• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:37
CEST 14:37
KST 21:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D ASL20 General Discussion Soulkey on ASL S20 BW General Discussion NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2650 users

Weak Thor AA crippling TvP creativity - Page 9

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next All
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
November 18 2010 22:05 GMT
#161
On November 18 2010 19:33 Nadagast wrote:
Thors have great anti air against light units, but against armored air units, their air attack is beyond terrible. With equal upgrades against Carriers, Thors do 4x4 = 16 damage per volley. That's less DPS than a stimmed Marine.

Thors weakness against armored air targets would be reasonable if they weren't so high up on the attack priority. In a large battle with Carriers on one side and Thors on the other, Thors do basically no DPS, unless you manually target Thors on ground units, they spend the entire fight shooting Interceptors and Carriers.

Now I know what you're saying: Get Vikings to kill Armored air units. But the problem is that Vikings suck on the ground. The problem is that getting armored air units is almost always a win for the Protoss in TvP. This is only masked by the fact that most TvPs are over fairly quickly and don't ever get past 2-3 base for the P, because almost all Terrans use bio. There are three ways getting Vikings to counter Carriers can go:
1. The best case scenario is that you make just enough to kill his Carriers then hope you win the ground battle. Terran maybe comes out slightly ahead in this case. But it's very difficult to hit the exact right amount of Vikings.
2. If you lose the air battle and he has carriers left over you lose the battle. Nothing else you have that shoots up (Marines and Thors) are good vs Carriers with support.
3. If you win the air battle with too many vikings left over, you'll lose the ground fight. Vikings that are 0/0 and on the ground are pretty terrible.

Also they are on an entirely separate upgrade table so you're at 0/0 when they already have some upgrades.

There are a couple of solutions to this problem:
Change Thor anti-air damage to be 12x4, or 24x2 instead of 6+6lightx4.
Change Thors to automatically target ground units over armored air units and Interceptors.

If Thors were changed so that Terrans had a viable counter to armored air other than Viking/Marines, I believe we would see playstyles other than bio open up.


You have just described the kind of balancing that Starcraft II has. Think of how wonderful it is you can't make a beastly unit that deals well with armored-ground, light-ground, armored-air, and light-air. Think of all those unused Vikings sitting inside the Starport because their macho comrade from the Factory just took over their role!
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
itsMAHVELbaybee
Profile Joined October 2008
292 Posts
November 18 2010 22:15 GMT
#162
The true problem is that 200/200 mech is not stronger than a 200/200 protoss army plain and simple.

Mech's playstyle is a "slowly but surely" mindset, massing a larger and larger force, taking expos, and harassing to deal economic damage for the inevitable big push. In BW 200/200 mech was slightly stronger than the protoss 200/200, which made it much more viable.

The lack of anti-air is just a problem in my opinion is the lack of scouting and adapting. Seeing as though a protoss sacrifices their ground unit count a bit. Seeing the tech switch too late and going on hellion/tank/ghost for too long will always get you killed. Just like BW, if you don't scout the tech switch to air, you won't get enough goliaths out in time to deal with it.

Even with EMP support, ghosts are expensive and result in lower tank count which is extremely important. You need to be preemptive with your EMPs. Otherwise the protoss will get 2-3 storms off, which by that time, EMPing his army makes no difference.
I am boss. -Minami-ke
GreEny K
Profile Joined February 2008
Germany7312 Posts
November 18 2010 22:20 GMT
#163
On November 19 2010 04:32 Irrational_Animal wrote:
well the way I see it once there is a strong Thor/tank/hellion force there is no way to beat that stuff on the ground so air is a natural counter to it. The problem is that the thor is too much of an allround unit to be also a hard counter against heavy air.


Exactly, and that's the way it should stay. Can't have a unit that doesn't have a weakness, that would just be crazy.
Why would you ever choose failure, when success is an option.
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
November 18 2010 22:26 GMT
#164
On November 18 2010 21:01 Nadagast wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 20:49 simme123 wrote:
On November 18 2010 20:47 Nadagast wrote:
On November 18 2010 20:43 simme123 wrote:
On November 18 2010 20:40 Nadagast wrote:
I guess I haven't been clear enough on another point: the presence of an armored air unit turns the Thor into less DPS than a stimmed marine, unless you manually target each of your Thors (which is very difficult to keep up for 5+ Thors in a large battle).

Just the fact that a Void Ray or Carrier exists on the field means that your Thors are doing terrible damage unless manually targeted. I'd be okay with them simply changing the attack priority to have armored air and interceptors as a Thor's lowest priority.


Well .. what purpose would the viking serve if the thor was strong vs all air? I'd say that it requires u to be a bit more reactive but still if the thor was good vs all air with it's strentghs vs ground it just wouldn't be a balanced unit.

'Strong' isn't a binary property. Vikings would still be stronger vs air and are much more mobile than slow walking Thors.

What I am proposing would simply be to make the Thor outdps a stimmed Marine on armored air targets. 50/0 vs 300/200 and the Marine does more dps. What I am proposing is giving Thors roughly the equivalent of 2.5-3 stimmed Marine's dps against armored air.


Well the thor doesn't only have the dps it's hp is much higher than that of a marine. And what you pay for when you get a thor isn't a strong anti armored air unit. It's fine as it is if you ask me. It's still really strong vs light air and all ground (with support).


Against Carriers:
10 Marines (500/0) vs 1 Thor (300/200)
550 (450) HP vs 400 HP
69.7 dps vs 5.3 dps

All I'm asking is that Marines aren't 13 times more effective against armored air. Thors will still be worse than Marines and Vikings against armored air, but they will be doing better than shooting blanks which is basically what they are doing now.


I'm all for nerfing marine anti-air in order to balance this equation. Maybe i can finally make some carriers as protoss
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
bobcat
Profile Joined May 2010
United States488 Posts
November 18 2010 22:29 GMT
#165
On November 18 2010 19:58 Bommes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2010 19:43 Espelz wrote:
To be honest : in about 350 ladder games i have seen carriers maybe... once or twice. Protoss has the same problem with air-upgrades that you say the vikings have (if protoss starts with colossi,terrans sometimes get +1 air attack even, so...). Also letting thors do normal damage vs. armored would make them stronger vs. BCs/Broodlords also, so it would also effect the other matchups... i dont think this is a good idea to be honest


Because you obviously don't play mech or you protoss opponents don't know how to respond to mech appropriately, it's really an issue. Mech is really really strong against protoss in late game, but weak thor AA makes it almost impossible to make a steady unitmix because you either have a groundarmy that obliterates everything and then you lose 15 tanks against 1 carrier or some void rays or you have 10 vikings and he just stops making air at all and vikings are really the most worthless unit in the game in the late game and just waste supply, so you lose the ground fight horribly. Plus they are on a different upgrade path, so they naturally aren't that good in later stages of the game.
Playing mech against mass gateway + starport + occassional robo/immortal is IMO not really winnable (steadily) if the protoss knows what to do, and that's really sad because mech would be a great response to protoss late game if it's upgradable AA would be existant.

Make thors much weaker against ground, change their 6(+6)x4 with 3.0s cd splash attack to something like 10x2 or 12x2 with 1.5s cooldown without or with really little splash, and they will be perfectly fine balanced. They are so slow, that they can't be the ultimate counter to air, because air naturally is very mobile, but at the same time they at least ARE some sort of Mech-AA possibility, which atm is non-existant and not even really viable against light air units without armor (mutalisks, phoenix) which they should counter gamedesign-wise.



Hmmmm, remove their bonus double, then double the damage they do to all units and reduce the splash. So basically just make thors do double damage to armored units. That way nothing can kill them.


And as long as we are talking about protoss armored air units being overpowered, name one air unit that is cost effective versus mass rines with combat shields and stim. Not phoenixes, not carriers, not void rays for certain.
If you are playing mech. There is no reason why a protoss player will be able to build an air force without you destroying him.
"I just want to see bobcat wrist deep in someone's mother's anus" 165 votes
Nadagast
Profile Joined January 2009
United States245 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 22:33:21
November 18 2010 22:32 GMT
#166
I think a lot of you are misunderstanding what I'm saying. Even with a buff to Thors anti armored air damage, they would still be a poor choice vs armored air. They just would no longer be so beyond absolutely terrible against armored air.
TurtlePerson2
Profile Joined October 2010
United States218 Posts
November 18 2010 22:45 GMT
#167
Terran has the most specialized air units in the game. Vikings are good at what they do, kill armored air units. Banshees are good at harass. Ravens are a good caster. Medivacs are a good support unit. Battlecruisers could be useful some day.

Thors AA attack is designed to kill mutalisks and phoenixes. That's why the took away the medivac prioritization because Thors aren't supposed to kill medivacs.

If you're having trouble against carriers, then you're having trouble scouting. It takes a long time to go carriers during which time the Protoss is vulnerable.
torturis exuvias eunt
DerNebel
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Denmark648 Posts
November 18 2010 22:46 GMT
#168
I dont remember seeing these kinds of threads when lurking in the BW era?

Just imagine it: "Too strong storms crippling TvP creativity" in the BW strategy forum. The problem is not in the game.

Think about it: Instead of one goliath, you now have two better goliaths! The viking flies and the thor is a freaking monster vs ground and light air. The tradeoff is that thors are weak vs armoured air, and vikings have to land to fire against ground.

The units are different, I can see the problem with Thors targeting carriers, but why post about what to change in the game, instead of finding a workaround? The game already does a lot of things for you, but why make it choose optimal targets for you? Would banelings also have to be changed to target squishý bio, eliminating blunders like rolling into thors? And should zergling split so banelings get free paths to the bioball? The next step after that would be rightclick psionic storms from hts and autostim when a major battle breaks out.

I am not saying im a good player, I lose games running my banelings into mech like any other person, but I dont complain that the game didn't play itself for me.
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
November 18 2010 22:49 GMT
#169
On November 19 2010 07:32 Nadagast wrote:
I think a lot of you are misunderstanding what I'm saying. Even with a buff to Thors anti armored air damage, they would still be a poor choice vs armored air. They just would no longer be so beyond absolutely terrible against armored air.


If your opponent is making carriers, use a scan to count how many there are and then make 3 x # of carriers. It's cost effective and will guarantee they don't make more carriers afterwards. If you make too many vikings, then that is your fault.

As far as thors, if they nerfed the ground damage, then buffing their anti-air would be fine, but otherwise they would be waaaaaay too cost effective. Marines are already cost effective as is, carriers and void rays are already countered by marines, vikings, and battleships. Giving terran another choice would make them way too strong.
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
Spekki0
Profile Joined November 2010
United States2 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 22:57:22
November 18 2010 22:52 GMT
#170
edit: deleted
link0
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1071 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 23:03:28
November 18 2010 23:01 GMT
#171
One carrier beats 3 vikings with +1. In larger battles the carriers win by an even bigger margin due to viking missile overkill.

1. Terran air armor upgrades are 50% more expensive than Protoss air attack upgrades. Terran needs dedicate an armory for air armor upgrades, but Protoss already has a idle cyber core for air attack upgrades.

2. You can never overbuild carriers since they are strong in all situations against any army composition. You can easily over/under build vikings.
http://www.justin.tv/link0 - Gosu.Linko - http://www.facebook.com/link0
puissance
Profile Joined May 2010
97 Posts
November 18 2010 23:03 GMT
#172
While the weak anti armor Thor attack is certainly a problem it is not the most important thing crippling TvP creativty - its the lack of versaitly of the Hellion compare to BW Vulture.
Spider Mines played a crucival role in mech builds, if Hellions would have mines instead of Preiginter they would be much more versatile.
This would reduce the pressure on the terran to go bio and allows for a more late game oriented style.
Building vikings would still be worse than producing Goliaths, but Toss has to upgrade air separatly too.
At the back door there's the collapsible rocks, you wanna destroy those to block off the back door with rocks and your opponent has to kill the rocks, and later you can shoot down the rocks to get to the third.. ~Day9 TvP Hots Battlereport
link0
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1071 Posts
November 18 2010 23:04 GMT
#173
Vikings in ground mode should receive Terran vehicle upgrades instead of Terran air upgrades. That'd help, a tiny bit.
http://www.justin.tv/link0 - Gosu.Linko - http://www.facebook.com/link0
MalVortex
Profile Joined May 2010
United States119 Posts
November 18 2010 23:05 GMT
#174
This is a terrible thread, how on earth is it 9 pages? The thor is a unit with an AA attack that includes multiple attacks and a massive bonus against light units, of course its bad against armored anti-air. It doesn't receive its bonus, and each attack is penalized vs. armor. This is the exact same balance you see on the phoenix, which can't kill a corrupter to save its life - multiple attacks, no attack bonus.

The really bizarre thing is, thors are really good in the TvP matchup already - there are a couple different variations on timing pushes that revolve around the thor. In the lategame, if you want to kill carriers and voidrays and stuff, why are you looking at specialized tier 3 unit when your own analysis says your most basic, tier 1, bread-and-butter unit does it better? Or you could get reactored vikings, the best AA unit in the game. This isn't a complaint even about TvP balance (and we could all agree it could use a few tweaks here and there), its a complaint that the thor doesn't do what it isn't designed to do.

You complain that if you go head to head, vikings vs. carriers, you might lose the ground battle. What ground battle? Carriers in any number are extraordinarily expensive and time consuming (its faster to get a mothership than a carrier), which is going to come at the cost of the protoss ground army... and terran units are superior in small numbers battles against gateway units. Even then, you still have hightech options like yamato, EMP, HSM, that can really pulverize expensive units like carriers.... Or your own, self admitted stim marines which do significant AA damage with no overkill. The thor isn't your answer to carriers, no. Nor is it designed to be.


Now, if you wanted to make a more open thread regarding AI attack priorities, that I could get behind. Units with several hundred percent attack gains when shooting specific unit types.... probably should go find those units and plasterize them. Immortals should naturally want to shoot marauders over marines, thors should shoot ground targets instead of voidrays, etc. That is a worthy discussion, and I'm sure many people would argue that having non-braindead AI removes part of the starcraft allure. Either way, at least you have an argument - complaining that a unit amazing vs. everything on the ground, and that can obliterate light air units in the blink of the eye, is not also amazing vs. armored air units is not a terribly productive use of time.
People are like the stars - There are bright ones and those that are dim
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 23:21:16
November 18 2010 23:18 GMT
#175
On November 19 2010 08:01 link0 wrote:
One carrier beats 3 vikings with +1. In larger battles the carriers win by an even bigger margin due to viking missile overkill.

1. Terran air armor upgrades are 50% more expensive than Protoss air attack upgrades. Terran needs dedicate an armory for air armor upgrades, but Protoss already has a idle cyber core for air attack upgrades.

2. You can never overbuild carriers since they are strong in all situations against any army composition. You can easily over/under build vikings.


What are you talking about? I seriously tested this yesterday. Sure if you are shooting the interceptors then yeah, carriers pwn, but you should be targeting the carrier itself. The only cost effective air unit against vikings are motherships and 1 or more carriers (motherships by themselves are not, but add in 1 carrier and they are because the carrier gets to do unlimited dmg while the mothership tanks, otherwise vikings are very cost effective against carriers.

Vikings counter carriers http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Viking
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
ryndaris
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
263 Posts
November 18 2010 23:23 GMT
#176
As a Protoss player, I completely agree with the OP. Having a unit like the Thor prioritize armored air over ground targets is nothing short of retarded. Some may contradict by saying that it introduces an element of "micro" or whatever you want to call it into battles through target-fire requirement. To those I say to each their own - I would much rather spend my APM on more meaningful things than telling the pilot of a huge warmachine which targets his weapons actually do damage to AFTER EVERY KILL. So yeah - fix Thor AI plx.

The suggestion to increase Thor damage vs. all air I don't agree with - I understand the reasoning behind it, but I find that it would be much simpler and much less volatile from a balance perspective to just fix the AI; buffing the damage in this case is beating around the bush and not fixing the real problem.

And on topic of AI - I would LOVE for my Voidrays to not prioritize anti-air units. Blizzard may have tried to make the Voidray more viable as a component of a regular army composition with the changes they've made not long ago, but that goal would be much better served by making the AI prioritize armored over anti-air. I'd love to be able to use Voidrays in this way vs. Zerg, but it's a bit hard when they charge straight into the Hydras which are HIDING BEHIND the roaches that the Voidrays are supposed to be killing.

Reading through this thread is pretty depressing btw - so many people COMPLETELY missing the point in the OP is scary.
Nadagast
Profile Joined January 2009
United States245 Posts
November 18 2010 23:27 GMT
#177
Yeah a lot of these replies are depressing...
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
November 18 2010 23:31 GMT
#178
On November 19 2010 08:23 RyN wrote:
As a Protoss player, I completely agree with the OP. Having a unit like the Thor prioritize armored air over ground targets is nothing short of retarded. Some may contradict by saying that it introduces an element of "micro" or whatever you want to call it into battles through target-fire requirement. To those I say to each their own - I would much rather spend my APM on more meaningful things than telling the pilot of a huge warmachine which targets his weapons actually do damage to AFTER EVERY KILL. So yeah - fix Thor AI plx.

The suggestion to increase Thor damage vs. all air I don't agree with - I understand the reasoning behind it, but I find that it would be much simpler and much less volatile from a balance perspective to just fix the AI; buffing the damage in this case is beating around the bush and not fixing the real problem.

And on topic of AI - I would LOVE for my Voidrays to not prioritize anti-air units. Blizzard may have tried to make the Voidray more viable as a component of a regular army composition with the changes they've made not long ago, but that goal would be much better served by making the AI prioritize armored over anti-air. I'd love to be able to use Voidrays in this way vs. Zerg, but it's a bit hard when they charge straight into the Hydras which are HIDING BEHIND the roaches that the Voidrays are supposed to be killing.

Reading through this thread is pretty depressing btw - so many people COMPLETELY missing the point in the OP is scary.


I think everyone is ignoring the point in the OP because there are a lot of situations like this. Why do my immortals target marines instead of marauders sometimes? Void rays? Targeting buildings over units? Yet marauders always effectively target zealots first, and hydras target ranged.
There are a lot of AI issues that could be fixed. One about the thor targeting air targets over ground is because they were meant to be an effective anti-air unit against mutalisks. The short is, if you don't like what your unit is shooting, use your micro to change it's target.
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-18 23:32:30
November 18 2010 23:31 GMT
#179
On November 19 2010 08:27 Nadagast wrote:
Yeah a lot of these replies are depressing...


They need the Pro Strategy forum already. :[

Don't worry, what you said makes sense and its one of the problems that makes TvP stupid and boring to play.
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
IPA
Profile Joined August 2010
United States3206 Posts
November 18 2010 23:38 GMT
#180
Nadagast (correct me if I'm wrong) tests a lot of this shit out with none other than PainUser. He (Pain) talks about some of these findings at length on the most recent State of the Game podcast.

So please, at least engage in civilized discussion here instead of mocking what you don't understand.

But you probably know better than PainUser right? -_-
Time held me green and dying though I sang in my chains like the sea.
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Map Test Tournament
11:00
$450 3v3 Open Cup
WardiTV333
IndyStarCraft 171
LiquipediaDiscussion
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 2: Playoffs Day 5
Cure vs TriGGeRLIVE!
Tasteless1141
Crank 968
Rex135
CranKy Ducklings120
3DClanTV 82
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 1141
Crank 968
Lowko308
IndyStarCraft 171
Rex 135
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 45439
Calm 8122
Horang2 4727
Bisu 1413
Hyuk 883
Stork 656
Snow 557
ZerO 358
actioN 312
EffOrt 286
[ Show more ]
Pusan 263
hero 259
Soma 241
Mini 209
Last 178
Light 155
Soulkey 147
Hyun 118
Liquid`Ret 76
ggaemo 71
Rush 63
Mind 60
ToSsGirL 41
JYJ38
Sea.KH 34
HiyA 32
Sharp 30
Free 25
sas.Sziky 22
sorry 22
scan(afreeca) 20
Sexy 20
Icarus 11
SilentControl 11
Terrorterran 10
IntoTheRainbow 4
Dota 2
singsing3279
qojqva1376
Gorgc720
Dendi667
XcaliburYe212
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1859
x6flipin628
hiko175
zeus149
markeloff78
edward6
Other Games
B2W.Neo859
DeMusliM422
Hui .175
Fuzer 157
Pyrionflax143
XaKoH 137
ArmadaUGS41
NeuroSwarm40
QueenE25
Trikslyr13
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1125
CasterMuse 20
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2869
• Jankos1490
Other Games
• WagamamaTV195
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
23m
RSL Revival
21h 23m
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
1d 14h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 19h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.