• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:03
CET 22:03
KST 06:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !9Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server? Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1364 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4115

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 23 2016 17:26 GMT
#82281
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23514 Posts
June 23 2016 17:28 GMT
#82282
On June 24 2016 02:01 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 24 2016 01:54 Mohdoo wrote:
On June 24 2016 01:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Didn't someone post an email from Hillary saying that she agrees with Solar that threatening terrorists families (namely Assad's) was a legitimate tactic? So if that makes him crazy, I suppose he has decent company?


Got a link to the email?


It was posted here earlier by someone else. Did you not see it or are you questioning the veracity?


I can't keep track of every post in this thread. Wasn't really sure what to search for, so I was assuming you had it on hand in some way.


The quote was already posted but here's the doc for reference.

wikileaks.org
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:29:56
June 23 2016 17:29 GMT
#82283
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
SK.Testie
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada11084 Posts
June 23 2016 17:30 GMT
#82284
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.
Social Justice is a fools errand. May all the adherents at its church be thwarted. Of all the religions I have come across, it is by far the most detestable.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
June 23 2016 17:31 GMT
#82285
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


You mean on mobile? Running ublock and I don't see anything on desktop. I tried to whitelist TL, but some of the inappropriate ads kept slipping through and I have zero tolerance for that when I'm at work.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:34:15
June 23 2016 17:32 GMT
#82286
On June 24 2016 02:30 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.

That we need to execute the families of terrorist without due process in order to win? Because that is what this discussion is about.

Edit: Before you answer, just remember this was the really uplifting discussion that got the thread closed last time. And it was brought up by Solar last time. Personally, I think we need a moratorium on murdering families as a solution to terrorism.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
June 23 2016 17:32 GMT
#82287
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


Mute the tab you view TL in has been working well for me.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:41:14
June 23 2016 17:34 GMT
#82288
On June 24 2016 02:14 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:43 xDaunt wrote:
Comparing the danger of mentally unstable white people to the danger of Islamic terrorism is disingenuous. The critical difference is that, unlike the lone, mentally unstable white person who shoots up a bunch of people, Islamic terrorists have an actual agenda that is backed by a lot of people: supplanting Western culture with Muslim culture. It's this assault on Western identity that merits governments giving extra -- and if you look at it in a vacuum, undue -- attention to Islamic terrorists.


Am I less dead if someone kills me without an agenda? If not I don't really care. The dangerous part is the murder thing, not the agenda

Sure, but the point is that Islamic terrorism also threatens those who won't die from the immediate acts of terrorism. It's not a "one off" type of thing.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:36:28
June 23 2016 17:36 GMT
#82289
On June 24 2016 02:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


Mute the tab you view TL in has been working well for me.

the problem is it's not just the sound; it was also randomly freezing up my other tabs because of something.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:40:48
June 23 2016 17:39 GMT
#82290
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly on an interview that would get spread by the MSM like wildfire while Hillary is secretive about it.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 23 2016 17:42 GMT
#82291
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 23 2016 17:44 GMT
#82292
On June 24 2016 02:30 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.

as the left and right are quite groupings, with many disparate opinions; it's hard to tell which left groups you're responding to.
There may well be some groups which aren't recognizing the problem, but I'd say most of them do have a good sense of what the problem is.
There are some on the left who understate the degree to which the problem is Islam; there are some on the right who overrstate the degree to which the problem is Islam.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:47:32
June 23 2016 17:46 GMT
#82293
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21997 Posts
June 23 2016 17:47 GMT
#82294
On June 24 2016 01:57 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Didn't someone post an email from Hillary saying that she agrees with Solar that threatening terrorists families (namely Assad's) was a legitimate tactic? So if that makes him crazy, I suppose he has decent company?


Yes, Hillary laid out everything on Assad in her e-mails. The only thing I didn't see mentioned was the Qatar pipeline.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

That is completely different from what Trump says.

Trump says kill their families.

That email says that because Assad's life and the lives of his family is in danger he will only react to force and not other means of negotiation.

The email does not say to threaten his family. It states the present situation (rebels threatening his life and that of his family) and its effect on negotation.

Once again a basic failure of the English language leads to stupid strawman statements.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:50:58
June 23 2016 17:49 GMT
#82295
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”


Fact is we have no idea what Trump will do. He changes his ideas too often.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82296
The email is an analysis of a scenario rather than advocating for a specific response.

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:50:39
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82297
Opps.. Double post.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21997 Posts
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82298
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”

"We should go after them" and give them hugs and cuddles?
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:54:24
June 23 2016 17:51 GMT
#82299
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”


Isn't that what I argued he was getting at like 2-3 weeks ago prior to a thread lock when everyone was bringing up how it made him such a monster for 'advocating we prioritize killing innocent families' as his foreign policy platform.

Golly-gee what a coincidence

I guess the billionaire running for president isn't a complete nutjob sociopath who just wants to murder innocent people. Fuck me right? haha
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:53:01
June 23 2016 17:51 GMT
#82300
All of those could mean anything or nothing. That is like mafia level "It would be a shame of something were to happen to them," passive aggressive.

On June 24 2016 02:50 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”

"We should go after them" and give them hugs and cuddles?


We need to change the rules on hugs and cuddles.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
RO8 - Day 3
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
ZZZero.O297
LiquipediaDiscussion
Ladder Legends
19:00
WWG Amateur Showdown
davetesta47
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
White-Ra 454
ProTech144
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 514
ZZZero.O 297
Zeus 257
ggaemo 155
firebathero 114
Shuttle 72
Mong 49
Dota 2
febbydoto51
LuMiX2
Counter-Strike
fl0m1884
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor337
Other Games
Grubby5455
FrodaN1497
Beastyqt792
hungrybox724
B2W.Neo342
Fuzer 93
ToD71
Trikslyr43
Chillindude26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick917
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 68
• StrangeGG 45
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• XenOsky 1
• Pr0nogo 1
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1677
• Shiphtur226
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
12h 57m
Ladder Legends
19h 57m
BSL 21
22h 57m
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Wardi Open
1d 14h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 19h
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.