• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:50
CEST 11:50
KST 18:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?7FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event13Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week4
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $200 Biweekly - StarCraft Evolution League #1
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest ASL20 Preliminary Maps Unit and Spell Similarities
Tourneys
[BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Effective Commercial Building Cost Assessment Tips Trading/Investing Thread US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 580 users

Patching is a bad idea

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
dreamend
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
64 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 21:16:05
September 20 2010 19:39 GMT
#1
..most of the time. Now I get the feeling most people will just assume that I'm a budding Terran superstar who doesn't want to have his winrate decrease which I could preemptively counter by saying I'm a Zerg player. But the reality is - it doesn't fucking matter, that's not what this is about.

What I want to convey is that patching detracts for the depth of the gameplay. Why? because rather than people coming up with creative solutions to problems, we get these easy quick-fix changes so the strategies used never get time to develop - the game just keeps changing flavour with every patch. What's worse is how common these proposed changes appear at lower levels, obviously I'm not a quotation database but it's funny how many threads I've read where people bitch about the game and how it should be changed as an alternative to simply playing better.

Scenario: Brood War before Bisu came along when Savior and friends were destroying everyone with his 3 Hatch Lair style in ZvP. I don't have any statistics but I'm sure a lot of Protosses know this was a pretty harsh time. Protoss would stick to their +1 Zealot rushes but they couldn't do a thing because Zerg would get the Mutalisks to hold off the attack and harass, then get the Lurkers which screwed up their tech and attack timings even more, so by the time they felt comfortable moving out Zerg was perfectly setup. Terrible summary but you get the idea, Protosses were in a pretty icky situation and from searching they were a fair share of PvZ imba threads/posts, but what's great is that rather than the solution being some bumpy patch, the game actually evolved when Bisu came along and popularised the Corsair opening and the matchup took an entirely new route. Take a look at some of the write-ups on how genius Bisu's revolution was, because those innovations were a huge part of Starcraft's longevity and its fun. It was around this time that most of the popular Zerg builds (4 hatch +1 carapace, 3 hatch muta/lurker) stopped working - a sure sign that the game was evolving. A more recent example is Fantasy's mech play, which I personally found super sexy and genius. For reference, my favourite game of the Bisu vs Savior series:

+ Show Spoiler +


So how does this relate? The mass reaper style TvZ seems the point of convergence for most of the imbalance bitching these days - but just take a step back and look, people are 10x more comfortable dealing with it than they were when it first really picked up popularity (the IEM tournament I think) because Zergs have a way better feel for the timings and know just exactly what they can get away with drone-wise. It's still a really potent opening but definitely in the coming months people will get better and better and holding it off (patch or not).. or perhaps we'll find a Zerg Revolutionist and thus a new reign of alleged imbalance will start! can't wait. But seriously, there will be just one streamed series where Zergs will watch it and think 'wow, we can actually do this' and new things will happen

A pretty interesting, relating story I heard on Weapon of Choice was where I believe DJWheat said how he didn't enjoy SF4 when it first was released, the gameplay was slow/imbalanced or something and the whole thing was just drab, but after a year when he tuned into a huge tournament the game had evolved tremendously and was actually awesome to watch. Keep in mind SF4 had very limited patching.

As I said at the beginning, patching is a bad idea most of the time. Play unpatched SC where a spawning pool costs 100 minerals - yeah stuff does need to be patched from time to time. But the Reaper openings, Zealot rushes and Tank damage nerfs are still grey areas to me, but kudos to Blizzard for waiting this long and not making any sudden shifts to gameplays, and keeping the changes relatively small. I also didn't mention this previously but, I feel this exact same way about people who say the SC2 gameplay is drab and the lacks the spark of BW, July wasn't muta microing from the start mate, though I get the feeling a lot of them are just being stubborn elitists haha

All in all, I really feel Starcraft 2 needs a year or so!

Pretty interested in what you guys think about this line of reasoning




ToastieNL
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands845 Posts
September 20 2010 19:42 GMT
#2
Nice post.

I think they should keep patches small and relatively 'weak', so they can change the bigger problems all around, but without killing creativity with something like reducing Hatch build time, Increasing Probe train time, give scvs 6 minerals to carry etc;)
Zerg lategame is imbalanced as shit. Also: "Protoss is really strong recently. Perhaps, it's time for there to be some changes for Terran." -MMA. Even MMA asks for buffs. Srsly Blizzard. Srsly.
FantaFunL
Profile Joined July 2010
Belgium71 Posts
September 20 2010 19:42 GMT
#3
Obviously a terran

User was warned for this post

User was temp banned for this post.
natewOw
Profile Joined April 2010
United States181 Posts
September 20 2010 19:43 GMT
#4
Pretty interested in what you guys think about this line of reasoning


It's flawed.

Patches happen because there are irreconcilable issues in the gameplay. Allowing these issues to persist causes games to die.
lol
dcberkeley
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada844 Posts
September 20 2010 19:44 GMT
#5
I tend to agree but it doesn't seem like Blizzard is making any major changes which is good.
Moktira is da bomb
Pekkz
Profile Joined June 2009
Norway1505 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 19:56:31
September 20 2010 19:44 GMT
#6
Are you for real. Both ZvP and ZvT is broken, zerg cant win tournaments. Its not a strategic problem where "if only zerg could come up with X" they would counter whatever. Its a fundamental imbalance and if they would not patch it, nobody would care to play zerg in tournaments.

What do you think some genious zerg can come up with to counter whatever is going on atm? They are allready using all the units that are avaiable to them in different situations. If zerg has a unit that can scout and find out what terrans are doing behind there wall before you can get overlord speed or overseer I would love to know.

Problem is there is only couple opening choices for zerg against P/T, where terran has a million things he can do, and if you cant scout it, you will be blind guessing and thereby putting yourself behind in alot of situations.


There aint gonna be some undiscovered counter to reaper the way it is, because there is three units that you can make before it hits your base, and all of them get owned by reaper speed/range.

Sc2 is getting figured out alot faster then sc bw because its not that different, and alot of the fundamentals transfer over.
in7e.sCream
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany48 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 19:47:38
September 20 2010 19:46 GMT
#7
back in bw's starting days, esports and gaming as a whole wasnt that much big i guess. if there were things like muta micro ( not simply pushing stop ) they would have been already discovered i think.
just my opinion, but you have to watch differently at this when you compare evolution of BW in comparison to SC2

maybe iam wrong, but if you look at the scene... there are BIG MONEY TOURNYS right from the start of sc2, even before. yeah it shouldnt affect balancing that much but if you look at the "Altitude TL Open" for example, in wich FOUR Terrans made it into the top four, there is balancing needed.

on the other hand, i think the hole Z-Situation is more of a design-flaw, not a balance one. I dont like to see how zergs only abled to stay in their base - yeah zergs can be aggressive if they baneling bust and go all in but come on, thats retarded.
Seam
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1093 Posts
September 20 2010 19:46 GMT
#8
On September 21 2010 04:39 Sybris wrote:

What I want to convey is that patching detracts for the depth of the gameplay. Why? because rather than people coming up with creative solutions to problems, we get these easy quick-fix changes so the strategies used never get time to develop - the game just keeps changing flavour with every patch. What's worse is how common these proposed changes appear at lower levels, obviously I'm not a quotation database but it's funny how many threads I've read where people bitch about the game and how it should be changed as an alternative to simply playing better.




There is really a limited amount of strategies Zerg can do, honestly. Having the least amount of attacking units does that.

Not to mention Zerg have an even more limited openers, since they have to react to the person they play against simply to stay in the game.

Most Pro's admit that Zerg is the weakest.

Yes, there needs to be a patch.
I only needed one probe to take down idra. I had to upgrade to a zealot for strelok. - Liquid`Tyler
celious
Profile Joined September 2009
United States195 Posts
September 20 2010 19:47 GMT
#9
patching is definitely necessary at this point its pretty clear that terran is stronger then the other races atm just from tournament statistics and you may say oh people just haven't found ways to beat them yet, that is flawed and you really cannont compare sc2 evolution of gameplay to bw, we have learned a lot from sc and sc2 game play is changing really really fast but terrans are still on top.
Wolf
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Korea (South)3290 Posts
September 20 2010 19:47 GMT
#10
Not bad for a second post. I think giving the game a bit more time isn't a bad idea at all, but Blizzard probably knows better than we do about the logistics.
Commentatorhttp://twitter.com/proxywolf
TL+ Member
SyyRaaaN
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden136 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 19:50:46
September 20 2010 19:48 GMT
#11
You compare SC 2 to Brood Wars. Sorry man, that comparison aint gonna work. I played Starcraft 1 from release to 2000. And we were happy about every patch that came until BW was released because it dealt with severe balance issues. We were heavily tired of 1 hatch muta/hydra plays. We were really tired of Reaver pops and so on. The list is long - anyone played SC1 1.00 with the 150-50 Dragon price with 5 range with upgrade or the sunkens of 1.00 who lost to a single zealot or two? Yes, I'm an old man now days - but still the boring strategies and features needs to go away.

These early patches shouldn't be so radical - but there are boring strategies in the early stages of the game and patching these fast are very welcome to evolve the strategies.

For instance, if they nerf 4 warp gate strategies i will miss it about as much as i missed the 1 hatch hydra plays from 1.00. The strategy would probably have been dropped later on - but it was boring as hell and the early patches promoted a better gameplay.
No Quote
zer0das
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States8519 Posts
September 20 2010 19:49 GMT
#12
You can't really compare a patch that was made like 3+ years into the game and after an expansion to one where the game just game out.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 20 2010 19:50 GMT
#13
Doesn't mean a solution does exist.

And if Bisu never came along Protoss still would have been in the dark. Would you really have the game stay this way for 7+ years if there was a solution but just never was found, if it could just as easily be patched and more balanced for the 7 years? Don't get me wrong, I understand that there may be "creative ways around it," but I also fail to see what a patch destroys when it's released wtihin the first 2 months of the game.

Maybe there is some build order solution, but what exactly does this patch cause that is so detrimental to the game...?
Seide
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States831 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 19:53:36
September 20 2010 19:50 GMT
#14
Patches have their place in the game. What you discribed is player innovation which will always be there.

The reason for patches is because the developers have an idea how they want the game to flow and feel. When it is not meeting their liking they can patch and tweak certain aspects so it is more to their liking.
So patches and player innovation are really 2 completely different things.

You talk in your post as if BW did not have any balance patches, it had plenty at first, then left alone as player innovation and maps took over the job of balancing.
One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish.
Shiladie
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada1631 Posts
September 20 2010 19:52 GMT
#15
While the point you're trying to make isn't invalid, it is more for a game that has been out and has been seen to be balanced for a while, with a few meta-game shifts.
With SC2, we won't see a gameplay that everyone is as happy as they were for BW's balance until about a year after shadows of the void, or whatever the protoss expansion is called comes out. Each expand will bring new concepts and units to the multiplayer requiring more balance patches.

After a year or 2 of that expansion being out, when we have about a 33% representation of races on average, then we can start being happy with the actual balance and instead purely focus on meta-game shifts.
BlasiuS
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States2405 Posts
September 20 2010 19:53 GMT
#16
On September 21 2010 04:39 Sybris wrote:

What I want to convey is that patching detracts for the depth of the gameplay. Why? because rather than people coming up with creative solutions to problems, we get these easy quick-fix changes so the strategies used never get time to develop - the game just keeps changing flavour with every patch. What's worse is how common these proposed changes appear at lower levels, obviously I'm not a quotation database but it's funny how many threads I've read where people bitch about the game and how it should be changed as an alternative to simply playing better.


I think you have the wrong idea about patching. Patching isn't about "easy quick-fix changes", it's about fixing completely game-breaking issues.

Blizz doesn't just implement quick-fix changes, at least not in starcraft (I've never played WoW).
next week on Everybody Loves HypnoToad:
Dreadwolf
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada220 Posts
September 20 2010 19:54 GMT
#17
On September 21 2010 04:39 Sybris wrote:
All in all, I really feel Starcraft 2 needs a year or so!

Pretty interested in what you guys think about this line of reasoning




You realize before broodwar there was starcraft, and it was very much unbalanced and even at the start of broodwar it wasnt "perfect". Broodwar didnt become the game it is now in one patch. it was progressive work, and the progresse for starcraft 2 is starting tomorrow.

Also, these change are not reaction of what happened in the last month, they where testing some of that stuff before the game was released. We got a taste of those at the end of the beta when they put in some stuff that was suposed to be for internal testing only.
GIGAR
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark88 Posts
September 20 2010 19:54 GMT
#18
While I do agree on the concept of deeper gameplay, I can't honestly think of anything that could give Zerg "an edge" in the current state of the game, no matter how bizarre it might be.


To be honest, I think Zerg's problems lies a lot more in the broken gameplay mechanics than actual balance between units.
Imbalances should occur in the top level of gameplay - "oh shoot, a Terran can get just a liiittle too many reapers", or whatever.

The current problem with "balance", and what most people are whining about, is not actually a balance problem - Zerg is definitely capable of stopping an MM ball, for instance.
The problem is that Zerg, as a race, is just not near as polished as the Terrans.
While we're seeing new Terran shiny tactics pretty much since release (helloo bunkers, for instance), I haven't personally seen anything for Zerg that makes me say: "Oh my god, this tact changes everything! MM is a totally horrible opener now!"

If a tactic is easy to pull off, very hard and micro intensive to counter, it becomes a problem, especially in lower ranked matches.
"it pisses me off that blizzard's reaction time to terran tears is about 14 seconds, but apparently the massive oceanic sea of zerg tears is caused by l2p-issues"
iAmJeffReY
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4262 Posts
September 20 2010 19:55 GMT
#19
The patch will change gameplay in a big way from such small changes. I think hydras will have a first-coming in TvZ since release. Just thinkin. I'm a bit more interested in the patch and features change. What features are they talking about??
Unbiased biased terran abuser Jeffrey. Sorry for the rage, friend!
StarBrift
Profile Joined January 2008
Sweden1761 Posts
September 20 2010 19:57 GMT
#20
It's very dangerous to compare sc2 to sc1 history. Both because sc2 has all the experience of and thinking behind strategy that sc1 had and the fact that the korean bw scene moved very slowly.

People like to give raise bw progamers to the skies and think that they were/are the perfect gamers in every sense. That is not true. The korean BW scene was largely full of people copying and copying builds. It relied on just getting as good mechanics as possible and doing what everyone else allready does. This is why these young kids were so successful in sc1, they only needed great mechanics and a good understanding of current trends. Only a few players through the years have been considered as truly creative minds.

Now in sc2 the player age is alot higher and the mechanical "skillcap" is alot lower which makes it more focused on strategy. The sc2 scene is moving 10 times faster than the BW scene did post 2005 atleast.

Also to people saying "the game has only been out for 2 months". That may be true but the 6 month beta fleshed out a lot of the viable strategy even before game release so in fact strategy has been developed for almost 3 quarters of a year.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 10m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 8737
Sea 3199
Flash 1803
TY 725
Zeus 218
Soma 207
Pusan 133
Rush 114
ToSsGirL 75
EffOrt 63
[ Show more ]
Aegong 51
Shinee 50
Sharp 43
ZerO 30
Stork 25
Movie 21
Noble 12
Mind 11
Free 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Hm[arnc] 3
Bale 1
Britney 0
Dota 2
420jenkins659
BananaSlamJamma644
XcaliburYe538
XaKoH 443
League of Legends
singsing608
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1077
shoxiejesuss780
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King125
Other Games
shahzam1275
ceh9770
Happy366
crisheroes254
KnowMe247
Pyrionflax162
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick690
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 35
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt461
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
1h 10m
PiGosaur Monday
14h 10m
The PondCast
1d
Replay Cast
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
3 days
FEL
3 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL: ProLeague
5 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.