• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:30
CEST 09:30
KST 16:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 656 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2316

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44257 Posts
September 19 2015 00:09 GMT
#46301
On September 19 2015 09:02 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 08:22 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On September 19 2015 08:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On September 19 2015 07:56 oneofthem wrote:
anyway

the pope is coming over soon. he's said some good things but what's the u.s. catholic view on him?


From what I've seen, the reasonable ones like and agree with him while the people on the more extreme end are pretty unhappy with him.

So more or less what you'd expect.


Even the American atheists appreciate this Pope... Less anti-science, focused on actually helping people, more progressive, etc.

Isn´t it especially the American atheists appreciate this Pope? What I understood of the more conservative Catholics is that this Pope is a fucking hippy and they don´t like him?


Ehhhhhh the fundamentalists, sure. But who are they to question the man who God directly speaks to?
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
September 19 2015 00:27 GMT
#46302
My Grandparents are pretty devout Catholics and they haven't been particular fans of the last two. The one before Francis they thought was a "grump" who didn't spread the word of god with an uplifting message (also they thought he was a pedophile cover-upper). They don't like Francis much because he appears to favor a socialist/communist type government, and they are children of the Cold War, where they saw Catholicism widely suppressed under the Iron Curtain and Catholic missionaries expelled from countries by a great many communist/socialist revolutionaries in the 3rd world.
Freeeeeeedom
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 19 2015 01:50 GMT
#46303
The White House is launching a campaign to encourage the 8.8 million legal immigrants in the U.S. to become citizens.

It's a multifaceted effort that could potentially add millions of new people to the voter rolls before the 2016 presidential election. The outreach includes online citizenship practice tests, the ability to pay fees with a credit card, and public service announcements on Univision.

President Obama announced the new initiative in a video Thursday.

While the White House does not portray the citizenship push as a partisan one, Karthick Ramakrishnan, a public policy professor at the University of California, Riverside who focuses on civic engagement and immigration, said efforts to increase the ranks of U.S. citizens are often seen through a political lens.

"Anytime there's a major push for naturalization by the White House ... especially when a Democratic administration does it, there's always the allegation that this is an attempt to try to get more Democratic voters," Ramakrishnan said.

He heard the same insinuations during the debate about immigration reform in Congress, he points out.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
September 19 2015 02:09 GMT
#46304
On September 19 2015 08:51 Cowboy64 wrote:
I don't understand why it's Trump's responsibility to correct someone at his speech, but Obama didn't have to repudiate the pastor at his church who said things like: "God damn America" and made multiple anti-Semitic statements over a 20 year period.


+ Show Spoiler +
full disclosure: I took that talking point from Rush Limbaugh. Make of that what you will.

I listened to that entire sermon. It's not what Rush makes it out to be. Don't know about the anti-semite stuff, but forgive me if I'm doubtful as to just how accurate their interpretation really is. Also, Obama had to put some a lot of distance between himself and his pastor in a real hurry. But one need look no further than McCain to see how deal with a rogue supporter with a mic.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 19 2015 02:14 GMT
#46305
President Barack Obama nominated Eric Fanning to be the next secretary of the Army, the White House said Friday, paving the way for the first openly gay leader of a military branch in U.S. history.

Fanning is currently serving as acting Army undersecretary and previously worked as an Air Force undersecretary and a chief of staff to Defense Secretary Ash Carter. His nomination to the post must be confirmed by the Senate.

"Eric brings many years of proven experience and exceptional leadership to this new role," Obama said in a statement. "I am confident he will help lead America's soldiers with distinction."

Advocacy groups said the nomination of an openly gay man to lead a U.S. service branch was a significant sign of progress in protecting the rights of LGBT individuals serving in the world's most powerful military.

The Pentagon updated its equal opportunity policy in June 2015 to bar discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation — a change in policy that Carter announced at a gay and lesbian pride celebration.

That change brought the Pentagon's rules into conformity with the 2011 decision to end the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, which allowed gays and lesbians to serve in the military only if they did not openly acknowledge their sexual orientation.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 19 2015 02:47 GMT
#46306
On September 19 2015 11:14 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
President Barack Obama nominated Eric Fanning to be the next secretary of the Army, the White House said Friday, paving the way for the first openly gay leader of a military branch in U.S. history.

Fanning is currently serving as acting Army undersecretary and previously worked as an Air Force undersecretary and a chief of staff to Defense Secretary Ash Carter. His nomination to the post must be confirmed by the Senate.

"Eric brings many years of proven experience and exceptional leadership to this new role," Obama said in a statement. "I am confident he will help lead America's soldiers with distinction."

Advocacy groups said the nomination of an openly gay man to lead a U.S. service branch was a significant sign of progress in protecting the rights of LGBT individuals serving in the world's most powerful military.

The Pentagon updated its equal opportunity policy in June 2015 to bar discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation — a change in policy that Carter announced at a gay and lesbian pride celebration.

That change brought the Pentagon's rules into conformity with the 2011 decision to end the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, which allowed gays and lesbians to serve in the military only if they did not openly acknowledge their sexual orientation.


Source


Kim Davis' jimmies must be so rustled.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 19 2015 03:30 GMT
#46307
U.S. and California environmental regulators said Friday they are investigating whether Volkswagen deliberately circumvented clean air rules on almost 500,000 diesel cars.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said Volkswagen allegedly used software in four-cylinder Volkswagen and Audi diesel cars from model years 2009 to 2015 to circumvent emissions testing of certain air pollutants.

“Put simply, these cars contained software that turns off emissions controls when driving normally and turns them on when the car is undergoing an emissions test,” Cynthia Giles, an enforcement officer at the EPA, told reporters in a teleconference.

The feature, known as a defeat device, results in the cars emitting as much as 40 times the legally permissible emissions, Giles said.

“Using a defeat device in cars to evade clean air standards is illegal and a threat to public health,” Giles said.

Volkswagen sold roughly 482,000 diesel passenger cars in the United States since 2008. The vehicle models include the Jetta, Beetle, Golf, Passat and Audi A3.

The EPA called on the German automaker to fix the cars’ emissions systems, but said car owners do not need to take any immediate action.

Volkswagen said in a statement it is cooperating with the investigation.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 19 2015 04:46 GMT
#46308
On September 19 2015 11:09 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 08:51 Cowboy64 wrote:
I don't understand why it's Trump's responsibility to correct someone at his speech, but Obama didn't have to repudiate the pastor at his church who said things like: "God damn America" and made multiple anti-Semitic statements over a 20 year period.


+ Show Spoiler +
full disclosure: I took that talking point from Rush Limbaugh. Make of that what you will.

I listened to that entire sermon. It's not what Rush makes it out to be. Don't know about the anti-semite stuff, but forgive me if I'm doubtful as to just how accurate their interpretation really is. Also, Obama had to put some a lot of distance between himself and his pastor in a real hurry. But one need look no further than McCain to see how deal with a rogue supporter with a mic.

Man, remember McCain. Like a Republican we could respect and had accomplished things. Who had some flaws, but at least he wasn't a total monster. A guy who was a Republican, but explained why progressive taxes were part of the system to college students. And stuck up for people who's opinion wasn't popular during town hall meetings. One of the few Republicans who said water boarding people was a bad plan.

Fuck man, McCain. Those were the days.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 19 2015 14:31 GMT
#46309
On September 19 2015 09:27 cLutZ wrote:
My Grandparents are pretty devout Catholics and they haven't been particular fans of the last two. The one before Francis they thought was a "grump" who didn't spread the word of god with an uplifting message (also they thought he was a pedophile cover-upper). They don't like Francis much because he appears to favor a socialist/communist type government, and they are children of the Cold War, where they saw Catholicism widely suppressed under the Iron Curtain and Catholic missionaries expelled from countries by a great many communist/socialist revolutionaries in the 3rd world.
These comments have been echoed by the observant Catholics I know. His political views on governance, with only minor nods to scriptural backing, have angered them. I didn't hear all that much about Benedict before him. Current pope is a very polarizing figure.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
September 19 2015 16:08 GMT
#46310
On September 19 2015 13:46 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 11:09 Falling wrote:
On September 19 2015 08:51 Cowboy64 wrote:
I don't understand why it's Trump's responsibility to correct someone at his speech, but Obama didn't have to repudiate the pastor at his church who said things like: "God damn America" and made multiple anti-Semitic statements over a 20 year period.


+ Show Spoiler +
full disclosure: I took that talking point from Rush Limbaugh. Make of that what you will.

I listened to that entire sermon. It's not what Rush makes it out to be. Don't know about the anti-semite stuff, but forgive me if I'm doubtful as to just how accurate their interpretation really is. Also, Obama had to put some a lot of distance between himself and his pastor in a real hurry. But one need look no further than McCain to see how deal with a rogue supporter with a mic.

Man, remember McCain. Like a Republican we could respect and had accomplished things. Who had some flaws, but at least he wasn't a total monster. A guy who was a Republican, but explained why progressive taxes were part of the system to college students. And stuck up for people who's opinion wasn't popular during town hall meetings. One of the few Republicans who said water boarding people was a bad plan.

Fuck man, McCain. Those were the days.


Pre 2006 McCain was a pretty awesome dude. He had that one brief flash in 2008 when he told someone they went to far but man pre 2006 McCain while I didnt agree with him on anything at least he understood how to govern which is something I could respect
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 19 2015 16:15 GMT
#46311
The he picked Sarah Palin and that was the end of the Republican party
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
September 19 2015 16:39 GMT
#46312
On September 19 2015 23:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 09:27 cLutZ wrote:
My Grandparents are pretty devout Catholics and they haven't been particular fans of the last two. The one before Francis they thought was a "grump" who didn't spread the word of god with an uplifting message (also they thought he was a pedophile cover-upper). They don't like Francis much because he appears to favor a socialist/communist type government, and they are children of the Cold War, where they saw Catholicism widely suppressed under the Iron Curtain and Catholic missionaries expelled from countries by a great many communist/socialist revolutionaries in the 3rd world.
These comments have been echoed by the observant Catholics I know. His political views on governance, with only minor nods to scriptural backing, have angered them. I didn't hear all that much about Benedict before him. Current pope is a very polarizing figure.


I don't think the Pope is polarizing, the truth seems to be handling that. If I had to pick between American Catholics and the pope on who does Catholicism better, I'm thinking the current pope wins that every time.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
September 19 2015 16:57 GMT
#46313
He also couldn't tell the difference between Iran and Iraq. Not that any of the candidates now can.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28654 Posts
September 19 2015 18:26 GMT
#46314
On September 19 2015 04:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 03:38 Plansix wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:34 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:27 farvacola wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:14 Gorsameth wrote:
Here is an idea. Obama is a 'Christian' because the political culture in America requires it.
The guy is smart enough to know God is not real and the bible is a work of fiction.

Sadly America is not ready to accept an atheist as President so he has to pretend to be a Christian.

Here's an idea: there are multitudes of highly intelligent individuals who believe in God, and you are in no position to question the faith of another person. This discussion is as vulgar as it is stupid.

Do you think being an Atheist makes it less likely to be elected compared to being Christian?

We all know the answer to that question, but that doesn't' mean this is going to be a productive discussion. It is a fact that being an atheist or religious has not baring on how intelligent a person is. Just because you know Obama is intelligent does not automatically make him an atheist.


I absolutely agree that Obama is a Christian because of his faith, and the fact that he's intelligent doesn't mean he *can't* be a Christian or that he's *secretly* an atheist, which is what Gorsameth was saying.

That being said, there have been multiple studies that have shown a negative correlation between religiosity and intelligence. Not causal, of course. Merely an association, but something to stir the pot if people think that there's no correlation whatsoever (or no studies done at all about these two factors). Wikipedia has a good compilation of some of them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

Here are some relevant quotes from the studies in the above link:

"the authors investigated the link between religiosity and intelligence on a country level. Among the sample of 137 countries, only 23 (17%) had more than 20% of atheists, which constituted “virtually all... higher IQ countries.” The authors reported a correlation of 0.60 between atheism rates and level of intelligence, which was determined to be “highly statistically significant”.[4]"

"The idea that analytical thinking makes one less likely to be religious is an idea supported by other early studies on this issue[19] including a report from Harvard University.[15] ... Furthermore, the Harvard study found that participants who tended to think more reflectively were less likely to believe in a god.[15]"

"In a 2013 meta-analysis, led by Professor Miron Zuckerman, of 63 scientific studies about IQ and religiosity, a negative relation between intelligence and religiosity was found in 53, and a positive relation in the remaining ten. Controlling for other factors, they can only confidently show strong negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity among American Protestants.[1][2]"

"Most of the recent scientific studies have found a negative correlation between I.Q. and religiosity.[1][2]"

"Studies have shown a strong link between national average IQ and atheism in society."

There exist many other studies out there too, which tend to be either inconclusive, show a very weak correlation, or show a moderately negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity.

But all this being said- yet again- being religious (or nonreligious) does not necessarily imply that you are particularly dumb (or smart), and there is no causal link between the two.


really not a big fan of referencing richard lynn, but I'll assume you didn't know that. ;p Also, I'm with Kwark, and this is entirely supported by my own anecdotal evidence. My impression is that american atheists are overwhelmingly more intelligent than average - but I have the same, perhaps even more significantly so, impression of Norwegian christians. Like every single person I've known throughout school who has been like a 'self identifying christian' (less than 10%) has been way smarter than the average student.
Moderator
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
September 19 2015 18:59 GMT
#46315
On September 20 2015 01:39 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 23:31 Danglars wrote:
On September 19 2015 09:27 cLutZ wrote:
My Grandparents are pretty devout Catholics and they haven't been particular fans of the last two. The one before Francis they thought was a "grump" who didn't spread the word of god with an uplifting message (also they thought he was a pedophile cover-upper). They don't like Francis much because he appears to favor a socialist/communist type government, and they are children of the Cold War, where they saw Catholicism widely suppressed under the Iron Curtain and Catholic missionaries expelled from countries by a great many communist/socialist revolutionaries in the 3rd world.
These comments have been echoed by the observant Catholics I know. His political views on governance, with only minor nods to scriptural backing, have angered them. I didn't hear all that much about Benedict before him. Current pope is a very polarizing figure.


I don't think the Pope is polarizing, the truth seems to be handling that. If I had to pick between American Catholics and the pope on who does Catholicism better, I'm thinking the current pope wins that every time.

What? The truth? Reducing the needed repentance for certain sins is always going to be controversial within a faith. And when his percieved favored economic model, at best, has led to a hyper-secular culture in Europe, its crazy to say the devout should not have mixed feelings.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
September 19 2015 19:46 GMT
#46316
Newest member of Republicans for Bernie Sanders....

[image loading]

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44257 Posts
September 19 2015 20:54 GMT
#46317
Hahahaha that's awesome, GH!
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 20 2015 00:37 GMT
#46318
The Obama administration accused Volkswagen on Friday of a stunning scheme to deceive the government about its cars’ emissions standards and ordered the German automaker to recall nearly 500,000 vehicles.

But as the White House begins investigating Volkswagen's practices, will it prosecute top executives of the company that's accused of deceiving the government and endangering public health?

The case provides an opportunity for the Department of Justice to deliver on a promise it made in a Sept. 9 memo to refocus its prosecution of white-collar crime on individual employees, rather than the institutions that employ them, and to pressure companies to cooperate in those efforts.

The DOJ memo, which The New York Times obtained, was an implicit response to criticism that the administration has avoided pursuing cases against individual white-collar criminals, preferring instead to strike deals with the companies that employ them. These deals typically result in substantial fines, but preclude jail time for individuals.

Critics have been especially unforgiving of what they see as the administration’s milquetoast policing of Wall Street: Not a single top finance executive has gone to prison for their role in the 2008 financial crisis. (Last year, the Times profiled Kareem Serageldin, a mid-level Credit Suisse banker who went to jail for lying about the value of his bank's mortgage securities.)

he Environmental Protection Agency on Friday issued Volkswagen a notice of violation for allegedly cheating emission-control standards. The company installed software in its diesel-powered vehicles that turned on their emissions control systems when the cars were inspected by state authorities, but otherwise left the cars free to emit 40 times the legal limit of nitrogen oxide. The chemical adds to the buildup of smog and ozone, which are tied to asthma and other respiratory illnesses and contribute to shortened lifespans. Volkswagen may have been trying to improve its cars’ performance, since the emissions control systems apparently limit torque and acceleration.

Volkswagen admitted to installing the software, the EPA said.

The EPA called Friday’s notice and recall an “opening salvo” in a larger investigation of wrongdoing on which it is collaborating with the DOJ and the state of California. Volkswagen said it was cooperating in the investigation.

If there is enough evidence that Volkswagen deliberately committed fraud, the case could be an ideal test for the DOJ’s professed rededication to the prosecution of individual corporate executives.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
hunts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2113 Posts
September 20 2015 03:43 GMT
#46319
On September 20 2015 03:26 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 04:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:38 Plansix wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:34 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:27 farvacola wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:14 Gorsameth wrote:
Here is an idea. Obama is a 'Christian' because the political culture in America requires it.
The guy is smart enough to know God is not real and the bible is a work of fiction.

Sadly America is not ready to accept an atheist as President so he has to pretend to be a Christian.

Here's an idea: there are multitudes of highly intelligent individuals who believe in God, and you are in no position to question the faith of another person. This discussion is as vulgar as it is stupid.

Do you think being an Atheist makes it less likely to be elected compared to being Christian?

We all know the answer to that question, but that doesn't' mean this is going to be a productive discussion. It is a fact that being an atheist or religious has not baring on how intelligent a person is. Just because you know Obama is intelligent does not automatically make him an atheist.


I absolutely agree that Obama is a Christian because of his faith, and the fact that he's intelligent doesn't mean he *can't* be a Christian or that he's *secretly* an atheist, which is what Gorsameth was saying.

That being said, there have been multiple studies that have shown a negative correlation between religiosity and intelligence. Not causal, of course. Merely an association, but something to stir the pot if people think that there's no correlation whatsoever (or no studies done at all about these two factors). Wikipedia has a good compilation of some of them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

Here are some relevant quotes from the studies in the above link:

"the authors investigated the link between religiosity and intelligence on a country level. Among the sample of 137 countries, only 23 (17%) had more than 20% of atheists, which constituted “virtually all... higher IQ countries.” The authors reported a correlation of 0.60 between atheism rates and level of intelligence, which was determined to be “highly statistically significant”.[4]"

"The idea that analytical thinking makes one less likely to be religious is an idea supported by other early studies on this issue[19] including a report from Harvard University.[15] ... Furthermore, the Harvard study found that participants who tended to think more reflectively were less likely to believe in a god.[15]"

"In a 2013 meta-analysis, led by Professor Miron Zuckerman, of 63 scientific studies about IQ and religiosity, a negative relation between intelligence and religiosity was found in 53, and a positive relation in the remaining ten. Controlling for other factors, they can only confidently show strong negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity among American Protestants.[1][2]"

"Most of the recent scientific studies have found a negative correlation between I.Q. and religiosity.[1][2]"

"Studies have shown a strong link between national average IQ and atheism in society."

There exist many other studies out there too, which tend to be either inconclusive, show a very weak correlation, or show a moderately negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity.

But all this being said- yet again- being religious (or nonreligious) does not necessarily imply that you are particularly dumb (or smart), and there is no causal link between the two.


really not a big fan of referencing richard lynn, but I'll assume you didn't know that. ;p Also, I'm with Kwark, and this is entirely supported by my own anecdotal evidence. My impression is that american atheists are overwhelmingly more intelligent than average - but I have the same, perhaps even more significantly so, impression of Norwegian christians. Like every single person I've known throughout school who has been like a 'self identifying christian' (less than 10%) has been way smarter than the average student.


With the exception of my parents and some professors, this is quite in line with my own experiences as well. I would be curious about looking into spirituality in the same sense, from my experience people who believe in "auras" and "ghosts" and "healing crystals" are also noticeably less intelligent than those who don't.
twitch.tv/huntstv 7x legend streamer
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
September 20 2015 04:17 GMT
#46320
On September 20 2015 03:26 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2015 04:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:38 Plansix wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:34 Gorsameth wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:27 farvacola wrote:
On September 19 2015 03:14 Gorsameth wrote:
Here is an idea. Obama is a 'Christian' because the political culture in America requires it.
The guy is smart enough to know God is not real and the bible is a work of fiction.

Sadly America is not ready to accept an atheist as President so he has to pretend to be a Christian.

Here's an idea: there are multitudes of highly intelligent individuals who believe in God, and you are in no position to question the faith of another person. This discussion is as vulgar as it is stupid.

Do you think being an Atheist makes it less likely to be elected compared to being Christian?

We all know the answer to that question, but that doesn't' mean this is going to be a productive discussion. It is a fact that being an atheist or religious has not baring on how intelligent a person is. Just because you know Obama is intelligent does not automatically make him an atheist.


I absolutely agree that Obama is a Christian because of his faith, and the fact that he's intelligent doesn't mean he *can't* be a Christian or that he's *secretly* an atheist, which is what Gorsameth was saying.

That being said, there have been multiple studies that have shown a negative correlation between religiosity and intelligence. Not causal, of course. Merely an association, but something to stir the pot if people think that there's no correlation whatsoever (or no studies done at all about these two factors). Wikipedia has a good compilation of some of them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

Here are some relevant quotes from the studies in the above link:

"the authors investigated the link between religiosity and intelligence on a country level. Among the sample of 137 countries, only 23 (17%) had more than 20% of atheists, which constituted “virtually all... higher IQ countries.” The authors reported a correlation of 0.60 between atheism rates and level of intelligence, which was determined to be “highly statistically significant”.[4]"

"The idea that analytical thinking makes one less likely to be religious is an idea supported by other early studies on this issue[19] including a report from Harvard University.[15] ... Furthermore, the Harvard study found that participants who tended to think more reflectively were less likely to believe in a god.[15]"

"In a 2013 meta-analysis, led by Professor Miron Zuckerman, of 63 scientific studies about IQ and religiosity, a negative relation between intelligence and religiosity was found in 53, and a positive relation in the remaining ten. Controlling for other factors, they can only confidently show strong negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity among American Protestants.[1][2]"

"Most of the recent scientific studies have found a negative correlation between I.Q. and religiosity.[1][2]"

"Studies have shown a strong link between national average IQ and atheism in society."

There exist many other studies out there too, which tend to be either inconclusive, show a very weak correlation, or show a moderately negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity.

But all this being said- yet again- being religious (or nonreligious) does not necessarily imply that you are particularly dumb (or smart), and there is no causal link between the two.


really not a big fan of referencing richard lynn, but I'll assume you didn't know that. ;p Also, I'm with Kwark, and this is entirely supported by my own anecdotal evidence. My impression is that american atheists are overwhelmingly more intelligent than average - but I have the same, perhaps even more significantly so, impression of Norwegian christians. Like every single person I've known throughout school who has been like a 'self identifying christian' (less than 10%) has been way smarter than the average student.

Beware the temptation to draw empirical conclusions. This falls in the classic mistake of assuming blacks make better athletes because most pro athletes in the US are black. Or, more relevant to this forum, that there's something inherent to being Korean that makes Koreans better at StarCraft.

I would point out that religiosity and atheism are not mutually exclusive or even a spectrum in most places. In fact, I would posit that this is a flawed dimensionality. Rather, it is the tolerance and vibrancy of other beliefs that comes with modernity, which in turn associates with advanced education and industry that baselines a society capable of providing for and cultivating citizens' intelligence, that is creating this correlation.
Prev 1 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 31m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 291
StarCraft: Brood War
Backho 162
Dewaltoss 116
sorry 47
ajuk12(nOOB) 23
Shine 22
Dota 2
ODPixel507
XcaliburYe255
Fuzer 78
League of Legends
JimRising 772
Super Smash Bros
Westballz2
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor122
Other Games
summit1g6717
ROOTCatZ71
SortOf43
Trikslyr23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2784
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH265
• practicex 35
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2142
League of Legends
• Lourlo1583
• Stunt601
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
2h 31m
Epic.LAN
4h 31m
CSO Contender
9h 31m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 2h
Online Event
1d 8h
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.