• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:13
CEST 02:13
KST 09:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL59Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event19Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Mineral Boosts Tutorial Video Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Replays question
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 492 users

Heart of the Swarm beta coming soon! - Page 36

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 34 35 36 37 38 144 Next
Do not use this thread to beg users for beta access or trade access with others. Thanks.
Deleuze
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United Kingdom2102 Posts
August 21 2012 14:17 GMT
#701
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


You shouldn't theorycraft on a game that's not yet in public Beta.
“An image of thought called philosophy has been formed historically and it effectively stops people from thinking.” ― Gilles Deleuze, Dialogues II
Snowbear
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1925 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-21 14:20:21
August 21 2012 14:19 GMT
#702
On August 21 2012 23:17 Deleuze wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


You shouldn't theorycraft on a game that's not yet in public Beta.


I am not theorycrafting, the guy I quoted is..
gruntrush
Profile Joined May 2008
Canada134 Posts
August 21 2012 14:20 GMT
#703
When will it be?!?
Don't worry, That's halo
Forikorder
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada8840 Posts
August 21 2012 14:21 GMT
#704
On August 21 2012 23:19 Snowbear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:17 Deleuze wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


You shouldn't theorycraft on a game that's not yet in public Beta.


I am not theorycrafting, the guy I quoted is..

your theorycrafting as much as he is by saying his theorycrafting is bad you theorycrafted his theorycrafting
ZXRP
Profile Joined August 2010
South Africa114 Posts
August 21 2012 14:25 GMT
#705
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


Could you please elaborate as to why you disagree with my suggestion?

I think the mine would certainly be more useful than in the current build where, if you micro it away the targeted unit will be the only unit lost (or damaged). Dustin Browder mentioned specifically that part of what they are struggling with in balancing the mine is to make the cost and supply just right so that it will not be over- or underpowered.

If you were suggesting that the mine explode immediately upon attachment (or at least, with a very short time window), the fear is that, with the pathing and unlimited unit selection, a unit that costs 1 supply could do 200 AOE damage from a fairly large range. This feels extremely powerful and unforgiving.

I believe that my suggestion is a good middle ground.
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the Universe - Carl Sagan
Forikorder
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada8840 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-21 14:32:21
August 21 2012 14:31 GMT
#706
On August 21 2012 23:25 ZXRP wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


Could you please elaborate as to why you disagree with my suggestion?

I think the mine would certainly be more useful than in the current build where, if you micro it away the targeted unit will be the only unit lost (or damaged). Dustin Browder mentioned specifically that part of what they are struggling with in balancing the mine is to make the cost and supply just right so that it will not be over- or underpowered.

If you were suggesting that the mine explode immediately upon attachment (or at least, with a very short time window), the fear is that, with the pathing and unlimited unit selection, a unit that costs 1 supply could do 200 AOE damage from a fairly large range. This feels extremely powerful and unforgiving.

I believe that my suggestion is a good middle ground.

the spider mine was recently changed so it does explode immmediately buit deals less AoE damage
stichtom
Profile Joined March 2011
Italy695 Posts
August 21 2012 14:42 GMT
#707
Another intwerview with David Kim with some very interesting questions: http://www.millenium.org/starcraft-2/accueil/actualites/hots-interviews-avec-les-developpeurs-sc2-questions-reponses-avec-les-devs-d-heart-of-the-swarm-73684?page=2


- Only 1 vs 1 and custom games in the Beta.
- No clan in the beta
- More stats in HOTS
Favourite player: IM.MVP ~ Favorite league: IPL
RedMosquito
Profile Joined September 2010
United States280 Posts
August 21 2012 14:45 GMT
#708
On August 21 2012 23:31 Forikorder wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:25 ZXRP wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


Could you please elaborate as to why you disagree with my suggestion?

I think the mine would certainly be more useful than in the current build where, if you micro it away the targeted unit will be the only unit lost (or damaged). Dustin Browder mentioned specifically that part of what they are struggling with in balancing the mine is to make the cost and supply just right so that it will not be over- or underpowered.

If you were suggesting that the mine explode immediately upon attachment (or at least, with a very short time window), the fear is that, with the pathing and unlimited unit selection, a unit that costs 1 supply could do 200 AOE damage from a fairly large range. This feels extremely powerful and unforgiving.

I believe that my suggestion is a good middle ground.

the spider mine was recently changed so it does explode immmediately buit deals less AoE damage


If the widow mine doesn't deal any AOE damage (blizzard probably didnt want it to be used for worker harass) im not sure how you're supposed to use that unit optimally. If it deals high damage to a single unit then you want it to hit things like immortals, collosus, ultralisks, tanks. None of these units just walk around by themselves. You would have to get extremely lucky for a collosus to walk over one before any stalkers do. Maybe during a gold leaguer broodlord push you can get a good widow mine off.

A better idea would be for the mine to only be set off by larger units. Basically things like zerglings, workers, zealots ect wont set it off. That way it can still do splash damage but not be used for worker harass. It also makes some logical sense. I really hope they figure this unit out because it seems like its gonna be scratched quickly.


Forikorder
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada8840 Posts
August 21 2012 14:47 GMT
#709
On August 21 2012 23:45 RedMosquito wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 23:31 Forikorder wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:25 ZXRP wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:12 Snowbear wrote:
On August 21 2012 23:10 ZXRP wrote:
There have been quite a few posts regarding the strength of the widow mine. Here is a suggestion that might make it both balanced and interesting.

When the mine attaches itself to a unit, it doesn't do the damage in one explosion but rather over time (starting right after the attachment), essentially exactly like irradiate in BW. This would do AOE damage to both friendly and enemy units (to make it more interesting and to address possible balance issues).

This would mean that, although you cannot avoid taking damage on the primary unit, you can't completely avoid taking damage on some of your other units either - if they are bunched up. This means that, even if the mine attaches itself to a ling, it will not be a total waste of money and supply for the terran player.

In addition, this will allow the zerg player to send "irradiated" units into the enemy force to get some payback.

As a final bonus, this would make the mine more noob friendly with regard to drops in the mineral line, as it would not kill all the workers seemingly without warning. You would the "units under attack" alert, and then have a few precious seconds to separate the workers out.

In conclusion, I believe this would address most, if not all, of the issues currently experienced and debated.


I really never read such a bad idea in my life, wow! The mine would be useless. The only thing the mine has to do atm is to act like the BW spidermine: explode and do splashdamage.


Could you please elaborate as to why you disagree with my suggestion?

I think the mine would certainly be more useful than in the current build where, if you micro it away the targeted unit will be the only unit lost (or damaged). Dustin Browder mentioned specifically that part of what they are struggling with in balancing the mine is to make the cost and supply just right so that it will not be over- or underpowered.

If you were suggesting that the mine explode immediately upon attachment (or at least, with a very short time window), the fear is that, with the pathing and unlimited unit selection, a unit that costs 1 supply could do 200 AOE damage from a fairly large range. This feels extremely powerful and unforgiving.

I believe that my suggestion is a good middle ground.

the spider mine was recently changed so it does explode immmediately buit deals less AoE damage


If the widow mine doesn't deal any AOE damage (blizzard probably didnt want it to be used for worker harass) im not sure how you're supposed to use that unit optimally. If it deals high damage to a single unit then you want it to hit things like immortals, collosus, ultralisks, tanks. None of these units just walk around by themselves. You would have to get extremely lucky for a collosus to walk over one before any stalkers do. Maybe during a gold leaguer broodlord push you can get a good widow mine off.

A better idea would be for the mine to only be set off by larger units. Basically things like zerglings, workers, zealots ect wont set it off. That way it can still do splash damage but not be used for worker harass. It also makes some logical sense. I really hope they figure this unit out because it seems like its gonna be scratched quickly.



LESS AoE damage not NO AoE damage
monx
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada1400 Posts
August 21 2012 19:31 GMT
#710
got a beta key...








+ Show Spoiler +
for shootmania
@ggmonx
LOLItsRyann
Profile Joined April 2011
England551 Posts
August 21 2012 19:34 GMT
#711
On August 22 2012 04:31 monx wrote:
got a beta key...








+ Show Spoiler +
for shootmania


I did get a Starcraft 2 beta key. No joke.
EG<3
Ahelvin
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
France1866 Posts
August 22 2012 08:11 GMT
#712
On August 22 2012 04:34 LOLItsRyann wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2012 04:31 monx wrote:
got a beta key...








+ Show Spoiler +
for shootmania


I did get a Starcraft 2 beta key. No joke.

You know too well what we say: pics or it didn't happen.
Join the Liquipedia Zerg Project ! PM me for more information :).
Snowbear
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1925 Posts
August 22 2012 08:21 GMT
#713
On August 22 2012 17:11 Ahelvin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2012 04:34 LOLItsRyann wrote:
On August 22 2012 04:31 monx wrote:
got a beta key...








+ Show Spoiler +
for shootmania


I did get a Starcraft 2 beta key. No joke.

You know too well what we say: pics or it didn't happen.


He said sc2 beta key, not HOTS beta key
SKDN
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden243 Posts
August 22 2012 08:50 GMT
#714
I hope I get a key this time and not like when sc2 beta came out begged to use my wow friends account
Cabinet Sanchez
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia1097 Posts
August 22 2012 09:02 GMT
#715
I'm still curious how the progamers, commentators and general community people get in to the beta, does anyone know?
I don't want or intend to game the system, I'm just kind of fascinated by the logistics of it all.

Does Blizzard just have some list somewhere? I mean I assume people like Artosis, Tasteless, Wolf, Khaldor will get in very quickly, plus people like Husky, Day9 and of course the pro gamers and so on.

Anyone got any ideas?
Halozination
Profile Joined January 2012
69 Posts
August 22 2012 09:47 GMT
#716
On August 21 2012 01:33 Forikorder wrote:
Show nested quote +
in my opionion the mechanism of lowground pylons for highground warpins made the game much more interesting and dynamic as its very good for harras or some light aggression (maybe from multiple angles) that does not go through the front door.


by harass or light agression i assume you mean extremely hard to hold off push that allows you to instantly reinforce inside of a zergs main base faster than they can actually get there reinforcements there (essentially giving the protoss the defenders advantage) and an extremely advantageous position where FFs can essentially make it so that the main has to be sacrificed

I only ment light aggression/harras. For example vs zerg attacing multiple places with a couple of zealots each or counter attacing zerg when hes attacing you with the help of vr or phoenix to give vision for the pylon. vs t dts or zealots and bypassing their ralley with obs/halluzinate. Z and T currently can spread out protoss a lot and force them to split up their army a lot (t: drops, z: drops, mutas, zergling/roach runbys, attacing multiple positions at once with large number advantage. So I dont like they take one of the ways protoss can do this away. Warp prism is fine but this change takes away diversity.)

The attac that you describe vs z is sort of allin as it is a huge comittment to warp in tons of units into the zergs main base that can not escape at any time. There are other allin attacs that are hard to hold as well... it should require some skill to hold well executed attacs in my oppinion. I don't really play this particular attac but even if you dont see it coming (which you should) it should not be the end of the world and its not easy peasy hold the ramp defenders advantage in the zerg main base.
On August 21 2012 02:01 Forikorder wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 01:55 Grumbels wrote:
On August 21 2012 01:33 Forikorder wrote:
in my opionion the mechanism of lowground pylons for highground warpins made the game much more interesting and dynamic as its very good for harras or some light aggression (maybe from multiple angles) that does not go through the front door.


by harass or light agression i assume you mean extremely hard to hold off push that allows you to instantly reinforce inside of a zergs main base faster than they can actually get there reinforcements there (essentially giving the protoss the defenders advantage) and an extremely advantageous position where FFs can essentially make it so that the main has to be sacrificed

you can do that with warp prisms too and having scattered pylons around is more interesting gameplay because it's more positional

warp prisms require you to delay the push to actually get the warp prism, pylon play does not

Just not true. You need something to give vision to allow highground warpin like a voidray/phoenix, this can make it about as fast as a warp prism attac and it can not really be said which attac is better as they are completely different. voidrays/phoenix give air support while warp prism can give safety for sentrys and micro and escape possibilities. If the game continues after the attac you probably will keep your airforce or warp prism+sentries.

I doubt that blizzard removed highground power because of cheesy rampblock tactics. Maybe they just wanted to to nerf the hots p some as it was too strong. (I mean they dont patch it in wol or do they...)
Adonminus
Profile Joined January 2012
Israel543 Posts
August 22 2012 10:26 GMT
#717
I hope blizzard would prefer to give beta keys to people with some good knowledge of sc2 such as master+. Or preferably like top 8 master. (yeah I say that cause I'm top 8 master). This would really help to have a better idea of the balance in the beta.
Darknat
Profile Joined March 2011
United States122 Posts
August 22 2012 10:59 GMT
#718
On August 21 2012 23:42 stichtom wrote:
Another intwerview with David Kim with some very interesting questions: http://www.millenium.org/starcraft-2/accueil/actualites/hots-interviews-avec-les-developpeurs-sc2-questions-reponses-avec-les-devs-d-heart-of-the-swarm-73684?page=2


- Only 1 vs 1 and custom games in the Beta.
- No clan in the beta
- More stats in HOTS



I kind of hope I get into the Beta now. I have a "crap" computer though so I doubt I will.
Forikorder
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada8840 Posts
August 22 2012 15:37 GMT
#719
I only ment light aggression/harras. For example vs zerg attacing multiple places with a couple of zealots each or counter attacing zerg when hes attacing you with the help of vr or phoenix to give vision for the pylon. vs t dts or zealots and bypassing their ralley with obs/halluzinate. Z and T currently can spread out protoss a lot and force them to split up their army a lot (t: drops, z: drops, mutas, zergling/roach runbys, attacing multiple positions at once with large number advantage. So I dont like they take one of the ways protoss can do this away. Warp prism is fine but this change takes away diversity.)


no it doesnt because Protoss only used the low ground pylon high ground warp in to do all-in agression

The attac that you describe vs z is sort of allin as it is a huge comittment to warp in tons of units into the zergs main base that can not escape at any time. There are other allin attacs that are hard to hold as well... it should require some skill to hold well executed attacs in my oppinion. I don't really play this particular attac but even if you dont see it coming (which you should) it should not be the end of the world and its not easy peasy hold the ramp defenders advantage in the zerg main base.


the thing is you dont have defenders advantage becasue most of your reinforcements are from your natural and third which is farther away then yor opponts pylon, plus if they jsut FF the ramp then they only have to deal with units coming from your main

Just not true. You need something to give vision to allow highground warpin like a voidray/phoenix, this can make it about as fast as a warp prism attac and it can not really be said which attac is better as they are completely different. voidrays/phoenix give air support while warp prism can give safety for sentrys and micro and escape possibilities. If the game continues after the attac you probably will keep your airforce or warp prism+sentries.

I doubt that blizzard removed highground power because of cheesy rampblock tactics. Maybe they just wanted to to nerf the hots p some as it was too strong. (I mean they dont patch it in wol or do they...)


the VR phoenix attack is undoubtably much stronger then straight WP attack because the WP attack is just Gateway units and the VR attack is everything the WP attack has but with phoenix and VRs especailly since Zerg has so few AA options early game and they can be sniped by Zealots pretty easily

and they said in an interview the change was to stop the sort of attack i jsut described they didnt like Protoss so easily warping into the main of someone without a WP
Noocta
Profile Joined June 2010
France12578 Posts
August 22 2012 15:42 GMT
#720
It's taking so long, omg..
With how it's going they'll release MoP before the HoTS beta.
" I'm not gonna fight you. I'm gonna kick your ass ! "
Prev 1 34 35 36 37 38 144 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 47m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 223
NeuroSwarm 165
ProTech79
ROOTCatZ 1
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 87
yabsab 29
Dota 2
febbydoto15
League of Legends
Grubby3266
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K857
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor183
Other Games
summit1g10625
tarik_tv7182
fl0m472
JimRising 422
Fnx 178
ViBE148
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV29
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH286
• davetesta38
• Hunta15 4
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki13
• Pr0nogo 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler82
League of Legends
• Doublelift5159
• Jankos1799
• masondota2665
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
9h 47m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
11h 47m
WardiTV European League
11h 47m
BSL: ProLeague
17h 47m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.