|
AlchemyLeague groupstage is over and 16 players remaining before the finals that will be played Sunday November 09 19:00CET
Raven & Koget will be casting the finals, Providing us with one Polish cast and one English.
Players was seeded by groupstage score. Those with equal points was seeded by ladder rank, into this format : http://binarybeast.com/xCODBO1011200
LancerX  vs Octzerg 
Cryoc  vs Voddy
Scan vs TTF
Dsaqwe vs Ytong
Sziky vs Zety
Madinho vs Talent
Eonzerg vs Normal
Trutacz vs Biyon
Note : Players that failed to show up on the default matchdays reviced only w.o without pts
Groupstage score
Sziky 12
TTF 6
Scan 12
Biyon 1
LancerX 13
Zety 6
Dsaqwe 8
Trutacz 7
Talent 4
Castle 2
Madinho 12
Octzerg 6
Eonzerg 12
Voddy 5
Cryoc 12
Normal 6
The rounds have the following starting maps, after which the loser picks:
Round of 16: Mist
Round of 8: Overwatch
Round of 4: Queen's Bridge
Round of 2: Outsider
200 $
1st place : 60%
2nd place : 25 %
3rd place : 15 %
Donate for a bigger prizepool
http://www.twitch.tv/kogetbw English
http://www.twitch.tv/terrantv Polish
Liquipedia : http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Alchemy_League
|
Well that Liquipedia is so incomplete right now. Left us all with a question mark with the group stage results. I was updating it from watching streams but I assumed someone with more info could fill it up later. Guess not.
|
On November 03 2014 07:48 DiMiaN wrote:
Well that Liquipedia is so incomplete right now. Left us all with a question mark with the group stage results. I was updating it from watching streams but I assumed someone with more info could fill it up later. Guess not.
Sync[GM] is updating it, if you want to help i can give you the latest updates
|
Can you provide a list with the advancing players sorted by their points? If the scores are based on LP, my score is wrong there. The series between Normal and me went + Show Spoiler +2-0 in my favor, the third replay was from a disconnect from Normal that we replayed. It's on the same map
|
I just updated the results based on the results that Casey messaged me. If it's 2-0, I'll fix it accordingly, but I won't be able to say whether or not your seeding is any different.
Just to clarify with everyone in regards to Liquipedia, I'm not running the tournament, I'm just updating the wiki based on the results that are given to me.
|
On November 03 2014 09:11 Cryoc wrote:Can you provide a list with the advancing players sorted by their points? If the scores are based on LP, my score is wrong there. The series between Normal and me went + Show Spoiler +2-0 in my favor, the third replay was from a disconnect from Normal that we replayed. It's on the same map . Does this affect the seeding? I guess walkovers don't give any points?
On November 03 2014 10:15 SynC[gm] wrote:
I just updated the results based on the results that Casey messaged me. If it's 2-0, I'll fix it accordingly, but I won't be able to say whether or not your seeding is any different.
Just to clarify with everyone in regards to Liquipedia, I'm not running the tournament, I'm just updating the wiki based on the results that are given to me.
Sorry Sync. I noticed it already yesterday evening so I already updated the wiki. I don't know either if the W.O.s vs Werdi count as points. Casey would have to confirm whether the change in circumstances do affect the seeding.
|
On November 03 2014 09:11 Cryoc wrote:Can you provide a list with the advancing players sorted by their points? If the scores are based on LP, my score is wrong there. The series between Normal and me went + Show Spoiler +2-0 in my favor, the third replay was from a disconnect from Normal that we replayed. It's on the same map . Does this affect the seeding? I guess walkovers don't give any points?
This information would have been really great to recive with the replays. I had no time to check the replays yesterday since we were casting the replays right after the games were done.
Players did recive pts for their w.o It's not ideal, but the way it will be when 8 of 32 players did not show up for a single groupmatch. I'll take some of the resposebility for that, I see now that I obviously have accepted players a little too easy, it seems like some people have participated without knowing what they actually participated in.
Your result will affect the seeding, i need to take a look at it later. I will remove the grid for now and update it later today.
|
Grid is updated, including a list with groupstage score
|
why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3
|
On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3
My bad, fixed
|
On November 04 2014 02:57 iamcasey wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3 My bad, fixed
Casey, same situation here, if Cryoc has 12 points=6 wins, I am supposed to have 6 points (4×2+2×(-1)) instead of 2, since I only lost vs Cryoc.
|
On November 04 2014 02:57 iamcasey wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3 My bad, fixed
trutacz still 2 points where he is 3.i think is better to check this a bit better ;
about lancerx he played all his matches
but there is not listed his games vs flyingjelly
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Ok, i messed it up, sorry ! I have the correct draw now, but il double check some results before i post them
On November 04 2014 03:56 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2014 02:57 iamcasey wrote:On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3 My bad, fixed trutacz still 2 points where he is 3.i think is better to check this a bit better ; about lancerx he played all his matches but there is not listed his games vs flyingjelly + Show Spoiler +
Thats new to me, i only have his replays vs Zety&Ruskig. I cant remember his games vs Flying and i cant find them in my mail or in my folder with all groupstage matches. Could you tell him to send them to me ?
|
|
|
Wow, LancerX is so good, he got more points than possible. Seriously though, that should probably be an 11.
|
On November 05 2014 21:46 Cryoc wrote:
Wow, LancerX is so good, he got more points than possible. Seriously though, that should probably be an 11.
it is one extra point for being bomjwa :D
|
Russian Federation178 Posts
|
this is not right at all, according to the scores it is:
1) Scan
2) Set)Sziky
3) LancerX
4) eOnzErG
5) Cryoc
6) Set)MaD
7) dsaqwe
8) trutaCz
9) OctZerg
10) ZeTy
11) TTF
12) Normal
13) vOddy
14) Talent? (I don't see in his ID in ladder stage)
15) BiYon
16) castle
so if it is 1 vs 9 it should be Scan vs OctZerg instead of Scan vs TTF...
also, your draw here has no similitude with the draw on TL.net, neither with the draw that should be done according to BinaryBeast, so how will it be in the end? cuz according to the pts I fixed the brackets in paint and it'd be like this: (in order)
Scan
OctZerg
Cryoc
vOddy
LancerX
TTF
dsaqwe
BiYon
Set)Sziky
ZeTy
Set)MaD
Talent
eOnzErG
Normal
trutaCz
castle
|
i want vods of groupstage
|
On November 06 2014 02:26 Belladona wrote:
this is not right at all, according to the scores it is:
1) Scan
2) Set)Sziky
3) LancerX
4) eOnzErG
5) Cryoc
6) Set)MaD
7) dsaqwe
8) trutaCz
9) OctZerg
10) ZeTy
11) TTF
12) Normal
13) vOddy
14) Talent? (I don't see in his ID in ladder stage)
15) BiYon
16) castle
so if it is 1 vs 9 it should be Scan vs OctZerg instead of Scan vs TTF...
also, your draw here has no similitude with the draw on TL.net, neither with the draw that should be done according to BinaryBeast, so how will it be in the end? cuz according to the pts I fixed the brackets in paint and it'd be like this: (in order)
Scan
OctZerg
Cryoc
vOddy
LancerX
TTF
dsaqwe
BiYon
Set)Sziky
ZeTy
Set)MaD
Talent
eOnzErG
Normal
trutaCz
castle
talent = AL.Senseii
|
So on the 3rd, I was PM'ed my Casey that the following brackets were supposed to look like this:
Sziky vs Octzerg
Madinho vs TTF
Eonzerg vs Trutacz
Dsaqwe vs Castle
Scan vs Voddy
LancerX vs Normal
Cryoc vs Zety
Talent vs Biyon
Now, OP says...
LancerX vs Octzerg
Cryoc vs Voddy
Scan vs TTF
Dsaqwe vs Castle
Sziky vs Zety
Madinho vs Talent
Eonzerg vs Normal
Trutacz vs Biyon
Any clarification on which is the right set of brackets?
|
On November 07 2014 08:41 art_of_turtle wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2014 02:26 Belladona wrote:
this is not right at all, according to the scores it is:
1) Scan
2) Set)Sziky
3) LancerX
4) eOnzErG
5) Cryoc
6) Set)MaD
7) dsaqwe
8) trutaCz
9) OctZerg
10) ZeTy
11) TTF
12) Normal
13) vOddy
14) Talent? (I don't see in his ID in ladder stage)
15) BiYon
16) castle
so if it is 1 vs 9 it should be Scan vs OctZerg instead of Scan vs TTF...
also, your draw here has no similitude with the draw on TL.net, neither with the draw that should be done according to BinaryBeast, so how will it be in the end? cuz according to the pts I fixed the brackets in paint and it'd be like this: (in order)
Scan
OctZerg
Cryoc
vOddy
LancerX
TTF
dsaqwe
BiYon
Set)Sziky
ZeTy
Set)MaD
Talent
eOnzErG
Normal
trutaCz
castle talent = AL.Senseii
thank you my child
|
people still play starcraft?
User was warned for this post
|
|
|
Bad news. Raven cant cast this Sunday because of personal reasons. I still have Koget who will cast in English for us, but he cant cover all matches. If someone are intrested to cast some of the games this Sunday 19:00 CET please PM me here at TL.net or add me on skype : LeifSandoy
|
I can cast if you want , this afternoon .:. But if i see that the level of these NOOBS is too low i will quit stream instantly.
Sincerely ~~ Effany A.k.A. iFU.AlfiO
|
On November 08 2014 22:00 Effany wrote:
I can cast if you want , this afternoon ...
What, which afternoon? O_o
The games are played tomorrow (sunday) at 19:00 CET, as far as I understand.
|
I'll be on tomorrow. Casey, are any games played already (replay cast) or all will be played at 7pm ?
|
there's no correct grid anywhere. only pairs, so nobody knows if it's even in order or not, since binary beast says scan should be on top cuz of #1, yet he's not on top on the "grid".
Someone upload THE RIGHT GRID, the complete one, please...
|
On November 08 2014 22:00 Effany wrote:
I can cast if you want , this afternoon .:. But if i see that the level of these NOOBS is too low i will quit stream instantly.
Sincerely ~~ Effany A.k.A. iFU.AlfiO
Bwahuahahahahaha, perfect!
|
On November 09 2014 01:12 kogeT wrote:
I'll be on tomorrow. Casey, are any games played already (replay cast) or all will be played at 7pm ?
All games will be played tomorrow
On November 09 2014 02:10 Belladona wrote:
there's no correct grid anywhere. only pairs, so nobody knows if it's even in order or not, since binary beast says scan should be on top cuz of #1, yet he's not on top on the "grid".
Someone upload THE RIGHT GRID, the complete one, please...
I made a mess with the grid, and im sorry for that. But i decided i would not change it again, many players started practicing for their match, thats why the grid stay as it is. Though im impressed how you manage to make the grid with only the information you can see in the groupstage score.
On November 06 2014 02:26 Belladona wrote:
this is not right at all, according to the scores it is:
so if it is 1 vs 9 it should be Scan vs OctZerg instead of Scan vs TTF...
also, your draw here has no similitude with the draw on TL.net, neither with the draw that should be done according to BinaryBeast, so how will it be in the end? cuz according to the pts I fixed the brackets in paint and it'd be like this: (in order)
This is TL.net i assume you mean liquipedia ? It takes more time to update that then in the OP. Scan have never been #1 on the ladderstage, Sziky is #1 and Scan is #2.
|
Ytong replace Castle since he dont have time to play today. If some players dont show up today, i will throw in a replacement if someone who already have participated in the league shows up and want to play.
|
|
|
sziky out, scan out, eon out? What happened and why are there allowed replacements if they didn't qualify...
|
On November 10 2014 07:11 dRaW wrote:
sziky out, scan out, eon out? What happened and why are there allowed replacements if they didn't qualify...
Sziky never showed up, Scan went afk some hours ago and is still not back. ytOng was used as replacment for castle who could not come today. ytOng had to forfeit because of personal reasons,wich i can confirm was very legit. He would have qualified for the groupstage if he diddent have to leave, so i think it was fair to give him a chance when there was an open spot.
Its really sad that alot of the players diddent show up, and several of those who did show, goes afk for such a long time. Disrespectful vs all the players and people involved.
|
Rush Hour 3 lol, Lancer what kind of map choice is this? :>
|
So, are you going to update the results on LP or should I take the dead article off the main page until you do?
|
Russian Federation178 Posts
great tour, gogo alchemy league 2 ^^
|
|
|
On November 10 2014 12:15 HyralGambit wrote:
So, are you going to update the results on LP or should I take the dead article off the main page until you do?
I just sent the results to Sync[gm] who is the one that helped me with the LP
|
On November 10 2014 12:15 HyralGambit wrote:
So, are you going to update the results on LP or should I take the dead article off the main page until you do?
Why in god's name would you take it off the main space? It fulfills every criteria, it just does not have the final results. I'm all fine with stressing out how underwhelming casey might be, but randomly switching around pages doesn't help ;_;
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i60.tinypic.com/5b4ig5.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/eN7fKhA.png)
![[image loading]](http://reachcastshow.com/files/2013/01/paypal-donate-button.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/60mABFE.png)
