EPTI still can't believe I got him for 6 and effOrt for 5. That's just unfair.
[SPL] STX SouL v Woongjin Stars - Page 41
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
I still can't believe I got him for 6 and effOrt for 5. That's just unfair. | ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:14 kdgns wrote: bogus was ahead on supply for a really long time, usually terran shouldnt have more supply than you because their units are so good, even supply usually means something bad. Soulkey responded nicely by abusing mobility using drops to delay the 2/1 push timing while he mass expanded, eventually swarming with a large late game army while terran starves What... terran is ahead of supply vs zerg usually. If they are equal then zerg is winning. | ||
|
N.geNuity
United States5112 Posts
| ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
konadora
Singapore66359 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:15 L_Master wrote: I'm telling you guys, and I've been saying this for a while: SK is one of the three best Zerg's out there. Only JD, effOrt, and to a lesser extend; hydra, compare. I still can't believe I got him for 6 and effOrt for 5. That's just unfair. Zero man, Zero. That game made up for the stupid mirrors earlier.  | ||
thopol
Japan4560 Posts
I think that Bogus's decision to focus on the bottom left was the deciding factor. He was pushing the top right, but decided (there are a few possible reasons) to push the bottom left main instead of persisting at the top. Soulkey was able to defend the bottom right at spectacular cost to Bogus, and that was it. I don't think Bogus giving up on the top of the map was necessarily bad, but I do think that he shouldn't have committed so heavily to the SW. For a long time there, we saw tanks and vultures all over the map simultaneously. Bogus must have figured that he would need to settle in for the long haul and to do that he'd need the whole side of the map. His distribution of forces was so spectacular that allocating everything to busting up one ramp seemed like a huge blunder. It's also worth noting that Bogus almost succeeded there in the bottom left. Soulkey was able to push him back perfectly every time it looked like curtains. Such an ill game though. I'm so glad I didn't miss this. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
And of course the commando Hunter Killer Hydras lol | ||
|
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
| ||
|
WTFTerran
Russian Federation286 Posts
gg bogus((( | ||
|
Phyrigian
New Zealand1332 Posts
| ||
|
hitthat
Poland2341 Posts
| ||
|
mustaju
Estonia4504 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:16 Nikon wrote: Ouch, upgrades were close to finishing. HUGE setback for Bogus for losing those armories. Considering that, the push seemed very impressive. Damn, Bogus, you sick. <3 | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:17 hitthat wrote: Many mines and vults are a must while defending your forces against swarm and bogus forgot that. Lurkers got too easy way to get close to tanks with a swarm support. err SK still lost quite a lot man to mines. If anything I would have liked to see more mine pulls from SK to completely fuck Bogus' army. He could have really abused that. | ||
|
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:16 Holgerius wrote: Zero man, Zero. That game made up for the stupid mirrors earlier. ZerO, Personally I can't quite place him on that level. When he is good he is FUCKING GOOD; but then he goes and plays like he did against Stork (I mean who needs storm dodge right?). If you really want to be a top player I think that consistency has to be there, and ZerO just doesn't seem to have that yet. He has to many mediocre/bad games. | ||
|
kdgns
United States2427 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:15 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: ? Terran should almost always be ahead on supply otherwise it means they're behind. well then, ignore my post completely cos im noob | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On December 07 2011 18:16 thopol wrote: Holy balls. I think that Bogus's decision to focus on the bottom left was the deciding factor. He was pushing the top right, but decided (there are a few possible reasons) to push the bottom left main instead of persisting at the top. Soulkey was able to defend the bottom right at spectacular cost to Bogus, and that was it. I don't think Bogus giving up on the top of the map was necessarily bad, but I do think that he shouldn't have committed so heavily to the SW. It was his only chance at securing another mining base (the nat) whilst pushing. The other base had already been mined a fair bit and would've taken longer to mine. The SW was also along the path of his freshest expansion so made sense in terms of defence too. | ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
| ||
