EPT[Valor] Strelok Statement - Page 13
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
mark05
Canada807 Posts
| ||
|
errol1001
454 Posts
On June 30 2009 23:42 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: "A" should be clarified as "fenix was in an unwinnable situation barring strelok getting up and walking away from his computer for the rest of the game" You mean like during nony vs f91 liquibition right? | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
| ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
| ||
|
Toxiferous
United States388 Posts
On June 30 2009 17:21 VarsityUser wrote: well its pretty obvious whats going on here. Nobody is right, its rules vs players vs player vs rules. artosis and especially rekrul you both come off as VERY biased. artosis is basically purely defending his own decision. You agreed to run the Valor tournament as a team of admins, you can't change decisions of one admin when he has already told a player a result over 'X' amount of time. Its a pretty basic and logical equation, minus the biased rage you failed as admins, and now BOTH players are taking fault for it. it's a valid complaint and a valid solution. There is nothing to be biased about. | ||
|
Mazer
Canada1086 Posts
| ||
|
renegade_zerg
Korea (South)525 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27179 Posts
| ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
| ||
|
Not_A_Notion
Ireland441 Posts
Edit As per below. My bad sorry Manifesto7 | ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27179 Posts
On July 01 2009 19:44 Not_A_Notion wrote: Tastelss Statement on the Issue on SCforAll http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=96656 Try looking at the forum first. | ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
Now in this situation, where the very same rules we put in places are impeding the "fair play" it is designed to protect. then the rules must be ignored in order to serve its original purpose: "protect fair play" One situation in which we can all agree on is if Kesp reversed their decision on gorush for typing the wrong thing in game, admitted they made a mistake, because the rules are trying to promote fair play. screwing gorush out of their game was not fair play, since he did not lost the game fair and square. Let's look at this similar e situation, if "final decision" is indeed a rule that designed to protects fair play, and that same very rule is impeding fair play then fuck the rules, change that final decision, and promote fair play. Strelot you need to do some critical thinking before your actions, try to take emotion out of your decisions. | ||
|
Cheerio
Ukraine3178 Posts
| ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
|
Orbifold
United States1922 Posts
On June 29 2009 20:51 Strelok. wrote: You know, i understand when girls in the shop, can't select between 2 dresses and change their decisions many times. But i really can't understand when serious men, professionals, change their decisions, "final decisions" as they call them, for many times. Strelok, this is unacceptable misogyny and you should be ashamed of yourself. Your contention that it is wrong to reverse a poor decision is absurd. Should we hang an innocent man because a judge said his ruling was "final"? Kudos to Valor for correcting their mistake, accepting fault, and putting in the time and effort to hold this tournament in the first place. | ||
|
Piste
6184 Posts
 i hate valor tournament and daniel lee even more. I used to like him but after him being such an unprofessional douche at the first round of VODded valor tour and now this... I don't enjoy gom matches anymore ;/ edit: i agree that if game is close, then its replay of that game. but fuck no you don't go and change your final decisions ;/ | ||
|
5unrise
New Zealand646 Posts
On July 01 2009 20:54 rei wrote: What are rules? why do we need them? why do people follow rules of a game? without rules people will allied mine, people will use wall hack, people will have 20k mineral 2 mins into the game, map hacks, wowwalker, D2bots, Rules are for the protection of something we call fair play. Now in this situation, where the very same rules we put in places are impeding the "fair play" it is designed to protect. then the rules must be ignored in order to serve its original purpose: "protect fair play" One situation in which we can all agree on is if Kesp reversed their decision on gorush for typing the wrong thing in game, admitted they made a mistake, because the rules are trying to promote fair play. screwing gorush out of their game was not fair play, since he did not lost the game fair and square. Let's look at this similar e situation, if "final decision" is indeed a rule that designed to protects fair play, and that same very rule is impeding fair play then fuck the rules, change that final decision, and promote fair play. Strelot you need to do some critical thinking before your actions, try to take emotion out of your decisions. Sage man, sage, everything I wanted to say | ||
|
Vex
Ireland454 Posts
On June 29 2009 23:16 Rekrul wrote: Wrong decisions were made. Wrong decisions were corrected and balance was restored. Now this little girl is whining. While I do possess male genetalia and am a man, what I said is that I am THE man. your grosely mis informed, you have very big problems dude. | ||
|
Vex
Ireland454 Posts
think about it, if he did, the 1-1 is diserved as strelok wins, so starting again is a viable option.. | ||
| ||
