WCG Korea, how it works - Page 2

On May 30 2006 14:47 Asta wrote:



that depends on how you define 'hard'. judging only by opponent-skill the amateur-tourneys will never be as hard as the pro-tourneys. anyway, what difference does it make how hard someones way to the finals was? if he is in and another player that could have beat him any day is out something went wrong.

On May 31 2006 02:15 ToT)MidiaN( wrote:
Maybe they know something about the map that is replacing estrella?!

On May 30 2006 13:03 Live2Win wrote:
This is how WCG Korea is working this year.... (it's sort of complicated)

For the 2nd Round, the KeSPA ranked progamers from 4~30 minus last year's WCG winner (fOru), (so it's 26 players) are automatically included for this round along with the 6 players from the "Nominated Progamer's Qualification Round". So, this round will include a total of 32 players. (6 players from Round 1 + KeSPA Ranks #4 ~ 26, minus fOru). They will be divided into 8 groups, single elmination. First place from each group advances to 3rd Round (8 players).

here.

On May 30 2006 19:33 HungZerg wrote:
no, because better player isnt an absolute thing. it all depends on style, race, etc, meaning a player maybe beat player 1 but not player 2, but player 2 could still beat player 1. theres no way to account for that, you just have to accept it.

On June 02 2006 07:45 8882 wrote:
will the replays be released?

also playing on other maps sounds unfair

generally the whole "progamers play alone" thing is unfair
make them play vs amatours, let's see if they will do that well

On May 31 2006 03:57 Live2Win wrote:
dunno what will replace Estrella. Might be RH, might not be. As for Beamo's question, I believe they get another chance? Also remember that it's the ranks of June, so many people around #29 or something will most likely participate in Round 1, since they won't know if they'll stay there next month.

On May 31 2006 08:48 Asta wrote:



read again!
i even put the term "any day" in to make it clear. maybe you should read the previous posts too.

ps: better player _is_ an absolute term. it just doesn't mean that you have to beat a worse player every time or even sometimes. read a book about measure theory if you don't get it.