On July 14 2012 21:52 iGn1t3 wrote:
so sad for Nestea. Should be a re-match.
so sad for Nestea. Should be a re-match.
lol.......can't believe all these posts are still going on.
Forum Index > Closed |
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
On July 14 2012 21:52 iGn1t3 wrote: so sad for Nestea. Should be a re-match. lol.......can't believe all these posts are still going on. | ||
Aerisky
United States12128 Posts
Poor Nestea ![]() Good on IM and Nestea for accepting the loss gracefully. Who knows how it would have gone with the original map and so many possible alternate timelines. Nestea is such a champ in defeat as well >.< | ||
philth
Canada2 Posts
I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. | ||
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. | ||
philth
Canada2 Posts
On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: Show nested quote + On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. Asserting that there is no solution without trying anything is genius though, I'm sure. Thanks for letting me know I'm kinda silly, I'll try to curb my thinking in the future. | ||
quaffle
United States249 Posts
| ||
paddyz
Ireland628 Posts
| ||
DeCoder
Finland236 Posts
| ||
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
On July 14 2012 22:59 philth wrote: Show nested quote + On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. Asserting that there is no solution without trying anything is genius though, I'm sure. Thanks for letting me know I'm kinda silly, I'll try to curb my thinking in the future. Hey i am not the one claiming there is a solution without giving one. I never said there isn't a solution mind, just that those couple ideas you thrown in got nothing to do with the subject at hand. Is there a solution? Who knows, that is for the mapmakers/players to figure out. | ||
ohampatu
United States1448 Posts
1. The mods are not doing their jobs, they are allowing people to say 'please die' and other harsh things about Byun, and only giving a warning for it. To put this in light, last time i replied to Incontrol and said some derogatory terms, I was insta banned (we'll ignore incontrol cussing/flaming/etc, cause you dont ban pros, i get it). Can the people trashing Byun be treated like this? I bet you'd insta ban if instead of 'Byun' getting made fun of, it was 'TLO' or 'NoNy'. Your letting people post the chat from his CoCa games, letting people call him a matchfixer. I blame this complete thread on TL and its MOD's. 2. There is no rule that states a depot has to be on a map. There is only the rule that GSL maps have to be used. I dont understand how people keep stating he broke a rule. He did no such thing. 3. Byun didn't do anything sneakily. He watched 10 vods (or more) of the map, saw that it never had a depot at all this season, and created a strat for it. Lets go ahead and call every player that has played on this map this season that hasn't mentioned the depots a 'horrible person, unprofessional, should quit gaming, no honor, etc'. 4. Nestea is the only person to blame at this point in time. He had the ability to pause. He had the ability to question the admins. He had the ability to beat the strat after scouting it. The only people who dropped the ball were GOM and Nestea. GOM put out an annoucement, Nestea didn't want to regame. Issues are now resolved. Drop the fucking subject already. 5. The depot is not a 'balance' object. The maps are balanced without depots. The depots are strictly there for viwership. At this point in time the best discussion would be if the depots are even needed anymore. Which they aren't. Maps have increased in size, zerg has gotten better early game. Ladder diamond players can prevent this strat, why are we making it ez on the pros that they dont have to do something a simple diamond player is expected to do every ladder game in PvZ. Most importantly. You people trashing Byun make me sick. He is a top 3 terran potentially, and your all trashing him, calling him a matchfixer, bringing up old information, trying to make him look like the bad guy. He is the only guy who out of the 3 who did his job 100 percent. Out of Byun, Nestea, and GOM....Byun acted 100 percent as he should have, whilst Nestea and GOM both dropped the ball when it was in their courts. | ||
canikizu
4860 Posts
2. What makes you think that Nestea didn't notice the depot missing? Metropolis is the first map of the series, which players have to practice the most. There's a large chance that he notice the depot, but he didn't think of Byun's strat. That's why he didn't pause the game, because maybe he himself thought that no depot is a feature of the map too. Tthis is not the first time it happens, GSL Crossfire and Dual Sight also don't have depots too (you can check vods on youtube, and fyi, CrossFire and Dual Sight were in the map pool last season) So, if Byun execute a strat that Nestea didn't expect and practice for, that counts as cheesy and abusing bugs now? No. Byun outclassed and "out metagamed" Nestea, simple as that. Nestea had a chance to clean up the bunker rush, but he failed, there's nothing else to say. | ||
whatevername
471 Posts
On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: Destructable rocks isnt a strategy, it is literally unacceptable that a map precludes a particular action because its perceived as imbalanced. It needs to be balanced away through patching, through the meta game, or simple map size/geography. Double bunker isnt even imbalanced, its easy as fuck to stop, its just a hold over mentality from the cheesefest of 2010.Show nested quote + On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. | ||
mrjpark
United States276 Posts
On July 15 2012 04:46 whatevername wrote: Show nested quote + Destructable rocks isnt a strategy, it is literally unacceptable that a map precludes a particular action because its perceived as imbalanced. It needs to be balanced away through patching, through the meta game, or simple map size/geography. Double bunker isnt even imbalanced, its easy as fuck to stop, its just a hold over mentality from the cheesefest of 2010.On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. Uh. It's actually just a free win. I guess it's not a balance problem since the Zerg player may as well have just not joined the game. | ||
whatevername
471 Posts
On July 15 2012 06:34 mrjpark wrote: Oh, so I guess you have literally never beaten a terran on every single ladder map eh?Show nested quote + On July 15 2012 04:46 whatevername wrote: On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: Destructable rocks isnt a strategy, it is literally unacceptable that a map precludes a particular action because its perceived as imbalanced. It needs to be balanced away through patching, through the meta game, or simple map size/geography. Double bunker isnt even imbalanced, its easy as fuck to stop, its just a hold over mentality from the cheesefest of 2010.On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. Uh. It's actually just a free win. I guess it's not a balance problem since the Zerg player may as well have just not joined the game. | ||
Peanutbutter717
United States240 Posts
| ||
sibs
635 Posts
On July 15 2012 06:35 whatevername wrote: Show nested quote + Oh, so I guess you have literally never beaten a terran on every single ladder map eh?On July 15 2012 06:34 mrjpark wrote: On July 15 2012 04:46 whatevername wrote: On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: Destructable rocks isnt a strategy, it is literally unacceptable that a map precludes a particular action because its perceived as imbalanced. It needs to be balanced away through patching, through the meta game, or simple map size/geography. Double bunker isnt even imbalanced, its easy as fuck to stop, its just a hold over mentality from the cheesefest of 2010.On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. Uh. It's actually just a free win. I guess it's not a balance problem since the Zerg player may as well have just not joined the game. Hmm its a free win if Terran gets the 2 bunkers blocking the ramp. Usually its stopped by a patrolling drone, again if you think theres a depot there you wont bother patrolling. | ||
whatevername
471 Posts
On July 15 2012 06:46 sibs wrote: It's a free win if he gets both bunkers up and you have no drones on the other side, which you will if you scouted a proxy 11-11 the only reasonably early bunker rush that will hurt you-- something nestea did scout, by the way.Show nested quote + On July 15 2012 06:35 whatevername wrote: On July 15 2012 06:34 mrjpark wrote: Oh, so I guess you have literally never beaten a terran on every single ladder map eh?On July 15 2012 04:46 whatevername wrote: On July 14 2012 22:42 Assirra wrote: Destructable rocks isnt a strategy, it is literally unacceptable that a map precludes a particular action because its perceived as imbalanced. It needs to be balanced away through patching, through the meta game, or simple map size/geography. Double bunker isnt even imbalanced, its easy as fuck to stop, its just a hold over mentality from the cheesefest of 2010.On July 14 2012 22:21 philth wrote: I've always felt the neutral supply depot is a half measure anyway, and rather clumsy to look at. A map should be able to be problem free inherently, without having to slap a gimmick on it. Maybe ramp sizes, number of ramps, distances from ramps to minerals, or some other mechanism, needs to be revisited. I don't have the answer myself, as I'm neither a map maker, nor a top level player. Yet I'm convinced the answer is out there somewhere. Neither of those things has anything to do with the problem of the double bunker rush. Don't see why it is gimmicky tbh. its just part of the map to prevent nonsense like we also had destructible rocks from bases removed. Also, claiming there is a solution when you don't know it is kinda silly. Uh. It's actually just a free win. I guess it's not a balance problem since the Zerg player may as well have just not joined the game. Hmm its a free win if Terran gets the 2 bunkers blocking the ramp. Usually its stopped by a patrolling drone, again if you think theres a depot there you wont bother patrolling. | ||
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On July 15 2012 06:38 Peanutbutter717 wrote: If Byun knew that the depots should have been there, he should have just played in a way that assumed it was there, because it was supposed to be. Spoken like someone who doesn't play this game for his living. | ||
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On July 15 2012 02:48 ohampatu wrote: This thread saddens me in so many ways. 1. The mods are not doing their jobs, they are allowing people to say 'please die' and other harsh things about Byun, and only giving a warning for it. To put this in light, last time i replied to Incontrol and said some derogatory terms, I was insta banned (we'll ignore incontrol cussing/flaming/etc, cause you dont ban pros, i get it). Can the people trashing Byun be treated like this? I bet you'd insta ban if instead of 'Byun' getting made fun of, it was 'TLO' or 'NoNy'. Your letting people post the chat from his CoCa games, letting people call him a matchfixer. I blame this complete thread on TL and its MOD's. 2. There is no rule that states a depot has to be on a map. There is only the rule that GSL maps have to be used. I dont understand how people keep stating he broke a rule. He did no such thing. 3. Byun didn't do anything sneakily. He watched 10 vods (or more) of the map, saw that it never had a depot at all this season, and created a strat for it. Lets go ahead and call every player that has played on this map this season that hasn't mentioned the depots a 'horrible person, unprofessional, should quit gaming, no honor, etc'. 4. Nestea is the only person to blame at this point in time. He had the ability to pause. He had the ability to question the admins. He had the ability to beat the strat after scouting it. The only people who dropped the ball were GOM and Nestea. GOM put out an annoucement, Nestea didn't want to regame. Issues are now resolved. Drop the fucking subject already. 5. The depot is not a 'balance' object. The maps are balanced without depots. The depots are strictly there for viwership. At this point in time the best discussion would be if the depots are even needed anymore. Which they aren't. Maps have increased in size, zerg has gotten better early game. Ladder diamond players can prevent this strat, why are we making it ez on the pros that they dont have to do something a simple diamond player is expected to do every ladder game in PvZ. Most importantly. You people trashing Byun make me sick. He is a top 3 terran potentially, and your all trashing him, calling him a matchfixer, bringing up old information, trying to make him look like the bad guy. He is the only guy who out of the 3 who did his job 100 percent. Out of Byun, Nestea, and GOM....Byun acted 100 percent as he should have, whilst Nestea and GOM both dropped the ball when it was in their courts. | ||
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On July 15 2012 02:48 ohampatu wrote: This thread saddens me in so many ways. 1. The mods are not doing their jobs, they are allowing people to say 'please die' and other harsh things about Byun, and only giving a warning for it. To put this in light, last time i replied to Incontrol and said some derogatory terms, I was insta banned (we'll ignore incontrol cussing/flaming/etc, cause you dont ban pros, i get it). Can the people trashing Byun be treated like this? I bet you'd insta ban if instead of 'Byun' getting made fun of, it was 'TLO' or 'NoNy'. Your letting people post the chat from his CoCa games, letting people call him a matchfixer. I blame this complete thread on TL and its MOD's. 2. There is no rule that states a depot has to be on a map. There is only the rule that GSL maps have to be used. I dont understand how people keep stating he broke a rule. He did no such thing. 3. Byun didn't do anything sneakily. He watched 10 vods (or more) of the map, saw that it never had a depot at all this season, and created a strat for it. Lets go ahead and call every player that has played on this map this season that hasn't mentioned the depots a 'horrible person, unprofessional, should quit gaming, no honor, etc'. 4. Nestea is the only person to blame at this point in time. He had the ability to pause. He had the ability to question the admins. He had the ability to beat the strat after scouting it. The only people who dropped the ball were GOM and Nestea. GOM put out an annoucement, Nestea didn't want to regame. Issues are now resolved. Drop the fucking subject already. 5. The depot is not a 'balance' object. The maps are balanced without depots. The depots are strictly there for viwership. At this point in time the best discussion would be if the depots are even needed anymore. Which they aren't. Maps have increased in size, zerg has gotten better early game. Ladder diamond players can prevent this strat, why are we making it ez on the pros that they dont have to do something a simple diamond player is expected to do every ladder game in PvZ. Most importantly. You people trashing Byun make me sick. He is a top 3 terran potentially, and your all trashing him, calling him a matchfixer, bringing up old information, trying to make him look like the bad guy. He is the only guy who out of the 3 who did his job 100 percent. Out of Byun, Nestea, and GOM....Byun acted 100 percent as he should have, whilst Nestea and GOM both dropped the ball when it was in their courts. Stop blaming Nestea, he took it like a man and only asked GOM to fix the problem for future matches. He is the one who acted 100 percent like he should have. What Byun did was definitely legal but probably not the Best in terms of sportsmanship. If you have problem with Nestea fans who are putting down Byun, that is fine. But Nestea didn't make a big deal out of it. So not sure why the blame is on him. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g8415 Grubby6534 Gorgc5581 ScreaM2610 FrodaN1439 Beastyqt1165 B2W.Neo538 shahzam241 Livibee239 C9.Mang0131 Sick129 ArmadaUGS96 Trikslyr73 SteadfastSC49 ZombieGrub38 rubinoeu4 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Hupsaiya ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Laughngamez YouTube • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
Epic.LAN
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] SOOP
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
|
|