• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:36
CEST 08:36
KST 15:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week0[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation RSL Season 1 - Final Week The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Summer Games Done Quick 2025! US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 592 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5060

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5058 5059 5060 5061 5062 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
September 20 2016 17:30 GMT
#101181
On September 21 2016 02:29 Doodsmack wrote:
The neat thing about humans is that we have brains to overcome the hunter gatherer lifestyle.

Whenever I see people playing Pokemon Go in the streets, I'm not so sure of this anymore...
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
September 20 2016 17:32 GMT
#101182
On September 21 2016 02:28 farvacola wrote:
Something like that, though the term "social construct" isn't quite right because the dynamics observed through historical analysis are never purely social nor are they constructs in the sense that they are built, they merely "are."


They are surely built over many generations? I don't think amoeba have a lot of social construct going on, but perhaps fish do so a little bit, some have been known to build nest-like things, at least... and then mammals tend to have it even more, with the adults taking care of the kids until they're old enough, etc. It comes along with the same sort of development that drives evolution: whatever works best to ensure survival.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 20 2016 17:33 GMT
#101183
On September 21 2016 02:30 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:29 Doodsmack wrote:
The neat thing about humans is that we have brains to overcome the hunter gatherer lifestyle.

Whenever I see people playing Pokemon Go in the streets, I'm not so sure of this anymore...

We do have their weird trend of seeing the latest zeitgeist as our culture reverting to its primal roots. But since we do this with every generation, I think that is just a sign of age and confusion over youth culture.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
September 20 2016 17:33 GMT
#101184
On September 21 2016 02:28 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:26 xDaunt wrote:
On September 21 2016 01:59 farvacola wrote:
The historical development of human organization, the one that people point to as they say that humans are naturally predisposed towards the dynamics observed through historical analysis (like tribalism), has no essential truth-bearing value vis a vie the human condition. In other words, the past is not proof that the past is the only possible path humans could have taken, it is merely an iterative narration of sorts. As much as I despise fallacy-talk, this is an outcropping of the naturalistic fallacy.

So our tribalistic nature is merely a social construct instead of some inherent predisposition? I suppose that you'd argue the same thing about monkeys and other social animals?

Something like that, though the term "social construct" isn't quite right because the dynamics observed through historical analysis are never purely social nor are they constructs in the sense that they are built, they merely "are."

Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:27 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On September 21 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Tautologies tied to musings of mental illness are not very compelling.


While I understand your point (there's no direct evidence that we are actually genetically predisposed to be social/tribal creatures), you're being pretty obstinate if you don't at least acknowledge that there is quite a bit of circumstantial evidence that points toward this conclusion.

That said, you could also define it as being predisposed to tribalism via evolution (as opposed to being predisposed directly by genetics), but again, all of the evidence is circumstantial.


My point is that whether or not humans are inherently tribalistic is not a "good" dispute to resolve because its both unprovable and not very useful after the fact.


Unprovable with our current knowledge.

As for how useful that knowledge would be, while appeals to naturalism are pretty useless for ethical discussions, I'm hard-pressed to say that any piece of knowledge is truly "useless".
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
September 20 2016 17:36 GMT
#101185
On September 21 2016 02:33 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:28 farvacola wrote:
On September 21 2016 02:26 xDaunt wrote:
On September 21 2016 01:59 farvacola wrote:
The historical development of human organization, the one that people point to as they say that humans are naturally predisposed towards the dynamics observed through historical analysis (like tribalism), has no essential truth-bearing value vis a vie the human condition. In other words, the past is not proof that the past is the only possible path humans could have taken, it is merely an iterative narration of sorts. As much as I despise fallacy-talk, this is an outcropping of the naturalistic fallacy.

So our tribalistic nature is merely a social construct instead of some inherent predisposition? I suppose that you'd argue the same thing about monkeys and other social animals?

Something like that, though the term "social construct" isn't quite right because the dynamics observed through historical analysis are never purely social nor are they constructs in the sense that they are built, they merely "are."

On September 21 2016 02:27 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On September 21 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Tautologies tied to musings of mental illness are not very compelling.


While I understand your point (there's no direct evidence that we are actually genetically predisposed to be social/tribal creatures), you're being pretty obstinate if you don't at least acknowledge that there is quite a bit of circumstantial evidence that points toward this conclusion.

That said, you could also define it as being predisposed to tribalism via evolution (as opposed to being predisposed directly by genetics), but again, all of the evidence is circumstantial.


My point is that whether or not humans are inherently tribalistic is not a "good" dispute to resolve because its both unprovable and not very useful after the fact.


Unprovable with our current knowledge.

As for how useful that knowledge would be, while appeals to naturalism are pretty useless for ethical discussions, I'm hard-pressed to say that any piece of knowledge is truly "useless".

Even uselessness has a use, and I'd argue that inherency relative to the human condition is actually absolutely impossible to establish beyond circumstance, but that's a discussion for another time
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
BallinWitStalin
Profile Joined July 2008
1177 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-11 19:26:09
September 20 2016 17:40 GMT
#101186
I await the reminiscent nerd chills I will get when I hear a Korean broadcaster yell "WEEAAAAVVVVVUUUHHH" while watching Dota
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 20 2016 17:47 GMT
#101187
Lock him up!
BallinWitStalin
Profile Joined July 2008
1177 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-11 19:25:55
September 20 2016 17:51 GMT
#101188
I await the reminiscent nerd chills I will get when I hear a Korean broadcaster yell "WEEAAAAVVVVVUUUHHH" while watching Dota
Madkipz
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Norway1643 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-20 18:01:51
September 20 2016 17:53 GMT
#101189
On September 21 2016 01:59 farvacola wrote:
The historical development of human organization, the one that people point to as they say that humans are naturally predisposed towards the dynamics observed through historical analysis (like tribalism), has no essential truth-bearing value vis a vie the human condition. In other words, the past is not proof that the past is the only possible path humans could have taken, it is merely an iterative narration of sorts. As much as I despise fallacy-talk, this is an outcropping of the naturalistic fallacy.


The idea that we're predisposed towards Tribalism all comes down to how you can gain some measure of trust.

We place our trust in family because we've nurtured each others from birth. The social contract is a simple one. My father and mother raised me, and fed me, and they expect to be helped when they are old enough to need it.

By the words of Tony Montana "All I've got is my balls and my word."

That's the social currency of the gangster, the mafia, the yakuza, the somali pirate, the middle eastern kurd, and everyone else that rejects modern government. Word of mouth and family. If you can't trust government then you gather together and the most trustworthy amongst your closest peers get saddled with the social responsibility to protect, or provide, and they also have to take care of any other needs the social structure being built around you has.

You see it on the internet everyday. Echo-chambers form based around political thought, social inclinations, and belief-structures. We talk about how everyone is free on the internet, but when we all have the freedom to do what we want. We gather together in a tribe. This doesn't mean humans are "only tribalistic and individualistic." It just means we're predisposed to form tribes of thought, of familial / regional bonds based on familiarity.

When Lawrence of arabia fought with the arabs during ww1 he got known as an honourable man. They respected him, and took him at his word. When he made deals on behalf of the british government he was really just a soldier following orders and carrying fourth the wishes of the british, but the arabs took him at his word because if he was this honourable man and respectable and all of this then naturally the british government would be just as good as that word.

The arabs were wrong on all accounts.

The social structure of the west had evolved past that point centuries before ww1. It goes all the way back to the french and the industrial revolution. The idea that we the people make a nation rather than putting faith in the king as empowered by the word of god. The french aspired towards ideals and while they failed at living up to that back then; it serves as the fundamental cornerstone of a modern democracy today. The world was never the same afterwards.

Modern government cannot exist without the ideal of a nation to back it up. The nation is built upon the corpses of millions of people who would wage total war and give their lives to protect the ideal of the state. The sacrifice of our ancestors is what gives the ideal that "all are equal under the law" value. Those values are intrinsically western values, because in other nations people bled for other ideals. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors.

Once trust in government goes away we see a larger inclination to revert to our old social structure, and the people who never trusted government at all largely group into the same neighborhoods. The universal factor is mostly based on mostly how wealthy they are, and they form communities based on that. Of-course this isn't science, and tribalism isn't the only factor, but it's the only way you can make sense of it all without going crazy.
"Mudkip"
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 20 2016 17:55 GMT
#101190
On September 21 2016 02:51 BallinWitStalin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:47 Doodsmack wrote:
Lock him up!


Eh, I see this tribalism debate emerging everywhere and it's just basically a meaningless tautological argument that bugs the shit out of me.

And then when people drag genetics into it......

ugh

To the layman, genetics is the new phrenology. With just a whiff of scientific authority, baseless conjecture can be turned into a plausible theory.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 20 2016 18:03 GMT
#101191
On September 21 2016 02:40 BallinWitStalin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:06 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 21 2016 01:59 farvacola wrote:
The historical development of human organization, the one that people point to as they say that humans are naturally predisposed towards the dynamics observed through historical analysis (like tribalism), has no essential truth-bearing value vis a vie the human condition. In other words, the past is not proof that the past is the only possible path humans could have taken, it is merely an iterative narration of sorts. As much as I despise fallacy-talk, this is an outcropping of the naturalistic fallacy.


Its in our genetics.

Like on this forum here, there is a tribalism.



Allright again I feel the need to chime in here as someone who works with genetics directly.

I am strongly suspicious of claims such as these. They are fundamentally unscientific, despite being presented with an "air" of science (i.e. genetics is often used in a scientific context, so if I call this genetics it must be based in science!).

Please, provide me experimental evidence that this is the case. I would bet there basically is none. This is not something that is empirically possible to study; on top of the fact that tribalism is not rigorously defined (read - wishy-washy concept whose meanign everyone interprets to support their own belief system), I know of no actual method that something as vague and general as "tribalism is in our genetics" could possibly be supported experimentally.

What you're doing is basically the same shit ancient Greek philosophers did; they think up some kind of arbitrary system and try to categorize everything they see into it in an attempt to create a coherent worldview. This results in ludicrous things, like people claiming that a woman's uterus is a separate organism.

In your own head you've arbitrarily created a set of meanings and definitions that self-reinforce your worldview. You have no empirical evidence to support this claim; it's fundamentally pretty meaningless for other people.

My response to claims like this is usually to just say "ok guy" and move on.

So "ok guy"....

Edit: for the record, "strongly suspicious" is just polite science-speak for "I think you're full of shit"


Yeah as you've demonstrated in your post, you don't work in genetics, quit lying.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 20 2016 18:04 GMT
#101192
This self-dealing story isn't even a headline on MSNBC's website. That, I am confused by. They must not expect to get many clicks out of it. Which is even more confusing.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 20 2016 18:05 GMT
#101193
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 20 2016 18:06 GMT
#101194
On September 21 2016 03:03 RealityIsKing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 02:40 BallinWitStalin wrote:
On September 21 2016 02:06 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 21 2016 01:59 farvacola wrote:
The historical development of human organization, the one that people point to as they say that humans are naturally predisposed towards the dynamics observed through historical analysis (like tribalism), has no essential truth-bearing value vis a vie the human condition. In other words, the past is not proof that the past is the only possible path humans could have taken, it is merely an iterative narration of sorts. As much as I despise fallacy-talk, this is an outcropping of the naturalistic fallacy.


Its in our genetics.

Like on this forum here, there is a tribalism.



Allright again I feel the need to chime in here as someone who works with genetics directly.

I am strongly suspicious of claims such as these. They are fundamentally unscientific, despite being presented with an "air" of science (i.e. genetics is often used in a scientific context, so if I call this genetics it must be based in science!).

Please, provide me experimental evidence that this is the case. I would bet there basically is none. This is not something that is empirically possible to study; on top of the fact that tribalism is not rigorously defined (read - wishy-washy concept whose meanign everyone interprets to support their own belief system), I know of no actual method that something as vague and general as "tribalism is in our genetics" could possibly be supported experimentally.

What you're doing is basically the same shit ancient Greek philosophers did; they think up some kind of arbitrary system and try to categorize everything they see into it in an attempt to create a coherent worldview. This results in ludicrous things, like people claiming that a woman's uterus is a separate organism.

In your own head you've arbitrarily created a set of meanings and definitions that self-reinforce your worldview. You have no empirical evidence to support this claim; it's fundamentally pretty meaningless for other people.

My response to claims like this is usually to just say "ok guy" and move on.

So "ok guy"....

Edit: for the record, "strongly suspicious" is just polite science-speak for "I think you're full of shit"


Yeah as you've demonstrated in your post, you don't work in genetics, quit lying.

This is not the experimental evidence requested.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
September 20 2016 18:07 GMT
#101195
He likely has just as much as evidence as he does competence with the English language.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 20 2016 18:07 GMT
#101196
On September 21 2016 03:05 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/SethAbramovitch/status/778091768793407488


This guy probably have good intentions.

But he missed the fact that there are beneficial people and there are some detrimental people.

We probably want to reward the beneficial ones and give less incentives to the detrimental people.
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
September 20 2016 18:08 GMT
#101197
On September 21 2016 03:06 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2016 03:03 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 21 2016 02:40 BallinWitStalin wrote:
On September 21 2016 02:06 RealityIsKing wrote:
On September 21 2016 01:59 farvacola wrote:
The historical development of human organization, the one that people point to as they say that humans are naturally predisposed towards the dynamics observed through historical analysis (like tribalism), has no essential truth-bearing value vis a vie the human condition. In other words, the past is not proof that the past is the only possible path humans could have taken, it is merely an iterative narration of sorts. As much as I despise fallacy-talk, this is an outcropping of the naturalistic fallacy.


Its in our genetics.

Like on this forum here, there is a tribalism.



Allright again I feel the need to chime in here as someone who works with genetics directly.

I am strongly suspicious of claims such as these. They are fundamentally unscientific, despite being presented with an "air" of science (i.e. genetics is often used in a scientific context, so if I call this genetics it must be based in science!).

Please, provide me experimental evidence that this is the case. I would bet there basically is none. This is not something that is empirically possible to study; on top of the fact that tribalism is not rigorously defined (read - wishy-washy concept whose meanign everyone interprets to support their own belief system), I know of no actual method that something as vague and general as "tribalism is in our genetics" could possibly be supported experimentally.

What you're doing is basically the same shit ancient Greek philosophers did; they think up some kind of arbitrary system and try to categorize everything they see into it in an attempt to create a coherent worldview. This results in ludicrous things, like people claiming that a woman's uterus is a separate organism.

In your own head you've arbitrarily created a set of meanings and definitions that self-reinforce your worldview. You have no empirical evidence to support this claim; it's fundamentally pretty meaningless for other people.

My response to claims like this is usually to just say "ok guy" and move on.

So "ok guy"....

Edit: for the record, "strongly suspicious" is just polite science-speak for "I think you're full of shit"


Yeah as you've demonstrated in your post, you don't work in genetics, quit lying.

This is not the experimental evidence requested.


He didn't ask nicely.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 20 2016 18:09 GMT
#101198
On September 21 2016 03:04 Doodsmack wrote:
This self-dealing story isn't even a headline on MSNBC's website. That, I am confused by. They must not expect to get many clicks out of it. Which is even more confusing.

It is working it way around. I believe MSNBC does video with their stories, so they might be pulling something together. Other outlets have picked it up.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 20 2016 18:10 GMT
#101199
On September 21 2016 03:07 farvacola wrote:
He likely has just as much as evidence as he does competence with the English language.

Yesterday he seemed to be the average Trump supporter, but today its pure one liners and bait posts with nothing to back them up.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 20 2016 18:11 GMT
#101200
On September 21 2016 03:05 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://twitter.com/SethAbramovitch/status/778091768793407488

The faux outrage over this Skittles meme business is hilarious. I hope the trolling from the Trump campaign continues.
Prev 1 5058 5059 5060 5061 5062 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 220
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 300
Noble 117
PianO 104
Bale 23
JulyZerg 16
Dota 2
ODPixel237
NeuroSwarm99
League of Legends
JimRising 703
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor112
Other Games
summit1g8818
Stewie2K893
shahzam767
monkeys_forever405
SortOf70
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick37706
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH368
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota260
League of Legends
• Lourlo1282
• Stunt563
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 24m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
6h 24m
Replay Cast
17h 24m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 9h
OSC
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.