• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:17
CEST 18:17
KST 01:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task28[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview19herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025)17Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure6
Community News
[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)9Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results212025 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers)14
StarCraft 2
General
Aligulac.com changelog and feedback thread Interview with oPZesty on Cheeseadelphia/Coaching herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025) DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview Power Rank: October 2018
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) Last Chance Qualifiers for OlimoLeague 2024 Winter $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners [ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Grand Finals [ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 [BSL20] RO20 Group Stage
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 15095 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8772

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8770 8771 8772 8773 8774 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
bigmetazltank
Profile Joined September 2017
34 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 08:58:12
September 19 2017 08:11 GMT
#175421
What the hell is wrong with American conservatives. In the majority of other countries a man like Manafort would ring alarm bells. But here you guys are literally defending Trump and shifting the blame on everyone else but Trump himself for walking into the rake that was Paul Manafort.

Manafort was literally, literally a man who, in the words of his own daughter's private email correspondence with her own family, was accepting "blood money" from the Russians to screw with Ukrainian political processes.

This goes back before Trump was even a serious political candidate so unless the Department of Justice are time travelers trying to rig an election of Hilldog, they're not wiretapping Trump Tower or Trump himself. They're wiretapping a man who is literally a Russian agent with a history of stirring up shit for the Russians for Russian money. This is documented to hell and back.

If Donald Trump can't vet his own campaign manager, someone everyone was calling a Russian goon, and say "hey it might be a bad idea to hire a man who was paid by the Russians to stir shit up in Ukraine", then its not the Department of Justice's fault. And it doesn't validate Donald Trump's claims that Obama was wiretapping him and his tower because the DoJ wasn't. Its clear that Trump is talking about Obama wiretapping himself personally to give Hillary Clinton an advantage in the election. Which is patently untrue.

He was wiretapping Manafort and if Trump and whoever don't care about his past history, its not the problem of law enforcement that you choose to associate yourself with said people. If I associate myself with a some drug kingpin knowingly, I don't think I have a right to complain if the FBI kept tabs on me.

On September 19 2017 15:28 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2017 15:07 Aquanim wrote:
Does anybody here disagree with my assertion that the claim that the Obama administration wiretapped anybody related to the Trump campaign because he was a political opponent has no known basis in fact?

Does it really matter why though? If Obama knew that Trumps campaign was being wiretapped indirectly thats a huge conflict of interest. That people in the media refuted, or were told to the effect that they refuted the fact of, that anyone was wiretapped is bad That it was done because he was a political opponent is subjective and opinion based. Its not Watergate where nixon specifically wanted to spy on the dems bad but its still pretty bad and would taint Obama's "practically scandal free" legacy.


Aren't Obama's fault if Trump decided to associate himself and actually hire a known Russian agent as his campaign manager. We knew who Manafort was before he became Trump's campaign manager. Its the reason why his stance on Ukraine was the complete opposite of a surprise.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 19 2017 08:40 GMT
#175422
Donald Trump is considering staging a US military parade in Washington on the Fourth of July Independence Day holiday, inspired by the parade he saw on Bastille Day in Paris.

Meeting France’s President Emmanuel Macron on the fringes of the UN general assembly, Trump said he had asked his White House chief of staff, retired Marine Corps general John Kelly, to look into the possibility of holding such a display of US military might.

Trump said he marvelled at the French parade that he saw with Macron on France’s 14 July national holiday.

In typical Trump fashion, the president said he wants the parade to be bigger and better than the one he saw in France.

“It was one of the greatest parades I have ever seen,” Trump said. “It was two hours on the button, and was military might, and I think a tremendous thing for France and the spirit of France.”

“And to a large extent, because of what I witnessed, we may do something like that on July 4th in Washington, down Pennsylvania Avenue,” Trump said. “We’re going to have to try and top it.”

He noted that France’s parade featured representatives from different wars and armed forces wearing different uniforms. “It was really so well done,” he said.

“So we’re actually thinking about 4th of July, Pennsylvania Avenue, having a really great parade to show our military strength,” Trump added.

Trump has often displayed an enthusiasm for military pageantry and had reportedly hoped for some kind of parade at his own inauguration.

Trump watched enthusiastically from a reviewing stand on 14 July as the French military showcased its tanks and fighter jets, including many US-made planes, along the famed Champs-Élysées. The occasion also marked the 100th anniversary of the US entrance into world war one.

Trump said he has discussed the parade idea with his chief of staff, John Kelly, a retired marine general.

The president, who has recruited three current and retired generals for his senior leadership team, also noted that the US spends $700bn on the military.

Washington already holds quite a few parades, including some with military participation that are held on Memorial Day and the Fourth of July. But those patriotic processions typically involve marching bands and uniformed elements, not the grand display of military hardware that Trump envisions.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17942 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 08:49:03
September 19 2017 08:43 GMT
#175423
On September 19 2017 04:14 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2017 04:04 xDaunt wrote:
On September 19 2017 04:01 GreenHorizons wrote:
On September 19 2017 03:57 xDaunt wrote:
On September 19 2017 03:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
In the chain you see that you had different requirements for what made something racist before you advanced this more recent argument.

It looks to me like I'm using your definition of racism, not advancing one of my own.

Regardless, I'm not seeing that I said then that is materially different from what I am saying now. If I have done anything, I have expanded my definition of racism, which you should be pleased with.


In the chain you say that the "Websters" definition of racism is one you accept, until now.

I do, but you asked why I would think otherwise, it's because you and others accepted/advocated a different definition of racism several months ago.

But you changed the definition of racist so you could have a white person be racist without being a white supremacist, which is pretty ridiculous to anyone paying attention.

You do understand that the definition of racism that I am advocating now is broader than the one that I advanced before and necessarily includes the previous definition, right?

And why exactly are you objecting to the idea that someone can be a racist without being a racial supremacist? I really don't get what the hang up is.

I got sniped. But oh well.

To answer his hang up, it's that you changed the definition so that the two are exclusive of each other. It fits the narrative being ponied about. When we were discussing race issues, we had very clear and cut lines in the sand. Then you started shifting the line and blurring it, so that the definition was changed and that it was removed entirely. Now, we're discussing two separate issues instead of one; the supposition that white supremacists are racists. You can be prejudice and not think your race is superior. But you cannot be racist and not a racial supremacist. It doesn't make sense.

I can, and I am.

I definitely don't believe my race is somehow superior. I do get called out on racist comments, leading me to believe I am at the very best, insensitive to racial issues and thus a bit racist myself.

E: oh, and just to be absolutely clear: to be a white supremacist, you obviously do have to be a racist, and Vox Day is very obviously both. Also, I believe xDaunts hilarious argument was that Vox Day, as pasty-faced a white dude as anybody has ever seen, cannot be a white supremacist, because he's not white (what is it, 1/16th Cherokee?).
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19573 Posts
September 19 2017 08:53 GMT
#175424
Who dafuk is Vox Day?
Freeeeeeedom
bigmetazltank
Profile Joined September 2017
34 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 08:56:31
September 19 2017 08:55 GMT
#175425
Video game designer, sci-fi writer, nationalist, anti-vaxxer and alt-right activist.
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8960 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 08:56:59
September 19 2017 08:56 GMT
#175426
On September 19 2017 17:43 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2017 04:14 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On September 19 2017 04:04 xDaunt wrote:
On September 19 2017 04:01 GreenHorizons wrote:
On September 19 2017 03:57 xDaunt wrote:
On September 19 2017 03:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
In the chain you see that you had different requirements for what made something racist before you advanced this more recent argument.

It looks to me like I'm using your definition of racism, not advancing one of my own.

Regardless, I'm not seeing that I said then that is materially different from what I am saying now. If I have done anything, I have expanded my definition of racism, which you should be pleased with.


In the chain you say that the "Websters" definition of racism is one you accept, until now.

I do, but you asked why I would think otherwise, it's because you and others accepted/advocated a different definition of racism several months ago.

But you changed the definition of racist so you could have a white person be racist without being a white supremacist, which is pretty ridiculous to anyone paying attention.

You do understand that the definition of racism that I am advocating now is broader than the one that I advanced before and necessarily includes the previous definition, right?

And why exactly are you objecting to the idea that someone can be a racist without being a racial supremacist? I really don't get what the hang up is.

I got sniped. But oh well.

To answer his hang up, it's that you changed the definition so that the two are exclusive of each other. It fits the narrative being ponied about. When we were discussing race issues, we had very clear and cut lines in the sand. Then you started shifting the line and blurring it, so that the definition was changed and that it was removed entirely. Now, we're discussing two separate issues instead of one; the supposition that white supremacists are racists. You can be prejudice and not think your race is superior. But you cannot be racist and not a racial supremacist. It doesn't make sense.

I can, and I am.

I definitely don't believe my race is somehow superior. I do get called out on racist comments, leading me to believe I am at the very best, insensitive to racial issues and thus a bit racist myself.

E: oh, and just to be absolutely clear: to be a white supremacist, you obviously do have to be a racist, and Vox Day is very obviously both. Also, I believe xDaunts hilarious argument was that Vox Day, as pasty-faced a white dude as anybody has ever seen, cannot be a white supremacist, because he's not white (what is it, 1/16th Cherokee?).

A few after this, xDaunt clarified his remarks for me. We figured out where the issue was (semantics).

I'm prejudice myself to an extent and I'm sure everyone is. It's how you survive in the world. But you can't be pro whatever your race is and claim to not be a racist. It's contradictory.
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 09:06:47
September 19 2017 09:05 GMT
#175427
On September 19 2017 15:28 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2017 15:07 Aquanim wrote:
Does anybody here disagree with my assertion that the claim that the Obama administration wiretapped anybody related to the Trump campaign because he was a political opponent has no known basis in fact?

Does it really matter why though? If Obama knew that Trumps campaign was being wiretapped indirectly thats a huge conflict of interest. That people in the media refuted, or were told to the effect that they refuted the fact of, that anyone was wiretapped is bad That it was done because he was a political opponent is subjective and opinion based. Its not Watergate where nixon specifically wanted to spy on the dems bad but its still pretty bad and would taint Obama's "practically scandal free" legacy.

I think it matters a lot if you tap someone clandistinely for being a political opponent or tap someone through official channels because a judge is convinced he is so damn shady that it is necessary, yes.

It's like a mafia sting and then Trump being outraged he was taped having a conversation with some mobsters. I'd say the bigger problem would be Trump talking to the mobsters in the first place.
Neosteel Enthusiast
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21555 Posts
September 19 2017 09:25 GMT
#175428
On September 19 2017 18:05 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2017 15:28 Sermokala wrote:
On September 19 2017 15:07 Aquanim wrote:
Does anybody here disagree with my assertion that the claim that the Obama administration wiretapped anybody related to the Trump campaign because he was a political opponent has no known basis in fact?

Does it really matter why though? If Obama knew that Trumps campaign was being wiretapped indirectly thats a huge conflict of interest. That people in the media refuted, or were told to the effect that they refuted the fact of, that anyone was wiretapped is bad That it was done because he was a political opponent is subjective and opinion based. Its not Watergate where nixon specifically wanted to spy on the dems bad but its still pretty bad and would taint Obama's "practically scandal free" legacy.

I think it matters a lot if you tap someone clandistinely for being a political opponent or tap someone through official channels because a judge is convinced he is so damn shady that it is necessary, yes.

It's like a mafia sting and then Trump being outraged he was taped having a conversation with some mobsters. I'd say the bigger problem would be Trump talking to the mobsters in the first place.

Yep. The same thing has actually happened in Italy where their PM (Berlusconi) has been caught on tape a bunch of times because he kept calling Mafiosi who were being wiretapped.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
bigmetazltank
Profile Joined September 2017
34 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 12:01:34
September 19 2017 11:58 GMT
#175429
On September 19 2017 18:05 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2017 15:28 Sermokala wrote:
On September 19 2017 15:07 Aquanim wrote:
Does anybody here disagree with my assertion that the claim that the Obama administration wiretapped anybody related to the Trump campaign because he was a political opponent has no known basis in fact?

Does it really matter why though? If Obama knew that Trumps campaign was being wiretapped indirectly thats a huge conflict of interest. That people in the media refuted, or were told to the effect that they refuted the fact of, that anyone was wiretapped is bad That it was done because he was a political opponent is subjective and opinion based. Its not Watergate where nixon specifically wanted to spy on the dems bad but its still pretty bad and would taint Obama's "practically scandal free" legacy.

I think it matters a lot if you tap someone clandistinely for being a political opponent or tap someone through official channels because a judge is convinced he is so damn shady that it is necessary, yes.

It's like a mafia sting and then Trump being outraged he was taped having a conversation with some mobsters. I'd say the bigger problem would be Trump talking to the mobsters in the first place.


That's exactly it and it actually infuriates me that American conservatives in this thread don't seem to see the difference. The conservatives in Australia seem to get the difference so I dunno what's going on here. Either they actually can't see the difference you highlight in your post, which is extremely concerning in so many ways, or they're being intentionally obtuse and trying to run some stupid "but Obama" angle.

Paul Manafort wasn't some day to day campaign manager who got some dirt dug up because Obama apparently kept wiretaps on his party's political opponent to help Hillary Clinton. The intelligence community and even the media had an idea who this guy was. In fact, the whole Ukraine u-turn combined with Trump associating himself with Manafort and Flynn so strongly are the reasons why the Russian collusion allegations are even a relatively reasonable allegation.

The fact that Trump associated with these people, despite being warned and told that these people may have loyalties other than the United States of America, should be the problem here and not the fact that the DoJ chose to keep tabs on these people.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3187 Posts
September 19 2017 12:56 GMT
#175430
On September 19 2017 13:13 Danglars wrote:
I was looking for this quote comparison since Nevuk linked her recent interview. It really is simply amazing what losing an election will do about your fears for Democracy.


In other news, the wiretapping charge by Trump that led to much guffawing was actually proved true recently.

Show nested quote +
Washington (CNN)US investigators wiretapped former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort under secret court orders before and after the election, sources tell CNN, an extraordinary step involving a high-ranking campaign official now at the center of the Russia meddling probe.

The government snooping continued into early this year, including a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Donald Trump.
Some of the intelligence collected includes communications that sparked concerns among investigators that Manafort had encouraged the Russians to help with the campaign, according to three sources familiar with the investigation. Two of these sources, however, cautioned that the evidence is not conclusive.

Special counsel Robert Mueller's team, which is leading the investigation into Russia's involvement in the election, has been provided details of these communications.
A secret order authorized by the court that handles the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) began after Manafort became the subject of an FBI investigation that began in 2014. It centered on work done by a group of Washington consulting firms for Ukraine's former ruling party, the sources told CNN.
The surveillance was discontinued at some point last year for lack of evidence, according to one of the sources.
The FBI then restarted the surveillance after obtaining a new FISA warrant that extended at least into early this year.
Sources say the second warrant was part of the FBI's efforts to investigate ties between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives. Such warrants require the approval of top Justice Department and FBI officials, and the FBI must provide the court with information showing suspicion that the subject of the warrant may be acting as an agent of a foreign power.

CNN

Tweet in question:


Trump's campaign chairman was under wiretaps before and after the 2016 election.

The dates on when the first warrant ended and when the second one started aren't clear as far as I can tell. If those dates don't include when Manafort was on the campaign Trump's claim is still unambiguously false; even if they do, his claim is still shaky at best. If this is what he was referring to, why didn't he clarify when asked? Because the details of Manafort seem to clearly justify such a wiretap, and the point of Trump's tweet was to spur outrage that "Obama decided to wiretap Trump." At which the claim is still intentionally deceptive, even if it winds up being narrowly correct (which, again, isn't even proven by these facts).

Here's a better question, though: why are you so eager to resurrect and vindicate random things Trump said? What does it change? A lot of your posting lately fits this pattern of reminding us of something Trump said that we thought was dumb, then trying to show that new evidence suggests it's not quite as dumb as we thought. Posting about antifa violence to justify the "both sides" comment. Posting about a shroud over a Jefferson statue to justify the "next it's Washington and Jefferson" bit. Now retconning the wiretap claim.

I don't find these terribly persuasive, but that's just my opinion. My question is, what would it even prove? If we thought Trump lied about 1000 things, but he actually lied about 999, what does it change? Iirc you self-identify as an "anti-anti-Trumper" because you also think Trump is mendacious and incompetent; does any of this move the needle for you on switching back to pro-Trump?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 19 2017 12:58 GMT
#175431
The Caribbean island nation of Dominica sustained “mind boggling” damage from Hurricane Maria, its prime minister said on Tuesday, after the storm hit with maximum sustained winds of nearly 160 miles per hour that ripped roofs off buildings, including his own home.

There was no immediate word of deaths or injuries on the island from Maria, the third in a string of devastating hurricanes to sweep through the region in recent weeks.

The National Hurricane Center said Tuesday morning that Maria, now moving away from Dominica, had regained Category 5 strength, after briefly dropping to Category 4. The “potentially catastrophic” storm is expected to approach the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico on Tuesday night and Wednesday, the center said.

Roosevelt Skerrit, Dominica’s prime minister, wrote on Facebook earlier Tuesday that the island nation of 72,000 had experienced “widespread devastation,” based on initial reports.

“So far we have lost all what money can buy and replace,” he said. “My greatest fear for the morning is that we will wake to news of serious physical injury and possible deaths as a result of likely landslides triggered by persistent rains.”

Mr. Skerrit said that “the winds have swept away the roofs of almost every person I have spoken to or otherwise made contact with.” On Monday night, he had said on Facebook that he had to be rescued after the storm tore the roof off his own official residence.

He said the island’s immediate priority was to rescue people who were trapped and provide medical care to the injured. “I am honestly not preoccupied with physical damage at this time, because it is devastating … indeed, mind boggling,” Mr. Skerrit said.

The storm had strengthened to Category 5, with maximum sustained winds near 160 m.p.h., hours before the eye passed over Dominica. Just over a day earlier it had been a tropical storm, but wind speeds had increased by 90 m.p.h. within 27 hours, the National Weather Service said.

After hitting Dominica, Maria weakened to Category 4 and continued northwest, with the eye of the storm passing south of the French island of Guadeloupe, before regaining strength.

Guadeloupe, which avoided the worst of Hurricane Irma, has been a staging ground for the regional aid response to that storm. It has also been a refuge for people from St. Martin, an island that was hit hard by Irma two weeks ago. So the arrival of Maria could compound the difficulties involved in recovering from the disasters.

The storm appeared to have knocked out Dominica’s radio stations, and Mr. Skerrit’s Facebook feed became the most prominent source of news about the storm’s arrival.

“Rough! Rough! Rough!” he wrote as the storm hit.

“I am at the complete mercy of the hurricane,” he said before he announced he had been rescued. “House is flooding.”

He said Tuesday morning that it was too early to discuss the condition of the island’s airports and seaports, but he expected them to be inoperable for a few days. He asked “friendly nations and organizations” to provide a helicopter so that he could survey the damage.

“We will need help, my friend, we will need help of all kinds,” he said.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 13:29:51
September 19 2017 13:28 GMT
#175432
Can we please leave the "Trump's deranged tweet about wiretaps was correct" stuff to t_d? Trump was relying on a report by Judge Nap that Trump Tower itself was wiretapped. No, Judge Nap did not get an exclusive scoop about Manafort being wiretapped. Trump's tweet says that Trump's own Trump Tower wires were tapped for political purposes. Trump was very clearly not talking about Manafort's cell phone.

But I guess it is a somewhat useful deflection to talk about Trump's tweet being vindicated instead of the fact that his campaign manager was under surveillance by the FBI. So I'll give you that.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 13:46:34
September 19 2017 13:41 GMT
#175433
To me this boils down to, "See, I was right! I was under FBI investigation!"! Kind of an odd thing to be bragging about, all things considered. It's kind of like bragging that your test for gonorrhea came back positive.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13818 Posts
September 19 2017 13:51 GMT
#175434
On September 19 2017 22:41 ticklishmusic wrote:
To me this boils down to, "See, I was right! I was under FBI investigation!"! Kind of an odd thing to be bragging about, all things considered. It's kind of like bragging that your test for gonorrhea came back positive.

Well when you say something and everyone tells you that you're wrong and you're paranoid before turning out that somehow you were right all along its different.

I don't see how Trump hireing manafort is a point. Again reality doesn't matter in this case much like most of Hillary's campaign its the perception that it creates at the end of the day when someone's campaign is beign wiretapped indirectly. Facts of the why can't really change that until the DOJ actualy comes out with something.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 19 2017 14:03 GMT
#175435
Yeah in a reality doesn't matter sense, Trump was right. But it's still like admitting his gonorrhea test was positive.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 19 2017 14:03 GMT
#175436
But was Trump actually right all along in the sense he had knowledge of what was going on, or alternatively was it him reposting something from some corner of the alt right web which happened to coincide with reality? because you don't get points when the final answer is somehow right but most of the math is wrong.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Elroi
Profile Joined August 2009
Sweden5588 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 14:05:30
September 19 2017 14:04 GMT
#175437
That is like saying you have been thrown in jail by Obama just because you visited some one who was in a jail during the Obama administration. I guess you could claim that in the first case you'd know you were in jail, but you didn't know about the wire tap in this case. But then again you should probably not hire the "Torture Lobbyist" in the first place (while bragging that you surround yourself by the best people)...
"To all eSports fans, I want to be remembered as a progamer who can make something out of nothing, and someone who always does his best. I think that is the right way of living, and I'm always doing my best to follow that." - Jaedong. /watch?v=jfghAzJqAp0
Tachion
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada8573 Posts
September 19 2017 14:04 GMT
#175438
On September 19 2017 22:41 ticklishmusic wrote:
To me this boils down to, "See, I was right! I was under FBI investigation!"! Kind of an odd thing to be bragging about, all things considered. It's kind of like bragging that your test for gonorrhea came back positive.

Except in this case there is absolutely nothing that they were right about.
Obama didn't order any tapping of Trump or Trump tower, which was the entire premise behind the tweets. There is no evidence that Trump or Trump tower were the targets of the tap. The FBI, NSA, and DoJ all refuted Trump's claims, yet certain people are just ignoring all the shit Trump got blatantly wrong and are making leaps of faith into what he might have meant because maybe, just maybe, they weren't complete fools for buying into it the first time.
i was driving down the road this november eve and spotted a hitchhiker walking down the street. i pulled over and saw that it was only a tree. i uprooted it and put it in my trunk. do trees like marshmallow peeps? cause that's all i have and will have.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 14:06:22
September 19 2017 14:06 GMT
#175439
i will amend my STD analogy by saying "it's like claiming that you got AIDS from your ex, but instead you got gonorrhea from a "lady of the night". or something like that.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-19 14:08:15
September 19 2017 14:06 GMT
#175440
I do wish people (and there's more than one offender here) would stop making arguments about how X is bad, then when it is demonstrated that X wasn't bad at all they retreat to "oh but X has bad optics and that's what's important".

What X looks like is important - but by making the erroneous statement first, and then pretending that discussing the optics is in any way the same as discussing the reality, you confound discussion on both issues.
Prev 1 8770 8771 8772 8773 8774 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Road to EWC
14:55
DreamHack Dallas Final Playoffs
ewc_black3934
ComeBackTV 1630
RotterdaM527
SteadfastSC306
Rex251
CranKy Ducklings176
CosmosSc2 171
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 527
Fuzer 312
Hui .308
SteadfastSC 306
Rex 251
CosmosSc2 171
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 66732
Hyuk 1114
EffOrt 1000
actioN 857
Nal_rA 330
firebathero 287
ggaemo 234
Hyun 72
Mind 69
Mini 52
[ Show more ]
sSak 49
Barracks 45
zelot 34
Aegong 26
soO 20
HiyA 17
yabsab 15
Movie 12
Sacsri 12
Dota 2
Gorgc9242
qojqva2734
Dendi2380
XcaliburYe248
BabyKnight19
League of Legends
JimRising 111
Counter-Strike
byalli371
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1060
Mew2King120
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor639
Liquid`Hasu399
Other Games
B2W.Neo3860
FrodaN902
Mlord743
KnowMe184
ToD177
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH324
• Adnapsc2 5
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV446
League of Legends
• Jankos1974
Other Games
• Shiphtur25
Upcoming Events
BSL: ProLeague
1h 43m
Cross vs TT1
spx vs Hawk
JDConan vs TBD
Wardi Open
18h 43m
SOOP
1d 15h
NightMare vs Wayne
Replay Cast
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
HupCup
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
[ Show More ]
Online Event
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
2025 GSL S1
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
YSL S1
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.