What a mess.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4475
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
zeo
Serbia6298 Posts
What a mess. | ||
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
On July 26 2016 17:24 zeo wrote: https://twitter.com/NRSC/status/757702991306776577 Whoa whats that about? | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7904 Posts
On July 26 2016 14:55 oBlade wrote: What's the problem? Putin is a horrible dictator, and Russia is not the principal foe of America. It's not mutually exclusive whatsoever. In fact both statements are quite obvious. | ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44620 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18832 Posts
![]() | ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On July 26 2016 21:34 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: How do you guys think the DNC vs. RNC speeches and oration have compared so far? I think the best RNC speakers were Trump's children, but not even they were anywhere near as eloquent or inspirational as Michelle Obama, and I think that Bernie's and Cory's speeches were incredibly well constructed and high tier compared to the RNC too... and this is only being able to select from the few speeches so far on day one of the DNC compared to everything the RNC had to offer. I don't know if the DNC can keep up several quality speeches each night, but barring a complete meltdown or scandal, it looks like the DNC speakers are higher quality. Largely agreed with this. | ||
pmh
1353 Posts
On July 26 2016 21:34 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: How do you guys think the DNC vs. RNC speeches and oration have compared so far? I think the best RNC speakers were Trump's children, but not even they were anywhere near as eloquent or inspirational as Michelle Obama, and I think that Bernie's and Cory's speeches were incredibly well constructed and high tier compared to the RNC too... and this is only being able to select from the few speeches so far on day one of the DNC compared to everything the RNC had to offer. I don't know if the DNC can keep up several quality speeches each night, but barring a complete meltdown or scandal, it looks like the DNC speakers are higher quality. That's the problem that I did underestimate. Trump has to win this race alone,he got almost no popular figures and well known politicians who will campaign for him. And even the politicians that support him,they only support him halve. Clinton has many,that much is clear now. Maybe he can win by himself but if all the democratic vips go campaigning for Clinton I don't see how. | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On July 26 2016 14:52 Introvert wrote: But to avoid being overly negative, here is a massive, fairly detailed look at a state actually trending towards red, and may be particularly susceptible to Trump. Why Donald Trump can win Pennsylvania- National Review I agree with ideas, but Pennsyltucky isn't big enough to outweigh Philly, Pittsburg and other metro areas which are growing larger and more liberal. Trump's unique potential is countered by two big weaknesses: a lousy ground game (a lot of GOP gains were due to shoveling $$$'s into the state) and his abysmally low share of the minority vote. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 26 2016 21:34 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: How do you guys think the DNC vs. RNC speeches and oration have compared so far? I think the best RNC speakers were Trump's children, but not even they were anywhere near as eloquent or inspirational as Michelle Obama, and I think that Bernie's and Cory's speeches were incredibly well constructed and high tier compared to the RNC too... and this is only being able to select from the few speeches so far on day one of the DNC compared to everything the RNC had to offer. I don't know if the DNC can keep up several quality speeches each night, but barring a complete meltdown or scandal, it looks like the DNC speakers are higher quality. I agree that the speakers were stronger both in skill and tone of the message. The lack of doom and gloom was refreshing. And the DNC has more to talk about in general, with more accomplishments under their belt for the last 8 years. | ||
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
www.washingtonpost.com | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
Do you have a job or are you paid to do this? | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44620 Posts
On July 26 2016 22:00 pmh wrote: That's the problem that I did underestimate. Trump has to win this race alone,he got almost no popular figures and well known politicians who will campaign for him. And even the politicians that support him,they only support him halve. Clinton has many,that much is clear now. Maybe he can win by himself but if all the democratic vips go campaigning for Clinton I don't see how. Well it's 100% Trump's fault too. When you make everyone your enemy by belittling and hating and spreading fear, you don't get many allies. That's why he got stuck with Mike Pence as VP; no one else wanted to be his runningmate lol. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 26 2016 21:34 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: How do you guys think the DNC vs. RNC speeches and oration have compared so far? I think the best RNC speakers were Trump's children, but not even they were anywhere near as eloquent or inspirational as Michelle Obama, and I think that Bernie's and Cory's speeches were incredibly well constructed and high tier compared to the RNC too... and this is only being able to select from the few speeches so far on day one of the DNC compared to everything the RNC had to offer. I don't know if the DNC can keep up several quality speeches each night, but barring a complete meltdown or scandal, it looks like the DNC speakers are higher quality. They'll have some technically good speeches every day -- particularly the headliners. But the ones that will matter will be those on the last day. That's when there will be maximum eyeballs and attention. For as rough as the Republican convention was, Trump still turned it into a big win with good performances on the last night. Hillary is going to have to do the same. Ultimately, the call is to vote for her, not the people speaking before her. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 26 2016 23:06 VayneAuthority wrote: come back to 300 posts and 150 of them are plansix shitposting lol Do you have a job or are you paid to do this? You are free to PM me if you have questions. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44620 Posts
On July 26 2016 23:06 VayneAuthority wrote: come back to 300 posts and 150 of them are plansix shitposting lol Do you have a job or are you paid to do this? I understand that that's hyperbole, but do you think all he does is shitpost? If anything, plasmidghost was the shitposter, considering he was just trolling and pasting stupid Reddit one-liners (that's what he said he was doing, anyway) ![]() | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On July 26 2016 23:09 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I understand that that's hyperbole, but do you think all he does is shitpost? If anything, plasmidghost was the shitposter, considering he was just trolling and pasting stupid Reddit one-liners (that's what he said he was doing, anyway) ![]() GGtemplar and plansix are the main shitposters. It wasnt hyperbole. Plansix had about 150 of the 300 posts, ggtemplar probably like 75-90. I felt like i was just reading them shitpost back and forth and everything else got drowned out. if anyone thinks either of them wasn't shitposting, sorry but you're in an echo chamber | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44620 Posts
On July 26 2016 23:11 VayneAuthority wrote: GGtemplar and plansix are the main shitposters. It wasnt hyperbole. Plansix had about 150 of the 300 posts, ggtemplar probably like 75-90. I felt like i was just reading them shitpost back and forth and everything else got drowned out. if anyone thinks either of them wasn't shitposting, sorry but you're in an echo chamber Eh, I guess you and I have different standards for shitposting. Quantity might reduce quality, but I still think they had plenty of quality posts too ![]() | ||
| ||