On October 25 2009 01:57 Pholon wrote:
Sudden Death: Lose a Nexus = Lose Game
Sudden Death: Lose a Nexus = Lose Game
+ Show Spoiler +
cloud's proxy nexus despite of that ftw xD
Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
On October 25 2009 01:57 Pholon wrote: Sudden Death: Lose a Nexus = Lose Game + Show Spoiler + cloud's proxy nexus despite of that ftw xD | ||
fanatacist
10319 Posts
| ||
dangots0ul
United States919 Posts
Though i would speculate the Pro would lose if the handicaps are as harsh as they were with cloud. Esp, when we got top players that KNOW how to abuse it and can somewhat keep up with macro) | ||
dangots0ul
United States919 Posts
On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah | ||
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
On October 24 2009 21:50 pangshai wrote: Handicaps: No Zealot Speed, No Goon Range, No Forge Ups, No Storm, No Minimap (thx to some toilet paper ^^) lol. how in the world is toss supposed to play with that against terran? any FE will get raped by 2 fac. probably 12 nex into 2base carrier with DTs or reaver or something. edit: forgot to mention that i love this idea! can't wait for the next episode Well, you proxy scouts of course! | ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
gk_ender
United States717 Posts
| ||
m3rciless
United States1476 Posts
On October 26 2009 03:33 dangots0ul wrote: it would be so sick if TL could get a Korea Pro to do this (Sea, savior?) and put him up against the BEST TL has to offer (nony, idra, nonming, incontrol, chill, louder, machine Kawaii, RET etc...) Though i would speculate the Pro would lose if the handicaps are as harsh as they were with cloud. Esp, when we got top players that KNOW how to abuse it and can somewhat keep up with macro) The korean would get annihilated as soon as the first handicap hit. Those players are good enough to exploit these things. | ||
![]()
Pholon
Netherlands6142 Posts
| ||
MountainDewJunkie
United States10340 Posts
On October 26 2009 07:45 m3rciless wrote: + Show Spoiler + On October 26 2009 03:33 dangots0ul wrote: it would be so sick if TL could get a Korea Pro to do this (Sea, savior?) and put him up against the BEST TL has to offer (nony, idra, nonming, incontrol, chill, louder, machine Kawaii, RET etc...) Though i would speculate the Pro would lose if the handicaps are as harsh as they were with cloud. Esp, when we got top players that KNOW how to abuse it and can somewhat keep up with macro) The korean would get annihilated as soon as the first handicap hit. Those players are good enough to exploit these things. ... Is this a commonly shared view? | ||
laLAlA[uC]
Canada963 Posts
On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: Show nested quote + On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; | ||
okum
France5778 Posts
| ||
gk_ender
United States717 Posts
On October 26 2009 08:59 laLAlA[uC] wrote: Show nested quote + On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; Ahh i see, your right 2 fact (which i love how you began this statement because 2 fact is a very general term for a very wide set of aggressive terran strats) completley gets annihilated by a 12 nex, seeing asthe 2 fact has more units, and not to mention capabilities like seiging quickly and laying little invisible units that protoss has no vision to see because of his build. Damn man, you really need to consult, stork, bisu, jangbi, and all the korean pro gamers and tell the to stop losing their games to such an ez win lol. Btw as for only god players knowing how to abuse slow tech, watch the entirety of our last tl arena, and you will see why we set the standards that we do. | ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
| ||
QuakerOats
United States1024 Posts
On October 26 2009 09:14 gk_ender wrote: Show nested quote + On October 26 2009 08:59 laLAlA[uC] wrote: On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; Ahh i see, your right 2 fact (which i love how you began this statement because 2 fact is a very general term for a very wide set of aggressive terran strats) completley gets annihilated by a 12 nex, seeing asthe 2 fact has more units, and not to mention capabilities like seiging quickly and laying little invisible units that protoss has no vision to see because of his build. Damn man, you really need to consult, stork, bisu, jangbi, and all the korean pro gamers and tell the to stop losing their games to such an ez win lol. Btw as for only god players knowing how to abuse slow tech, watch the entirety of our last tl arena, and you will see why we set the standards that we do. Um... I think it's commonly accepted that 2 fact (any of the "wide set of aggressive terran strats") is not very good against 12 nexus. | ||
laLAlA[uC]
Canada963 Posts
On October 26 2009 09:21 QuakerOats wrote: Show nested quote + On October 26 2009 09:14 gk_ender wrote: On October 26 2009 08:59 laLAlA[uC] wrote: On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; Ahh i see, your right 2 fact (which i love how you began this statement because 2 fact is a very general term for a very wide set of aggressive terran strats) completley gets annihilated by a 12 nex, seeing asthe 2 fact has more units, and not to mention capabilities like seiging quickly and laying little invisible units that protoss has no vision to see because of his build. Damn man, you really need to consult, stork, bisu, jangbi, and all the korean pro gamers and tell the to stop losing their games to such an ez win lol. Btw as for only god players knowing how to abuse slow tech, watch the entirety of our last tl arena, and you will see why we set the standards that we do. Um... I think it's commonly accepted that 2 fact (any of the "wide set of aggressive terran strats") is not very good against 12 nexus. This. Edit: Searching Tl forums, all of them say to bunker rush or some other very all-in rush. Very few suggested a 2 fac variant. | ||
dangots0ul
United States919 Posts
On October 26 2009 09:23 laLAlA[uC] wrote: Show nested quote + On October 26 2009 09:21 QuakerOats wrote: On October 26 2009 09:14 gk_ender wrote: On October 26 2009 08:59 laLAlA[uC] wrote: On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; Ahh i see, your right 2 fact (which i love how you began this statement because 2 fact is a very general term for a very wide set of aggressive terran strats) completley gets annihilated by a 12 nex, seeing asthe 2 fact has more units, and not to mention capabilities like seiging quickly and laying little invisible units that protoss has no vision to see because of his build. Damn man, you really need to consult, stork, bisu, jangbi, and all the korean pro gamers and tell the to stop losing their games to such an ez win lol. Btw as for only god players knowing how to abuse slow tech, watch the entirety of our last tl arena, and you will see why we set the standards that we do. Um... I think it's commonly accepted that 2 fact (any of the "wide set of aggressive terran strats") is not very good against 12 nexus. This. Edit: Searching Tl forums, all of them say to bunker rush or some other very all-in rush. Very few suggested a 2 fac variant. He was being sarcastics. Go find me a rep of good players when 12 nex is faced against 2 fact and it wins. | ||
QuakerOats
United States1024 Posts
On May 23 2009 10:19 IdrA wrote: and do NOT 2 fac. double nex is a hard counter to 2 fac, it becomes ridiculously allin and their production kicks in before any kind of decent 2 fac hits. | ||
gk_ender
United States717 Posts
On October 26 2009 09:21 QuakerOats wrote: Show nested quote + On October 26 2009 09:14 gk_ender wrote: On October 26 2009 08:59 laLAlA[uC] wrote: On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; Ahh i see, your right 2 fact (which i love how you began this statement because 2 fact is a very general term for a very wide set of aggressive terran strats) completley gets annihilated by a 12 nex, seeing asthe 2 fact has more units, and not to mention capabilities like seiging quickly and laying little invisible units that protoss has no vision to see because of his build. Damn man, you really need to consult, stork, bisu, jangbi, and all the korean pro gamers and tell the to stop losing their games to such an ez win lol. Btw as for only god players knowing how to abuse slow tech, watch the entirety of our last tl arena, and you will see why we set the standards that we do. Um... I think it's commonly accepted that 2 fact (any of the "wide set of aggressive terran strats") is not very good against 12 nexus. 2 fact vult with mines is a very good containment move against 12 nex bc of late obs, if it doesnt completely succeed in wrecking the protoss economy, then it it gives map control. The problem with 2 fact against 12 nex actually is very player orientated, it requires positioning and micro, that if screwed up will end up with a loss from the terran, much like using one of july zergs muta builds, if you dont have the skills, it falls flat (though as i said vult with mines actually is the hardest counter to 12 nex, and thus requires the least amount of skill for success.) This is also misconceived because it is thought if the protoss player loses no probes he is ahead even if the natural nexus goes down, which is only true after a certain window of time, again a higher level idea, i mentioned the names i did because they have all lost 12 nex to 2 fact at least once in my memory.(though jangbi and stork have also beaten 2 fact from 12 nex) | ||
laLAlA[uC]
Canada963 Posts
On October 26 2009 10:26 gk_ender wrote: Show nested quote + On October 26 2009 09:21 QuakerOats wrote: On October 26 2009 09:14 gk_ender wrote: On October 26 2009 08:59 laLAlA[uC] wrote: On October 26 2009 03:35 dangots0ul wrote: On October 25 2009 01:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: lol there's no shame to losing in a game of imba handicaps the terran who won the first time was too good for the tournament he actually could have won without the handicaps If you assume that the situation was 12 nex vs. 2 fact, then yeah -___- I'm D+. And plus 12 nex > 2 fac ez. And to the person who said that only good players know how to abuse handicaps, I'm terrible and I know how to abuse slow tech. -_-;; Ahh i see, your right 2 fact (which i love how you began this statement because 2 fact is a very general term for a very wide set of aggressive terran strats) completley gets annihilated by a 12 nex, seeing asthe 2 fact has more units, and not to mention capabilities like seiging quickly and laying little invisible units that protoss has no vision to see because of his build. Damn man, you really need to consult, stork, bisu, jangbi, and all the korean pro gamers and tell the to stop losing their games to such an ez win lol. Btw as for only god players knowing how to abuse slow tech, watch the entirety of our last tl arena, and you will see why we set the standards that we do. Um... I think it's commonly accepted that 2 fact (any of the "wide set of aggressive terran strats") is not very good against 12 nexus. 2 fact vult with mines is a very good containment move against 12 nex bc of late obs, if it doesnt completely succeed in wrecking the protoss economy, then it it gives map control. The problem with 2 fact against 12 nex actually is very player orientated, it requires positioning and micro, that if screwed up will end up with a loss from the terran, much like using one of july zergs muta builds, if you dont have the skills, it falls flat (though as i said vult with mines actually is the hardest counter to 12 nex, and thus requires the least amount of skill for success.) This is also misconceived because it is thought if the protoss player loses no probes he is ahead even if the natural nexus goes down, which is only true after a certain window of time, again a higher level idea, i mentioned the names i did because they have all lost 12 nex to 2 fact at least once in my memory.(though jangbi and stork have also beaten 2 fact from 12 nex) So this takes our argument where? (: Obv 2 fac mines vs double tech is extremely effective. Nothing else really proven/disproven. 8D | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Bisu ![]() Stork ![]() BeSt ![]() Flash ![]() Shuttle ![]() Soulkey ![]() actioN ![]() Nal_rA ![]() Barracks ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv17692 singsing2860 Lowko1123 hiko676 Beastyqt419 crisheroes220 XcaliburYe172 ArmadaUGS160 KnowMe88 Trikslyr72 FrodaN24 QueenE22 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • davetesta23 StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends Other Games |
Online Event
ShoWTimE vs MaxPax
SHIN vs herO
Clem vs Cure
SHIN vs Clem
ShoWTimE vs SHIN
SOOP
DongRaeGu vs sOs
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
SC Evo League
WardiTV Invitational
Chat StarLeague
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Online Event
MaxPax vs herO
SHIN vs Cure
Clem vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs herO
ShoWTimE vs Clem
[ Show More ] Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Chat StarLeague
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Afreeca Starleague
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
RSL Revival
GSL Code S
|
|