• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:50
CEST 02:50
KST 09:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[G] Progamer Settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 569 users

Microsoft buys Activision/Blizzard for $70B - Page 4

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1179 Posts
January 20 2022 14:09 GMT
#61
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.

Puosu
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
6985 Posts
January 20 2022 14:45 GMT
#62
Open source BW would be so sick
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
January 20 2022 17:25 GMT
#63
On January 19 2022 17:42 evilfatsh1t wrote:
3 threads discussing the acquisition and im still struggling to see how the fuck they came up with a $70b valuation for this dogshit company. like seriously...what the fuck happened there?
My guess is that is the calculated cost to buy shares at a price that at least 50% of shareholders will be willing to part their shares for. That's how it generally works. But I still don't how how that would be $69billion. That seems to be greatly overvalued.
Timebon3s
Profile Joined May 2018
Norway688 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-20 18:26:50
January 20 2022 18:26 GMT
#64
Well you don't invest for current value, you invest for what it might be worth down the line.
A buy-out is also generally much higher than the current marked value of the company, and it's almost always seen as hitting the jackpot for the shareholders.

As someone else said, there are very smart people doing these calculations.
We don't have the skill nor the information they have...
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1179 Posts
January 20 2022 19:08 GMT
#65
It basically means that Microsoft thinks that buying Activision now is a profitable investment. Meaning they can easily cover the costs of the investment in the long run. (and here I don't think it has to be a long-term investment anyways, because of the other points I've made throughout the thread).

Microsoft will be valuated at around 3 trillion dollars in a couple of years I think, so this is peanuts.
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway8055 Posts
January 20 2022 20:59 GMT
#66
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.


Underestimate of the year. Microsoft not only supports open source project, they are the world largest Open Source company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_and_open_source
art_of_turtle
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
United States1183 Posts
January 20 2022 22:24 GMT
#67
On January 20 2022 20:27 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2022 20:01 art_of_turtle wrote:
A sure fire way to kill a game and community is to make it pay to play, like adding it to their Microsoft game pass for $9.99 a month.
Your away that game pass isn't the only way to play right?
Some people want to buy individual games for $50-60. Some people want to pay $9.99 a month to play any of 100+ games.

Both can co-exist.

Did not know that. As long as I don't have to pay for this game again I guess it could be neutral.
Flash should fear Sacsri
lost dedicated
Profile Joined June 2021
41 Posts
January 20 2022 22:33 GMT
#68
On January 21 2022 07:24 art_of_turtle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2022 20:27 Gorsameth wrote:
On January 20 2022 20:01 art_of_turtle wrote:
A sure fire way to kill a game and community is to make it pay to play, like adding it to their Microsoft game pass for $9.99 a month.
Your away that game pass isn't the only way to play right?
Some people want to buy individual games for $50-60. Some people want to pay $9.99 a month to play any of 100+ games.

Both can co-exist.

Did not know that. As long as I don't have to pay for this game again I guess it could be neutral.

lol when remastered came out i remember people on the bnet forums pmuch rioting over having to pay for the game again.

"i bought this game in 1997, why should i have to pay for it again? fuck you blizzard"
"i got this game at a flea market in 2007, paywalling ladder is bullshit"

but my absolute favorite was "i've pirated this game for twenty years. why the fuck do i have to pay for it now?"
Lavalisk
Profile Joined July 2020
Argentina47 Posts
January 20 2022 22:37 GMT
#69
To everyone who said things can't get worse, I disagree with such reasoning. My experience tells me it can always get worse, independently of how bad the current situation is.
As far as I'm concerned this could be the beginning of a complete shutdown. Microsoft only cares about profits. I'll just wait and see what happens, I have distrust.
Having cancer doesn't prevent getting AIDS.
My body, my mind and my soul belong to God.
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3696 Posts
January 20 2022 23:24 GMT
#70
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.


It is generally extremely hard to open source old codebases, as they tend to contain a lot of proprietary code that you do not have the licenses to release. SC:R has not only this problem, but also contains a *ton* of modern shared Blizzard code now, for things like talking to their services, reporting telemetry, handling netcode, graphics, etc. It's extremely unlikely they're going to want to open source the code that runs e.g. Diablo 4 and Overwatch 2, so I think it's extremely unlikely they want to open source SC:R at all. Pretty much a pipe dream considering how much work it would be to do in the first place.

There are already ways of integrating with the game if you desire to do so, ShieldBattery does it. It's not as easy as reading a codebase but it also keeps the riffraff from finding the low hanging exploits (e.g. hacks). If anything, open sourcing tends to make a lot of these things *harder*, because companies often do so with licenses that are more restrictive than what is allowed via reverse engineering, and it becomes very hard to argue that you haven't used their source code (or derivative material of it) in development.

As far as #2 (moving to Azure), if you think this would make a positive difference you really have no idea what you're talking about tbh. Their choice of cloud platform has extremely little to do with any of the negative aspects you're talking about, this is just tech fanboy-ism without real understanding.

If you want to be optimistic, sure, be optimistic. I honestly think at this point nobody can have any clue whether this will be a good, bad, or neutral thing for BW. I can't imagine that "what are we going to do with SC:R?" was a front-of-mind question when considering this acquisition given that Blizzard has approximately 1 developer shared between SC2, WC3:R, and SC:R at this point. Let's just avoid giving people hope for stuff that is clearly not going to happen, and also avoid clamoring for Microsoft to do things that actually harms the community's current efforts and BW's long-term vitality.
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1179 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-21 00:16:03
January 21 2022 00:12 GMT
#71
On January 21 2022 08:24 tec27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.



Let's just avoid giving people hope for stuff that is clearly not going to happen, and also avoid clamoring for Microsoft to do things that actually harms the community's current efforts and BW's long-term vitality.


Clearly not going to happen? So it seems like you do have a very tangible idea on what Microsoft wants to do with the Blizzard IPs. Please do share that with the people here, like you can probably see everyone is on their toes waiting for the details...

Your work with Shield Battery has been amazing, however proper development from the publisher (ofc given that it's not at the sub-standard of Activsion that we've been accustomed to since Remastered launch) is vastly superior to the SB approach.

I don't expect you to agree but the statements that I've quoted here are ridiculous at best, not even calling them speculative is worth it.

meegrean
Profile Joined May 2008
Thailand7699 Posts
January 21 2022 00:19 GMT
#72
Woo hoo, Big Tech consumes more gaming companies!
Brood War loyalist
tec27
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States3696 Posts
January 21 2022 03:07 GMT
#73
On January 21 2022 09:12 oxKnu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2022 08:24 tec27 wrote:
On January 20 2022 23:09 oxKnu wrote:
Microsoft, since Nadella's tenure has greatly changed in their community approach as opposed to the very closed-in and proprietary Microsoft way of the 90s. They are part of open source now, and they do have open source projects and initiatives that they actively support.

And it's a software company at its core. They have FAR more resources than Activision, Blizzard ever had or could ever dream of having at any point in the past. This is the company that represents the nr.1 operating system target for the vast majority of the video game developers out there.

In essence what this means: If they want to do something, they fucking sure as hell have all the tools to do it.

And from a reputation perspective, this is a giant that is fighting with Apple, Tesla and co in the stock market, they can't afford debacles and the moronic chaos that Activision Blizzard was. That alone is a clear win in itself.

Now for BW, this probably won't mean much in the short term, however I do feel they'll make a positive decision for this game in the future. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be any of the very rosey and optimistic things mentioned in this thread but it could be one of these few:

1. Fully open-sourcing the BW codebase. They'll want to keep their Starcraft franchise rights and so on but open sourcing the code and basically giving it away is entirely possible. From there on, the sky is the limit. Plenty of talented developers that would love to tinker with it (and advance it).

2. Greatly improving the infrastructure behind this game. Blizzard was cheaping out on keeping the user data on GCP for Remastered and judging by how poor any of that stuff is being represented in-game it probably can be improved by a migration to Azure (which MS owns).

3. Adopting everything BW into a consolidated team paid by Microsoft. They have all the RTS games at this point, so if they want to keep working on the game they can have the best paid team working on it. And from the AoE2 perspective, they have a far better idea on how to manage that kind of game than Activision ever did.

All in all, I'm very optimistic about any of this really. At the very core, I am close to 100% sure that there is hardly any way that this acquisition is not a great move forward for Starcraft.



Let's just avoid giving people hope for stuff that is clearly not going to happen, and also avoid clamoring for Microsoft to do things that actually harms the community's current efforts and BW's long-term vitality.


Clearly not going to happen? So it seems like you do have a very tangible idea on what Microsoft wants to do with the Blizzard IPs. Please do share that with the people here, like you can probably see everyone is on their toes waiting for the details...

Your work with Shield Battery has been amazing, however proper development from the publisher (ofc given that it's not at the sub-standard of Activsion that we've been accustomed to since Remastered launch) is vastly superior to the SB approach.

In the part of my post that you snipped out I told you exactly why it was extremely unlikely that they would open source the code. If you don't like that reasoning because it doesn't coincide with what you'd like to happen, I'm not really sure what to tell you, it is very much the reality of the situation.


I don't expect you to agree but the statements that I've quoted here are ridiculous at best, not even calling them speculative is worth it.

I honestly have no idea what this sentence is even trying to say (the only thing you quoted was a part of my post?) so I'm not sure how you would like me to respond to it.
Can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?
Headgehog
Profile Joined January 2022
10 Posts
January 21 2022 07:50 GMT
#74
--- Nuked ---
oxKnu
Profile Joined December 2017
1179 Posts
January 26 2022 15:39 GMT
#75
The Microsoft earnings call was today and there was a lot of talk about the metaverse. Higher-ups implying that it might be the next big wave of the Internet going forward.

In line with what I was expecting and I think work on something big might start as soon as Q2 even.

Unfortunately, I don't think anything related to SC, unless they try to spin Heroes of The Storm somehow for that medium. If I had to bet, I would go with WoW.
LUCKY_NOOB
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
Bulgaria1425 Posts
January 26 2022 18:26 GMT
#76
On January 20 2022 02:22 razorsuKe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2022 17:37 LUCKY_NOOB wrote:
$68.7 billion is $69 billion rounded up... NOT 70 like the title says... I love razersuke but u fucked that one up BIG TIME!


The first headline I read quoted 70B, something like this:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2022/01/18/microsoft-is-buying-activision-blizzard-for-70-billion-a-colossal-purchase-for-xbox/


This is why one must investigate further than a headline as those are often decepting. ^_._^
ko-fi.com/luckynoob
Essbee
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Canada2371 Posts
January 26 2022 20:17 GMT
#77
On January 21 2022 16:50 Headgehog wrote:
Lets hope SC3 is going to be a reality, and we'll control the game by voice/mic or maybe VR set, other than mouse & keyboard, imagine giving orders/actions with a voice in SC3, and how the APM will be calculated then


Rappers would be S-rank.
DanielBc
Profile Joined August 2022
1 Post
Last Edited: 2022-08-21 11:10:53
August 13 2022 18:56 GMT
#78
Hello and if I would also like to be an S rank, what am I supposed to do concretely? I would also like to participate in the contest, because I also really like games. One of my friends told me that I can easily find the clothes for the tournament on this web platform, is it true?
.father
Profile Joined August 2022
2 Posts
August 13 2022 19:53 GMT
#79
On August 14 2022 03:56 DanielBc wrote:
Hello and if I would also like to be an S rank, what am I supposed to do concretely?

you gotta git gud
HerbMon
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States460 Posts
August 14 2022 03:30 GMT
#80
On August 14 2022 04:53 .father wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2022 03:56 DanielBc wrote:
Hello and if I would also like to be an S rank, what am I supposed to do concretely?

you gotta git gud

lik reel gud
How we will win in the period ahead.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
SEL Masters #4 - Day 1
CranKy Ducklings57
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft166
Nina 64
ProTech64
Livibee 57
RuFF_SC2 5
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 857
NaDa 99
sSak 44
Dota 2
monkeys_forever457
NeuroSwarm78
League of Legends
JimRising 651
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1742
fl0m1211
taco 1077
Coldzera 68
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox538
Liquid`Ken56
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor96
Other Games
summit1g9518
C9.Mang0278
ViBE188
Maynarde166
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick44358
BasetradeTV147
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH96
• RyuSc2 55
• Hupsaiya 35
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2358
• masondota21571
Other Games
• Scarra2137
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
9h 10m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
12h 10m
Replay Cast
23h 10m
RSL Revival
1d 9h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 15h
OSC
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.