|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On February 21 2017 03:30 LegalLord wrote: The greatest irony of this presidency so far? By all indications the people who voted Trump seem to be happy with what Trump has done. I don't see how that's ironic. i feel like i'm missing something.
|
|
|
|
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote: Big mistake for CPAC. could be. what do you estimate it will cost them in lost support/donations/clout/whatever compared to the alternative actions they could have taken?
|
Is it? Is it really? Having been aware of Milo for about three years, I think they got out right before people really started to find out exactly what kind of person he is.
|
Also the fact that a conservative website is the one that broke the story says it all.
|
If you say something people don't like and they get a whiff of it, you get disinvited from generic feelgood conferences. MORE NEWS AT 11!
|
On February 21 2017 03:58 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Also the fact that a conservative website is the one that broke the story says it all. So some conservatives think he's making them look bad? Perhaps they think he's too ostentatious? He fights one extreme with another and just ends up too polarizing for the moderates.
|
I think the chance of Milo making them look bad is 100%.
|
New York Senator Chuck Schumer has ramped up pressure on Donald Trump and the federal government to accept the mounting costs of protecting the president, the first family and their extended entourage.
Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, inserted himself into the debate on Sunday, saying it costs $500,000 per day for nearly 200 police officers to protect Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, which houses the Trump family business headquarters and serves as the home of the first lady, Melania Trump, and the couple’s son, Barron. The senator estimated the cost could rise to as much as $183m annually.
At current estimates, even a four-year Trump administration could be heading for a billion dollars in taxpayer-borne costs – an eight-fold increase of the $97m Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, estimates it cost to protect Barack Obama over the two terms of his administration.
The estimated costs of guarding Trump Tower have varied from $1m a day (during daily protests before the inauguration) to around $100,000 for the first lady and Barron, 10, who are staying in New York until at least the end of the school year.
Schumer urged Trump to include the costs in the federal budget, noting that New York City has only been reimbursed $7m of $35m requested for the cost of protecting the tower for the period between election day and the Inauguration.
“It’s simply unfair to have New York City taxpayers alone bear the burden of NYPD protection at Trump Tower. President Trump: this is your protection, so I challenge you to put these costs in your upcoming federal budget and make a commitment to reimburse New York City,” Schumer said during a press briefing at his Manhattan office.
In contrast, the cost of protecting former president Obama during his four trips to the city last year came to just $4.1m. The costs of protecting the Obama family home in Chicago over the same pre-inauguration period in his presidency was estimated at $2.2m.
Source
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Trump company should pay 2% of gross income for overhead related to Trump being president.
|
On February 21 2017 03:46 Nevuk wrote:![[image loading]](http://static01.mediaite.com/med/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/slack-imgs-1.jpg)
Basically they're trying to isolate and exile the alt-right/ Milo and Trump supporters? That's not an insignificant percentage of conservative supporters they're explicitly turning away with this move, although I do like that they actually have some standards for speakers, even though they apparently didn't vet Milo ahead of time (they should have already known he's a scumbag). It shows that the Republican base is not willing to be explicitly seen as the Party of Trump, although on the other hand this will become another counterexample to the claim that liberals are the only ones who own the political correctness/ safe space/ getting triggered titles.
Overall, I think it's a net good for America though.
|
On February 21 2017 03:53 xDaunt wrote: Big mistake for CPAC.
Maybe the mistake was inviting him in the first place.
I mostly agree with Drone's discussion on this topic.
|
On February 21 2017 05:43 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Basically they're trying to isolate and exile the alt-right/ Milo and Trump supporters? That's not an insignificant percentage of conservative supporters they're explicitly turning away with this move, although I do like that they actually have some standards for speakers, even though they apparently didn't vet Milo ahead of time (they should have already known he's a scumbag). It shows that the Republican base is not willing to be explicitly seen as the Party of Trump, although on the other hand this will become another counterexample to the claim that liberals are the only ones who own the political correctness/ safe space/ getting triggered titles. Overall, I think it's a net good for America though.
Considering Trumps speaking I'm guessing no.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
|
I will enjoy watching that man put Bannon in his place. Or quit in protest. I give it a 50/50.
|
From what I've seen I'm a big fan of the pick. He is very intelligent and a student of history. I don't think he would be afraid to tell Bannon or any of the other political hacks that they are fucking idiots.
Complete 180 from Flynn.
|
I am thankful that we will have someone who understands that words in English translate into different worlds in Arabic. This was a complex concept for Flynn.
Now if we can just get that through congress.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
|
|
|
|