware that is used for spam bots, social media bots and those ddos attacks.
Wouldn't hold your breath on the cleaning it up part, the amount of technologically retarded people online is staggering. If all the phishing and tricks to get people's information/machines didn't work they wouldn't be doing it. Unfortunately it works quite well on a lot of people and an alarming number of companies have had their databases ransacked so even big companies aren't immune to shit.
Twitch does allow sorting by player skill in CS:GO using the API from valve, that's one way of sorting things if people are looking for high skilled players though it does nothing for entertaining players. Could probably do it by follows as well, I'm assuming the bots aren't logged into accounts so they can't follow a stream to inflate that number.
|
Well, my opinium is.. this is bad
|
idd
|
The reason people think WinterSC viewbots is because the people who post in the forums are generally higher level players (at least plat). Most of us are not impressed with the content that Winter provides. He's zerg so watching him play offrace is quite painful. People think, "there's no way anyone finds this crap educational." But I think the fact of the matter is, there's more bronze scrubs out there than we realize. You'll never find someone good watching his stream, though. Anyone masters or above would consider his stream garbage.
|
On July 16 2014 22:51 eightym wrote: The reason people think WinterSC viewbots is because the people who post in the forums are generally higher level players (at least plat). Most of us are not impressed with the content that Winter provides. He's zerg so watching him play offrace is quite painful. People think, "there's no way anyone finds this crap educational." But I think the fact of the matter is, there's more bronze scrubs out there than we realize. You'll never find someone good watching his stream, though. Anyone masters or above would consider his stream garbage. I watch his stream, and I'm at least mid diamond as Terran. I just enjoy watching someone commentate their games who tries to provide good content and seems like a genuinely good person.
|
On July 16 2014 22:51 eightym wrote: The reason people think WinterSC viewbots is because the people who post in the forums are generally higher level players (at least plat). Most of us are not impressed with the content that Winter provides. He's zerg so watching him play offrace is quite painful. People think, "there's no way anyone finds this crap educational." But I think the fact of the matter is, there's more bronze scrubs out there than we realize. You'll never find someone good watching his stream, though. Anyone masters or above would consider his stream garbage.
I get the idea, but I find the stream hypocritical. I don't see the appeal, personally, smurfing low leaguers all day and ruling your chat with an iron first, no thanks buddy. Other people probably viewbot him, but I wouldn't complain if I was him either, even if the 3K viewer count is fake, i'm sure it feels good to see that.
|
|
Twitch's own issue, they have TAC in place as a threat, but it seems like the distinguishing factor is determining the source of the view bots rather than opting for a Youtube style three strike rule.
Not really fair if people can viewbot you at their own discretion and you're held accountable for it.
|
I visit bhw a lot and there are always people giving free live viewers 500-5k. They all thank the OP always, so they probably got the views.
However after I visit some channels that have been boosted by bhw freebies, a lot of them have been closed.
Sometimes they just like to go on a troll weekend and boost some random stuff. For the lulz I guess.
|
The argument that someone else is botting winter is nonsense. If that were so, he wouldn't start out at 2000+ every time he streams. There's no reason someone would be motivated enough to assume that responsibility 24 hours a day 7 days a week. Especially when viewbots help him.
The only two valid possibilities are that he is viewbotting himself, or the viewers are valid. If the viewers are valid, he's literally the only streamer I have ever seen that immediately jumps to 2,000+ viewers the moment he streams. Even Stephano, Demuslim, TLO, Destiny, etc (i.e. actual popular streamers) start out at a hundred or so, and gradually work their way up to 2,000+
Winter played the system and he played it well. Props to him. I hope Twitch.tv creates some sort of algorithm like Google's PageRank to eliminate these cheaters. Just something to eliminate how easy it is to game the system.
People automatically watch the person who has the most views. Viewbots steal viewers from the streamers who deserve to be on top.
There's no way to prove that he is viewbotting until twitch makes their viewcount algorithm more strict and we can see him drop to, at most, 800 viewers/day.
|
I saw Painuser's stream popping up with 75 views the other day.
There's no way in hell even half of those are real.
|
On July 17 2014 01:46 eightym wrote: The argument that someone else is botting winter is nonsense. If that were so, he wouldn't start out at 2000+ every time he streams. There's no reason someone would be motivated enough to assume that responsibility 24 hours a day 7 days a week. Especially when viewbots help him.
Unless they want to get him removed - They would have plenty of motive.
The only two valid possibilities are that he is viewbotting himself, or the viewers are valid. If the viewers are valid, he's literally the only streamer I have ever seen that immediately jumps to 2,000+ viewers the moment he streams. Even Stephano, Demuslim, TLO, Destiny, etc (i.e. actual popular streamers) start out at a hundred or so, and gradually work their way up to 2,000+
Winter played the system and he played it well. Props to him. I hope Twitch.tv creates some sort of algorithm like Google's PageRank to eliminate these cheaters. Just something to eliminate how easy it is to game the system.
Winter plays it very well, and can say "It was not me" and others are doing such out of spite.
People automatically watch the person who has the most views. Viewbots steal viewers from the streamers who deserve to be on top.
There's no way to prove that he is viewbotting until twitch makes their viewcount algorithm more strict and we can see him drop to, at most, 800 viewers/day.
Exactly - ZLFreeBird now makes money for twitch.tv, so I doubt anything will happen.
|
I did find it kind of strange that winter would get so many viewers, though I don't think it's viewbots. he's new and I could see lower league players watching his stream a lot since he does actively talk about what he's doing, something destiny used to do and idra also used to do it.
|
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
a lot of these 'viewbot' results can be skewed because people don't watch from twitch, but rather from embeds like on TL
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
you don't have to be logged into twitch to watch a stream...
|
I find the moaning and reasoning behind the anti-viewbot stance suspect. I think it amounts to nothing in the end. For starters, you can't "trick" people into watching a sub par stream (do they have no free will?), unless those people are bandwagoners who don't know anything about the stream and dont actually care.
If a stream sucks for one reason or another, people WILL leave to find a different one, whether bots are giving it extra viewers or not. Bots might be incentive to go to check out if its any good, but people only STAY if it's actually good. Therefore, bots really have minimal, if any, impact on retaining viewers beyond a single day.
I'm actually chuckling a bit at the thought of people actually paying for this service. Talk about fleecing fools.
Case in point, I have watched plenty of twitch streams from TL and for GSLs and have NEVER heard about this Winter character. Noone talks about him. I wasn't even aware of this person's existence until this thread. Clearly the botting didn't draw me in when i use twitch regularly.
|
On July 30 2014 00:12 amazingxkcd wrote:you don't have to be logged into twitch to watch a stream...
When you have actually only 5 people talking with 3000 viewers, there is something wrong dude.
|
On July 30 2014 01:24 Socup wrote: I find the moaning and reasoning behind the anti-viewbot stance suspect. I think it amounts to nothing in the end. For starters, you can't "trick" people into watching a sub par stream (do they have no free will?), unless those people are bandwagoners who don't know anything about the stream and dont actually care.
If a stream sucks for one reason or another, people WILL leave to find a different one, whether bots are giving it extra viewers or not. Bots might be incentive to go to check out if its any good, but people only STAY if it's actually good. Therefore, bots really have minimal, if any, impact on retaining viewers beyond a single day.
I'm actually chuckling a bit at the thought of people actually paying for this service. Talk about fleecing fools.
Case in point, I have watched plenty of twitch streams from TL and for GSLs and have NEVER heard about this Winter character. Noone talks about him. I wasn't even aware of this person's existence until this thread. Clearly the botting didn't draw me in when i use twitch regularly.
Ya well said, I think those concerned about bots "stealing" viewers underestimate the intelligence of fellow humans.
|
On July 30 2014 18:25 wasdf wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2014 01:24 Socup wrote: I find the moaning and reasoning behind the anti-viewbot stance suspect. I think it amounts to nothing in the end. For starters, you can't "trick" people into watching a sub par stream (do they have no free will?), unless those people are bandwagoners who don't know anything about the stream and dont actually care.
If a stream sucks for one reason or another, people WILL leave to find a different one, whether bots are giving it extra viewers or not. Bots might be incentive to go to check out if its any good, but people only STAY if it's actually good. Therefore, bots really have minimal, if any, impact on retaining viewers beyond a single day.
I'm actually chuckling a bit at the thought of people actually paying for this service. Talk about fleecing fools.
Case in point, I have watched plenty of twitch streams from TL and for GSLs and have NEVER heard about this Winter character. Noone talks about him. I wasn't even aware of this person's existence until this thread. Clearly the botting didn't draw me in when i use twitch regularly. Ya well said, I think those concerned about bots "stealing" viewers underestimate the intelligence of fellow humans. This doesn't make it more right. He should be removed from the featuring, or even ban from the live stream list of TL.
|
|
Big red flag when it comes to Winter in my opinion is how his viewership is unaffected by major events and other streams on top of his relatively dead chat and absurd donations and its always 3000k viewers. Seems highly suspect to me but I obviously can't say if hes viewbotting or not.
|
Hey if you go to winter's channel and then state the obvious, you'll likely get banned like how I did. I'm sure stating "this chat is slow, there are 300 active viewers here" is a bannable offense only in winter's channel.
Pathetic
http://i.imgur.com/T06cQlo.jpg
|
On July 31 2014 17:10 Foreverkul wrote:Big red flag when it comes to Winter in my opinion is how his viewership is unaffected by major events and other streams on top of his relatively dead chat and absurd donations and its always 3000k viewers. Seems highly suspect to me but I obviously can't say if hes viewbotting or not. 
I doubt anyone is actually donating that much money to his stream. He can fake it by stating any amount he wants since none of it is verified and he likes to keep it that way. Who in the right mind would donate 600 dollars just to watch him stream? His chat is always dead but the mod is always around to ban people who states specific facts about his channel that he doesn't want people to realize his use with viewbots and donation scams. That's right scams, why does he keep asking people to "give him" money, really he's not that important. Compare his chat with someone who really has 3k viewers, use Hutch for example. Now Hutch is genuine and you can tell by how active his chat is suggesting that he actually has 3k viewers.
Let's not be fooled and inadvertently give this guy any of your money.
http://i.imgur.com/T06cQlo.jpg
|
Why do almost all posters in this thread have 0 or 1 posts? Does TL have POST BOTTERS?!?!
|
On September 15 2014 21:46 dizzy101 wrote: Why do almost all posters in this thread have 0 or 1 posts? Does TL have POST BOTTERS?!?!
Could you be more relevant?
|
On September 15 2014 21:46 dizzy101 wrote: Why do almost all posters in this thread have 0 or 1 posts? Does TL have POST BOTTERS?!?!
cross forum posting, most of these users are from the sc forums, which doesn't register post count on liquiddota
also, please don't throw these accusations around regarding viewbotting.
|
When winter's stream wasnt featured yet, i was curious about his stream, as he got 2k viewers without being featured. After watching it for a bit, i found myself tuning in more often, as i quite enjoyed it. While it certainly does seem a lot, i can also understand why people tune in.
Winter can't defend himself against most of these accusations, regardless of him being innocent or not. Statistics on viewer activity in chat or viewer amount/tournament activity correlations are suggestive at best. Given he did not viewbot, how would he be able to prove his viewers are real? How could you explain people tuning in quickly? Answering those questions will lead to kafkaesque situations very quickly. Some accusations are irrelevant. Some people, according to winter himself, donate quite a bit. He could be lying about it to make people donate. I can certainly see that. However, does that relate to viewbotting? Not necessarily of course. Suppose he does lie about it, does this necessarily say he's viewbotting? No, of course not. It does say he's being dishonest on some points. There might even be a correlation between people lying about donation and people viewbotting, i don't know. But even if that were true, because we're looking at a single case, we still wouldn't be able to say he was based on this argument, making the issue if he's lying or not about his donations irrelevant.
Also, doyougmailbro has quite the case of myopia. "I wouldn't give him money, so nobody would". I wouldn't, you wouldn't, but that doesnt mean nobody would. Using thát as an argument seems immature at best.
I don't know if he's viewbotting or not. It seems suspicious indeed, but i haven't read anything worth debating yet; at least not in this thread.
|
On September 15 2014 22:36 Yorbon wrote: When winter's stream wasnt featured yet, i was curious about his stream, as he got 2k viewers without being featured. After watching it for a bit, i found myself tuning in more often, as i quite enjoyed it. While it certainly does seem a lot, i can also understand why people tune in.
Winter can't defend himself against most of these accusations, regardless of him being innocent or not. Statistics on viewer activity in chat or viewer amount/tournament activity correlations are suggestive at best. Given he did not viewbot, how would he be able to prove his viewers are real? How could you explain people tuning in quickly? Answering those questions will lead to kafkaesque situations very quickly. Some accusations are irrelevant. Some people, according to winter himself, donate quite a bit. He could be lying about it to make people donate. I can certainly see that. However, does that relate to viewbotting? Not necessarily of course. Suppose he does lie about it, does this necessarily say he's viewbotting? No, of course not. It does say he's being dishonest on some points. There might even be a correlation between people lying about donation and people viewbotting, i don't know. But even if that were true, because we're looking at a single case, we still wouldn't be able to say he was based on this argument, making the issue if he's lying or not about his donations irrelevant.
Also, doyougmailbro has quite the case of myopia. "I wouldn't give him money, so nobody would". I wouldn't, you wouldn't, but that doesnt mean nobody would. Using thát as an argument seems immature at best.
I don't know if he's viewbotting or not. It seems suspicious indeed, but i haven't read anything worth debating yet; at least not in this thread.
What are you even talking about? The point I wanted to make was that he ban people who mention anything about viewbots and viewer count in the chat as he banned me as soon as he realizes what I said. it's shady business what he's doing and if you can't contribute to the thread then why are you even typing so much just to insert that someone is immature for posting about his negative experience on winterstarcraft stream. No one should be banned based alone on that sentence. Oh and you mention stay on topic? well I was commenting on what someone said about his viewbot usages and donation scams. So this thread isn't about you not knowing if he is viewbotting or not since you merely attacked the OP without much consideration. You're a troll at best but I expected that.
The argument now is that I believe he lied about the donations and I believe he ban people who addresses the unfair usage of viewbots just to trick people to donate and subscribe to his channel.
If this is considered fair game within the twitch stream community then so be it. But seriously, the ban was unnecessary. I'm not upset or have the intention to disdain someone to mark down his reputation. Like i said, it's just pathetic to ban people who speak their mind.
|
a common explanation would be that he has had a lot of people causing trouble talking about viewbots in his channel in the past and a result of that conflict was that he started banning troublemakers and you got lumped with that crowd. like if you make a joke about rape to a rape victim without realising they just got raped you're gonna get in trouble
|
On September 16 2014 02:37 doyougmailbro wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2014 22:36 Yorbon wrote: When winter's stream wasnt featured yet, i was curious about his stream, as he got 2k viewers without being featured. After watching it for a bit, i found myself tuning in more often, as i quite enjoyed it. While it certainly does seem a lot, i can also understand why people tune in.
Winter can't defend himself against most of these accusations, regardless of him being innocent or not. Statistics on viewer activity in chat or viewer amount/tournament activity correlations are suggestive at best. Given he did not viewbot, how would he be able to prove his viewers are real? How could you explain people tuning in quickly? Answering those questions will lead to kafkaesque situations very quickly. Some accusations are irrelevant. Some people, according to winter himself, donate quite a bit. He could be lying about it to make people donate. I can certainly see that. However, does that relate to viewbotting? Not necessarily of course. Suppose he does lie about it, does this necessarily say he's viewbotting? No, of course not. It does say he's being dishonest on some points. There might even be a correlation between people lying about donation and people viewbotting, i don't know. But even if that were true, because we're looking at a single case, we still wouldn't be able to say he was based on this argument, making the issue if he's lying or not about his donations irrelevant.
Also, doyougmailbro has quite the case of myopia. "I wouldn't give him money, so nobody would". I wouldn't, you wouldn't, but that doesnt mean nobody would. Using thát as an argument seems immature at best.
I don't know if he's viewbotting or not. It seems suspicious indeed, but i haven't read anything worth debating yet; at least not in this thread.
What are you even talking about? The point I wanted to make was that he ban people who mention anything about viewbots and viewer count in the chat as he banned me as soon as he realizes what I said. it's shady business what he's doing and if you can't contribute to the thread then why are you even typing so much just to insert that someone is immature for posting about his negative experience on winterstarcraft stream. No one should be banned based alone on that sentence. Oh and you mention stay on topic? well I was commenting on what someone said about his viewbot usages and donation scams. So this thread isn't about you not knowing if he is viewbotting or not since you merely attacked the OP without much consideration. You're a troll at best but I expected that. The argument now is that I believe he lied about the donations and I believe he ban people who addresses the unfair usage of viewbots just to trick people to donate and subscribe to his channel. If this is considered fair game within the twitch stream community then so be it. But seriously, the ban was unnecessary. I'm not upset or have the intention to disdain someone to mark down his reputation. Like i said, it's just pathetic to ban people who speak their mind. Like i said, what's happening is indeed suspicious. You can call it shady business, but that alone doesnt amount to anything. What one needs besides that is relevant arguments.
The reason i called you immature, was because you were projecting your own views on the quality of winter's stream unto others. Quoting your post "I doubt anyone is actually donating that much money to his stream. He can fake it by stating any amount he wants since none of it is verified and he likes to keep it that way. Who in the right mind would donate 600 dollars just to watch him stream?" Like i said in my original post, that you think no one would, doesnt actually mean no one would. That's all i referred to regarding you specifically.
Secondly, i never mentioned anything about being ontopic. I actively tried to get the discussion to debating relevant arguments, meaning that they have anything to do with accusations. To make this clearer, let's quote you again:
"I doubt anyone is actually donating that much money to his stream. He can fake it by stating any amount he wants since none of it is verified and he likes to keep it that way. Who in the right mind would donate 600 dollars just to watch him stream? His chat is always dead but the mod is always around to ban people who states specific facts about his channel that he doesn't want people to realize his use with viewbots and donation scams. That's right scams, why does he keep asking people to "give him" money, really he's not that important. Compare his chat with someone who really has 3k viewers, use Hutch for example. Now Hutch is genuine and you can tell by how active his chat is suggesting that he actually has 3k viewers. "
Notice how doubts about the truth on his donations fluently go over to comparing winter to someone named Hutch, who ' actually has 3k viewers'. This at least suggests one thinks there is a relation between the two (just in case: the two being faking donations and viewbotting). I have elaborated on why I think the truth on donations is irrelevant to winter viewbotting. If you agree, then everythings fine. I that case i fell into some suggestive writing. Both of us have some blame in this miscommunication.
I don't care about your experiences in the winter chat. As the thread is on viewbotting, i restricted myself to accusations of viewbotting. I feel your experiences are completely irrelevant to anything i said. If it looks that way, i apologise. And me being a troll or not has nothing to do with anything. Lastly, I don't really understand how i attacked the op? I was merely reacting to people having an opinion on the legitimacy of winter's stream numbers.
|
On June 03 2014 05:27 Vandrad wrote: So Winter used Viewbots?
Now it makes sense. I'm following the sc2 scene since 2011 and this guy appeared out of nowhere with 2k viewers.
This makes sense to me now also, i saw him with like 2500 viewers out of no where also, and had no idea who he was.
|
On September 16 2014 07:23 Yorbon wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2014 02:37 doyougmailbro wrote:On September 15 2014 22:36 Yorbon wrote: When winter's stream wasnt featured yet, i was curious about his stream, as he got 2k viewers without being featured. After watching it for a bit, i found myself tuning in more often, as i quite enjoyed it. While it certainly does seem a lot, i can also understand why people tune in.
Winter can't defend himself against most of these accusations, regardless of him being innocent or not. Statistics on viewer activity in chat or viewer amount/tournament activity correlations are suggestive at best. Given he did not viewbot, how would he be able to prove his viewers are real? How could you explain people tuning in quickly? Answering those questions will lead to kafkaesque situations very quickly. Some accusations are irrelevant. Some people, according to winter himself, donate quite a bit. He could be lying about it to make people donate. I can certainly see that. However, does that relate to viewbotting? Not necessarily of course. Suppose he does lie about it, does this necessarily say he's viewbotting? No, of course not. It does say he's being dishonest on some points. There might even be a correlation between people lying about donation and people viewbotting, i don't know. But even if that were true, because we're looking at a single case, we still wouldn't be able to say he was based on this argument, making the issue if he's lying or not about his donations irrelevant.
Also, doyougmailbro has quite the case of myopia. "I wouldn't give him money, so nobody would". I wouldn't, you wouldn't, but that doesnt mean nobody would. Using thát as an argument seems immature at best.
I don't know if he's viewbotting or not. It seems suspicious indeed, but i haven't read anything worth debating yet; at least not in this thread.
What are you even talking about? The point I wanted to make was that he ban people who mention anything about viewbots and viewer count in the chat as he banned me as soon as he realizes what I said. it's shady business what he's doing and if you can't contribute to the thread then why are you even typing so much just to insert that someone is immature for posting about his negative experience on winterstarcraft stream. No one should be banned based alone on that sentence. Oh and you mention stay on topic? well I was commenting on what someone said about his viewbot usages and donation scams. So this thread isn't about you not knowing if he is viewbotting or not since you merely attacked the OP without much consideration. You're a troll at best but I expected that. The argument now is that I believe he lied about the donations and I believe he ban people who addresses the unfair usage of viewbots just to trick people to donate and subscribe to his channel. If this is considered fair game within the twitch stream community then so be it. But seriously, the ban was unnecessary. I'm not upset or have the intention to disdain someone to mark down his reputation. Like i said, it's just pathetic to ban people who speak their mind. Like i said, what's happening is indeed suspicious. You can call it shady business, but that alone doesnt amount to anything. What one needs besides that is relevant arguments. The reason i called you immature, was because you were projecting your own views on the quality of winter's stream unto others. Quoting your post "I doubt anyone is actually donating that much money to his stream. He can fake it by stating any amount he wants since none of it is verified and he likes to keep it that way. Who in the right mind would donate 600 dollars just to watch him stream?" Like i said in my original post, that you think no one would, doesnt actually mean no one would. That's all i referred to regarding you specifically. Secondly, i never mentioned anything about being ontopic. I actively tried to get the discussion to debating relevant arguments, meaning that they have anything to do with accusations. To make this clearer, let's quote you again: "I doubt anyone is actually donating that much money to his stream. He can fake it by stating any amount he wants since none of it is verified and he likes to keep it that way. Who in the right mind would donate 600 dollars just to watch him stream? His chat is always dead but the mod is always around to ban people who states specific facts about his channel that he doesn't want people to realize his use with viewbots and donation scams. That's right scams, why does he keep asking people to "give him" money, really he's not that important. Compare his chat with someone who really has 3k viewers, use Hutch for example. Now Hutch is genuine and you can tell by how active his chat is suggesting that he actually has 3k viewers. " Notice how doubts about the truth on his donations fluently go over to comparing winter to someone named Hutch, who ' actually has 3k viewers'. This at least suggests one thinks there is a relation between the two (just in case: the two being faking donations and viewbotting). I have elaborated on why I think the truth on donations is irrelevant to winter viewbotting. If you agree, then everythings fine. I that case i fell into some suggestive writing. Both of us have some blame in this miscommunication. I don't care about your experiences in the winter chat. As the thread is on viewbotting, i restricted myself to accusations of viewbotting. I feel your experiences are completely irrelevant to anything i said. If it looks that way, i apologise. And me being a troll or not has nothing to do with anything. Lastly, I don't really understand how i attacked the op? I was merely reacting to people having an opinion on the legitimacy of winter's stream numbers.
I'm sure you can get your bullshit across quicker by saying less. Anyways, my experience matters every bit here and your views do not. I've disregarded everything the OP has mentioned and I am arguing from my point of my view, my experience from a few hours ago, after being unjustifiably banned, so I went and made an account and realized that I could not start a thread until I've waited 3 days for the account to be legitimate so I can start my own threads. If you're not happy with the direction of this old thread has gone, then you should start your own. If what I say did not seem relevant to you then why the are you even responding and getting my attention? Well this is my last message to you. I'm not even sure why you think you could come on here and critiqued everything I've said and making it personal by calling me nearsighted and immature. It's a good enough example to bring a my point across. I've said what I needed to say.
|
On September 16 2014 06:18 FFGenerations wrote: a common explanation would be that he has had a lot of people causing trouble talking about viewbots in his channel in the past and a result of that conflict was that he started banning troublemakers and you got lumped with that crowd. like if you make a joke about rape to a rape victim without realising they just got raped you're gonna get in trouble
Except he bans a regular without much thought? I mean, there are other options ,quieting someone for some time would do but a permanent ban over that? C'mon
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Yup we're not doing this.
|
|
|
|