EPTSC:R Graphical Gripes - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Leeoku
1617 Posts
| ||
|
Piste
6184 Posts
| ||
|
l3rand0n
14 Posts
On March 28 2017 07:19 KrazyTrumpet wrote: No, they don't have that right. The company can listen if it chooses, but it's not a right. The people who complain can simply choose not to buy. This community has literally complained about anything and everything for a very, very long time. I have never seen/been a part of any other community that was just so...whiny. If Blizzard's smart, they'll listen to the communities general consensus's regarding the graphics in SC:R. Also, you could look at it like we're all very whiny, or you could look at it like we all just REALLY CARE about BW. It's all in the perspective. | ||
|
Culture
Canada488 Posts
Marines and Zerglings need a bit of work. Specifically, Marines seem to lack team color at some angles, and look like they are shooting in the wrong direction. Zerglings 'arms' look too pronounced. Zerglings also lack a bit of a shadow underneath them to distinguish things. Zergling building animation looks tooo different from the original one. Tanks look too small. Tank threads look too detailed. The zealot 'braid' when facing top right is too distinguished from the rest of the body. It use to look like it was almost connected to the right foot before, and now it looks off. The terrain titleset in this screenshot: http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fif4qRAHvAj2onzHwx4NSM.jpg looks too grimy / noisy. Units should have the right amount of 'pop' against the terrain. Right now, tanks, zerglings and marines are not distinguishable enough. In the above screenshot, the marine icon just looks wrong. Unit HP in the menu for some units looks too saturated when filled in. I love the more pronounced minerals, though. They 'pop' just the right amount. | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On March 28 2017 06:40 Railgan wrote: As someone who never played Broodwar it looks basically the same to me. Like a 20 years old game. As someone who doesn't really care about the opinion on Brood War of someone who's never played Brood War, thank you for playing.  | ||
|
Levque
88 Posts
This remaster is essentially a love letter to the BW community so helping Blizzard touch up these sprites with constructive criticism is a good thing! Blizzard wants it to look right and we want it to look right! The overall feedback has been overwhelmingly positive and personally, I'm blown away by how well Blizzard has handled this....it's really amazing and I can't wait to play it. | ||
|
st4ck0v3rfl0w
79 Posts
More critique (everything just my opinion): - the font: the height, the spacing the 3... everything looks strange. The starcraft2 font looks more starcraft-like than this - the command buttons in the right bottom: why so bright and flat? I think the original style was better - badlands and char tileset are too noisy - buildings look cut out which is probably true for the original as well, but I think there is room for improvement. Something like ambient occlusion at the edge to the floor - the filled wireframe for protoss units looks too flat for my taste - the heavy breathing of the hydra den is a bit irritating | ||
|
Cheesefome
320 Posts
You guys are the worst community hahahaha! It's was never meant to be a brand spanking new game. It was suppose to be a simple update to better resolutions. No longer will the game feel like a gameboy video game. The matchmaking/lat/binds/anti hacks ect ect.. are the cherry on top. Honestly surprised how many of you guys are complaining about a high resolution starcraft. Holy crap! lol. Are you serious? Sitting here and judging every aspect of the game is setting yourself up for huge disappointment when it's actually released. If you really don't care or appreciate the resolution update then you can always stick to the old school graphics set up. That is probably why they made it possible for players to play between those 2 platforms. | ||
|
Poly_Optimize
Canada156 Posts
| ||
|
st4ck0v3rfl0w
79 Posts
On March 28 2017 12:55 Cheesefome wrote: Sitting here and judging every aspect of the game is setting yourself up for huge disappointment when it's actually released. Why do you think did they release pictures and videos that are obviously work in progress? This is our chance to give feedback about the new graphics and influence the artistic decisions. | ||
|
RWLabs
Korea (South)273 Posts
For all of them they all look a bit plastic. | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10579 Posts
bruh. | ||
|
NukeTheStars
United States278 Posts
On March 28 2017 07:36 Piste wrote: probes are not cute anymore This was the only thing that mattered and they screwed it up! >:O | ||
|
byj
529 Posts
On March 28 2017 14:12 FlaShFTW wrote: control-f sunken, not a single damn mention bruh. there is one on the same page  | ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1779 Posts
Also it didn't say anything about sound effects whose had a pretty bad sample rate 32kz mono. I am pretty sure that they weren't sampled like that, too bad they didn't update them to a decent quality. Blizzard are you reading this? Please do something about it. | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
On March 28 2017 06:38 Waxangel wrote: you guys are the fucking worst but keep at it, maybe some useful suggestions will come of it yeah, people that don't totally buy into the hype and dislike some particular things about SC:R are the worst! Should probably ban them all! | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On March 28 2017 12:55 Cheesefome wrote: You guys are the worst community hahahaha! Oh noes, Mr. 37-Posts-Total is judging the entire community 'cuz it wants SC:R to be perfect. Whatever will we do?? He's so involved, he MUST know what's up!!!  LOL, get a grip, hoss. Pretty sure the SC:R design team likes honest feedback, and even if they somehow didn't, your trolling sure isn't a bright and shining contribution. | ||
ImbaTosS
United Kingdom1741 Posts
On March 28 2017 06:40 Railgan wrote: As someone who never played Broodwar it looks basically the same to me. Like a 20 years old game. Well, thank goodness you weighed in. Please don't hesitate to interject more of your valuable insights. | ||
|
fazek42
Hungary441 Posts
My overall feedback is also overwhelmingly positive and I am personally also blown away by how well Blizzard has handled this.However, I do agree that I would prefer a grittier, less cartoonish look (it was super interesting to see someone post the original beta, and its resemblance to BW:R). The protoss explosion animation on buildings for example really stood out to me as wrong as well. I'm surprised to see a lot of very good points in this thread and hopefully the highly competent BW team will be reading this thread. I'm sure not everything mentioned here is feasible to do, but there are some really good points here, as well as on reddit, from people who seem to know graphic art / shadowing / modelling / etc. I guess by nature of having more details / high res some things are inevitable, but it would be awesome if for example the siege tank could be made to feel more robust and fearsome. I also agree with - some Zerg unit's skin color is a little too bright/needs a tad darker tone, e.g. Zergling, Hydralisk, Ultralisk (not the team coloring) - scv sparkles too bright - buttons / replay bar too bright Overall I think there are some very good points here, and I don't think people who are trying to make the BW:R look even better are 'whining' | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
On March 28 2017 06:38 Waxangel wrote: you guys are the fucking worst but keep at it, maybe some useful suggestions will come of it Not even out yet and people are tearing it apart. Good on ya, starcraft community. | ||
| ||
