|
From National Geographic article from Aug. 2004: The Heavy Cost of Fat. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0408/feature3/
![[image loading]](http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f304/00alpine/b9fe27b0.jpg)
Two women, (one 250 pounds, 5′6″, 40.3 BMI, the other 120 pounds, 5′5″, 20 BMI), spent five hours under a state-of-the-art open scanner to get a high resolution magnetic resonance imaging scan (MRI)
Whoaaaa, fat people strong!
|
These images are really disturbing lol, but I can't see where this could be going in regards to discussion. Just pointing out how fat people are fat?
|
yeah I'll definitely take the 120 lb woman. I definitely have a thing for skinny girls.
|
On April 14 2010 22:33 MourningWould wrote: Whoaaaa, fat people strong!fat
Look at all that fat.
|
why are you posting a 6 year old article?
|
anyone else seeing skull in that 120lb body? = o
|
What's surprising to me is the fat one doesnt appear to have much more muscle.
|
konadora
Singapore66155 Posts
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
actually, the sizes of the intestines and stomach are really interesting...
|
On April 14 2010 22:42 Reason wrote: What's surprising to me is the fat one doesnt appear to have much more muscle. She does appear to have like 10% more muscle mass, which I assume is what she needs to carry around the extra weight.
|
United States4796 Posts
On April 14 2010 22:46 Chuiu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2010 22:42 Reason wrote: What's surprising to me is the fat one doesnt appear to have much more muscle. She does appear to have like 10% more muscle mass, which I assume is what she needs to carry around the extra weight.
Yeah but to be skinny you can work that muscle mass in too....that much extra fat with almost zero extra muscle is disgusting.
|
|
makes me wanna see what I would look like in one of those scan (6'1 265, on a high protein 6000-7000calorie a day diet)
|
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On April 14 2010 23:12 Irrelevant wrote: makes me wanna see what I would look like in one of those scan (6'1 265, on a high protein 6000-7000calorie a day diet) reps
|
On April 14 2010 23:12 Irrelevant wrote: makes me wanna see what I would look like in one of those scan (6'1 265, on a high protein 6000-7000calorie a day diet)
Damn that's a lot of McDonalds. I want that.
|
On April 14 2010 23:19 disco wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2010 23:12 Irrelevant wrote: makes me wanna see what I would look like in one of those scan (6'1 265, on a high protein 6000-7000calorie a day diet) Damn that's a lot of McDonalds. I want that. I don't eat fast food(okay very rarely like once a month at most and generally something like panda express orange chicken + rice), and haven't been to a McDonalds in over 10 years
|
On April 14 2010 22:38 Sunyveil wrote: yeah I'll definitely take the 120 lb woman. I definitely have a thing for skinny girls.
I think everyone has a thing for skinny girls, even fat chicks.
|
poor lady even has fat blobs in his brain...
|
On April 14 2010 22:44 thedeadhaji wrote: actually, the sizes of the intestines and stomach are really interesting...
Fat bodies exist both "externally" as well as internally .
|
On April 14 2010 23:26 Irrelevant wrote: poor lady even has fat blobs in his brain... Looks like the fat lady hasn't gone to take a poop in a while either ... lol
|
|
|
|