• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:57
CEST 02:57
KST 09:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 643 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 147

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 145 146 147 148 149 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 05 2013 21:12 GMT
#2921
On March 06 2013 05:49 Grumbels wrote:
Discussions about the military budget are always so funny, given that the only reasonable thing to do to the budget is to cut it in half (it's a start), but oh well. It's just posturing because the military still commands a great deal of respect and is almost beyond reproach, so they're all fighting over who can give the military more tanks they won't even use.

The reasonable thing to do with the military budget would be to freeze it like they did with all other discretionary spending. Of course, that's just if you want to go after the debt/deficit.

As for this random yelling guy that just came in here blaming Obama and calling the sequester insignificant, the issue is that the cuts are going to happen regardless. Congress screwed up big time, and now Republicans are looking for a way to offset the blame. The sequester cuts are actually quite huge as well. If you take away transfer payments (SS, unemployment, etc.) and medical compensation, that cuts the graph by 50-60%. The things it cuts are government contracts and direct services, which are already fairly barebone from the last 2-4 years of spending freezes and cuts. These are cuts that most directly cause job loss, and don't do much for the overall budget. It was a stupid move in the first place by Congress and had very little to do with the president.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
March 05 2013 21:26 GMT
#2922
On March 06 2013 05:20 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 05:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:06 oneofthem wrote:
some of these budget outlays were already made ahead of time and altering them would cause some trauma, resulting in layoffs and so forth.

the problem with the republican proposal seems to be an expansion of executive power to make domestic cuts, but not military ones.

I thought the Rep proposal was for power over all cuts and the military fix was a separate bill?

the executive discretion is larger on the domestic side than it is on the military side.

from the wopo article

Show nested quote +
The White House argues that the Toomey-Inhofe bill doesn’t give it quite as much control as its proponents say. For instance, it gives the president the power to move cuts from defense spending over to domestic spending, but not to do the reverse. And within the defense cuts, there are limitations on the president’s authority. It forces him to largely abide by the spending decisions made in the National Defense Authorization Act — a limitation it doesn’t place on the domestic side. It also subjects whatever recommendations the White House does make to a congressional vote of disapproval.


it's quite the deviously ingenious move.

A-ha! Thanks, great info!

On March 06 2013 05:55 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 05:33 oneofthem wrote:
it's what we would usually call a bait. there's no reason why the entire thing can't be scrapped or made less painful in other ways

Like....oh I don't know.....getting rid of tax loopholes only the super rich can enjoy? Nahhhhhhhh


Obama rejected that in favor of hiking tax rates. Now that rates have risen he wants to revisit that well.

Wealthy's Tax Bill Will Hit 30-Year High in 2013

With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
Link

At some point that well's going to run dry...
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
March 05 2013 21:31 GMT
#2923
I don't consider Obama's prioritization of hiking rates too big an error. And I'm less concerned with wealthy families and more so with wealthy things that can be considered people.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
DeltaX
Profile Joined August 2011
United States287 Posts
March 05 2013 21:47 GMT
#2924
On March 06 2013 05:31 rusedeguerre wrote:
The point is that the president is rejecting something that would make sequestration less painful. Obviously the Republicans want to give the president more of the responsibility here, but that is a non-issue when we are talking about the president intentionally hurting the American public for political gain.


You could also say that republicans rejected Obama's plan of limiting deductions and entitlement cuts and forced the sequester for political gain.

The real solution is not to throw your arms up in the air and have someone else do the work for you, the solution is to sit down and work it out.

Either way I don't see this passing. I don't see many democrats supporting such a blatant political stunt and I don't see enough republicans being willing to go along with it to even get it past the house. I personally see this as a way for republicans to force Obama to make the cuts they have been trying to get for the last decade or so, and then blame him for it.
TotalBalanceSC2
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada475 Posts
March 05 2013 21:58 GMT
#2925
Well looks like Hugo Chavez is dead now, It seems they are laying the blame on foreign powers, possibly the U.S.
Vvix
Profile Joined February 2009
Brazil40 Posts
March 05 2013 22:00 GMT
#2926
Im not seeing they claim fault to foreign powers, but havent watched since the beggining
"Through habit the unnatural can become natural and men forget to question themselves." Miyamoto Musashi
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
March 05 2013 22:05 GMT
#2927
Quick! Let's engineer a coup and set up a puppet regime!
shikata ga nai
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 05 2013 22:07 GMT
#2928
On March 06 2013 06:26 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 05:20 oneofthem wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:06 oneofthem wrote:
some of these budget outlays were already made ahead of time and altering them would cause some trauma, resulting in layoffs and so forth.

the problem with the republican proposal seems to be an expansion of executive power to make domestic cuts, but not military ones.

I thought the Rep proposal was for power over all cuts and the military fix was a separate bill?

the executive discretion is larger on the domestic side than it is on the military side.

from the wopo article

The White House argues that the Toomey-Inhofe bill doesn’t give it quite as much control as its proponents say. For instance, it gives the president the power to move cuts from defense spending over to domestic spending, but not to do the reverse. And within the defense cuts, there are limitations on the president’s authority. It forces him to largely abide by the spending decisions made in the National Defense Authorization Act — a limitation it doesn’t place on the domestic side. It also subjects whatever recommendations the White House does make to a congressional vote of disapproval.


it's quite the deviously ingenious move.

A-ha! Thanks, great info!

Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 05:55 farvacola wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:33 oneofthem wrote:
it's what we would usually call a bait. there's no reason why the entire thing can't be scrapped or made less painful in other ways

Like....oh I don't know.....getting rid of tax loopholes only the super rich can enjoy? Nahhhhhhhh


Obama rejected that in favor of hiking tax rates. Now that rates have risen he wants to revisit that well.

Show nested quote +
Wealthy's Tax Bill Will Hit 30-Year High in 2013

With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
Link

At some point that well's going to run dry...

For a second there, I thought this "wealthy being overtaxed" was a serious concern. Then I realized 30 years ago was the beginning of the Reagan era, which can be considered as a good starting point of all the wealth redistribution to the top. I don't necessarily agree with brute force redistribution, but correcting the regressive nature of "capitalism" with a highly progressive tax structure seems like a reasonable cause. I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.
TotalBalanceSC2
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada475 Posts
March 05 2013 22:13 GMT
#2929
On March 06 2013 07:05 sam!zdat wrote:
Quick! Let's engineer a coup and set up a puppet regime!

I am sure if they wanted a puppet regime they would already have a plan in action.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-05 22:16:34
March 05 2013 22:14 GMT
#2930
On March 06 2013 07:07 aksfjh wrote:
I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.


by the end of the century there will be a capitalist moon base where all the money will go. it'll be the new switzerland.

and then sam's grandson will be railing against the abuse of power by the "transplanetary finance class"
shikata ga nai
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 05 2013 22:25 GMT
#2931
On March 06 2013 07:14 sam!zdat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 07:07 aksfjh wrote:
I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.


by the end of the century there will be a capitalist moon base where all the money will go. it'll be the new switzerland.

and then sam's grandson will be railing against the abuse of power by the "transplanetary finance class"

Not likely. His parents will likely shed his grandfather's ideals, fleeing to a better life that doesn't revolve around starving physically while exercising philosophical prowess. Sam's grandson will likely be one of the financiers of the moon colonies, battling for a 0.5% reduction in tax rates while shipping hundreds of people to the moon ala 1700s slave ship conditions.
Shiragaku
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong4308 Posts
March 05 2013 22:28 GMT
#2932
Even though I see myself getting further and further from Slavoj Zizek, I would have to agree with his small statement of Chavez


I use to be a pretty big fan of Chavez, but dear God is he a fraudulent socialist. Yes, he is a major improvement to his nation, but his prison system is brutal, his economic system is more state capitalism, and his foreign policy is atrocious, often supporting despots like Gaddafi, Iran, and China.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
March 05 2013 22:29 GMT
#2933
On March 06 2013 07:07 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 06:26 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:20 oneofthem wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:06 oneofthem wrote:
some of these budget outlays were already made ahead of time and altering them would cause some trauma, resulting in layoffs and so forth.

the problem with the republican proposal seems to be an expansion of executive power to make domestic cuts, but not military ones.

I thought the Rep proposal was for power over all cuts and the military fix was a separate bill?

the executive discretion is larger on the domestic side than it is on the military side.

from the wopo article

The White House argues that the Toomey-Inhofe bill doesn’t give it quite as much control as its proponents say. For instance, it gives the president the power to move cuts from defense spending over to domestic spending, but not to do the reverse. And within the defense cuts, there are limitations on the president’s authority. It forces him to largely abide by the spending decisions made in the National Defense Authorization Act — a limitation it doesn’t place on the domestic side. It also subjects whatever recommendations the White House does make to a congressional vote of disapproval.


it's quite the deviously ingenious move.

A-ha! Thanks, great info!

On March 06 2013 05:55 farvacola wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:33 oneofthem wrote:
it's what we would usually call a bait. there's no reason why the entire thing can't be scrapped or made less painful in other ways

Like....oh I don't know.....getting rid of tax loopholes only the super rich can enjoy? Nahhhhhhhh


Obama rejected that in favor of hiking tax rates. Now that rates have risen he wants to revisit that well.

Wealthy's Tax Bill Will Hit 30-Year High in 2013

With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
Link

At some point that well's going to run dry...

For a second there, I thought this "wealthy being overtaxed" was a serious concern. Then I realized 30 years ago was the beginning of the Reagan era, which can be considered as a good starting point of all the wealth redistribution to the top. I don't necessarily agree with brute force redistribution, but correcting the regressive nature of "capitalism" with a highly progressive tax structure seems like a reasonable cause. I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.

Wealth was redistributed to the top? The new wealth that was created primarily went to the top. That's still a concern, but a different beast altogether.

As for the well running dry, France and the UK haven't been having too much success with their latest top tax brackets. Perhaps we should let the last two tax hikes on the rich take effect and measure the impact before going for round three?
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-05 22:35:07
March 05 2013 22:29 GMT
#2934
On March 06 2013 07:25 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 07:14 sam!zdat wrote:
On March 06 2013 07:07 aksfjh wrote:
I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.


by the end of the century there will be a capitalist moon base where all the money will go. it'll be the new switzerland.

and then sam's grandson will be railing against the abuse of power by the "transplanetary finance class"

Not likely. His parents will likely shed his grandfather's ideals, fleeing to a better life that doesn't revolve around starving physically while exercising philosophical prowess. Sam's grandson will likely be one of the financiers of the moon colonies, battling for a 0.5% reduction in tax rates while shipping hundreds of people to the moon ala 1700s slave ship conditions.


oh dear! I'd better not reproduce. Can't have that.

edit: I'm not saying I think Chavez is a saint or anything. I'd just rather have a fraud who stands up to American imperialism than a fraud who's an American stooge, if we're gonna pick and choose between frauds, which seems like the only option.
shikata ga nai
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-05 22:36:20
March 05 2013 22:35 GMT
#2935
On March 06 2013 07:29 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 07:07 aksfjh wrote:
On March 06 2013 06:26 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:20 oneofthem wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:06 oneofthem wrote:
some of these budget outlays were already made ahead of time and altering them would cause some trauma, resulting in layoffs and so forth.

the problem with the republican proposal seems to be an expansion of executive power to make domestic cuts, but not military ones.

I thought the Rep proposal was for power over all cuts and the military fix was a separate bill?

the executive discretion is larger on the domestic side than it is on the military side.

from the wopo article

The White House argues that the Toomey-Inhofe bill doesn’t give it quite as much control as its proponents say. For instance, it gives the president the power to move cuts from defense spending over to domestic spending, but not to do the reverse. And within the defense cuts, there are limitations on the president’s authority. It forces him to largely abide by the spending decisions made in the National Defense Authorization Act — a limitation it doesn’t place on the domestic side. It also subjects whatever recommendations the White House does make to a congressional vote of disapproval.


it's quite the deviously ingenious move.

A-ha! Thanks, great info!

On March 06 2013 05:55 farvacola wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:33 oneofthem wrote:
it's what we would usually call a bait. there's no reason why the entire thing can't be scrapped or made less painful in other ways

Like....oh I don't know.....getting rid of tax loopholes only the super rich can enjoy? Nahhhhhhhh


Obama rejected that in favor of hiking tax rates. Now that rates have risen he wants to revisit that well.

Wealthy's Tax Bill Will Hit 30-Year High in 2013

With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
Link

At some point that well's going to run dry...

For a second there, I thought this "wealthy being overtaxed" was a serious concern. Then I realized 30 years ago was the beginning of the Reagan era, which can be considered as a good starting point of all the wealth redistribution to the top. I don't necessarily agree with brute force redistribution, but correcting the regressive nature of "capitalism" with a highly progressive tax structure seems like a reasonable cause. I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.

Wealth was redistributed to the top? The new wealth that was created primarily went to the top. That's still a concern, but a different beast altogether.


No, it's not. That's the commodity fetish. "material relations between people and social relations between things"
shikata ga nai
Shiragaku
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong4308 Posts
March 05 2013 22:40 GMT
#2936
edit: I'm not saying I think Chavez is a saint or anything. I'd just rather have a fraud who stands up to American imperialism than a fraud who's an American stooge, if we're gonna pick and choose between frauds, which seems like the only option.


But even from a pragmatic standpoint, it seems awfully dangerous given on whose side he is on which seems to be the East Asian Capitalists. Yes, American capitalism is awful, but at least it allows you and me to talk about how evil capitalism is. Chavez's history of free speech has been pretty shady, Castro censors like hell, Iran and Libya arrest you, and China sends you to reeducation. You would think that some of these places are puppet nations of America.
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 05 2013 22:43 GMT
#2937
On March 06 2013 07:29 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2013 07:07 aksfjh wrote:
On March 06 2013 06:26 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:20 oneofthem wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:06 oneofthem wrote:
some of these budget outlays were already made ahead of time and altering them would cause some trauma, resulting in layoffs and so forth.

the problem with the republican proposal seems to be an expansion of executive power to make domestic cuts, but not military ones.

I thought the Rep proposal was for power over all cuts and the military fix was a separate bill?

the executive discretion is larger on the domestic side than it is on the military side.

from the wopo article

The White House argues that the Toomey-Inhofe bill doesn’t give it quite as much control as its proponents say. For instance, it gives the president the power to move cuts from defense spending over to domestic spending, but not to do the reverse. And within the defense cuts, there are limitations on the president’s authority. It forces him to largely abide by the spending decisions made in the National Defense Authorization Act — a limitation it doesn’t place on the domestic side. It also subjects whatever recommendations the White House does make to a congressional vote of disapproval.


it's quite the deviously ingenious move.

A-ha! Thanks, great info!

On March 06 2013 05:55 farvacola wrote:
On March 06 2013 05:33 oneofthem wrote:
it's what we would usually call a bait. there's no reason why the entire thing can't be scrapped or made less painful in other ways

Like....oh I don't know.....getting rid of tax loopholes only the super rich can enjoy? Nahhhhhhhh


Obama rejected that in favor of hiking tax rates. Now that rates have risen he wants to revisit that well.

Wealthy's Tax Bill Will Hit 30-Year High in 2013

With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
Link

At some point that well's going to run dry...

For a second there, I thought this "wealthy being overtaxed" was a serious concern. Then I realized 30 years ago was the beginning of the Reagan era, which can be considered as a good starting point of all the wealth redistribution to the top. I don't necessarily agree with brute force redistribution, but correcting the regressive nature of "capitalism" with a highly progressive tax structure seems like a reasonable cause. I don't think we really have to worry about the well running dry any time in the near future.

Wealth was redistributed to the top? The new wealth that was created primarily went to the top. That's still a concern, but a different beast altogether.

As for the well running dry, France and the UK haven't been having too much success with their latest top tax brackets. Perhaps we should let the last two tax hikes on the rich take effect and measure the impact before going for round three?

Good point about growth. I still see it as a huge problem that should be corrected, and believe tax rates are an effective tool.

The EU austerity measures are hitting on multiple points. Not only are there tax hikes on the rich, but I believe there are also massive cuts to spending as well, which lowers employment and services for low and middle classes. This isn't a well running dry as much as a self induced drought.

That's not to suggest we shouldn't use a "wait and see" approach when it comes to tax rates, and what we've done is probably too much for now. But I've more than established myself as a person who wants us to focus on economic recovery first and foremost, not somebody that wants to solve some imagined fiscal crisis involving debts and deficits. My connection comes in as your first point with growth in that I don't want the economic recovery to be diverted to serve those that have benefited most from the last 30 years of growth.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-05 22:45:35
March 05 2013 22:45 GMT
#2938
i know man. It's hard out here for a pimp, naw mean? At the end of the day, though, I'll take a Chavez over a Pinochet any day.
shikata ga nai
Shiragaku
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong4308 Posts
March 05 2013 22:52 GMT
#2939
On March 06 2013 07:45 sam!zdat wrote:
i know man. It's hard out here for a pimp, naw mean? At the end of the day, though, I'll take a Chavez over a Pinochet any day.

Hee hee, I guess I can possibly live with that.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 05 2013 23:01 GMT
#2940
Donald Trump will speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Maryland next week, the American Conservative Union announced Tuesday.

“Donald Trump is an American patriot and success story with a massive following among small government conservatives,” ACU Chairman Al Cardenas said in a press release. “I look forward to welcoming him back to the CPAC stage next week. Mr. Trump’s previous CPAC appearance was hugely popular among our attendees and we expect it will be even more popular this year.”


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Prev 1 145 146 147 148 149 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Korean StarCraft League #77
CranKy Ducklings109
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft475
Livibee 120
ProTech66
Vindicta 26
RuFF_SC2 13
StarCraft: Brood War
MaD[AoV]34
Bale 25
Icarus 3
Dota 2
monkeys_forever330
NeuroSwarm124
League of Legends
JimRising 592
Counter-Strike
summit1g10826
tarik_tv4886
taco 563
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King129
Other Games
shahzam885
Maynarde144
JuggernautJason106
ToD96
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick49546
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta25
• HeavenSC 15
• Mapu3
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2351
League of Legends
• Jankos1388
• TFBlade664
• Stunt254
Other Games
• Scarra1431
• WagamamaTV190
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
9h 4m
WardiTV European League
15h 4m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
23h 4m
The PondCast
1d 9h
WardiTV European League
1d 11h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 15h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.