| Forum Index > BW General |
|
s_k_911
China362 Posts
The servers of blizzard game which run by netease in china will stop on 23rd.Jan.2023. I run a softether hub for sc:re.But the hub are not that good enough. Is there any software for building a server for sc:re? Please teach me:tanks2003@gmail.com Thanks. | ||
|
kogeT
Poland2041 Posts
 | ||
|
Chris_Havoc
United States600 Posts
That is if Blizzard doesn't find another publisher within China by January 23rd. | ||
|
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
|
Chris_Havoc
United States600 Posts
On November 17 2022 19:51 outscar wrote: Does this mean SC2 will also shutdown? Haven't seen a topic yet but think this is huge and will lower playerbase on both games even more. 2023 is already bad year ... Yes it would also involve StarCraft 2, and yes it could severely impact operating the WTL going forward. But the real potential killer in this for Blizzard is Overwatch League. Netease owns Shanghai Dragons, and many OWL players & fans are chinese. If this shutdown is a prolonged one, it could damage the financial stability of all Blizzard eSports within China and elsewhere. | ||
|
Piste
6180 Posts
| ||
|
Puosu
6992 Posts
https://shieldbattery.net/ its the future | ||
|
papapanda
Taiwan326 Posts
On November 17 2022 19:56 Chris_Havoc wrote: Yes it would also involve StarCraft 2, and yes it could severely impact operating the WTL going forward. But the real potential killer in this for Blizzard is Overwatch League. Netease owns Shanghai Dragons, and many OWL players & fans are chinese. If this shutdown is a prolonged one, it could damage the financial stability of all Blizzard eSports within China and elsewhere. I have no doubt it will impact general Chinese interest in SC2 in a big way, but as far as WTL goes most of the games are not played on the Chinese server so I don't see WTL directly taking a hit like OW would. | ||
|
lestye
United States4186 Posts
Freaking Bobby Kotick screws over everyone. | ||
|
s_k_911
China362 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10011 Posts
On November 18 2022 11:09 s_k_911 wrote: 3000-5000 men login in china sc:re server everyday. shieldbattery will adopt all these men, np | ||
|
keaneu
Korea (South)65 Posts
| ||
|
MineraIs
United States846 Posts
| ||
|
hgfgfrtefd
1 Post
| ||
|
ZGDFRRETE
1 Post
| ||
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On November 17 2022 19:56 Chris_Havoc wrote: Yes it would also involve StarCraft 2, and yes it could severely impact operating the WTL going forward. But the real potential killer in this for Blizzard is Overwatch League. Netease owns Shanghai Dragons, and many OWL players & fans are chinese. If this shutdown is a prolonged one, it could damage the financial stability of all Blizzard eSports within China and elsewhere. Won't be an issue for WTL for now. All Chinese pros play on Korean ladder and all the matches are played on non Chinese servers. | ||
|
iopq
United States1006 Posts
On November 18 2022 04:23 lestye wrote: https://www.eurogamer.net/netease-boss-blames-damage-done-by-a-jerk-for-activision-shutdown-of-world-of-warcraft-overwatch-in-china Freaking Bobby Kotick screws over everyone. It's China that makes Blizzard have a licensing agreement with a Chinese company it's not being shut down anywhere else, it's primarily a Chinese government program | ||
|
Jealous
10232 Posts
On November 18 2022 04:23 lestye wrote: https://www.eurogamer.net/netease-boss-blames-damage-done-by-a-jerk-for-activision-shutdown-of-world-of-warcraft-overwatch-in-china Freaking Bobby Kotick screws over everyone. China blaming someone from the West for its problems, in this case likely caused by its isolationist policy. Yup, I'm sure Bobby Kotick is responsible. After all, it makes so much sense for him to ban the most populous country in the world from playing his company's games! | ||
|
Calvinbobo
China90 Posts
On November 18 2022 21:12 iopq wrote: It's China that makes Blizzard have a licensing agreement with a Chinese company it's not being shut down anywhere else, it's primarily a Chinese government program Blizzard ALREADY has the license. It is only the agreement between Netease and Blizzard that is expiring. Blizzard is asking for much more, including user data, which is sensitive in every country worldwide. | ||
|
iopq
United States1006 Posts
On November 19 2022 00:29 Calvinbobo wrote: Blizzard ALREADY has the license. It is only the agreement between Netease and Blizzard that is expiring. Blizzard is asking for much more, including user data, which is sensitive in every country worldwide. So what? It's a Chinese only requirement that you need to have an agreement with a Chinese company. Blizzard can do whatever they want in most countries in the world. China is the one that's been tightening down on games, including limiting students' online play time to one hour a week. 8PM-9PM on Friday, lol Also, Steam doesn't connect from China anymore. But let's immediately blame Blizzard without proof | ||
|
Hitokiri3
18 Posts
| ||
GTR
51497 Posts
On November 18 2022 19:51 digmouse wrote: Won't be an issue for WTL for now. All Chinese pros play on Korean ladder and all the matches are played on non Chinese servers. was WTL assisted/funded by netease at all? i feel like that'd be the main issue. my main concern is the wc3 scene; although with players slowly shifting from netease to war3 champions + the community picking up the slack with the absence of WGL over the past year has eased these concerns slightly. | ||
|
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
|
Cheesefome
314 Posts
On November 18 2022 11:09 s_k_911 wrote: 3000-5000 men login in china sc:re server everyday. Shield Battery is your next best bet and it's not a bad one at all, actually better than battle.net. | ||
|
iopq
United States1006 Posts
On November 19 2022 10:08 outscar wrote: I wonder if they can play through VPN? But if it's account issue if it's Chinese Blizz might nuke it so only option will be to change account region via ticket. You have to buy the game again, AFAIK | ||
|
Calvinbobo
China90 Posts
On November 19 2022 01:34 iopq wrote: So what? It's a Chinese only requirement that you need to have an agreement with a Chinese company. Blizzard can do whatever they want in most countries in the world. China is the one that's been tightening down on games, including limiting students' online play time to one hour a week. 8PM-9PM on Friday, lol Also, Steam doesn't connect from China anymore. But let's immediately blame Blizzard without proof Well, the proof is everywhere, if you read the news... Check Bloomberg (if you can think of any other source that is more trustworthy to you, check them instead). Blizzard asked for a higher cut, a prepayment of two years, and data from millions of Chinese users. And what is wrong with China asking Blizzard to get a license? Maybe Blizzard can "do what they want in most countries", but that certainly doesn't include China. If Blizzard wants to keep making money from China, then play by the rules and show some respect to the counterparty and long-term partner, Netease. | ||
|
Gesotsas
1 Post
| ||
|
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On November 19 2022 06:15 GTR wrote: was WTL assisted/funded by netease at all? i feel like that'd be the main issue. my main concern is the wc3 scene; although with players slowly shifting from netease to war3 champions + the community picking up the slack with the absence of WGL over the past year has eased these concerns slightly. Almost entirely self funded by Scboy alongside sponsors. | ||
|
iopq
United States1006 Posts
On November 20 2022 11:37 Calvinbobo wrote: Well, the proof is everywhere, if you read the news... Check Bloomberg (if you can think of any other source that is more trustworthy to you, check them instead). Blizzard asked for a higher cut, a prepayment of two years, and data from millions of Chinese users. And what is wrong with China asking Blizzard to get a license? Maybe Blizzard can "do what they want in most countries", but that certainly doesn't include China. If Blizzard wants to keep making money from China, then play by the rules and show some respect to the counterparty and long-term partner, Netease. In other countries Blizzard gets 100% for the products they make, since it's their games. Why should some Chinese company get a big cut for doing just user registrations and running a server? I've signed up in China, it's nothing different, it just checked the government id. That company does nothing to deserve a cut, considering Blizzard does this feature in Korea themselves to satisfy local laws for underage people | ||
|
s_k_911
China362 Posts
On November 21 2022 04:59 iopq wrote: In other countries Blizzard gets 100% for the products they make, since it's their games. Why should some Chinese company get a big cut for doing just user registrations and running a server? I've signed up in China, it's nothing different, it just checked the government id. That company does nothing to deserve a cut, considering Blizzard does this feature in Korea themselves to satisfy local laws for underage people 1. Blizzard choose to co-operate with netease at the very beginning ,but not to run a china company of his own. 2. I know lots of china players buy both china-server-sc-re and korea-server-sc-re. Maybe the players not the big companies are the victims. | ||
|
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On November 21 2022 04:59 iopq wrote: In other countries Blizzard gets 100% for the products they make, since it's their games. Why should some Chinese company get a big cut for doing just user registrations and running a server? I've signed up in China, it's nothing different, it just checked the government id. That company does nothing to deserve a cut, considering Blizzard does this feature in Korea themselves to satisfy local laws for underage people Chinese law does not allow foreign companies to operate online games solely on their own, requires a local partner. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
WardiTV Korean Royale
BSL: GosuLeague
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Reynor
Maru vs SHIN
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
BSL: GosuLeague
RSL Revival
WardiTV Korean Royale
RSL Revival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
