• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:56
CEST 08:56
KST 15:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy5uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event14Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple5SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Lambo Talks: The Future of SC2 and more... uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Global Tourney for College Students in September
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September BW General Discussion ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Bitcoin discussion thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 504 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4115

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 23 2016 17:26 GMT
#82281
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23244 Posts
June 23 2016 17:28 GMT
#82282
On June 24 2016 02:01 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 24 2016 01:54 Mohdoo wrote:
On June 24 2016 01:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Didn't someone post an email from Hillary saying that she agrees with Solar that threatening terrorists families (namely Assad's) was a legitimate tactic? So if that makes him crazy, I suppose he has decent company?


Got a link to the email?


It was posted here earlier by someone else. Did you not see it or are you questioning the veracity?


I can't keep track of every post in this thread. Wasn't really sure what to search for, so I was assuming you had it on hand in some way.


The quote was already posted but here's the doc for reference.

wikileaks.org
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:29:56
June 23 2016 17:29 GMT
#82283
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
SK.Testie
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada11084 Posts
June 23 2016 17:30 GMT
#82284
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.
Social Justice is a fools errand. May all the adherents at its church be thwarted. Of all the religions I have come across, it is by far the most detestable.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15690 Posts
June 23 2016 17:31 GMT
#82285
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


You mean on mobile? Running ublock and I don't see anything on desktop. I tried to whitelist TL, but some of the inappropriate ads kept slipping through and I have zero tolerance for that when I'm at work.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:34:15
June 23 2016 17:32 GMT
#82286
On June 24 2016 02:30 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.

That we need to execute the families of terrorist without due process in order to win? Because that is what this discussion is about.

Edit: Before you answer, just remember this was the really uplifting discussion that got the thread closed last time. And it was brought up by Solar last time. Personally, I think we need a moratorium on murdering families as a solution to terrorism.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
June 23 2016 17:32 GMT
#82287
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


Mute the tab you view TL in has been working well for me.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:41:14
June 23 2016 17:34 GMT
#82288
On June 24 2016 02:14 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:43 xDaunt wrote:
Comparing the danger of mentally unstable white people to the danger of Islamic terrorism is disingenuous. The critical difference is that, unlike the lone, mentally unstable white person who shoots up a bunch of people, Islamic terrorists have an actual agenda that is backed by a lot of people: supplanting Western culture with Muslim culture. It's this assault on Western identity that merits governments giving extra -- and if you look at it in a vacuum, undue -- attention to Islamic terrorists.


Am I less dead if someone kills me without an agenda? If not I don't really care. The dangerous part is the murder thing, not the agenda

Sure, but the point is that Islamic terrorism also threatens those who won't die from the immediate acts of terrorism. It's not a "one off" type of thing.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:36:28
June 23 2016 17:36 GMT
#82289
On June 24 2016 02:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


Mute the tab you view TL in has been working well for me.

the problem is it's not just the sound; it was also randomly freezing up my other tabs because of something.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:40:48
June 23 2016 17:39 GMT
#82290
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly on an interview that would get spread by the MSM like wildfire while Hillary is secretive about it.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 23 2016 17:42 GMT
#82291
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 23 2016 17:44 GMT
#82292
On June 24 2016 02:30 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:26 Plansix wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:23 farvacola wrote:
Somewhere in between killing families and complete pacifism lies the solution, clearly.

But those options are complicated. I hate complicated solutions to complex problems.


The large statement the right wants to get across is that the left is trying to re-write what the problem is in the first place and not accepting it when it's staring them in the face.

as the left and right are quite groupings, with many disparate opinions; it's hard to tell which left groups you're responding to.
There may well be some groups which aren't recognizing the problem, but I'd say most of them do have a good sense of what the problem is.
There are some on the left who understate the degree to which the problem is Islam; there are some on the right who overrstate the degree to which the problem is Islam.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:47:32
June 23 2016 17:46 GMT
#82293
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21696 Posts
June 23 2016 17:47 GMT
#82294
On June 24 2016 01:57 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 01:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Didn't someone post an email from Hillary saying that she agrees with Solar that threatening terrorists families (namely Assad's) was a legitimate tactic? So if that makes him crazy, I suppose he has decent company?


Yes, Hillary laid out everything on Assad in her e-mails. The only thing I didn't see mentioned was the Qatar pipeline.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]

That is completely different from what Trump says.

Trump says kill their families.

That email says that because Assad's life and the lives of his family is in danger he will only react to force and not other means of negotiation.

The email does not say to threaten his family. It states the present situation (rebels threatening his life and that of his family) and its effect on negotation.

Once again a basic failure of the English language leads to stupid strawman statements.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:50:58
June 23 2016 17:49 GMT
#82295
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”


Fact is we have no idea what Trump will do. He changes his ideas too often.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82296
The email is an analysis of a scenario rather than advocating for a specific response.

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:50:39
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82297
Opps.. Double post.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21696 Posts
June 23 2016 17:50 GMT
#82298
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”

"We should go after them" and give them hugs and cuddles?
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:54:24
June 23 2016 17:51 GMT
#82299
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Show nested quote +
Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”


Isn't that what I argued he was getting at like 2-3 weeks ago prior to a thread lock when everyone was bringing up how it made him such a monster for 'advocating we prioritize killing innocent families' as his foreign policy platform.

Golly-gee what a coincidence

I guess the billionaire running for president isn't a complete nutjob sociopath who just wants to murder innocent people. Fuck me right? haha
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-23 17:53:01
June 23 2016 17:51 GMT
#82300
All of those could mean anything or nothing. That is like mafia level "It would be a shame of something were to happen to them," passive aggressive.

On June 24 2016 02:50 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2016 02:49 On_Slaught wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:46 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:42 zlefin wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On June 24 2016 02:29 zlefin wrote:
GH -> the quote didn't sound like it remotely said what you said it said.

PS man I wish tl would stop having annoying ads so I didn't have to disable stuff that breaks other discussion/forum features just to be able to use tl.


It's literally no different than what Trump was saying from a functional perspective. Use threat against the opposition's family as leverage.

The only difference is Trump came and said it outright bluntly and Hillary is secretive about it.

please don't say literally when you mean figuratively.
I disagree with your reading of the Hillary statement on this point; that's not how it reads to me. But I can see how you might read it your way; though the evidence that she intended it to mean they should direct attacks against members of Assad's family who aren't guilty of anything seems rather thin.


I meant literal when I said literal. Functionally, they are literally advocating the same use of force policies.

We just have to disagree then but I think you're being unfairly biased here in your interpretation of the two's positions.


I mean Trump literally isn't saying that. Especially since he changed his view.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-terrorists_us_56e0d7cde4b065e2e3d4d82d

Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he doesn’t necessarily want to kill the families of terrorists — a controversial proposal he has raised at various points during his campaign.

Instead, Trump told CNN, his policy would merely be “to go after them” if he wins the White House.

What “go after them” actually means is left to the imagination of voters, since Trump spoke only in evasive bromides during the interview.

“We have to do something and it’s the only way you stop it.”
“We have to be a lot tougher. We are playing with a different set of rules.”
“We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we are playing.”
“We’re not fighting it strongly enough.”

"We should go after them" and give them hugs and cuddles?


We need to change the rules on hugs and cuddles.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 4m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 99
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 15748
Sea 6351
ggaemo 487
Leta 294
ajuk12(nOOB) 15
SilentControl 9
Bale 7
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1118
Other Games
summit1g7535
WinterStarcraft641
Mew2King68
amsayoshi53
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick836
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH334
• davetesta9
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1936
• Lourlo1231
• Stunt597
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4h 4m
The PondCast
1d 3h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
CSO Contender
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
SC Evo League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

StarCon 2025 Philadelphia
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.