• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:11
CET 19:11
KST 03:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Disasterpiece Theater: Soulkey vs sOs (2013-05-21)11WTL 2022 Winter - Regular Season Awards + Wrap-up24WTL Winter - The 2v2 Tour25WTL 2022 Winter - Regular Season Finale7Reynor wins HomeStory Cup XXII17
Community News
SC2 shut down in China, WTL to continue335.0.11 Patch Released - Balance Changes139New Worlds Map Contest III: All Submissions (VOTE HERE)74ESL Open Cup #158: RagnaroK, HeroMarine, Cure win4IEM Katowice 2023 - groups and brackets announced21
StarCraft 2
General
Serral joins BASILISK Serral leaves ENCE Red Boost - Health Results, Uses, Benefits, Scam O New Ladder Maps Announced - Used at IEM Katowice Disasterpiece Theater: Soulkey vs sOs (2013-05-21)
Tourneys
WardiTV 2023 Opens (Monthly) $5000 #PassionCraft Knockout TournyCraft free tourny management web app NorCal StarFest I [EPT 2021-22] ESL Open Cups
Strategy
Custom Maps
[A] (Minigames) Raynor Party [A] [TPS RPG] Transformers: Open World (WIP) Work In Progress Melee Maps
External Content
Mutation # 353 Hostile Territory Mutation # 352 Railroad Switch Mutation # 351 Assembly of Vengeance Mutation # 350 Burning Evacuation
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [Interview] skb9728_CyGnus – Legendary Mapmaker [ASL15] Afreeca Starleague To Start On Feb 14 BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
Dewalt vs. top Chinese players - 1/27/2023 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues New Worlds Map Contest III: All Submissions (VOTE HERE) Artosis vs Apes with Clubs
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Valkyrie dmg formula? 2v2 Spell Combos Marine rate of fire
Other Games
General Games
The XBox Thread Fire Emblem The PlayStation 5 Destiny 2 - PC/Xbox/PS4 Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official Dota and Chess General Discussion [DPC 23] Tour 1 Discussion
League of Legends
[Spring 2023] LoL E-sports General Discussion [Patch Notes] Release General Discussion
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia Community Thread Team Liquid Maria L
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Coronavirus and You
Fan Clubs
The GoOdy Fan Club The TY Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[TV] HBO The Last Of Us series [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion!
Sports
2022 - 2023 Football Thread NBA General Discussion 2021 NFL/CFB Season TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2022
World Cup 2022
FIFA World Cup 2022 - Knockout Stage FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Thread
Tech Support
Which Gaming Laptop Should I Buy? Simple Questions Simple Answers Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Happy Birthday R1CH! Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
It's that time of year YET A…
Umpteen
I'm still around doodling and…
Glider
Someone Crashed my Plane …
micronesia
A spiritual journey th…
mewithoutDrew
The Kitty Arcade Saga
MrBitter
My Goals for 2023
DeNikSSB
State of StarCraft II
Jealous
Burning it all down - Reti…
BreAKerTV
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1291 users

Microsoft buys Activision/Blizzard for $70B - Page 4

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1073 Posts
January 20 2022 14:09 GMT
#61
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.

Puosu
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
6957 Posts
January 20 2022 14:45 GMT
#62
Open source BW would be so sick
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
January 20 2022 17:25 GMT
#63
On January 19 2022 17:42 evilfatsh1t wrote:
3 threads discussing the acquisition and im still struggling to see how the fuck they came up with a $70b valuation for this dogshit company. like seriously...what the fuck happened there?
My guess is that is the calculated cost to buy shares at a price that at least 50% of shareholders will be willing to part their shares for. That's how it generally works. But I still don't how how that would be $69billion. That seems to be greatly overvalued.
Timebon3s
Profile Joined May 2018
507 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-20 18:26:50
January 20 2022 18:26 GMT
#64
Well you don't invest for current value, you invest for what it might be worth down the line.
A buy-out is also generally much higher than the current marked value of the company, and it's almost always seen as hitting the jackpot for the shareholders.

As someone else said, there are very smart people doing these calculations.
We don't have the skill nor the information they have...
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1073 Posts
January 20 2022 19:08 GMT
#65
It basically means that Microsoft thinks that buying Activision now is a profitable investment. Meaning they can easily cover the costs of the investment in the long run. (and here I don't think it has to be a long-term investment anyways, because of the other points I've made throughout the thread).

Microsoft will be valuated at around 3 trillion dollars in a couple of years I think, so this is peanuts.
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway7244 Posts
January 20 2022 20:59 GMT
#66
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.


Underestimate of the year. Microsoft not only supports open source project, they are the world largest Open Source company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_and_open_source
art_of_turtle
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
United States1077 Posts
January 20 2022 22:24 GMT
#67
On January 20 2022 20:27 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2022 20:01 art_of_turtle wrote:
A sure fire way to kill a game and community is to make it pay to play, like adding it to their Microsoft game pass for $9.99 a month.
Your away that game pass isn't the only way to play right?
Some people want to buy individual games for $50-60. Some people want to pay $9.99 a month to play any of 100+ games.

Both can co-exist.

Did not know that. As long as I don't have to pay for this game again I guess it could be neutral.
Flash should fear Sacsri
lost dedicated
Profile Joined June 2021
41 Posts
January 20 2022 22:33 GMT
#68
On January 21 2022 07:24 art_of_turtle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2022 20:27 Gorsameth wrote:
On January 20 2022 20:01 art_of_turtle wrote:
A sure fire way to kill a game and community is to make it pay to play, like adding it to their Microsoft game pass for $9.99 a month.
Your away that game pass isn't the only way to play right?
Some people want to buy individual games for $50-60. Some people want to pay $9.99 a month to play any of 100+ games.

Both can co-exist.

Did not know that. As long as I don't have to pay for this game again I guess it could be neutral.

lol when remastered came out i remember people on the bnet forums pmuch rioting over having to pay for the game again.

"i bought this game in 1997, why should i have to pay for it again? fuck you blizzard"
"i got this game at a flea market in 2007, paywalling ladder is bullshit"

but my absolute favorite was "i've pirated this game for twenty years. why the fuck do i have to pay for it now?"
Lavalisk
Profile Joined July 2020
Argentina28 Posts
January 20 2022 22:37 GMT
#69
To everyone who said things can't get worse, I disagree with such reasoning. My experience tells me it can always get worse, independently of how bad the current situation is.
As far as I'm concerned this could be the beginning of a complete shutdown. Microsoft only cares about profits. I'll just wait and see what happens, I have distrust.
Having cancer doesn't prevent getting AIDS.
My body, my mind and my soul belong to God.
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3626 Posts
January 20 2022 23:24 GMT
#70
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.


It is generally extremely hard to open source old codebases, as they tend to contain a lot of proprietary code that you do not have the licenses to release. SC:R has not only this problem, but also contains a *ton* of modern shared Blizzard code now, for things like talking to their services, reporting telemetry, handling netcode, graphics, etc. It's extremely unlikely they're going to want to open source the code that runs e.g. Diablo 4 and Overwatch 2, so I think it's extremely unlikely they want to open source SC:R at all. Pretty much a pipe dream considering how much work it would be to do in the first place.

There are already ways of integrating with the game if you desire to do so, ShieldBattery does it. It's not as easy as reading a codebase but it also keeps the riffraff from finding the low hanging exploits (e.g. hacks). If anything, open sourcing tends to make a lot of these things *harder*, because companies often do so with licenses that are more restrictive than what is allowed via reverse engineering, and it becomes very hard to argue that you haven't used their source code (or derivative material of it) in development.

As far as #2 (moving to Azure), if you think this would make a positive difference you really have no idea what you're talking about tbh. Their choice of cloud platform has extremely little to do with any of the negative aspects you're talking about, this is just tech fanboy-ism without real understanding.

If you want to be optimistic, sure, be optimistic. I honestly think at this point nobody can have any clue whether this will be a good, bad, or neutral thing for BW. I can't imagine that "what are we going to do with SC:R?" was a front-of-mind question when considering this acquisition given that Blizzard has approximately 1 developer shared between SC2, WC3:R, and SC:R at this point. Let's just avoid giving people hope for stuff that is clearly not going to happen, and also avoid clamoring for Microsoft to do things that actually harms the community's current efforts and BW's long-term vitality.
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1073 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-21 00:16:03
January 21 2022 00:12 GMT
#71
On January 21 2022 08:24 tec27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.



Let's just avoid giving people hope for stuff that is clearly not going to happen, and also avoid clamoring for Microsoft to do things that actually harms the community's current efforts and BW's long-term vitality.


Clearly not going to happen? So it seems like you do have a very tangible idea on what Microsoft wants to do with the Blizzard IPs. Please do share that with the people here, like you can probably see everyone is on their toes waiting for the details...

Your work with Shield Battery has been amazing, however proper development from the publisher (ofc given that it's not at the sub-standard of Activsion that we've been accustomed to since Remastered launch) is vastly superior to the SB approach.

I don't expect you to agree but the statements that I've quoted here are ridiculous at best, not even calling them speculative is worth it.

meegrean
Profile Joined May 2008
Thailand7699 Posts
January 21 2022 00:19 GMT
#72
Woo hoo, Big Tech consumes more gaming companies!
Brood War loyalist
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3626 Posts
January 21 2022 03:07 GMT
#73
On January 21 2022 09:12 oxKnu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2022 08:24 tec27 wrote:
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.



Let's just avoid giving people hope for stuff that is clearly not going to happen, and also avoid clamoring for Microsoft to do things that actually harms the community's current efforts and BW's long-term vitality.


Clearly not going to happen? So it seems like you do have a very tangible idea on what Microsoft wants to do with the Blizzard IPs. Please do share that with the people here, like you can probably see everyone is on their toes waiting for the details...

Your work with Shield Battery has been amazing, however proper development from the publisher (ofc given that it's not at the sub-standard of Activsion that we've been accustomed to since Remastered launch) is vastly superior to the SB approach.

In the part of my post that you snipped out I told you exactly why it was extremely unlikely that they would open source the code. If you don't like that reasoning because it doesn't coincide with what you'd like to happen, I'm not really sure what to tell you, it is very much the reality of the situation.


I don't expect you to agree but the statements that I've quoted here are ridiculous at best, not even calling them speculative is worth it.

I honestly have no idea what this sentence is even trying to say (the only thing you quoted was a part of my post?) so I'm not sure how you would like me to respond to it.
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
Headgehog
Profile Joined January 2022
10 Posts
January 21 2022 07:50 GMT
#74
--- Nuked ---
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1073 Posts
January 26 2022 15:39 GMT
#75
The Microsoft earnings call was today and there was a lot of talk about the metaverse. Higher-ups implying that it might be the next big wave of the Internet going forward.

In line with what I was expecting and I think work on something big might start as soon as Q2 even.

Unfortunately, I don't think anything related to SC, unless they try to spin Heroes of The Storm somehow for that medium. If I had to bet, I would go with WoW.
LUCKY_NOOB
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
Bulgaria969 Posts
January 26 2022 18:26 GMT
#76
On January 20 2022 02:22 razorsuKe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2022 17:37 LUCKY_NOOB wrote:
$68.7 billion is $69 billion rounded up... NOT 70 like the title says... I love razersuke but u fucked that one up BIG TIME!


The first headline I read quoted 70B, something like this:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2022/01/18/microsoft-is-buying-activision-blizzard-for-70-billion-a-colossal-purchase-for-xbox/


This is why one must investigate further than a headline as those are often decepting. ^_._^
NO HUNTERS FREE FOR ALL Discord: https://discord.gg/kWNQvnd
Essbee
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Canada2371 Posts
January 26 2022 20:17 GMT
#77
On January 21 2022 16:50 Headgehog wrote:
Lets hope SC3 is going to be a reality, and we'll control the game by voice/mic or maybe VR set, other than mouse & keyboard, imagine giving orders/actions with a voice in SC3, and how the APM will be calculated then


Rappers would be S-rank.
DanielBc
Profile Joined August 2022
1 Post
Last Edited: 2022-08-21 11:10:53
August 13 2022 18:56 GMT
#78
Hello and if I would also like to be an S rank, what am I supposed to do concretely? I would also like to participate in the contest, because I also really like games. One of my friends told me that I can easily find the clothes for the tournament on this web platform, is it true?
.father
Profile Joined August 2022
1 Post
August 13 2022 19:53 GMT
#79
On August 14 2022 03:56 DanielBc wrote:
Hello and if I would also like to be an S rank, what am I supposed to do concretely?

you gotta git gud
HerbMon
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States440 Posts
August 14 2022 03:30 GMT
#80
On August 14 2022 04:53 .father wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2022 03:56 DanielBc wrote:
Hello and if I would also like to be an S rank, what am I supposed to do concretely?

you gotta git gud

lik reel gud
Like, have you ever been so turned off by someone that instead of removing your pants, you put an extra pair on?- Nina Zerg
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
17:00
#15
Epic vs MixuLIVE!
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
MaxPax vs Spirit
RotterdaM1448
IndyStarCraft 292
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1448
IndyStarCraft 292
UpATreeSC 182
TKL 161
BRAT_OK 53
Dragon 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 31008
Jaedong 1416
firebathero (twitch) 342
firebathero 174
sas.Sziky 85
Rock 68
Purpose 10
Dota 2
Gorgc10713
Fuzer 185
monkeys_forever102
febbydoto18
League of Legends
Trikslyr109
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
fl0m2329
shoxiejesuss1780
kennyS1198
byalli758
Foxcn586
Other Games
hiko12966
Beastyqt1060
Lowko528
crisheroes493
sgares410
Mew2King80
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream31275
Other Games
B2W.Neo659
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO453
StarCraft 2
Esl_sc2195
ESL.tv195
Dota 2
BeyondTheSummit137
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 23 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• MEDOEDLive 72
• ZERG-TV 51
• StrangeGG 47
• MindelVK 14
• 80smullet 13
• Adnapsc2 11
• IndyKCrew
• Poblha
• Migwel
• Laughngamez YouTube
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• Kozan
• Gussbus
• intothetv
• aXEnki
• Alpha X_
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 19
• Michael_bg 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4966
Other Games
• Shiphtur221
Upcoming Events
The PiG Daily
3h 49m
herO vs Dark
Scarlett vs Cure
herO vs ByuN
Reynor vs ByuN
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
5h 49m
Wardi Open
17h 49m
BSL: ProLeague
22h 49m
ESL Pro Tour
1d 8h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 22h
ESL Pro Tour
2 days
ESL Pro Tour
3 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Ultimate Battle: Snow vs Light
OSC Championship Season 10
NGS Storm Division S6 Quals
ESL Challenger League S43 EU

Ongoing

BSL Season 16
Strength Challenge 30K
Tournament of Honor
FS Mania
RISS Season 1
KOR-CHN Invitational League 1: Paralyze vs XiaoShuai
WTL 2022 Winter
NGS Storm Division S6
ESL Challenger League S44 NA
ESL Challenger League S44 EU
ESL Challenger League S44 AP
BLAST Premier Spring Groups

Upcoming

Spring Cup 4: Chinese Qualifier 2
CHN vs KOR Week30
ASL Season 15: Online Qualifier Day 2
Spring Cup 4: Chinese Qualifier 1
Spring Cup 4: Chinese Qualifier
Spring Cup Season 4: Korea
ASL Season 15: Online Qualifier Day 1
#PassionCraft Knockout
IEM Katowice 2023
BLAST.tv Paris Major 2023
ESL Challenger Melbourne 2023
ESL Pro League Season 17
CCT Central Europe Finals #1
IEM Katowice 2023
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2023 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.