• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:27
CET 21:27
KST 05:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)37
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BW General Discussion Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Which foreign pros are considered the best?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Provigil(modafinil) pills Cape Town+27 81 850 2816
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1691 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7310

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7308 7309 7310 7311 7312 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Artisreal
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany9235 Posts
April 09 2017 21:52 GMT
#146181
How can a rich white man attract more hate than a well educated, sympathetic black man?
In the US.

come fucking on!?
passive quaranstream fan
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14098 Posts
April 09 2017 22:33 GMT
#146182
On April 10 2017 06:17 zlefin wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we should lower the level of security given to presidents. How often does congress/others review the overall security level to decide if it's too high/low/about right?

You think congress should be able to lower the level of security given to people because of what they think or feel about their level of security? Surely you can't have actually thought that sentence out.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-09 22:34:37
April 09 2017 22:34 GMT
#146183
On April 10 2017 06:52 Artisreal wrote:
How can a rich white man attract more hate than a well educated, sympathetic black man?
In the US.

come fucking on!?

Turns out the majority of people aren't racist.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
April 09 2017 22:43 GMT
#146184
On April 10 2017 07:33 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 06:17 zlefin wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we should lower the level of security given to presidents. How often does congress/others review the overall security level to decide if it's too high/low/about right?

You think congress should be able to lower the level of security given to people because of what they think or feel about their level of security? Surely you can't have actually thought that sentence out.

you're being needlessly rude, and a total jerk with no justification, so I won't dignify that with any other response than you should be less rude.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45245 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-10 00:17:38
April 10 2017 00:16 GMT
#146185
On April 10 2017 04:21 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has said he had "no conversation" about Mexico paying for Donald Trump's border wall when he met the country's top diplomat.

In an interview with NBC News, Mr Tillerson was asked whether he made it clear the US expects Mexico to pay for the wall during his meeting with Mexico's Foreign Secretary Luis Videgaray.

"We had no conversation about that issue," the Secretary of State said.

"We have had very productive talks around actions that can be taken to slow and stem and discourage transmigration of people coming from central America through Mexico and entering the United States.

"And in fact, the level of immigration, illegal crossings from Mexico... has dropped dramatically.

"So I think Mexico is quite pleased and we've had a number of discussions with them on now we'll work together to make further progress."

During the US presidential election, Mr Trump promised Mexico would pay for his "big, beautiful wall."

When asked further about whether it was US policy to make Mexico pay for the wall, Mr Tillerson said: "It's just not part of our discussions between the foreign minister and myself.

"We were also talking to organise an even greater effort around transnational crime and counter-narcotics to stem the flow of narcotics that flow into the United States and the flow of weapons from the United States into Mexico that supports the cartels.

"So we're really focused on working at very high levels to address some of these problems and challenges that are really in the interest of both of our countries to make progress on."

There has been a huge drop in the number of people arrested crossing the Mexico border into the US since Mr Trump took office.

The Trump administration has sought to take credit for the decline, with the White House issuing a statement to say Mr Trump's "commitment to securing our border and supporting law enforcement is already showing results."

However, those working in shelters and experts on migration said it will take several more months to judge whether any drop-off is long lasting, and others think the real "Trump effect" was pushing fearful people to move up their journeys and get to the US before he took office.


Source


"And in fact, the level of immigration, illegal crossings from Mexico... has dropped dramatically."


Oh good, it looks like Trump's invisible border wall is making America great again. Surely everyone's heard that this wall was already built and paid by Mexicans, at Trump's request?

He should just announce that the wall has been built and Mexico paid for it. The Trump supporters will believe him anyway, and it's not like they'll be convinced by fact-checking. I'm actually not sure why Trump hasn't lied about its construction yet. Hell, he can drop the issue from further conversation, and the American taxpayers will save billions of dollars. Sounds win-win to me.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
BlueBird.
Profile Joined August 2008
United States3889 Posts
April 10 2017 00:22 GMT
#146186
I wouldn't be shocked if the border crossings dropped somewhat with change in policy from ice. It's probably over exaggerated but yeah it's within the realm of possibility.
Currently Playing: Android Netrunner, Gwent, Gloomhaven, Board Games
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
April 10 2017 00:47 GMT
#146187
Illegal immigration before : "lol usa doesn't do shit, I know lots of people who did it and are now able to live there"
now: "we don't really know what the hell this orange dude is gonna do, he seems kinda reckless and it might actually be a risk"
Question.?
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-10 00:55:44
April 10 2017 00:54 GMT
#146188
I mean border-hopping illegal immigration has been on the decline for a while now. Not surprising negative rhetoric would hit it further.

That's a big reason so much of the substantive policy discussion about it has focused less on "how to stop it" and more "what to do about existing individuals/people overstaying visas or using other methods."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43532 Posts
April 10 2017 01:02 GMT
#146189
On April 10 2017 07:34 a_flayer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 06:52 Artisreal wrote:
How can a rich white man attract more hate than a well educated, sympathetic black man?
In the US.

come fucking on!?

Turns out the majority of people aren't racist.

Ah yes, because it's binary. People either want to kill all niggers or they're completely not racist. That's how it works. This has been your race relations update courtesy of a_flayer.

A terrible white man can still be less popular than a fantastic black man in a racist country if he's terrible enough.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43532 Posts
April 10 2017 01:03 GMT
#146190
On April 10 2017 09:47 biology]major wrote:
Illegal immigration before : "lol usa doesn't do shit, I know lots of people who did it and are now able to live there"
now: "we don't really know what the hell this orange dude is gonna do, he seems kinda reckless and it might actually be a risk"

Really?

What exactly has changed materially? These aren't people carefully weighing the pros and cons each day. These are people risking their lives already. You think the average illegal immigrant is carefully monitoring the political situation and judging what to do based upon the odds of various policies being passed?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-10 01:20:35
April 10 2017 01:17 GMT
#146191
On April 10 2017 10:03 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 09:47 biology]major wrote:
Illegal immigration before : "lol usa doesn't do shit, I know lots of people who did it and are now able to live there"
now: "we don't really know what the hell this orange dude is gonna do, he seems kinda reckless and it might actually be a risk"

Really?

What exactly has changed materially? These aren't people carefully weighing the pros and cons each day. These are people risking their lives already. You think the average illegal immigrant is carefully monitoring the political situation and judging what to do based upon the odds of various policies being passed?


Yes, the fear caused by donald trump's rhetoric alone, and his brashness in trying to push for controversial policies like the muslim ban, and possibly, maybe one day, who knows when, or if, deporting families of illegal immigrants is a powerful deterrent. Even the most uneducated illegal immigrant coming from mexico knows what trump is about (maybe they think he's crazy, brash, or an orange maniac), even if they don't know that ICE is getting a funding boost, or that mexico is going to pay for the wall (lol). The rhetoric alone, has caused the stock markets to rise and deterred illegals. Ofcourse if he doesn't deliver, rhetoric won't be enough, and things will reverse back to pre-trump.
Question.?
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-10 01:25:03
April 10 2017 01:23 GMT
#146192
Are there hard numbers to back up all this talk about shifts in illegal immigration patterns? mostly it's too early to have good data iirc.
at laest on the numbers that ACTUALLY matter, unlike the normal trite bs politicians talk about that has no real validity.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14098 Posts
April 10 2017 01:33 GMT
#146193
On April 10 2017 07:43 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 07:33 Sermokala wrote:
On April 10 2017 06:17 zlefin wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we should lower the level of security given to presidents. How often does congress/others review the overall security level to decide if it's too high/low/about right?

You think congress should be able to lower the level of security given to people because of what they think or feel about their level of security? Surely you can't have actually thought that sentence out.

you're being needlessly rude, and a total jerk with no justification, so I won't dignify that with any other response than you should be less rude.

Bro you wondered if it would be good if congress was in control over the protection of the president. Its the dumbest thing said in this thread in a while and should be responded to with a slap to the head. Its not needlessly rude and with your record thats a pretty lame reason to end the conversation.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4381 Posts
April 10 2017 01:35 GMT
#146194
Bernie Sanders : "Yes we have to get rid of Assad but we cannot do it unilaterally"

https://mobile.twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/851069274001158144

Video embedded in tweet, see link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-10 01:54:01
April 10 2017 01:49 GMT
#146195
Should have taken the Hillary Clinton "let's fuck up Syria but do it as quietly as possible" approach. Too bad it's too loud now to do it right.

Discussion on the legality of the strike based on US and UN rules: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/us/politics/military-force-presidential-power.html (tl;dr version: dubious legality but no one gives a fuck).
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
April 10 2017 02:46 GMT
#146196
On April 10 2017 10:33 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 07:43 zlefin wrote:
On April 10 2017 07:33 Sermokala wrote:
On April 10 2017 06:17 zlefin wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we should lower the level of security given to presidents. How often does congress/others review the overall security level to decide if it's too high/low/about right?

You think congress should be able to lower the level of security given to people because of what they think or feel about their level of security? Surely you can't have actually thought that sentence out.

you're being needlessly rude, and a total jerk with no justification, so I won't dignify that with any other response than you should be less rude.

Bro you wondered if it would be good if congress was in control over the protection of the president. Its the dumbest thing said in this thread in a while and should be responded to with a slap to the head. Its not needlessly rude and with your record thats a pretty lame reason to end the conversation.

So who should be in charge of budgeting the security bill then? Because right now it seems like it's a giant blank check.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14098 Posts
April 10 2017 02:52 GMT
#146197
On April 10 2017 11:46 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 10:33 Sermokala wrote:
On April 10 2017 07:43 zlefin wrote:
On April 10 2017 07:33 Sermokala wrote:
On April 10 2017 06:17 zlefin wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we should lower the level of security given to presidents. How often does congress/others review the overall security level to decide if it's too high/low/about right?

You think congress should be able to lower the level of security given to people because of what they think or feel about their level of security? Surely you can't have actually thought that sentence out.

you're being needlessly rude, and a total jerk with no justification, so I won't dignify that with any other response than you should be less rude.

Bro you wondered if it would be good if congress was in control over the protection of the president. Its the dumbest thing said in this thread in a while and should be responded to with a slap to the head. Its not needlessly rude and with your record thats a pretty lame reason to end the conversation.

So who should be in charge of budgeting the security bill then? Because right now it seems like it's a giant blank check.

It is a blank check and any requests for more funding will go through or there would be heaps of obvious trouble. It's a legitimate political football but let's not get ahead of ourselves and take nonstarters like limiting or lowering security for heads of state seriously.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
April 10 2017 03:11 GMT
#146198
On April 10 2017 11:52 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2017 11:46 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On April 10 2017 10:33 Sermokala wrote:
On April 10 2017 07:43 zlefin wrote:
On April 10 2017 07:33 Sermokala wrote:
On April 10 2017 06:17 zlefin wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we should lower the level of security given to presidents. How often does congress/others review the overall security level to decide if it's too high/low/about right?

You think congress should be able to lower the level of security given to people because of what they think or feel about their level of security? Surely you can't have actually thought that sentence out.

you're being needlessly rude, and a total jerk with no justification, so I won't dignify that with any other response than you should be less rude.

Bro you wondered if it would be good if congress was in control over the protection of the president. Its the dumbest thing said in this thread in a while and should be responded to with a slap to the head. Its not needlessly rude and with your record thats a pretty lame reason to end the conversation.

So who should be in charge of budgeting the security bill then? Because right now it seems like it's a giant blank check.

It is a blank check and any requests for more funding will go through or there would be heaps of obvious trouble. It's a legitimate political football but let's not get ahead of ourselves and take nonstarters like limiting or lowering security for heads of state seriously.

So you don't think any governing body should be able to say "no more weekly Resort vacations that are costing millions of dollars"?
Average means I'm better than half of you.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 10 2017 03:14 GMT
#146199
Taser International, the company that manufactures stun guns and body cameras, announced this week that it was launching a program to provide free body cameras to “every police officer in America.”

The company, now called Axon, said it will also provide supporting hardware, software, data storage, training, and support to police departments free of cost for one year.

It’s unclear how the offer will affect the Baltimore City and Baltimore County police departments, which have already signed multimillion-dollar contracts with the company to equip their officers with body cameras.

“We are continuing to explore those options with Axon,” said Baltimore Police spokesman Detective Jeremy Silbert.

An Axon spokesman said the deal is available to all departments, including those with existing contracts with competitors and current Axon customers that might want to upgrade to newer cameras.

“This will apply to any and all agencies that want to test and evaluate,” spokesman Steve Tuttle wrote in an email.

For existing customers, such as Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Tuttle wrote, “we are also offering current customers to get sufficient discounts that are the equivalent or better to get a free year of Evidence.com [digital evidence management solution]. We knew this offer was coming and we made appropriate accommodations.”

Baltimore signed an $11.6 million contract with Taser to equip 2,500 officers with body cameras by January 2018. The city chose Taser after a pilot program in which the city tested body cameras on 150 officers from Taser, Atlantic Tactical Inc. and Brekford Corp. Nine others companies submitted proposals.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35166 Posts
April 10 2017 03:23 GMT
#146200
On April 10 2017 12:14 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
Taser International, the company that manufactures stun guns and body cameras, announced this week that it was launching a program to provide free body cameras to “every police officer in America.”

The company, now called Axon, said it will also provide supporting hardware, software, data storage, training, and support to police departments free of cost for one year.

It’s unclear how the offer will affect the Baltimore City and Baltimore County police departments, which have already signed multimillion-dollar contracts with the company to equip their officers with body cameras.

“We are continuing to explore those options with Axon,” said Baltimore Police spokesman Detective Jeremy Silbert.

An Axon spokesman said the deal is available to all departments, including those with existing contracts with competitors and current Axon customers that might want to upgrade to newer cameras.

“This will apply to any and all agencies that want to test and evaluate,” spokesman Steve Tuttle wrote in an email.

For existing customers, such as Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Tuttle wrote, “we are also offering current customers to get sufficient discounts that are the equivalent or better to get a free year of Evidence.com [digital evidence management solution]. We knew this offer was coming and we made appropriate accommodations.”

Baltimore signed an $11.6 million contract with Taser to equip 2,500 officers with body cameras by January 2018. The city chose Taser after a pilot program in which the city tested body cameras on 150 officers from Taser, Atlantic Tactical Inc. and Brekford Corp. Nine others companies submitted proposals.


Source

That would be pretty awesome. I don't know of any downside to cops having body cams.
Prev 1 7308 7309 7310 7311 7312 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 33m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 342
UpATreeSC 198
ProTech141
SKillous 121
SpeCial 109
JuggernautJason102
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 74
Dewaltoss 41
Dota 2
Dendi777
420jenkins299
syndereN210
capcasts2
League of Legends
C9.Mang0156
Counter-Strike
fl0m3718
Fnx 1453
pashabiceps836
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor153
Other Games
Grubby3519
FrodaN1345
Beastyqt927
B2W.Neo522
Liquid`Hasu221
QueenE162
Harstem153
ArmadaUGS134
Pyrionflax102
Mew2King81
Livibee73
ZombieGrub23
ViBE16
minikerr11
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 15
• Reevou 4
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4058
• WagamamaTV412
League of Legends
• Nemesis5377
• imaqtpie2303
• TFBlade1292
• Shiphtur446
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
13h 33m
HomeStory Cup
1d 15h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
HomeStory Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-27
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.