US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6659
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On January 27 2017 07:47 On_Slaught wrote: Smart? Risking damage to our economy just so somebody else funds Trump's vanity project? I think you're forgetting just how stupid and petty the basis of this argument is. For Mexico, it's an issue of national dignity. For Trump, considering the wall is to our benefit, not Mexicos, it's a matter of his ego that we don't just pay for it ourselves. You think that justifies damaging relationships and threatening a trade war? I'm not interesting in pointless moralizing. Here are the basic facts: 1) Mexico runs a huge trade surplus with the US 2) Mexico benefits hugely from illegal immigration to the US (which is why the government actively encourages it, despite its brazen hypocrisy when it comes to its own southern border) 3) The US has huge leverage over Mexico given 1 and 2 I really don't give a flying fucking about Mexican feelings. If anything, and as a good American, you should start thinking about the above from the perspective of an American. Mexico is abusing our good will. And it is time that Mexico even out the ledger. | ||
Sermokala
United States13738 Posts
On January 27 2017 07:47 On_Slaught wrote: Smart? Risking damage to our economy just so somebody else funds Trump's vanity project? I think you're forgetting just how stupid and petty the basis of this argument is. For Mexico, it's an issue of national dignity. For Trump, considering the wall is to our benefit, not Mexicos, it's a matter of his ego that we don't just pay for it ourselves. You think that justifies damaging relationships and threatening a trade war? If you honestly think this is all because of a wall you're not paying attention. If you think Trump campaigned on a wall during the election because he thinks a wall is a good vanity project you vastly underestimate trumps vanity. Also Mexico has a bunch of oil. And it goes into the gulf via texas. Thats a huge bargining chip as well if things get tough. | ||
dankobanana
Croatia237 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:00 xDaunt wrote: 2) Mexico benefits hugely from illegal immigration to the US how? | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
WASHINGTON — Stephen K. Bannon, President Trump’s chief White House strategist, laced into the American press during an interview on Wednesday evening, arguing that news organizations had been “humiliated” by an election outcome few anticipated, and repeatedly describing the media as “the opposition party” of the current administration. “The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for awhile,” Mr. Bannon said during a telephone call. “I want you to quote this,” Mr. Bannon added. “The media here is the opposition party. They don’t understand this country. They still do not understand why Donald Trump is the president of the United States.” The scathing assessment — delivered by one of Mr. Trump’s most trusted and influential advisers, in the first days of his presidency — comes at a moment of high tension between the news media and the administration, with skirmishes over the size of Mr. Trump’s inaugural crowd and the president’s false claims that millions of illegal votes by undocumented immigrants swayed the popular vote against him. Mr. Bannon, who rarely grants interviews to journalists outside of Breitbart News, the provocative right-wing website he ran until last August, was echoing comments by Mr. Trump this weekend, when the president said he was in “a running war” with the media and called journalists “among the most dishonest people on earth.” During a call to discuss Sean M. Spicer, the president’s press secretary, Mr. Bannon ratcheted up the criticism, offering a broad indictment of the news media as biased against Mr. Trump and out of touch with the American public. That’s an argument familiar to readers of Breitbart and followers of Trump-friendly personalities like Sean Hannity. “The elite media got it dead wrong, 100 percent dead wrong,” Mr. Bannon said of the election, calling it “a humiliating defeat that they will never wash away, that will always be there.” “The mainstream media has not fired or terminated anyone associated with following our campaign,” Mr. Bannon said. “Look at the Twitter feeds of those people: they were outright activists of the Clinton campaign.” (He did not name specific reporters or editors.) “That’s why you have no power,” Mr. Bannon added. “You were humiliated.” Of all of Mr. Trump’s advisers in the White House, Mr. Bannon is the one tasked with implementing the nationalist vision that Mr. Trump channeled during the later months of the campaign, one that stemmed from Mr. Bannon himself. And in many ways Mr. Trump’s first week has put into action that vision — from the description of “American carnage’’ Mr. Trump laid out in his inauguration speech, to a series of executive actions outlining policy on trade agreements, immigration, the building of a border wall and the demands that Mexico pay for it. He is one of the strongest forces in a White House with competing power centers. A savvy manipulator of the press, and a proud provocateur, Mr. Bannon was among the few advisers in Mr. Trump’s circle who was said to have urged on Mr. Spicer’s confrontational, emotional statement to a shocked White House briefing room on Saturday, when the White House disputed press reports on the inauguration crowd size. He mostly shares Mr. Trump’s view that the news media has misunderstood the movement that the president rode into office. On the telephone, Mr. Bannon spoke in blunt but calm tones, peppered with a dose of profanities, and humorously referred to himself at one point as “Darth Vader.” He said, with ironic relish, that Mr. Trump was elected by a surge of support from “the working class hobbits and deplorables.” The conversation was initiated by Mr. Bannon to offer praise for Mr. Spicer, who has been criticized this week for making false claims at the White House podium about the attendance of Mr. Trump’s inaugural crowd, for calling reporters dishonest and lecturing them about what stories to write and for failing to disavow Mr. Trump’s lie about widespread voter fraud in the election. Asked if he was concerned that Mr. Spicer had lost credibility with the news media, Mr. Bannon chortled. “Are you kidding me?” he said. “We think that’s a badge of honor. ‘Questioning his integrity’ — are you kidding me? The media has zero integrity, zero intelligence, and no hard work.” “You’re the opposition party,” Mr. Bannon said. “Not the Democratic Party. You’re the opposition party. The media’s the opposition party.” Mr. Bannon mostly referred to the “elite” or “mainstream” media, but he cited The New York Times and The Washington Post by name. “The paper of record for our beloved republic, The New York Times, should be absolutely ashamed and humiliated,” Mr. Bannon said. “They got it 100 percent wrong.” He added that he has been a reader of The Times for most of his adult life. Source. Pay very close attention to that bolded part. Y'all on the Left may want to start giving Trump and his team a little more respect. They are far more capable than you realize. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
it seems more like a way to give mexico an easy way to not cooperate, and incentives for not cooperating. unless you have a plan wherein there's some future deal that lets mexico look like they're standing up to you, but wherein america actually gets what it wants. but if you could pull off such a plan, it seems like there'd be a simpler plan with less blowback that would accomkplsih the game goals. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15398 Posts
Cross border ---> make 20x what you would in your shithole village ---> send half of it back to your family so they don't starve. It is a very common practice. Lots of immigrants from Mexico, whether legal or not, are sending money back to their families because they desperately need it. It isn't uncommon for a ton of people to squeeze into an apartment in a bid to maximize money sent home. | ||
Sermokala
United States13738 Posts
The incomes from ilegal immigrants sending money back to their families in mexico forms a very large pesudo welfare program. any disruption or difficulty in getting that money into mexico will result in rioting in the streets. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Transfer payments. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:01 Sermokala wrote: If you honestly think this is all because of a wall you're not paying attention. If you think Trump campaigned on a wall during the election because he thinks a wall is a good vanity project you vastly underestimate trumps vanity. Also Mexico has a bunch of oil. And it goes into the gulf via texas. Thats a huge bargining chip as well if things get tough. point of clarification: did you intend to write "underestimate" there, or is it a typo? | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:00 xDaunt wrote: I'm not interesting in pointless moralizing. Here are the basic facts: 1) Mexico runs a huge trade surplus with the US 2) Mexico benefits hugely from illegal immigration to the US (which is why the government actively encourages it, despite its brazen hypocrisy when it comes to its own southern border) 3) The US has huge leverage over Mexico given 1 and 2 I really don't give a flying fucking about Mexican feelings. If anything, and as a good American, you should start thinking about the above from the perspective of an American. Mexico is abusing our good will. And it is time that Mexico even out the ledger. You're looking at this from a purely economic perspective and completely ignoring the pragmatics of politics. Do you really think there will be no consequences to bullying nations we're supposed to be allies with? This also ignores the the fact that the wall will not stop illegal immigration. Coupled with the fact that making Mexico's economy suffer will only increase the drive of people to make it into the u.s, and basically you're doing a lot of damage for little change. You also jeopardize NAFTA renegotiations. If you want more fair dealings with Mexico then sort that shit out in renegotiating NAFTA. But to try and "even the ledger" over something as divisive as the wall is counterproductive and only results and people not wanting to cooperate. Like zlefin said above if your goal is to even things out then this is the exact wrong approach to do. | ||
dankobanana
Croatia237 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:05 Mohdoo wrote: Cross border ---> make 20x what you would in your shithole village ---> send half of it back to your family so they don't starve. It is a very common practice. Lots of immigrants from Mexico, whether legal or not, are sending money back to their families because they desperately need it. It isn't uncommon for a ton of people to squeeze into an apartment in a bid to maximize money sent home. how would that be any different from a LEGAL immigrant? | ||
Mohdoo
United States15398 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:11 dankobanana wrote: how would that be any different from a LEGAL immigrant? It wouldn't be other than it increases the # of people doing it. Illegal immigrants add to the number of total immigrants doing it. I would also say that illegal immigrants have a higher % chance of doing it because they are more likely to come from poor places. A poor Mexican will not have an easy time immigrating to the US. | ||
dankobanana
Croatia237 Posts
| ||
Mohdoo
United States15398 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:16 dankobanana wrote: and btw doesnt cheap labour force helps american businesses? :\ Yes, many shit-tier small business owners who like to feel like they are some kind of American hero for owning their own garbage business benefit quite a bit from hiring a cook for cash. | ||
Sermokala
United States13738 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:10 zlefin wrote: point of clarification: did you intend to write "underestimate" there, or is it a typo? I'm pretty sure I spelled it right and the same way you did. A wall doesn't seem much compared to the guy who shits on gold toilets. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:16 dankobanana wrote: and btw doesnt cheap labour force helps american businesses? :\ businesses yes. low-wage workers, tend to be hurt by it, due to the competition. goods, it varies. it does help keep the price of fruit and such low, having people willing to work many hours in a day picking fruit and doing other such farm tasks for minimum wage (or less if illegal). | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:17 Sermokala wrote: I'm pretty sure I spelled it right and the same way you did. A wall doesn't seem much compared to the guy who shits on gold toilets. ok, that makes sense; I was just surprised at the notion of someone underestimating trump's vanity. | ||
dankobanana
Croatia237 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:18 zlefin wrote: businesses yes. low-wage workers, tend to be hurt by it, due to the competition. goods, it varies. it does help keep the price of fruit and such low, having people willing to work many hours in a day picking fruit and doing other such farm tasks for minimum wage (or less if illegal). as I understand, Trump wants to stregthen USA manufactureres and make them compete with China so I feel this is a missed opportunity. you cant compete if you do not lower wages | ||
| ||