• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:56
CEST 00:56
KST 07:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!10Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)77Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format16[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!18
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" [D] Wireframe Casting Removed
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion HORROR STARCRAFT MOVIE BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Famous was FlaSh before his Debut? screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! General RTS Discussion Thread Path of Exile ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Role of Gaming on Mental Hea…
TrAiDoS
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6159 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6931

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6929 6930 6931 6932 6933 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
February 20 2017 23:53 GMT
#138601
Bill Maher picked a hell of a time to be buddy with Milo.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14160 Posts
February 20 2017 23:54 GMT
#138602
Wow another celebrity downed by pedophilia. I guess people really do lose perspective after they get power.

I'm in corn country right now and there are wind turbines for days. It might just be the best thing to happen to farmers after ethanol.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 21 2017 00:11 GMT
#138603
not fond of ethanol. too much wasteful subsidies, not a very good source for it from what i've read. agricultural lobbies strong.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 21 2017 00:47 GMT
#138604
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
February 21 2017 00:49 GMT
#138605
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy.

What exactly about this controversy is "faux"?
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 21 2017 00:52 GMT
#138606
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.

is the bench really so thin that you can't find someone better than milo to do the job?
that seems doubtful.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
February 21 2017 00:52 GMT
#138607
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.


so let me get this straight, you're defending pedophilia because of your fight against liberalism? What the fuck happened to you, did a fat liberal kid beat you up in high school? You've completely gone off the deep end

User was warned for this post
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-21 00:59:13
February 21 2017 00:58 GMT
#138608
13-16 isn't even paedophilia, it's hebephilia if it's a philia at all.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
February 21 2017 01:00 GMT
#138609
Milo laughed off sexual abuse by priests of 13 year old minors, in that context pedophilia is common parlance as we're clearly talking about child abuse and rape.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 21 2017 01:01 GMT
#138610
On February 21 2017 09:52 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.


so let me get this straight, you're defending pedophilia because of your fight against liberalism? What the fuck happened to you, did a fat liberal kid beat you up in high school? You've completely gone off the deep end

Not that I'm in favor of these relationships, but adults having sex with teenagers isn't the same as adults having sex with the pre-pubescent. Have you seen the sexual activity rates among high school students? Like others have pointed out, the policy considerations behind age of consent laws and how they apply socially and individually are complicated. Dismissing what Milo said as pure pedophilia is just stupid.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States46232 Posts
February 21 2017 01:01 GMT
#138611
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.


1. What about the controversy is faux?

2. Why is Milo so important to the conservative cause? What does he bring to the table, exactly? I rarely see him even talking about anything besides hating on groups of people.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 21 2017 01:10 GMT
#138612
On February 21 2017 09:58 a_flayer wrote:
13-16 isn't even paedophilia, it's hebephilia if it's a philia at all.

indeed, that is true properly speaking. unfortunately the colloquial lingo does not match up with the formal definitions, and misses the useful distinction.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
February 21 2017 01:11 GMT
#138613
On the morning of Feb. 12, wind power provided 52.1 percent of the electricity for the 14-state grid known as the Southwest Power Pool (SPP). This is a significant milestone for wind, which has never before provided a majority of power for any U.S. grid, according to SPP.

SPP is responsible for 60,000 miles of power lines running from North Dakota and Montana to Texas, New Mexico and Louisiana. Wind generates about 15 percent of the electricity in the SPP region and is third behind coal and natural gas.

The February 52.1 percent wind-penetration beat the April 2016 record of 49.2 percent. Wind-penetration is a measure of the grid's electrical total load served by wind.

"Ten years ago, we thought hitting even a 25 percent wind-penetration level would be extremely challenging and any more than that would pose serious threats to reliability," Vice President of Operations Bruce Rew said in an SPP statement. Rew explained SPP can now reliably manage more than 50 percent wind-penetration and that they have not yet reached their "ceiling."

American Wind Energy Association's Greg Alvarez celebrated the news in a blog post. "Records like these resonate, because they demonstrate wind energy can play a key role in an affordable, reliable, diversified energy mix," he said. "That creates a stronger system, and helps keep more money in the pockets of families and businesses."

In the early 2000s, SPP wind power provided less than 400 megawatts (MW) and now provides 16,000 MW. A single MW is usually able to power around 1,000 homes, Climate Central explained.

SPP has achieved this wind power milestone because of its enormous power generation footprint, which covers nearly 550,000 square miles. If the upper Great Plains is not windy one day, SPP "can deploy resources waiting in the Midwest and Southwest to make up any sudden deficits," Rew said.

Since 2007, SPP has spent more than $10 billion on high-voltage transmission infrastructure with a focus on connecting "rural, isolated wind farms to population centers hundreds of miles away," the organization said.

In 2015, 39 states harnessed electricity from utility-scale wind projects, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Texas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Kansas and California produced the most wind energy and about 50 percent of the total for U.S. wind production.

In 2016, wind power was the largest U.S. source of renewable electric capacity and is now the country's fourth-largest energy source.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3304 Posts
February 21 2017 01:24 GMT
#138614
On February 21 2017 10:01 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 09:52 Nyxisto wrote:
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.


so let me get this straight, you're defending pedophilia because of your fight against liberalism? What the fuck happened to you, did a fat liberal kid beat you up in high school? You've completely gone off the deep end

Not that I'm in favor of these relationships, but adults having sex with teenagers isn't the same as adults having sex with the pre-pubescent. Have you seen the sexual activity rates among high school students? Like others have pointed out, the policy considerations behind age of consent laws and how they apply socially and individually are complicated. Dismissing what Milo said as pure pedophilia is just stupid.

So should Milo go pick up his NAMBLA membership card? And if he did would that, at least, be qualification for disavowing him? Because I'm struggling to think of what else could be disqualifying if not advocating for adults having sex with 13yo's, whether you wanna call that pedophilia or not.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States46232 Posts
February 21 2017 01:27 GMT
#138615
On February 21 2017 10:01 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 09:52 Nyxisto wrote:
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.


so let me get this straight, you're defending pedophilia because of your fight against liberalism? What the fuck happened to you, did a fat liberal kid beat you up in high school? You've completely gone off the deep end

Not that I'm in favor of these relationships, but adults having sex with teenagers isn't the same as adults having sex with the pre-pubescent. Have you seen the sexual activity rates among high school students? Like others have pointed out, the policy considerations behind age of consent laws and how they apply socially and individually are complicated. Dismissing what Milo said as pure pedophilia is just stupid.


"Teenagers" is a pretty broad word though too for this kind of discussion, because sleeping with a 13 year old as an adult is way different than sleeping with an 18 year old.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-21 01:41:33
February 21 2017 01:31 GMT
#138616
On February 21 2017 10:00 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo laughed off sexual abuse by priests of 13 year old minors, in that context pedophilia is common parlance as we're clearly talking about child abuse and rape.

I'm basically taking the side of Liquid'Drone on this matter and using the distinction between the two as the reasoning. Puberty and the path to sexual maturity is a thing and it's important to note that. Beyond that, I dislike what I see as a bit of a manic witch hunt surrounding "pedophilia" (in quotes to highlight the muddled distinction) because it turns into this sort of stuff (in part, I think, as a result of the removal of that distinction):

http://globalnews.ca/news/2911629/rcmp-asks-vigilante-pedophile-hunters-to-leave-law-enforcement-to-the-pros/?sf34701422=1

Also, I hate the discussion of this one person. Who cares. He doesn't determine policy or invade countries all willy nilly.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
February 21 2017 01:39 GMT
#138617
On February 21 2017 09:47 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote:
Big mistake for CPAC.


Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.

I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.

No, CPAC was right to invite Milo, and they should have kept him rather than get bowled over by this faux controversy. His comments basically distill down to having the age of consent somewhere between 13 and 16 is fine. The argument for that isn't exactly outrageous.

Like I tell my Never-Trumper friends, Milo is too important to the conservative cause to dismiss or cast aside. Even though he is more libertarian than social conservative, he has done more to roll back the liberal cultural stranglehold than anyone in recent memory -- particularly among younger folks.


i knew you were okay with trump's comments about pussy grabbing, this isnt too far of a stretch i suppose.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
February 21 2017 01:40 GMT
#138618
The lies are starting to catch up and go over the top...

President Trump’s personal lawyer and a former business associate met privately in New York City last month with a member of the Ukrainian parliament to discuss a peace plan for that country that could give Russia long-term control over territory it seized in 2014 and lead to the lifting of sanctions against Moscow.

The meeting with Andrii V. Artemenko, the Ukrainian politician, involved Michael Cohen, a Trump Organisation lawyer since 2007, and Felix Sater, a former business partner who worked on real estate projects with Trump’s company.

The occurrence of the meeting, first reported Sunday by the New York Times, suggests that some in the region aligned with Russia have been seeking to use Trump business associates as an informal conduit to a new president who has signaled a desire to forge warmer relations with Russia. The discussion took place amid increasingly intense scrutiny of the ties between Trump’s team and Russia, as well as escalating investigations on Capitol Hill of the determination by U.S. intelligence agencies that the Kremlin intervened in last year’s election to help Trump.

The Times reported that Cohen said he left the proposal in a sealed envelope in the office of then-national security adviser Michael T. Flynn while visiting Trump in the White House. The meeting took place days before Flynn’s resignation last week following a report in The Washington Post that he had misled Vice President Pence about his discussions in December of election-related sanctions with the Russian ambassador to the United States.

Cohen, speaking with The Post on Sunday, acknowledged that the meeting took place and that he had left with the peace proposal in hand.

But Cohen said he did not take the envelope to the White House and did not discuss it with anyone. He called suggestions to the contrary “fake news.”

“I acknowledge that the brief meeting took place, but emphatically deny discussing this topic or delivering any documents to the White House and/or General Flynn,” Cohen said. He said he told the Ukrainian official that he could send the proposal to Flynn by writing him at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

The Times stood by its story Sunday.

“Mr. Cohen told the Times in no uncertain terms that he delivered the Ukraine proposal to Michael Flynn’s office at the White House. Mr. Sater told the Times that Mr. Cohen had told him the same thing,” Matt Purdy, a deputy managing editor, said in a statement to the Post.

The Times reported that the proposal discussed at last month’s meeting included a plan to require the withdrawal of Russian forces from Eastern Ukraine. Then Ukrainian voters would decide in a referendum whether Crimea, the territory Russia seized in 2014, would be leased to Russia for a 50-year or a 100-year term. Artemenko said Russian leaders supported his proposal, the Times reported.

In Ukraine, Artemenko belongs to a bloc that opposes the nation’s current president, Petro O. Poroshenko. It is a group whose efforts were previously aided by Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign manager, who had advised Ukraine’s previous pro-Vladimir Putin president until his ouster amid public protests in 2014 — a development that sparked the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Manafort told the Post that he had “no role” in Artemenko’s initiative.

In his remarks at the Munich Security Conference, Vice President Mike Pence said that Russia must be held “accountable” regarding Ukraine and “demand they honour” the Minsk ceasefire agreement.

The back-channel discussions could disrupt delicate diplomacy between the new Trump administration and Poroshenko. Artemenko told the Times he hopes evidence of corruption by Poroshenko could be used to effect his ouster, a necessary first step to pushing his peace proposal.

Cohen said the meeting between the Ukrainian politician, Cohen and Sater lasted less than 15 minutes and took place at a New York hotel.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-21 01:43:04
February 21 2017 01:42 GMT
#138619
On February 21 2017 10:31 a_flayer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 10:00 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo laughed off sexual abuse by priests of 13 year old minors, in that context pedophilia is common parlance as we're clearly talking about child abuse and rape.

I'm basically taking the side of Liquid'Drone on this matter and using the distinction between the two as the reasoning. Puberty and the path to sexual maturity is a thing. Beyond that, I dislike what I see as a bit of a manic witch hunt surrounding "pedophilia" (in quotes to highlight the muddled distinction) because it turns into this sort of stuff:

http://globalnews.ca/news/2911629/rcmp-asks-vigilante-pedophile-hunters-to-leave-law-enforcement-to-the-pros/?sf34701422=1

Also, I hate the discussion of this one person. Who cares. He doesn't determine policy or invade countries all willy nilly.


A 18 year old sleeping with a 14 year old might be a "path to sexual maturity". A 13 year old sleeping with a 28 old is statutory rape and the priest thing he threw in even hints at the fact that he things child abuse is for some reason a joke. It's worth to care about this because this stuff seems to be leaking into the mainstream American news-cycle and it definitely does not belong there.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States46232 Posts
February 21 2017 01:50 GMT
#138620
On February 21 2017 10:42 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2017 10:31 a_flayer wrote:
On February 21 2017 10:00 Nyxisto wrote:
Milo laughed off sexual abuse by priests of 13 year old minors, in that context pedophilia is common parlance as we're clearly talking about child abuse and rape.

I'm basically taking the side of Liquid'Drone on this matter and using the distinction between the two as the reasoning. Puberty and the path to sexual maturity is a thing. Beyond that, I dislike what I see as a bit of a manic witch hunt surrounding "pedophilia" (in quotes to highlight the muddled distinction) because it turns into this sort of stuff:

http://globalnews.ca/news/2911629/rcmp-asks-vigilante-pedophile-hunters-to-leave-law-enforcement-to-the-pros/?sf34701422=1

Also, I hate the discussion of this one person. Who cares. He doesn't determine policy or invade countries all willy nilly.


A 18 year old sleeping with a 14 year old might be a "path to sexual maturity". A 13 year old sleeping with a 28 old is statutory rape and the priest thing he threw in even hints at the fact that he things child abuse is for some reason a joke. It's worth to care about this because this stuff seems to be leaking into the mainstream American news-cycle and it definitely does not belong there.


It's probably a defense mechanism; he was raped by a priest when he was 14. The priest was like 30 iirc.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Prev 1 6929 6930 6931 6932 6933 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 5m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ViBE221
BRAT_OK 78
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 474
League of Legends
JimRising 348
Trikslyr35
Counter-Strike
summit1g6720
minikerr52
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox489
PPMD21
Other Games
tarik_tv5839
Grubby2840
shahzam587
UpATreeSC298
ToD215
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
Other Games
gamesdonequick0
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 78
• RyuSc2 26
• Adnapsc2 14
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade633
Other Games
• imaqtpie927
• Scarra655
• Shiphtur300
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
1h 5m
The PondCast
11h 5m
Kung Fu Cup
12h 5m
OSC
1d 1h
CrankTV Team League
1d 12h
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
[ Show More ]
Online Event
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Proleague 2026-07-21
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.