EPTbut knowing blizzard it'll take a long long time even though the code is only a few lines probably (considering they've coded a similar feature on WoW)
Blizzard to add name change if people show support - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Poo
Canada536 Posts
but knowing blizzard it'll take a long long time even though the code is only a few lines probably (considering they've coded a similar feature on WoW) | ||
|
ReaperX
Hong Kong1758 Posts
On September 12 2011 12:50 benjammin wrote: if valve can manage it, why can't blizzard? It's different dude, WoW/SC2 names are different to TF2/COD names. | ||
|
Truedot
444 Posts
On September 12 2011 12:50 desrow wrote: valve doesnt have to deal with stream cheaters Its not against the rules to stream cheat on starcraft either. not against BLizzard rules that is. And honestly, does someone force you to stream? Does a stream of your play automatically go out live when you boot up sc2 for the first time? Im having trouble understanding how this can be a valid coherent argument against name changes. | ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
there is an endless list of things to implement. | ||
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:02 ReaperX wrote: It's different dude, WoW/SC2 names are different to TF2/COD names. why is it different? it seems like even a clan tag would be trivial to add | ||
|
f0rzaa
United States59 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:02 ReaperX wrote: It's different dude, WoW/SC2 names are different to TF2/COD names. I don't really see why it would be impossible. In steam you have you username which you give to your friends to add you to their friends list, ie your Real ID email address. In steam you can freely change your displayed name however many times you want for free, why can't blizzard add this? | ||
|
MarKeD
Australia183 Posts
| ||
|
Truedot
444 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:00 cHaNg-sTa wrote: by setting up a "pay to grief" system as you're stating, you're in effect legitimizing all people's claims that "they can be assholes and just buy their way out of it". Seriously? is that the kind of way you think society should be? or are you just dumb? What you may not have realized is that people already do this "paid name change" on their own, via selling their SC2 account/CD and buying a new one. GMs and their friends have done it with smurf accounts that get revealed. You really think "pro" griefers and internet assholes dont do this as well? Some simply buy new CDs without even selling their old ones. So saying that it should be a paid name change makes as much sense as shitting on the carpet. exactly. This is truie too. there's more political and philosophical issues behind this behavior and whether it is allowed or not. Everything that is human behavior is serious business, even in pleasure or entertainment venues. Because that behavior corrupts or changes behavior in other venues of life. | ||
|
desRow
Canada2654 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:04 Truedot wrote: Its not against the rules to stream cheat on starcraft either. not against BLizzard rules that is. And honestly, does someone force you to stream? Does a stream of your play automatically go out live when you boot up sc2 for the first time? Im having trouble understanding how this can be a valid coherent argument against name changes. ... people like destiny who people abuse and stream cheat against, at least since people cant have free name change, destiny can recognize those people and black screen his stream or put his 2nd monitor | ||
|
storm44
1293 Posts
| ||
|
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:00 Truedot wrote: by setting up a "pay to grief" system as you're stating, you're in effect legitimizing all people's claims that "they can be assholes and just buy their way out of it". Seriously? is that the kind of way you think society should be? or are you just dumb? What you may not have realized is that people already do this "paid name change" on their own, via selling their SC2 account/CD and buying a new one. GMs and their friends have done it with smurf accounts that get revealed. You really think "pro" griefers and internet assholes dont do this as well? Some simply buy new CDs without even selling their old ones. So saying that it should be a paid name change makes as much sense as shitting on the carpet. exactly. Quick to jump to personal insults, aren't you? I'm more amused that people are thinking that Blizzard is actually willing to give free name changes. | ||
|
lotrscwow
Afghanistan27 Posts
| ||
|
darunia
United States139 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:06 MarKeD wrote: Blizzard could very easily deal with stream cheaters if they were competent/wanted to. Would it really be that easy? I mean you need info about whether one client is streaming and whether the other client is accessing that specific stream. I'm not sure that is something the SC2 client can handle easily... | ||
Falling
Canada11607 Posts
But names changes, clan support, and shared replays are some pretty basic gaps in Battlenet 2.0 that make it more 0.5 then anything else. | ||
|
Namkung
Canada151 Posts
| ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:11 lotrscwow wrote: guess stop hating on blizzard. I know that battle.net 2.0 has some missing features but blizzard is doing their best. Without blizzard there wouldn't even be this awesome game Starcraft 2 so I think we should give them a break It is not the problem that they don't have the time to implement it; nor is it difficult to code. It is rather simple and already existing, but I don't know why they are not omplementing it. Maybe they just dont know how to get the most money out of it... Blizzard, do aou want no second name change so that we have to buy another copy?? wtf... | ||
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
On September 12 2011 13:14 Namkung wrote: the point about not having free name change reducing spam / stream cheating etc. is certainly a valid point . but this problem only exists because we are only allowed to make one "id" (if you will) for one sc2 account and not as many as you want (like you could in wc3 or bw) it's not really a valid point when it reflects 0.001% of the userbase's interests | ||
|
ECA.BruTATroN
United States282 Posts
| ||
|
lizzard_warish
589 Posts
| ||
|
Strivers
United States358 Posts
| ||
| ||
