EPTHow Good is ElkY? - Page 5
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
P)x-IcedEarth
Finland2 Posts
| ||
|
ShAsTa
Belgium2841 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On July 25 2003 08:54 ejai63 wrote: Still the Koreans usually go 5-2 or 6-1, which is a VERY good winning percentage against some top players from around the world. Expecting all 4 koreans to go 7-0 and win the top 4 spots is unreasonable. Plus, the competition for this year's WCG will probably be a lot tougher than previous years wrong. considering that you are one of those people that think you can't compare Rekrul with Nada 6-1 and 5-2 are no *good* results. Rekrul can beat Nada like Froz can beat Boxer. | ||
|
InFiNitY[pG]
Germany3467 Posts
On July 25 2003 11:13 ToKoreaWithLove wrote: NaDa? Altho I would think NaDa is less scary than boxer (for non-koreans) because of his style of play.. i'd say it's the other way around. Nada plays unbelievably consistent and makes hardly any misstakes. while you can probably outsmart neither boxer nor nada, you can still outmacro boxer like froz did in wcg if you are prepared for his micro-intesive moves. | ||
ToKoreaWithLove
Norway10161 Posts
On July 25 2003 13:38 InFiNitY[pG] wrote: i'd say it's the other way around. Nada plays unbelievably consistent and makes hardly any misstakes. while you can probably outsmart neither boxer nor nada, you can still outmacro boxer like froz did in wcg if you are prepared for his micro-intesive moves. True but I think the typhical western style of play is more based around macro than korean style (less true than 3 years ago, but still), which means mass strats are more common than the micro intensive wars you often see in the big leagues. And while I fully agree about NaDa being consistent, boxer is far more unpredictable. Heck, mensrea even dubbed it "the boxer factor". | ||
| ||
