• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:25
CET 01:25
KST 09:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book5Clem wins HomeStory Cup 287HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info4herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2RSL Season 4 announced for March-April7Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Clem wins HomeStory Cup 28 HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 HomeStory Cup 28 RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
Recent recommended BW games BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? StarCraft player reflex TE scores
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Safe termination pills Johannesburg+27 63 034 8600
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Play, Watch, Drink: Esports …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1158 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4115

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 23 2016 17:26 GMT
#82281
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23633 Posts
June 23 2016 17:28 GMT
#82282
On June 24 2016 02:01 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 24 2016 01:54 Mohdoo wrote:
On June 24 2016 01:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Didn't someone post an email from Hillary saying that she agrees with Solar that threatening terrorists families (namely Assad's) was a legitimate tactic? So if that makes him crazy, I suppose he has decent company?


Got a link to the email?


It was posted here earlier by someone else. Did you not see it or are you questioning the veracity?


I can't keep track of every post in this thread. Wasn't really sure what to search for, so I was assuming you had it on hand in some way.


The quote was already posted but here's the doc for reference.

wikileaks.org
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:29:56
June 23 2016 17:29 GMT
#82283
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
SK.Testie
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada11084 Posts
June 23 2016 17:30 GMT
#82284
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.
Social Justice is a fools errand. May all the adherents at its church be thwarted. Of all the religions I have come across, it is by far the most detestable.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15736 Posts
June 23 2016 17:31 GMT
#82285
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


You mean on mobile? Running ublock and I don't see anything on desktop. I tried to whitelist TL, but some of the inappropriate ads kept slipping through and I have zero tolerance for that when I'm at work.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:34:15
June 23 2016 17:32 GMT
#82286
On June 24 2016 02:30 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.

That we need to execute the families of terrorist without due process in order to win? Because that is what this discussion is about.

Edit: Before you answer, just remember this was the really uplifting discussion that got the thread closed last time. And it was brought up by Solar last time. Personally, I think we need a moratorium on murdering families as a solution to terrorism.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
June 23 2016 17:32 GMT
#82287
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


Mute the tab you view TL in has been working well for me.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:41:14
June 23 2016 17:34 GMT
#82288
On June 24 2016 02:14 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:43 xDaunt wrote:
Comparing the danger of mentally unstable white people to the danger of Islamic terrorism is disingenuous. The critical difference is that, unlike the lone, mentally unstable white person who shoots up a bunch of people, Islamic terrorists have an actual agenda that is backed by a lot of people: supplanting Western culture with Muslim culture. It's this assault on Western identity that merits governments giving extra -- and if you look at it in a vacuum, undue -- attention to Islamic terrorists.


Am I less dead if someone kills me without an agenda? If not I don't really care. The dangerous part is the murder thing, not the agenda

Sure, but the point is that Islamic terrorism also threatens those who won't die from the immediate acts of terrorism. It's not a "one off" type of thing.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:36:28
June 23 2016 17:36 GMT
#82289
On June 24 2016 02:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


Mute the tab you view TL in has been working well for me.

the problem is it's not just the sound; it was also randomly freezing up my other tabs because of something.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:40:48
June 23 2016 17:39 GMT
#82290
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly on an interview that would get spread by the MSM like wildfire while Hillary is secretive about it.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 23 2016 17:42 GMT
#82291
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 23 2016 17:44 GMT
#82292
On June 24 2016 02:30 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.

as the left and right are quite groupings, with many disparate opinions; it's hard to tell which left groups you're responding to.
There may well be some groups which aren't recognizing the problem, but I'd say most of them do have a good sense of what the problem is.
There are some on the left who understate the degree to which the problem is Islam; there are some on the right who overrstate the degree to which the problem is Islam.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:47:32
June 23 2016 17:46 GMT
#82293
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22084 Posts
June 23 2016 17:47 GMT
#82294
On June 24 2016 01:57 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Didn't someone post an email from Hillary saying that she agrees with Solar that threatening terrorists families (namely Assad's) was a legitimate tactic? So if that makes him crazy, I suppose he has decent company?


Yes, Hillary laid out everything on Assad in her e-mails. The only thing I didn't see mentioned was the Qatar pipeline.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

That is completely different from what Trump says.

Trump says kill their families.

That email says that because Assad's life and the lives of his family is in danger he will only react to force and not other means of negotiation.

The email does not say to threaten his family. It states the present situation (rebels threatening his life and that of his family) and its effect on negotation.

Once again a basic failure of the English language leads to stupid strawman statements.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:50:58
June 23 2016 17:49 GMT
#82295
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”


Fact is we have no idea what Trump will do. He changes his ideas too often.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82296
The email is an analysis of a scenario rather than advocating for a specific response.

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:50:39
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82297
Opps.. Double post.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22084 Posts
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82298
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”

"We should go after them" and give them hugs and cuddles?
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:54:24
June 23 2016 17:51 GMT
#82299
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”


Isn't that what I argued he was getting at like 2-3 weeks ago prior to a thread lock when everyone was bringing up how it made him such a monster for 'advocating we prioritize killing innocent families' as his foreign policy platform.

Golly-gee what a coincidence

I guess the billionaire running for president isn't a complete nutjob sociopath who just wants to murder innocent people. Fuck me right? haha
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:53:01
June 23 2016 17:51 GMT
#82300
All of those could mean anything or nothing. That is like mafia level "It would be a shame of something were to happen to them," passive aggressive.

On June 24 2016 02:50 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”

"We should go after them" and give them hugs and cuddles?


We need to change the rules on hugs and cuddles.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Thunderfire All-Star Day 2
CranKy Ducklings28
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft659
Nathanias 100
UpATreeSC 84
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 49
ggaemo 40
NaDa 23
League of Legends
JimRising 482
Counter-Strike
minikerr19
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox710
Mew2King121
AZ_Axe34
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor293
Other Games
tarik_tv15915
gofns12321
summit1g6814
FrodaN3825
KnowMe247
ToD111
Maynarde103
ViBE51
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2084
BasetradeTV265
StarCraft 2
angryscii 26
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 129
• Hupsaiya 81
• RyuSc2 54
• davetesta9
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 74
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5584
• Scarra1097
Other Games
• tFFMrPink 16
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
11h 35m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
14h 35m
OSC
23h 35m
Replay Cast
1d 8h
Wardi Open
1d 11h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 16h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Reynor vs Creator
Maru vs Lambo
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
LiuLi Cup
3 days
Clem vs Rogue
SHIN vs Cyan
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs herO
Online Event
5 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
Serral vs Zoun
Cure vs Classic
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.