|
AlchemyLeague groupstage is over and 16 players remaining before the finals that will be played Sunday November 09 19:00CET Raven & Koget will be casting the finals, Providing us with one Polish cast and one English.
Players was seeded by groupstage score. Those with equal points was seeded by ladder rank, into this format : http://binarybeast.com/xCODBO1011200
LancerX vs Octzerg  Cryoc vs Voddy  Scan vs TTF  Dsaqwe vs Ytong  Sziky vs Zety  Madinho vs Talent  Eonzerg vs Normal  Trutacz vs Biyon 
Note : Players that failed to show up on the default matchdays reviced only w.o without pts
Groupstage score
Sziky 12 TTF 6 Scan 12 Biyon 1 LancerX 13 Zety 6 Dsaqwe 8 Trutacz 7 Talent 4 Castle 2 Madinho 12 Octzerg 6 Eonzerg 12 Voddy 5 Cryoc 12 Normal 6
The rounds have the following starting maps, after which the loser picks:
Round of 16: Mist Round of 8: Overwatch Round of 4: Queen's Bridge Round of 2: Outsider
200 $
1st place : 60% 2nd place : 25 % 3rd place : 15 %
Donate for a bigger prizepool
http://www.twitch.tv/kogetbw English http://www.twitch.tv/terrantv Polish
Liquipedia : http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Alchemy_League
|
Well that Liquipedia is so incomplete right now. Left us all with a question mark with the group stage results. I was updating it from watching streams but I assumed someone with more info could fill it up later. Guess not.
|
On November 03 2014 07:48 DiMiaN wrote: Well that Liquipedia is so incomplete right now. Left us all with a question mark with the group stage results. I was updating it from watching streams but I assumed someone with more info could fill it up later. Guess not.
Sync[GM] is updating it, if you want to help i can give you the latest updates
|
Can you provide a list with the advancing players sorted by their points? If the scores are based on LP, my score is wrong there. The series between Normal and me went + Show Spoiler +2-0 in my favor, the third replay was from a disconnect from Normal that we replayed. It's on the same map . Does this affect the seeding? I guess walkovers don't give any points?
|
I just updated the results based on the results that Casey messaged me. If it's 2-0, I'll fix it accordingly, but I won't be able to say whether or not your seeding is any different.
Just to clarify with everyone in regards to Liquipedia, I'm not running the tournament, I'm just updating the wiki based on the results that are given to me.
|
On November 03 2014 09:11 Cryoc wrote:Can you provide a list with the advancing players sorted by their points? If the scores are based on LP, my score is wrong there. The series between Normal and me went + Show Spoiler +2-0 in my favor, the third replay was from a disconnect from Normal that we replayed. It's on the same map . Does this affect the seeding? I guess walkovers don't give any points?
On November 03 2014 10:15 SynC[gm] wrote: I just updated the results based on the results that Casey messaged me. If it's 2-0, I'll fix it accordingly, but I won't be able to say whether or not your seeding is any different.
Just to clarify with everyone in regards to Liquipedia, I'm not running the tournament, I'm just updating the wiki based on the results that are given to me.
Sorry Sync. I noticed it already yesterday evening so I already updated the wiki. I don't know either if the W.O.s vs Werdi count as points. Casey would have to confirm whether the change in circumstances do affect the seeding.
|
On November 03 2014 09:11 Cryoc wrote:Can you provide a list with the advancing players sorted by their points? If the scores are based on LP, my score is wrong there. The series between Normal and me went + Show Spoiler +2-0 in my favor, the third replay was from a disconnect from Normal that we replayed. It's on the same map . Does this affect the seeding? I guess walkovers don't give any points?
This information would have been really great to recive with the replays. I had no time to check the replays yesterday since we were casting the replays right after the games were done.
Players did recive pts for their w.o It's not ideal, but the way it will be when 8 of 32 players did not show up for a single groupmatch. I'll take some of the resposebility for that, I see now that I obviously have accepted players a little too easy, it seems like some people have participated without knowing what they actually participated in.
Your result will affect the seeding, i need to take a look at it later. I will remove the grid for now and update it later today.
|
Grid is updated, including a list with groupstage score
|
why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3
|
On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3
My bad, fixed
|
On November 04 2014 02:57 iamcasey wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3 My bad, fixed Casey, same situation here, if Cryoc has 12 points=6 wins, I am supposed to have 6 points (4×2+2×(-1)) instead of 2, since I only lost vs Cryoc.
|
On November 04 2014 02:57 iamcasey wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3 My bad, fixed trutacz still 2 points where he is 3.i think is better to check this a bit better ;
about lancerx he played all his matches but there is not listed his games vs flyingjelly + Show Spoiler +
|
Ok, i messed it up, sorry ! I have the correct draw now, but il double check some results before i post them
On November 04 2014 03:56 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2014 02:57 iamcasey wrote:On November 04 2014 02:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: why trutacz and dsaqwe same points if in the brackets dsaqwe is 3-2 and trutacz 3-3 ? also how is that they only 2 points O_O
2 points for win -1 for loss 2x3=6-2=4 2x3=6-3=3 My bad, fixed trutacz still 2 points where he is 3.i think is better to check this a bit better ; about lancerx he played all his matches but there is not listed his games vs flyingjelly + Show Spoiler +
Thats new to me, i only have his replays vs Zety&Ruskig. I cant remember his games vs Flying and i cant find them in my mail or in my folder with all groupstage matches. Could you tell him to send them to me ?
|
|
Wow, LancerX is so good, he got more points than possible. Seriously though, that should probably be an 11.
|
On November 05 2014 21:46 Cryoc wrote: Wow, LancerX is so good, he got more points than possible. Seriously though, that should probably be an 11.
it is one extra point for being bomjwa :D
|
Russian Federation178 Posts
|
this is not right at all, according to the scores it is:
1) Scan 2) Set)Sziky 3) LancerX 4) eOnzErG 5) Cryoc 6) Set)MaD 7) dsaqwe 8) trutaCz 9) OctZerg 10) ZeTy 11) TTF 12) Normal 13) vOddy 14) Talent? (I don't see in his ID in ladder stage) 15) BiYon 16) castle
so if it is 1 vs 9 it should be Scan vs OctZerg instead of Scan vs TTF...
also, your draw here has no similitude with the draw on TL.net, neither with the draw that should be done according to BinaryBeast, so how will it be in the end? cuz according to the pts I fixed the brackets in paint and it'd be like this: (in order)
Scan OctZerg
Cryoc vOddy
LancerX TTF
dsaqwe BiYon
Set)Sziky ZeTy
Set)MaD Talent
eOnzErG Normal
trutaCz castle
|
i want vods of groupstage
|
On November 06 2014 02:26 Belladona wrote: this is not right at all, according to the scores it is:
1) Scan 2) Set)Sziky 3) LancerX 4) eOnzErG 5) Cryoc 6) Set)MaD 7) dsaqwe 8) trutaCz 9) OctZerg 10) ZeTy 11) TTF 12) Normal 13) vOddy 14) Talent? (I don't see in his ID in ladder stage) 15) BiYon 16) castle
so if it is 1 vs 9 it should be Scan vs OctZerg instead of Scan vs TTF...
also, your draw here has no similitude with the draw on TL.net, neither with the draw that should be done according to BinaryBeast, so how will it be in the end? cuz according to the pts I fixed the brackets in paint and it'd be like this: (in order)
Scan OctZerg
Cryoc vOddy
LancerX TTF
dsaqwe BiYon
Set)Sziky ZeTy
Set)MaD Talent
eOnzErG Normal
trutaCz castle talent = AL.Senseii
|
|
|
|